• Skip to primary navigation
  • Skip to main content
  • Skip to primary sidebar

TireTerrain

  • Home
  • Comparisons & Reviews
  • All-Terrain Tire Decision Tool
  • Pro Tips
  • About
Home » Comparisons & Reviews » Firestone Destination XT vs BFGoodrich KO2 — Towing & Heavy-Duty Performance Tested in 2025

Firestone Destination XT vs BFGoodrich KO2 — Towing & Heavy-Duty Performance Tested in 2025

Updated: September 29, 2025 by Emrecan Gurkan Leave a Comment

Technical insights, and driver feedback — from a former Bridgestone test engineer.

The BFGoodrich KO2 and Firestone Destination X/T are two very different takes on the Off-Road A/T category in the U.S. and Canada. Unlike smoother On-Road A/Ts, both are designed with reinforced casings and deeper tread for drivers who need more than just highway manners. The KO2, a staple on Wranglers, Tacomas, and ½-ton pickups, is proven for its sidewall toughness, 3PMSF-rated winter traction, and long tread life, though it can ride stiffer and louder on pavement. If you’re curious how it compares to its newer sibling, check our BFGoodrich KO3 vs KO2 breakdown.

The Destination X/T, by contrast, is one of the lightest LT all-terrains in its class — a favorite on ¾-ton and 1-ton trucks where load capacity and stability matter most. It delivers a quiet ride and solid durability, but doesn’t out-muscle the KO2 in every condition.

That’s the trade-off most buyers face — and in the sections ahead, we’ll show how they compare across dry, wet, winter, and off-road testing. You can also line them up in our All-Terrain Tire Decision Tool to get quick recommendations by SUV, CUV, or truck class.

Firestone Destination X/T isn't the best tires for ice but it has extremely satisfying performance on deep and light snow

Quick Look

From my perspective as a former Bridgestone engineer, the Firestone Destination XT leans more toward an efficiency-oriented choice, making it an excellent tire for towing and hauling. Its stiffer, more rigid blocks provide stability but also result in a rougher ride compared to softer all-terrains. The BFGoodrich KO2, by contrast, shines for those who prioritize on-road manners, especially since it’s available in C and D load ranges that make it more versatile for lighter trucks and SUVs. In terms of winter performance, both deliver similar results in light and deep snow, but on ice I’d recommend being more cautious with the Destination XT, where its grip is less confidence-inspiring.

Firestone Destination XT

Firestone Destination XT tire
Compare prices:
Amazon
Prime shipping Direct from brands
Tire Rack
Free road-hazard coverage Backed by Discount Tire
SimpleTire
Financing options Local installers

BFGoodrich All-Terrain T/A KO2

BFGoodrich KO2 tire
Compare prices:
Amazon
Prime shipping Direct from brands
Tire Rack
Free road-hazard coverage Backed by Discount Tire
SimpleTire
Financing options Local installers

Tire Decision Tool

For those in a hurry: this tool makes it easy. Just pick your vehicle and what matters most to you, and it’ll instantly suggest the best tire options.

Click Show to see tire recommendations. (After that, changes update automatically.)
No matching tires found. Try another selection.

A side note: Honestly, this tool is a game-changer → TireRack’s Decision Guide. Just enter your car and it shows the best tires in seconds (backed by real test data 🚗💨). I also explain exactly how I use it in my walkthrough here.

    Tread Appearance

    Firestone Destination X/T is easy to fit rim. Hugee advantage for a big tire!

    Firestone Destination XT (review) looks like a slightly less aggressive version of the Falken Wildpeak AT3W. Wildpeak AT3 is a trustworthy option. It is one of the best all-terrain tires. Destination XT’s tread design promises better on-road manners than Wildpeak AT3W.

    On the other hand, BF Goodrich KO2 has a more aggressive tread design. It tends to perform well off the road. Actually, it proved their off-road ability on Baja Race. It is a champion.

    Let’s start with the center section. 

    Firestone Destination XT has a lot of sipes on the center section. These sipes will improve your traction ability dramatically. Especially in winter conditions. Moreover, siping on the center blocks is full-depth so you get full traction for all of tread life.

    BF Goodrich KO2 also has a good amount of siping on the center. The only difference is it has straight sipes. Which will decrease your ice and winter traction. Yet, this sipe design is better for off-road traction.

    And lastly shoulders,

    Destination XT has staggered shoulder lugs that have less siping straight and not full depth. Luckily, this makes them stiffer for better highway speeds. Normally, that causes a bit of wet performance but they increased the evacuation ability with thicker sipes on shoulders.

