Which feels better on dry pavement — Grabber A/TX or KO2?

Very close on paper (~140 ft & 0.72 g vs ~142 ft & 0.71 g), but Grabber feels more nimble in lane changes, while KO2 feels heavier and more planted.

Which is safer in the rain?

Grabber A/TX. It stopped in ~179 ft (0.48) vs KO2’s ~195 ft (0.43), and stays composed in storms; KO2 trades wet grip for durability.

Who wins in snow and on ice?

Snow: Grabber (≈73-ft stop, 45.5-ft launch) vs KO2 (≈76-ft, 46-ft). Ice: both struggle, but Grabber stops a hair shorter (~49 ft vs ~51 ft).

Which is better off-road?

KO2 dominates: ~9.3 dirt / 9.0 sand / 9.3 mud / 9.5 rock. Grabber holds its own for trails (~8.5/7.8/7.8/7.8) but isn’t as tough in mud/rocks.

Which rides quieter and more comfortably day-to-day?

Grabber A/TX rides softer and hums on highway; KO2 is firmer and can feel harsh on patched pavement.

What about towing and heavy loads (¾-ton/1-ton)?

KO2. Its stiff carcass tracks straighter under tongue weight and feels more planted when braking with a trailer.

KO2 typically delivers 50–60k+ miles with rotations; Grabber is usually 40–50k depending on use.

BFGoodrich KO2 vs Grabber A/TX — Expert Review for SUV & Truck Drivers in 2025

Real test data, off-road insights, and daily-driving impact — from a former Bridgestone engineer.

In our testing and from thousands of driver reports, the BFGoodrich KO2(vs KO3) and General Grabber A/TX stand out as two of the most compared Off-Road A/T tires in the U.S. and Canada. Unlike On-Road A/Ts, these tires are built with tougher sidewalls and deeper tread for drivers who spend real time off pavement. The KO2, a favorite on Wranglers, Tacomas, and ½-ton trucks, has proven its durability on sharp rock and under heavy loads, though it rides stiffer and louder on the highway. The Grabber A/TX takes a different angle: a quieter ride, better wet grip, and a 3PMSF winter rating backed by a 60,000-mile warranty, making it attractive to drivers who want year-round dependability without KO2’s harsher road manners.

That’s the trade-off most buyers face — and in the sections ahead, we’ll show how they compare across dry, wet, snow, and off-road testing. You can also enter your vehicle type and driving needs into our All-Terrain Tire Decision Tool — it instantly recommends the top 3 tires that actually fit your setup.

Quick Verdict – Who Wins What?

General Grabber ATX

Tested Rating: 8.3/10

BFGoodrich All-Terrain T/A KO2

Tested Rating: 8.3/10

The General Grabber A/TX feels more nimble on pavement, stopping shorter in the wet (179 ft vs KO2’s 195 ft) and biting harder in snow and ice, which makes it the safer daily driver for SUVs and half-ton trucks. The BFGoodrich KO2, on the other hand, is built with toughness in mind—it routinely lasts 50–60k+ miles, holds a straighter line under heavy towing, and crushes off-road with stronger scores in dirt, mud, sand, and rock. In short, the Grabber wins for comfort and wet/snow grip, while the KO2 dominates off-road, durability, and heavy-duty stability.

Let’s clear up a couple of common questions before starting

I often get asked about these — and Tire Rack has some great quick reads that explain them better than any post could:

Is AWD or 4WD really enough for rain, slush, snow, and ice?
https://www.tirerack.com/upgrade-garage/are-traction-stability-control-and-awd-4wd-good-enough-for-all-seasons
Understanding ply loads / ply rating – Important for Towing & Hauling:
https://www.tirerack.com/upgrade-garage/what-are-load-ranges-ply-ratings

Raw Test Data

Tire Test Data

Pick categories to show metrics, then open ☰ to pick tires. Optional chart is hidden by default.

Parentheses show the rank among the currently displayed tires (1 = best for that metric).

Note: Lower is better for Stopping & Acceleration; higher is better for g-force, comfort, traction & off-road ratings. Parentheses show the rank among the currently displayed tires (1 = best for that metric).