    BF Goodrich KO2 has similar shoulders design. The only difference is the angle of thick sipes. BF Goodrich placed those sipes at different angles. That is going to improve your traction ability in harsh off-road conditions. In return, the noise level will be up after you make some miles.

    In summary, BF Goodrich KO2 has a more aggressive tread design. Yet, in my point of view, Firestone Destination XT promises more.

    Tread Life

    I generally associate treadwear with even wearing ability. Well, it is also related to balance by implication (How long do all-terrain tires last?).

    Tread depths are par. So the above paragraph topics will be our deciding points. 

    BFG KO2 has an asymmetric tread design. Also has a wider void area. These will cause balancing issues if you miss your rotation times. As a result, you will face uneven wearing.

    Firestone Destination XT has a symmetrical tread design. Also has a close pattern design. So, it tends to wear evenly. 

    I can confidently say that Firestone Destination XT promises more regarding treadwear. Yet, on this level, it is all about you and your driving habits.

    Getting maximum wear life from a tire is related to you as well as your tire,

    If you’d like to learn how to get maximum tread life:

    https://tireterrain.com/how-to-make-tires-last-longer/

    Note: Both tires come up with a 50000-mile tread life warranty.

    You can check the below Destination XT videos (7500 miles and 22500 miles) from my dearest friend Scott. He also shared his views on holding stones.

    Noise Comparison

    I’ll keep this section concise. The comparison is quite clear to me. While a deeper tread may look appealing, it tends to generate more noise and vibration. Therefore, the Firestone Destination XT is the louder tire in this comparison.

    However, it’s essential to remember that expecting too much in terms of quietness from both tires doesn’t make sense, as these are aggressive off-road tires.

    All in all, if reducing noise is a priority, especially with C and D load range options, the BF Goodrich KO2 is the tire to choose.

    A side note here: Even though some tires tend to make noise because of their tread patterns, it’s still possible to keep your tire noise down.

    I’m leaving a perfect explanation below from DiscountTire for those who need it;

    How to Keep Tire Noise Down? –>
    https://www.discounttire.com/learn/tire-noise

    Comfort

    At beginning of the article, I talked about the good on-road manners of Destination XT. In this section, the table turned.

    Comfort is related to compound as well as pattern. Destination XT has a softer design. I agree. Yet, I have made my research. Thanks to my fellows on Bridgestone.

    Destination XT has a rigid compound due to wear rate. And that cost lack of comfort. Slow down when you are passing the bumps.

    BF Goodrich KO2 offers a slightly smoother ride than Firestone Destination XT.

    Here is a perfect article what to expect from all-terrain tires for daily driving –> https://tireterrain.com/are-all-terrain-tires-good-for-daily-driving/

    Wet Performance

    Wet performance of all-terrain tires can be a concern due to their wide design, which makes them prone to hydroplaning.

    Deeper tread can help improve wet performance, giving Firestone Destination XT a slight advantage. However, it’s worth noting that its stiff compound can lead to reduced wet traction.

    In this case, I’d opt for the BF Goodrich KO2 because it provides a bit more security in wet conditions. Nevertheless, I still believe that the stability of the Firestone Destination XT can be an advantage, especially for hauling and towing applications.

    Note: Hydroplaning is vital for a safe ride under the pouring rain. However, it might occur even with the best tire. Maybe you can’t prevent it but if you know what it is and how to deal with it, you can easily stay on the safe side.

    Here is an extremely efficient guide about ‘How to Deal with Hydroplaning?‘ –> https://www.discounttire.com/learn/hydroplaning

    Winter Performance

    Both of these tires carry the 3 peak mountain snowflake marking, indicating their ability to perform well in snowy conditions. However, it’s important to acknowledge that despite these ratings, all-terrain tires are not specialized snow tires. While they can handle light and deep snow effectively, they may not excel on icy surfaces.

    In general, BF Goodrich KO2 may be the better choice for winter driving due to its softer compound. However, Firestone Destination XT is optimized for heavy loads, and its 5-rib design provides better traction under load, making it a good option for work applications.

    In summary, for vehicles like Jeeps and off-road trucks, I recommend BF Goodrich KO2 for winter conditions. For work-related tasks and heavy loads, Firestone Destination XT is a suitable choice.

    A side note here: Understanding the snow performance of all-terrain tires can be quite challenging. For those who find it perplexing, I’d like to direct your attention to a helpful resource: “6 Best All-Terrain Tires for Snow by AT Tire Category“ This article is specifically designed to assist you in making informed decisions regarding all-terrain tires in snowy conditions.

    Off-Road Performance

    Well, you can't beat the Baja Champ that easily

    Off-road is where BF Goodrich KO2 shines. It is a champion tire and hard to defeat.