Sources worth checking

Tire Rack AT Tire Test Tire Rack On-Road A/T Ratings Tire Rack Off-Road A/T Ratings SimpleTire Reviews Amazon SUV/LT Tires

Dry Performance — KO2 Stays Planted, Grabber Feels Livelier

In dry tests, the Grabber A/TX stopped in ~140 feet and held 0.72 g, while the KO2 needed 142 feet with 0.71 g cornering. On paper, they’re nearly identical, but the feel is a little different. The Grabber reacts quicker when you toss it into a ramp or lane change — it’s slightly more nimble, while the KO2 holds line with a heavy, planted feel.

Plenty of Jeep and Tacoma owners point this out: the Grabber “feels more agile on pavement,” while KO2 “isn’t sporty but feels like it’s made of concrete.” I lean the same way. The KO2’s harder compound and thick sidewall resist flex, which gives it stability when loaded, but makes it less lively for daily driving. Grabber’s softer carcass translates to sharper response, especially on lighter SUVs.

For ¾-ton and 1-ton trucks, though, KO2 shines. The same stiffness that dulls agility in a crossover makes a Silverado or F-250 feel rock solid when towing. Grabber can wander a bit under heavy tongue weight, while KO2 just locks down.

👉 Verdict: Grabber A/TX is the livelier daily driver choice, while KO2 is better for HD trucks where stability matters more than sharpness.

Wet Performance — Grabber Holds, KO2 Slides Early

On wet pavement, the Grabber stopped in 179 feet with 0.48 traction, while the KO2 stretched further at 195 feet and just 0.43 traction. That’s a real-world difference: with the Grabber, you’ve got more margin before ABS kicks in; with KO2, you feel it let go earlier on slick roads.

Drivers back this up. A Bronco owner said their KO2s were “bulletproof off-road but downright sketchy in rain,” while another noted the Grabber “stayed composed in storms.” I’ll be honest — I agree with both. KO2 favors durability and chip resistance over wet adhesion, so you’re always trading grip for toughness. Grabber’s silica-heavy compound gives it more bite in the wet, even if it wears a little faster.

On HD trucks, the difference is more nuanced. KO2 still takes longer to stop, but with weight in the bed or a trailer hitched, it feels steadier under braking than Grabber. The stiff carcass resists squirm, which some owners prefer.

👉 Verdict: Grabber A/TX is clearly safer in rain, especially for daily commuters, but KO2 feels steadier when braking heavy loads on HD trucks.

Note from the Expert: When it comes to rain, I always emphasize two things: compound grip and water evacuation. You can see the full details in my analysis, but if you take just one thing away, remember that an AT tire’s stiff nature makes achieving top-tier wet performance a constant battle. This is why the question, Are All-Terrain Tires Good in Rain?, requires a nuanced answer that balances tread design against rubber stiffness.

Winter & Snow — Grabber Bites Better, KO2 Stays Tough

On snow-packed roads, the Grabber stopped in ~73 feet with a 45.5-foot launch, while the KO2 stretched to 76 feet and 46 feet respectively. That makes the Grabber the sharper snow tire, giving you confidence pulling away or stopping on plowed routes.

Forum chatter matches my experience. Tacoma owners often say the KO2 “gets you through snow but pushes wide,” while the Grabber “feels locked down and calm.” I think that nails it — KO2 is capable, but Grabber offers more predictable snow bite for SUVs and light trucks.

From the engineering side, it’s about siping and compound. Grabber uses denser winter siping and a slightly softer blend that stays pliable in the cold. KO2’s tougher rubber stays stiff, trading snow bite for chip resistance.

On ¾-ton and 1-ton trucks, though, KO2 fights back. Its rigid carcass makes it track straighter under load, and many HD owners say it “feels more planted with a trailer in snow.” I agree — the Grabber grips better unloaded, but KO2 feels steadier once you’re hauling.

👉 Verdict: Grabber A/TX snow performance is better for SUVs and half-tons, while KO2 earns trust on HD trucks for towing in winter.

Note from the Expert: Our discussions often boil down to the core tradeoff. On one hand, you must understand why all-terrain tires are truly effective in deep snow, but not on ice. On the other hand, you face the 3PMSF Paradox—the hidden cost of that badge. The short answer is: The 3PMSF badge certifies traction, but it costs you durability. Dive into our full analysis on the critical 3PMSF rating for severe winter and off-road service, and its hidden costs, before you risk your rig on the trail.

Ice — Both Struggle, KO2 Holds a Hair Longer

On ice, the Grabber stopped in ~49 feet, while the KO2 needed about 51 feet. Neither is stellar — this is where you start looking at dedicated winter tires — but the Grabber’s edge is noticeable in emergency stops.

Owners agree. A Colorado driver said their KO2s “felt like hockey pucks” on black ice, while another running Grabbers noted they “weren’t great, but at least predictable.” I felt the same: Grabber lets go gradually, while KO2 hangs on stiffly, then breaks free quicker.

On ¾-ton and 1-ton rigs, the KO2’s stiffness makes slides feel longer, but straighter. That’s less scary when towing because the truck doesn’t fishtail as easily. The Grabber is a little grabbier, which can feel twitchy under heavy load.

👉 Verdict: Grabber is the slightly safer pick on ice for light trucks and SUVs, but KO2 is more stable for HD drivers who need to tow in icy conditions.

Off-Road — KO2 Is King, Grabber Holds Its Own

The data puts KO2 at 9.3 dirt / 9.0 sand / 9.3 mud / 9.5 rock versus Grabber A/TX at 8.0 / 7.8 / 7.9 / 7.8. On the trail that plays out exactly how you’d expect: KO2 shrugs off sharp rock and digs through soupy sections, while Grabber feels happier on forest roads, gravel, and moderate sand. I’ve heard plenty of owners describe KO2 as “indestructible,” and I’m with them — the chip-resistant compound and beefy sidewalls are the difference when the terrain turns nasty.
For SUVs & ½-tons, Grabber’s the smoother partner for camping trails and mixed use. For ¾-ton/1-ton rigs, KO2’s carcass doesn’t deform under weight, so it holds line on rocky climbs and washboard where the Grabber starts to feel soft.
👉 Verdict: KO2 for abuse and technical terrain; Grabber A/TX for everyday trail versatility and comfort.

Note from the Expert: Every successful day on the trail is about preparation and physics, because tire longevity is earned, not given. Before you even start, you must master the critical link between tire pressure and load range for every rig to maximize your contact patch. Once moving, remember your ultimate off-road armor is your sidewall protection against the inevitable pinch flat. And finally, your traction on the obstacle is dictated by choosing the right aggressive vs hybrid tread pattern for your terrain. Master those three steps, and your rig will be ready for anything.

Comfort & Noise — Grabber Wins for Daily Driving

The Grabber scores a 7.0 in comfort, while the KO2 sits at 7.0 as well — but they don’t feel the same. Grabber rides softer, with a hum at highway speeds, while KO2 feels firmer, especially on patched pavement.

One Reddit driver put it simply: “KO2s are tough but beat you up on long trips. Grabbers are easier to live with.” I agree. KO2’s stiffness is a plus off-road and under load, but it makes daily commuting harsher. Grabber feels more forgiving on family trips or daily drives.

On ¾-ton and 1-ton trucks, KO2’s firmness blends better. Many HD owners report KO2s “feel planted when towing,” while Grabber can feel a touch vague under heavy load.

👉 Verdict: Grabber wins for comfort and noise on daily SUVs and half-tons, while KO2 feels steadier for HD towing but harsher for commuters.

Note from the Expert: For years, choosing all-terrain meant accepting noise—a true compromise for off-road grip. That’s why the question, Are All-Terrain Tires Louder than Highway Tires?, used to have a simple “yes” answer. Now, with the rise of on-road models, the core issue has shifted from noise to overall refinement. To fully understand which side of the comfort spectrum you’re buying into, you need to determine Are All-Terrain Tires Good for Daily Driving?—a question that depends entirely on the tire’s construction, not just the name.

Tread Life & Longevity — KO2 Outlasts, Grabber Runs Solid

From what I’ve seen and read, the KO2 consistently lasts 50k+ miles, sometimes even 60k with rotations. The Grabber is closer to 40–50k, depending on use. That matches lab tests and owner logs — KO2 is simply harder, and it shows in tread life.

Owners often phrase it like this: “KO2s last forever, Grabbers wear like a normal A/T.” I’d phrase it more technically: KO2’s compound resists chipping and its block design wears slowly, while Grabber trades some of that for better wet and snow grip.

On ¾-ton and 1-ton trucks, KO2 is the safer long-term play. It resists irregular wear under heavy towing, while Grabber needs strict rotations to stay even.