    On the other hand, Destination XT will give you everything you need on mild off-road. No doubt!

    Destination XT‘s self-cleaning ability is huge. It can effortlessly throw the dirt out of lugs. So, BF Goodrich KO2 too. They are even on dirt.

    Sand performance is easy to evaluate. Less aggressive design works better on the sand. Therefore, Destination XT is my pick.

    BF Goodrich KO2 is killing it in mud. A wider shoulder block provides better traction. In addition to that, sidewalls are deeper than Destination XT’s. That will help you on deeper mud.

    Lastly the rock. Destination XT will not let you down on gravel or pavement. Yet, climbing ability is not as good as BF Goodrich’s. As long as, we are talking about LT sizes; I am going to say even for rocks.

    In summary, both are great tires for off-road. I recommend BF Goodrich for severe and Destination XT for mild applications.

    Specs

    Firestone Destination XTBF Goodrich KO2
    CategoryAll-Terrain TireAll-Terrain Tire
    VehicleLight Truck, SUVLight Truck, SUV
    Available Sizes (Rim)15”, 16”, 17”, 18”, 20”15’’, 16’’, 17’’, 18’’, 20’’, 22’’
    Weight35- 61 lbs34-78 lbs
    Made InUSAOpelika, AL, USA
    Severe Snow Rated (3PMSF)YesYes
    Warranty (P-metric)50,000 Miles50,000 Miles
    Warranty (LT Sizes)50,000 Miles50,000 Miles
    PricesCheck price section to see best possible pricesCheck price section to see best possible prices

    🚨 Breaking News Alert! 🚨

    Hold onto your seats because I’m thrilled to introduce the all-new BF Goodrich All-Terrain T/A KO3 – the next evolution of the fan-favorite KO2! And the excitement doesn’t stop there – this beast is now available in two additional OEM sizes: LT285/70R17 and LT275/65R20. Get ready for the ultimate off-road experience with the KO3!

    Specification Comparison for Popular Sizes

    When evaluating the performance of Firestone Destination XT and BF Goodrich KO2, it’s essential to recognize that their characteristics can differ depending on the tire size. Before delving into a direct comparison, let’s emphasize some key factors:

    • Wheel Sizes: Both BF Goodrich KO2 and Firestone Destination XT are available in various wheel sizes, including 15”, 16”, 17”, 18”, and 20”. Additionally, BF Goodrich KO2 offers a 22” option.

    • Load Ranges: These tires are designed to accommodate different load ranges. BF Goodrich KO2 is available in ‘C, D, E’ load ranges, whereas Firestone Destination XT is offered in ‘C and E’ load ranges. It’s worth noting that the ‘C’ load range option is not available for most sizes of Firestone Destination XT.

    • Weight: In most sizes, Firestone Destination XT is lighter than BF Goodrich KO2, particularly in the E load range category.

    • Height: Firestone Destination XT tends to have a greater height compared to BF Goodrich KO2 for most sizes.

    These variations in wheel sizes, load ranges, weight, and height should be considered when selecting the appropriate tire to meet your specific requirements. Now, let’s proceed with a comprehensive comparison of popular sizes.

    35×12.5R20

    Toyo Open Country AT3 Toyo Open Country AT3 Falken Wildpeak AT3W BF Goodrich KO2 General Grabber ATX Sumitomo Encounter AT Nitto Recon Grappler AT Cooper Discoverer AT3 XLT Yokohama Geolander AT G015 Hankook Dynapro AT2 Extreme Cooper Discoverer Rugged Treak Nitto Ridge Grappler Kumho Road Venture AT52 Yokohama Geolander X-AT Toyo Open Country R/T Trail Mickey Thompson Baja Boss AT Hankook Dynapro AT2 Extreme Firestone Destination XT Yokohama Geolander X-AT Mickey Thompson Baja Legend Exp Kenda Klever RT
    Category Off Road AT Tire Off Road AT Tire Off Road AT Tire Off Road AT Tire Off Road AT Tire Off Road AT Tire Off Road AT Tire On Road AT Tire On Road AT Tire On Road AT Tire On Road AT Tire Rugged Terrain Tire On Road AT Tire Rugged Terrain Tire Rugged Terrain Tire Rugged Terrain Tire On Road AT Tire Off Road AT Tire Rugged Terrain Tire Rugged Terrain Tire Rugged Terrain Tire
    Load Range E F F E E E F F E E F F E F F F F E E F F
    Weight 67 lbs 67 lbs 77 lbs 67 lbs 70 lbs 75 lbs 68 lbs 67 lbs 59 lbs 73 lbs 69 lbs 68 lbs 66 lbs 70 lbs 69 lbs 72 lbs 65 lbs 59 lbs 71 lbs 62 lbs 68 lbs
    Tread Depth 16.9/32″ 16.9/32″ 19/32″ 15/32″ 16/32″ 19/32″ 16.9/32″ 16.5/32″ 16/32″ 14.5/32″ 18.5/32″ 18.3/32″ 16/32″ ‘- 16.9 18.5/32″ 15.5/32″ 17/32″ 19/32″ 18.8/32”
    Tread Width 10.9″10.3″10.9″ 11.1″ 10.6″ 10.5″ 11″ 10.6″ 10.5″ 10.8″ 9.8″10.2″ 10.1″ 11″ 10.2″ 10.2″ 10.3″ 10.8″ 10″ 10.2 10”
    Made In United States United States Thailand United States United States Thailand United States United States Phillippines Korea United States United States Vietnam Japan United States United States Korea Canada Japan United States Taiwan

    In this particular size, Firestone Destination XT stands out as the lighter and narrower option, making it a suitable choice if fuel efficiency is your primary concern. However, it’s important to note that its deeper tread and stiffer construction may result in a slightly rougher ride. If you don’t intend to subject this size to heavy-duty use, BF Goodrich KO2 is a more optimized choice for this specific size.

    Note: Both of these tires are included in my best list for this specific size. If you’d like to explore more options, check out my full list of recommendations here –> [https://tireterrain.com/best-35×12-50r20-all-terrain-tires/]

    285/70R17

    Toyo Open Country AT3 Toyo Open Country AT3 Toyo Open Country AT3 Falken Wildpeak AT3W Falken Wildpeak AT3W Falken Wildpeak AT3W BF Goodrich KO2 BF Goodrich KO2 General Grabber ATX Goodyear Wrangler Duratrac Cooper Discoverer S/T Maxx Sumitomo Encounter AT Goodyear Wrangler Duratrac Sumitomo Encounter AT Firestone Destination AT2 Firestone Destination XT BF Goodrich KO3 Pirelli Scorpion All Terrain Plus Nitto Recon Grappler AT Nitto Nomad Grappler Nitto Recon Grappler AT Yokohama Geolander AT G015 Cooper Discoverer AT3 4S Cooper Discoverer AT3 XLT BF Goodrich Trail Terrain T/A General Grabber APT Yokohama Geolander AT G015 Hankook Dynapro AT2 Extreme Cooper Discoverer Rugged Trek Cooper Discoverer Rugged Trek Nitto Ridge Grappler Nitto Ridge Grappler Nitto Ridge Grappler Toyo Open Country R/T Trail Toyo Open Country R/T Trail Kenda Klever R/T Kenda Klever AT2
    Category Off Road AT Tire Off Road AT Tire Off Road AT Tire Off Road AT Tire Off Road AT Tire Off Road AT Tire Off Road AT Tire Off Road AT Tire Off Road AT Tire Commercial AT Tire Commercial AT Tire Off Road AT Tire Commercial AT Tire Off Road AT Tire On Road AT Tire Off Road AT Tire Off Road AT Tire On Road AT Tire Off Road AT Tire On Road AT Tire Off Road AT Tire On Road AT Tire On Road AT Tire On Road AT Tire On Road AT Tire On Road AT Tire On Road AT Tire On Road AT Tire Rugged Terrain Tire Rugged Terrain Tire Rugged Terrain Tire Rugged Terrain Tire Rugged Terrain Tire Rugged Terrain Tire Rugged Terrain Tire Rugged Terrain Tire Off Road AT tire
    Load Range E SL C C E SL E C E E E SL D E SL E C D E SL SL SL SL E SL SL E E SL E SL C E C E E E
    Weight 55 lbs 47 lbs 54 lbs 63 lbs 58 lbs 50 lbs 58 lbs 51 lbs 59 lbs 60 lbs 62 lbs 52 lbs 51 lbs 60 lbs 41 lbs 51 lbs 56 lbs 55 lbs 54 lbs 45 lbs 48 lbs 45 lbs 43 lbs 55 lbs 46 lbs 46 lbs 54 lbs 61 lbs 48 lbs 57 lbs 48 lbs 55 lbs 55 lbs 56 lbs 57 lbs 56 lbs 56 lbs
    Tread Depth 16.5/32″ 13.6/32″ 16.5/32″ 18/32″ 18/32″ 13/32″ 15/32″ 15/32″ 16/32″ 18/32” 18.5/32″ 13/32″ 18/32” 18/32″ 12/32″ 16/32″ 15/32″ 15/32″ 16/32″ 13.4/32″ 13.6/32″ 13/32″ 14/32″ 17/32″ 12.5/32″ 14/32″ 18/32″ 15.5/32″ 16/32″ 18.5/32″ 13.5/32″ 16.4/32″ 16.4/32″ 16.5/32″ 16.5/32″ 16.3/32” 14.87/32”
    Tread Width 9″ 9″ 9″ 9.6″ 9.6″ 9.6″ 9.2″ 9.3″ 9″ 9.5″ 9.2″ 9.2″ 9.6″ 9.6″ 9.2″ 8.8″ 9.3″ 9.1″ 9.1″ 9.2″ 8.5″ 9.2″ 9.2″ 9.1″ 9.2″ 8.9″ 8.9″ 9.4″ 9.4″ 8.9″ 8.9″ 8.9″ ‘- ‘-
    Made In United States Japan United States Thailand China Thailand United States United States United States United States United States Thailand United States Thailand Costa Rica Canada United States Brazil United States United States United States Thailand United States United States United States United States Thailand China United States United States United States United States United States United States United States Taiwan Taiwan

    This tire size is a popular choice among predominantly on-road users. As a result, BF Goodrich KO2 offers a C load range option for this size. Surprisingly, even with the C load range, BF Goodrich KO2 weighs the same as the Firestone Destination XT. If your top priority is on-road performance, the C load range BF Goodrich KO2 could be a suitable choice. The same equation applies if you prefer the E load range – Firestone Destination XT for work, and BF Goodrich KO2 for a more adventurous and off-road-oriented experience.

    Note: For a comprehensive list of recommendations tailored to this specific size, you can explore my full list here –> [https://tireterrain.com/best-285-70r17-all-terrain-tires/]

    275/60R20

    Falken Wildpeak AT3W Falken Wildpeak AT3W Toyo Open Country AT3 Toyo Open Country AT3 BF Goodrich KO2 General Grabber ATX General Grabber ATX Sumitomo Encounter AT Goodyear Wrangler Duratrac Firestone Destination XT Firestone Destination AT2 Nitto Recon Grappler AT Nitto Recon Grappler AT Cooper Discoverer AT3 4S Hankook Dynapro AT2 Xtreme Yokohama Geolander AT G015 Vredestein Pinza AT Hankook Dynapro AT2 Xtreme Cooper Discoverer AT3 XLT Cooper Discoverer Rugged Trek General Grabber APT Nitto Ridge Grappler Nitto Ridge Grappler Toyo Open Country R/T Trail BF Goodrich Trail Terrain TA Mickey Thompson Baja Boss AT Mickey Thompson Baja Boss AT Toyo Open Country R/T Trail Kenda Klever AT2 Kenda Klever AT2
    Category Off Road AT Tire Off Road AT Tire Off Road AT Tire Off Road AT Tire Off Road AT Tire Off Road AT Tire Off Road AT Tire Off Road AT Tire Commercial AT Tire Off Road AT Tire On Road AT Tire Off Road AT Tire Off Road AT Tire On Road AT Tire On Road AT Tire On Road AT Tire On Road AT Tire On Road AT Tire On Road AT Tire Rugged Terrain Tire On Road AT Tire Rugged Terrain Tire Rugged Terrain Tire Rugged Terrain Tire On Road AT tire Rugged Terrain Tire Rugged Terrain Tire Rugged Terrain Tire Off Road AT Tire Off Road AT Tire
    Load Range D SL E SL D D XL SL SL E E XL E SL D SL SL SL E SL SL E XL SL SL E SL E XL E
    Weight58 lbs 50 lbs 55 42 lbs 55 lbs 56 lbs 50 lbs 49 lbs 46 lbs 52 lbs 42 lbs 46 lbs 55 lbs 44 lbs 57 lbs 45 lbs 44 lbs 44 lbs 56 lbs 47 lbs 45 lbs 58 lbs 45 lbs 44 lbs 47 lbs 64 lbs 48 lbs 57 lbs 53 lbs 56 lbs
    Tread Depth 18/32″ 13/32″ 16.4 13.5/32″ 15/32″ 16/32″ 14/32″ 12/32″ 16/32″ 16/32″ 12/32″ 13.5/32″ 15.9/32″ 12.5/32″ 14.5/32″ 12/32″ 12/32″ 12.5/32″ 16/32″ 16/32″ 14/32″ 16.4/32″ 13.5/32″ 13.5 12.5/32″ 18.5/32″ 16/32″ 16.4 13.35/32” 14.87/32”
    Tread Width 9.2″ 9.6″ 9.4″9.1″ 9″ 9.4″ 9.6″ 9″ ‘- 9.6″ 8.8″ 9.1″ 9.3″ 9.1″ ‘- 8.3″ 8.6″ 8.8″ 9.2″ 9.4″ 9.4″ 9.2″ 8.9″ ‘- 9.5″ 9.8″ 9.3″ ‘- ‘- ‘-
    Made In Thailand Thailand United States United States United States United States United States Thailand United States Canada United States United States United States United States Korea Phillippines India United States United States United States United States United States United States United States United States United States United States United States Taiwan Taiwan

    In this size, the tables turn. Despite Firestone Destination XT being lighter, it’s a taller and wider tire at the same time. This generally makes it a better option for users who prioritize traction. On the other hand, I’ve found that the D-rated BF Goodrich KO2 is the best overall tire for this size, offering a balanced performance profile.

    265/70R17

    Falken Wildpeak AT3W Falken Wildpeak AT3W Toyo Open Country AT3 Toyo Open Country AT3 BF Goodrich KO2 BF Goodrich KO2 General Grabber ATX General Grabber ATX General Grabber ATX Cooper Discoverer ST Maxx Sumitomo Encounter AT Goodyear Wrangler Duratrac Sumitomo Encounter AT Firestone Destination AT2 BF Goodrich Trail Terrain TA Cooper Discoverer AT3 4S Firestone Destination XT General Grabber APT Nitto Recon Grappler AT General Grabber APT Vredestein Pinza AT Yokohama Geolander AT G015 Yokohama Geolander AT G015 Hankook Dynapro AT2 Extreme Vredestein Pinza AT Cooper Discoverer AT3 LT Cooper Discoverer AT3 LT Hankook Dynapro AT2 Extreme Cooper Discoverer Rugged Trek Cooper Discoverer Rugged Trek Nitto Ridge Grappler Nitto Ridge Grappler Mickey Thompson Baja Boss AT Mickey Thompson Baja Boss AT Toyo Open Country RT Trail Toyo Open Country RT Trail Kenda Klever RT Kenda Klever AT2 Kenda Klever AT2
    Category Off Road AT Tire Off Road AT Tire Off Road AT Tire Off Road AT Tire Off Road AT Tire Off Road AT Tire Off Road AT Tire Off Road AT Tire Off Road AT Tire Commercial AT Tire Off Road AT Tire Commercial AT Tire Off Road AT Tire On Road AT Tire On Road AT Tire On Road AT Tire Off Road AT Tire On Road AT Tire Off Road AT Tire On Road AT Tire On Road AT Tire On Road AT Tire On Road AT Tire On Road AT Tire On Road AT tire On Road AT Tire On Road AT Tire On Road AT Tire Rugged Terrain Tire Rugged Terrain Tire Rugged Terrain Tire Rugged Terrain Tire Rugged Terrain Tire Rugged Terrain Tire Rugged Terrain Tire Rugged Terrain Tire Rugged Terrain Tire Off Road AT Tire Off Road AT Tire
    Load Range E SL E SL C E SL C E E E E SL SL SL SL E C E SL SL E SL SL E E C E XL ESL E E XL C E E SL E
    Weight 51 lbs 45 lbs 48 lbs 42 lbs 46 lbs 53 lbs 44 lbs 47 lbs 55 lbs 55 lbs 54 lbs 51 lbs 46 lbs 38 lbs 57 lbs 42 lbs 45 lbs 42 lbs 50 lbs 47 lbs 40 lbs 51 lbs 41 lbs 39 lbs 52 lbs 50 lbs 45 lbs 48 lbs 45 lbs 53 lbs 42 lbs 51 lbs 57 lbs 44 lbs 49 lbs 49 lbs 47 lbs 47 lbs 47 lbs
    Tread Depth 17/32″ 13/32″ 16.3/32″ 13.4/32″ 15/32″ 15/32″ 14/32″ 16/32″ 16/32″ 18.5/32″ 17/32″ 18/32″ 13/32″ 12/32″ 12.5/32″ 14/32″ 15/32″ 12/32″ 15.7/32″ 14/32″ 13/32″ 18/32″ 13/32″ 12.5/32″ 16/32″ 16.5/32″ 16.5/32″ 15/32″ 16/32″ 18.5/32″ 13.5/32″ 16.4/32″ 18.5/32″ 16/32″ 16.3/32” 16.3/32” 16.3/32” 13.35/32 14.87/32”
    Tread Width 8.9″ 9″ 8.4″ 8.4″ 8.8″ 8.7″ 7.2″ 8.4″ 8.3″ 8.7″ 8.7″ 9″ 8.9″ 8.3″ 8.7″ 8.6″ 8.7″ 8.5″ 8.5″ 8.6″ 8.1″ 8.4″ 8″ 8.4″ 7.8″ 8.7″ 8.7″ 8.4″ 8.8″ 8.9″ 8.4″ 8.4″ 9.2″ 8.7″ ‘- ‘- ‘- ‘-
    Made In Japan United States United States Japan Canada United States United States United States United States United States Thailand United States Thailand United States United States United States Canada United States United States United States India Thailand Thailand Indonesia India United States United States Indonesia United States United States United States United States United States United States United States United States Taiwan Taiwan Taiwan

    So, first of all, if you spend most of your time on the road, the C-rated BF Goodrich KO2 is the best option. On the other hand, if you’re looking for the most efficient choice, the E-load range Firestone Destination XT is still a good pick, even though it might ride a bit rough. The significant weight difference between the two is notable. I recommend the BF Goodrich KO2 if your primary concern is better traction on loose ground.

    Size Selection

    Before we dive into selecting the right tire size, it’s essential to understand the tire standards that manufacturers follow.

    Technical Standards & Regulations

    In Europe, the tire standardizing organization is called ETRTO. In the United States, it’s The Tire and Rim Association (TRA), while in Japan, it’s the Japanese Automobile Tire Manufacturers Association (JATMA). Although there may be other organizations, they generally align with one of these three.

    When it comes to passenger car tires, TRA designates them by placing the letter “P” in front of the size to indicate conformity to the TRA standard. On the other hand, ETRTO and JATMA do not use any letters, which can sometimes be confusing when determining which standard is being used.

    For light truck tires, TRA uses the letters “LT” in front of the tire size, while JATMA places the letters “LT” after the size. ETRTO, however, uses the letter “C” after the size to indicate tires of this type.

    In the realm of medium truck tires, ETRTO uses the letter “C” after the size to designate tires designed according to their standard. In contrast, TRA and JATMA do not use any letters in this context.

    Now, here’s what’s essential: Tires with the same dimensions (size) may have different maximum load capacities depending on the standard being followed. So, it’s crucial to consider the relevant standard when choosing tires.

    When it comes to load capacity designations, “SL” (Standard Load) and “XL” (Extra Load) are used for all passenger car tires, regardless of which standard is being followed. In the ETRTO standard, “Reinforced” is also used as an alternative to “XL.”

    Load Range, on the other hand, is specific to TRA. ETRTO and JATMA use the term “Load Index.” While TRA references Load Indexes, it’s important to note that the values provided are approximate.

    To sum it up, understanding the tire standards and designations is vital as they play a significant role in determining the right tire size and load capacity. By considering the appropriate standards, you can make an informed decision when selecting tires that meet your vehicle’s requirements.

    Here are two great articles if you wanna dive deeper:

    Load Range vs Load Index: https://www.discounttire.com/learn/load-range-load-index

    Tire Sizing System: https://www.discounttire.com/learn/euro-vs-pmetric-tires

    How to Select the Right Tire Size Based on Your Requirements?

    When it comes to selecting tire sizes for your vehicle, it’s important to keep in mind that most vehicles offer more than one original equipment size. Let’s take the 2019 Ford F-150 Lariat Crew Cab 4WD as an example. You have three different tire size options: 275/55R20 SL, 275/65R18 Load Range C, or 275/65R18 SL.

    Note: I use Toyo Open Country AT3 for an example tire. You can use this link to see tire options for your vehicle and then make a comparison between the sizes:
    https://www.discounttire.com/fitment/vehicle

    If you don’t know your tire size: https://tireterrain.com/find-tires-by-vin-number/

    Let’s focus on comparing the 275/65R18 SL and 275/65R18 Load Range C options for a more detailed comparison. Your decision should be based on your priorities. If you prioritize a smooth ride and better handling, the SL option is the way to go. On the other hand, if you value hauling or towing performance and tire longevity, the Load Range C option would be a better fit.

    As a tire engineer, my perspective often revolves around load-carrying capacity. Generally, tires with higher load capabilities tend to provide a stiffer ride. However, there’s a bit of an illusion to consider. When you compare the two tires in the same size, the SL-rated tire may initially appear to have a higher load capability. But here’s the catch: P metric tires, like the SL option, need to be derated by a factor of 1.1 when used on a truck. Crunching the numbers reveals that the SL option actually has a lower maximum load capability. Additionally, it boasts a lower tread depth, which translates to better responsiveness.

    The same principles I mentioned earlier also apply when comparing XL and E Load range tires. In summary, if your vehicle allows for Passenger Car or LT (Light Truck) tires, going with a passenger option will provide you with better on-road manners. However, if you find yourself venturing off-road frequently, own a working truck, or regularly engage in towing and hauling heavy loads, then LT tires are generally the better choice for your needs.

    Couple of tips for towing;

    • Even though the load index of passenger car tires fits, when it comes to towing, sidewall stability is the issue. Hence, LT tires with Load Range C, D, or E provide better stability. 
    • Generally, a load index higher than 119 is recommended for towing
    • Proper loading is important for even wearing. 60/40 rule should be followed. 60% of the weight should be on the front axle and 40%of weight should be applied rear axle of the trailer. Besides that, try to center load. Start with heavier ones if you gonna stack them up.

    To wrap it up, selecting the right tires comes down to choosing the ones that align with your driving preferences and specific requirements.

    Conclusion

    Since Destination XT is only available for LT sizes, I have made the comparison on LT size-based. If Firestone will decide to expand their line-up with P-metrics, BF Goodrich KO2 would be a competitor to them.

    A Quick Check List:

    • LT sizes have stronger sidewalls. That feature makes them more durable. Yet, these tires offer a rougher ride. (LT vs P-Metric tires)
    • XL sizes tend to carry more load and offer better handling. Hence, if you’ll go with p-metric sizes, they might be a better pick for hauling and towing( XL vs SL tires)
    • Please pay attention to the load index & load range and speed index. These metrics are essential if you expect decent tread life
    • There isn’t a bad tire in the market right now, you should just know what to expect from tires

    Firestone Destination XT is my choice regarding the price difference. It is almost as good as BF Goodrich in every section. Even better in wet and snow.

    Catch it before prices will be up!

    I hope this comparison will help you to decide. If you have any questions, you are more than welcome to leave them below! Have a safe ride!

    BF Goodrich KO2 Related Articles

    Read Review
    Compare with:
    vs BFGoodrich All-Terrain T/A KO3 vs Falken Wildpeak A/T3W vs Falken Wildpeak A/T4W vs Firestone Destination XT vs General Grabber ATX vs Nitto Ridge Grappler vs Toyo Open Country A/T III vs Yokohama Geolandar A/T4

    Firestone Destination XT Related Articles

    Read Review
    Compare with:
    vs BFGoodrich All-Terrain T/A KO2 vs Falken Wildpeak A/T3W

    For those who prefer to see whole market analyze:

    • https://tireterrain.com/best-all-terrain-tires/
    • https://tireterrain.com/best-all-terrain-tires-for-snow/
    • https://tireterrain.com/best-1-2-ton-truck-tires/
    • https://tireterrain.com/best-3-4-ton-truck-tires/
    • https://tireterrain.com/best-rt-tires/
    • https://tireterrain.com/best-tires-for-snow-plowing/
    • https://tireterrain.com/on-road-all-terrain-tires-highway/

    A couple of popular size analyses:

    • https://tireterrain.com/best-35x12-50r20-all-terrain-tires/
    • https://tireterrain.com/best-285-70r17-all-terrain-tires/
    • https://tireterrain.com/best-275-55r20-all-terrain-tires/
    • https://tireterrain.com/best-275-65r18-all-terrain-tires/

    Want to learn more about all-terrain tires:

    • https://tireterrain.com/highway-tires-vs-all-terrain-vs-mud-terrain/
    • https://tireterrain.com/all-season-vs-all-terrain-tires/
    • https://tireterrain.com/tire-load-index-and-load-range/
    • https://tireterrain.com/lt-tires-vs-passenger-tires/
    • https://tireterrain.com/are-all-terrain-tires-good-for-daily-driving/
    • https://tireterrain.com/are-all-terrain-tires-good-in-snow/
    • https://tireterrain.com/are-all-terrain-tires-loud/
    • https://tireterrain.com/how-long-do-all-terrain-tires-last/
    • https://tireterrain.com/are-all-terrain-tires-good-in-rain/
    • https://tireterrain.com/off-road-tire-pressure-load-range-for-every-rig/

    Filed Under: All Terrain Tires Tagged With: bf goodrich ko2, firestone destination xt, firestone destination xt vs ko2

    Reader Interactions

    Leave a Reply Cancel reply

    Your email address will not be published. Required fields are marked *

    Primary Sidebar

    Find Tires

    About Me

    Hey, it's Emre. I'm the proud dad of two cats, a former Bridgestone field engineer, and I hold degrees in Civil and Industrial engineering. I'm also a firm believer in the motto that "bigger is better." Read More…

    Contact Channels

    • Email
    • Facebook
    • LinkedIn
    • Twitter

    High-End Tires by Category

    Best All-Terrain Tires

    Best Rugged-Terrain Tires

    Best Mud-Terrain Tires

    Best All-Season Tires for Snow

    Best Tires for Snow Plowing

    Best Semi-Truck Tires

    Categories

    Copyright © 2025

    • Disclaimer
    • About Me
    • Contact
    • Privacy Policy