👉 Verdict: KO2 longevity is a standout, while Grabber offers solid life with better wet/snow balance but shorter treadwear.

Tire Size Selection: The Basics You Can’t Skip

Even the best tread design can’t rescue a tire that’s built too weak. Back when I was testing tires at Bridgestone, I saw all-terrain models that should’ve performed but fell short — simply because the basics (size, load strength, and speed rating) weren’t matched to the vehicle.

P-Metric vs. LT (Light Truck) Tires

The first step is knowing whether you need LT or passenger tires. LT (Light Truck) tires are built with extra reinforcement and stiff sidewalls, designed for towing, hauling, or off-road use. Passenger (P-metric) tires are lighter, smoother, and tuned for daily comfort and fuel efficiency — but they’ll flex more under load.

Understanding Tire Load Range: XL vs. E-Load

Then comes the tire load index and load range — essentially your tire’s strength rating. Here’s where things split between passenger XL and LT E:

XL (Extra Load) is a passenger tire with reinforced sidewalls. It can handle a bit more pressure (~41 PSI) than a standard SL tire and is perfect for SUVs, crossovers, or light trucks that carry extra gear, passengers, or small trailers. XL tires ride softer and quieter than LT options, making them ideal for daily use.
E Load Range is an LT tire class built with a much thicker casing. E-rated tires can handle far more pressure (up to ~80 PSI) and heavier loads, which makes them essential for ¾-ton and 1-ton trucks towing trailers or hauling close to max capacity. The trade-off is weight, stiffer ride, more road noise, and a small drop in fuel efficiency.

Put simply: XL is for “extra luggage and family,” while E is for “truck bed full of bricks or a car trailer.”

Why the Tire Speed Rating Matters for Safety

Finally, don’t overlook the tire speed rating. It’s not just about top speed — it measures how well a tire handles heat and stress at highway pace. Lower ratings (like S) tend to ride softer and last longer, while higher ratings (H, T) feel more stable and responsive under sharp maneuvers. Heat build-up is the silent killer of tires, and speed rating is your safeguard.

Bottom line: Match your tire’s construction (LT vs P-metric), load range (XL vs E), and speed rating to your vehicle’s demands. Get those right, and everything else — off-road grip, winter traction, comfort — will finally perform the way it was designed to.

Conclusion

If you’re mostly on-road and want better rain and snow grip with a friendlier ride, the Grabber A/TX is the easy daily-driver pick. If you tow, wheel often, or need a tire that shrugs off abuse and lasts longer, the BFGoodrich KO2 is worth the firmer ride and longer wet stops. In short: Grabber for commuters and light-trail weekends; KO2 for HD trucks, towing, and serious off-road.

General Grabber ATX Related Articles

BF Goodrich KO2 Related Articles

Frequently Asked Questions: Grabber A/TX vs BFGoodrich KO2

Which feels better on dry pavement — Grabber A/TX or KO2?
Very close on paper (~140 ft & 0.72 g vs ~142 ft & 0.71 g), but Grabber feels more nimble in lane changes, while KO2 feels heavier and more planted.
Which is safer in the rain?
Grabber A/TX. It stopped in ~179 ft (0.48) vs KO2’s ~195 ft (0.43), and stays composed in storms; KO2 trades wet grip for durability.
Who wins in snow and on ice?
Snow: Grabber (≈73-ft stop, 45.5-ft launch) vs KO2 (≈76-ft, 46-ft). Ice: both struggle, but Grabber stops a hair shorter (~49 ft vs ~51 ft).
Which is better off-road?
KO2 dominates: ~9.3 dirt / 9.0 sand / 9.3 mud / 9.5 rock. Grabber holds its own for trails (~8.5/7.8/7.8/7.8) but isn’t as tough in mud/rocks.
Which rides quieter and more comfortably day-to-day?
Grabber A/TX rides softer and hums on highway; KO2 is firmer and can feel harsh on patched pavement.
What about towing and heavy loads (¾-ton/1-ton)?
KO2. Its stiff carcass tracks straighter under tongue weight and feels more planted when braking with a trailer.
Which lasts longer?
KO2 typically delivers 50–60k+ miles with rotations; Grabber is usually 40–50k depending on use.

For those who prefer to see whole market analyze:

A couple of popular size analyses:

Want to learn more about all-terrain tires: