TireTerrain

All Terrain Tires

Best All Terrain Tires of 2024

Updated: by Leave a Comment

The all-terrain tire market has seen quite the action in 2024. Leading brands like BF Goodrich and Falken have both rolled out exciting new hero products, raising the stakes in an already competitive space. In this article, I’ll dive into the standout features of these new releases and explore how they stack up against their predecessors. Let’s get started!

All-Terrain Tire Segmentation

To better grasp the all-terrain tire market, let’s take a brief look at the key segments:

  • On-Road All-Terrain Tires
    Designed for 80% on-road and 20% off-road use. These tires can handle light off-road conditions like gravel and dirt, making them ideal for everyday driving with occasional off-road detours.

  • Off-Road All-Terrain Tires
    Balanced for 50% on-road and 50% off-road usage. These can tackle most terrains, except for deep mud, offering a versatile option for drivers who spend equal time on both paved roads and rugged trails.

  • Rugged All-Terrain Tires
    Offering a 40% on-road and 60% off-road split, these are great if you want an aggressive, off-road look without sacrificing too much

  • Commercial All-Terrain Tires
    Built for heavy-duty use with a 30% on-road and 70% off-road ratio. Known for their superior durability, they’re mostly available in LT (Light Truck) sizes and can withstand tougher conditions, perfect for commercial or industrial applications.

BF Goodrich All-Terrain T/A KO3

BF Goodrich began rolling out popular sizes of the highly anticipated All-Terrain T/A KO3 earlier this year, completing the release process in August 2024. As the most popular brand in the U.S., it naturally caught our attention. We decided to put the KO3 to the test and conducted some in-depth research to see how it performs.

Looking at the BF Goodrich All-Terrain KO3 on the left and the KO2 on the other left, you'll notice a subtle difference—specifically, the KO3 has a slightly higher land-to-groove ratio. This means the KO3 features more rubber in contact with the road, which contributes to its improved on-road performance.

As a former Bridgestone engineer, I consider the BF Goodrich KO3 to be one of the top contenders in the all-terrain tire market. However, it’s important to note that this tire is currently only available in LT sizes, which may result in a slightly stiffer ride if you’re switching from P-metric sizes.

That said, the KO3 is a bit narrower compared to the KO2, which enhances its ride quality and reduces road noise—an impressive feat for an off-road-focused tire. Just keep in mind, if you primarily drive on-road, there are better-suited options for your needs.

BF Goodrich KO3 vs. KO2: Key Differences

Side-by-side comparison shot: Fresh BF Goodrich KO3 on the left, showing off its new tread pattern, and the seasoned KO2 on the right, with visible wear, revealing more voids
At first glance, you might not notice a major difference between the BF Goodrich KO3 and KO2. However, when you dive into the specs, a few key distinctions stand out:
  • Weight: The KO3 is a heavier tire.
  • Tread Pattern: The KO3 features a narrower tread pattern, which impacts its handling.
  • On-Road Performance: The KO3 offers better on-road manners, providing a smoother and quieter ride.
  • Off-Road Traction: The KO2 excels in loose-ground traction, making it the superior choice for rugged terrains.
  • Wet Traction: Thanks to improved hydroplaning resistance, the KO3 outperforms the KO2 on wet roads.
  • Winter Performance: In my experience, the KO2 is the better option for winter conditions, offering superior traction in snow and ice.

For a more detailed comparison, check out the full review here.

Falken Wildpeak AT4W

In early 2024, Falken released Wildpeak AT4W. Unlike BF Goodrich, suprisingly, they build a completely new tire. 

New set of Falken Wildpeak AT4W

The Falken Wildpeak AT4W is a robust tire designed for durability, making it an excellent choice, especially for 3/4-ton vehicles and above. Unlike its predecessor, the AT4W is heavier and features more aggressive lugs along with a stiffer rubber compound. This design not only enhances its off-road capabilities but also contributes to its overall strength.

While the AT4W excels in off-road performance, it’s worth noting that this added toughness comes at a cost: it offers a slightly stiffer ride on paved roads. Additionally, its premium construction might stretch your budget a bit. Nevertheless, if you’re seeking a tire that can handle rugged terrains without compromising durability, the Falken Wildpeak AT3W is a strong contender.

Falken Wildpeak AT4W vs AT3W

The KO3 tread design features an “S” pattern down the center, accompanied by distinct “C” and “Z” shaped lugs. The “C” type lugs are full depth, offering consistent performance over time. In contrast, the “Z” type lugs are angled out more aggressively, making them shallower compared to those on the Falken Wildpeak AT3W.

However, when comparing the Falken Wildpeak AT4W to its predecessor, the AT3W, Falken seems to have made some key sacrifices.

  • Strength: The AT4W is noticeably stronger overall. Its lugs are more robust, and the tire’s durability is superior.
  • Mud Traction: The side lugs on the AT4W are designed for better mud traction, being deeper and more staggered than those on the AT3W.

In short, the Falken Wildpeak AT4W is clearly more off-road oriented. It’s almost like there’s a fight in the market: Falken is targeting BF Goodrich KO2 users, while BF Goodrich is going after Falken Wildpeak AT3W drivers.

Nitto Terra Grappler G3

The Nitto Terra Grappler G3 is the latest evolution in Nitto’s on-road all-terrain lineup. Compared to its predecessor, the Terra Grappler G2, the G3 boasts larger lugs for improved traction and durability. Additionally, Nitto has upped the ante with a higher mileage warranty, making the G3 a more long-lasting option for those seeking both on-road comfort and off-road capability.

Nitto Terra Grappler G3 looks dope!

The Nitto Terra Grappler G3 stands out for offering a quiet and comfortable ride, setting it apart from the other options discussed in this article. While the G3 features a 3-2 lug design (compared to the 3-3 design of its predecessor), this adjustment increases the amount of rubber in contact with the road.

For severe off-road enthusiasts, this may not be ideal, as it slightly reduces off-road aggressiveness. However, for heavy-duty users, this tire could become a new favorite. It’s also worth noting that the G3 carries an A temperature rating for its H-speed-rated models, meaning it generates less heat, which in turn leads to less wear and longer tire life.

Nitto Terra Grappler G2 vs Nitto Terra Grappler G3

A weared Nitto Terra Grappler G2 and brand new Nitto Terra Grappler G3

Both the Nitto Terra Grappler G2 and G3 are excellent choices for on-road driving, but each has its own set of advantages:

  • The Nitto Terra Grappler G3 offers higher mileage, especially for 3/4-ton or larger vehicles.
  • In terms of durability, the G3 is the more robust option.
  • Both the G2 and G3 deliver an equally comfortable and quiet ride.
  • For winter-oriented driving, I recommend the Terra Grappler G3 for its better performance in colder conditions.
  • On wet roads, the G2 has a slight edge, providing better traction.

Cooper Discoverer Road + Trail AT

The Cooper Discoverer Road + Trail AT is a new-generation all-terrain tire, designed to broaden Cooper’s already strong presence in the market. While Cooper has earned a stellar reputation with the Discoverer AT3 4S, they aim to expand their lineup with the Road + Trail AT, offering drivers even more versatile options for both on-road and off-road adventures.

Road + Trail on 2017 SuperCrew

The Cooper Discoverer Road + Trail AT is a dependable all-terrain tire that provides a solid amount of off-road traction. Compared to the Discoverer AT3, this tire has a more aggressive tread design, which translates to superior traction, especially on rugged terrain. While it performs exceptionally well on both wet and dry surfaces, its ice-stopping distance falls slightly behind the competition due to the increased void area in the tread.

Cooper Discoverer AT3 4S vs Road + Trail AT

The Cooper Discoverer AT3 4S is a fantastic option for those who prioritize on-road performance, though it leans more towards the appearance of an all-season tire. However, market demands have shifted towards more aggressive-looking all-terrain options for on-road use, which led to the release of the Cooper Discoverer Road + Trail AT.

Compared to the AT3 4S, the Road + Trail AT offers:

  • Better traction on wet and dry surfaces
  • A more aggressive appearance
  • Less longevity due to its more rugged design
  • Improved off-road capability
  • Slightly worse responsiveness on-road

Yokohama Geolander AT4

The Yokohama Geolandar AT4 is a new on-road all-terrain tire and the successor to the Geolandar AT G015. Its design strikes a balance between the rugged Yokohama Geolandar X-AT and the more road-oriented G015, offering a versatile option for drivers who need a tire that performs well both on the road and off.

Perfectly balanced tire

Much like Cooper, Yokohama is shifting its focus toward a more aggressive tread design, enhancing the tire’s visual appeal. In my opinion, the Geolandar AT4 is one of the best-optimized all-terrain tires for those who want to balance on-road performance with mild off-road capability and a comfortable driving experience.

However, just like with the Cooper Discoverer Road + Trail AT, the more aggressive tread pattern of the AT4 results in slightly reduced tread life, as it prioritizes traction and performance over longevity.

Conclusion

All-terrain tires are evolving. While many manufacturers are shifting their focus towards on-road performance and appearance, brands like BF Goodrich continue to prioritize durability above all.

In my opinion, it’s crucial to identify your specific needs if you want to get the most out of your all-terrain tires. Whether you’re looking for enhanced on-road comfort, rugged off-road capabilities, or a balance of both, knowing your priorities will help you achieve maximum performance.

The document below will guide you through this decision-making process. Please note, however, that it currently does not include the latest all-terrain tire releases.

All-Terrain Tires Cheat Sheet

Finding the ideal all-terrain tire among the plethora of options available can be overwhelming. But don’t worry, my team and I have taken on this challenge head-on. Besides our hands-on experiences with these tires, we also analyze thousands of customer reviews and test reports. 

We also analyzed ‘What customer complains more about all-terrain tires?’. Even though some of these complains are coming from the nature of all-terrain tires, there is still way to prevent yourself from these issues. Below, you can see articles about, hydroplaning, tire noise

Please note that: Light-Duty is 1500 series, Medium-Duty is 2500 series and Heavy-Duty is 3500 series. If you do towing or hauling, I recommend considering at least Medium-Duty tires.

Mobile users can scroll the table to the left to see the whole data.

All-Terrain Tires Cheat Sheet
NameCategoryArticles3PMSFRoad NoiseMileageFuel EconomyRiding ComfortResponsivenessWet PerformanceMild WinterSevere WinterMild Off-RoadSevere Off-RoadBest Fit by Pickup Truck ClassificationWarranty (SL or XL)Warranty (LT)Product Page

Falken Wildpeak AT3W

Off Road All Terrain TireReviewYesDecentDecentPoorDecentDecentDecentElegantElegantDecentAverageLight-Duty55,000 Miles55,000 MilesWildpeak AT3W
Toyo Open Country AT3Off Road All Terrain TireReviewYesAverageElegantDecentDecentDecentDecentElegantDecentElegantDecentMedium-Duty65,000 Miles50,000 MilesToyo Open Country AT3
General Grabber ATXOff Road All Terrain TireReviewYesAverageDecentDecentDecentDecentDecentDecentDecentElegantElegantHeavy-Duty60,000 Miles50,000 MilesGeneral Grabber ATX
BF Goodrich KO2Off Road All Terrain TireReviewYesDecentDecentDecentDecentElegantDecentDecentDecentElegantElegantHeavy-DutyN/A50,000 MilesBF Goodrich All-Terrain T/A KO2
Sumitomo Encounter ATOff Road All Terrain TireReviewYesDecentDecentAverageDecentDecentDecentElegantAverageDecentAverageLight-Duty60,000 Miles60,000 MilesSumitomo Encounter AT
Firestone Destination XTOff Road All Terrain TireReviewYesAverageDecentElegantDecentElegantDecentDecentAverageDecentDecentHeavy-DutyN/A50,000 MilesFirestone Destination X/T
Cooper Discoverer AT3 XLTOn Road All Terrain TireReviewNoDecentDecentDecentDecentElegantDecentDecentAverageElegantAverageHeavy-DutyN/A60,000 MilesCooper Discoverer AT3 XLT
Falken Wildpeak AT TrailOn Road All Terrain TireReviewYesDecentDecentDecentDecentDecentElegantDecentDecentElegantAverageLight-Duty65,000 MilesN/AFalken Wildpeak AT Trail
Cooper Discoverer AT3 4SOn Road All Terrain TireReviewYesElegantDecentElegantElegantElegantElegantElegantDecentDecentFairy WellLight-Duty65,000 MilesN/ACooper Discoverer AT3 4S
Firestone Destination AT2On Road All Terrain TireReviewYesDecentElegantElegantElegantElegantDecentElegantAverageDecentAverageLight-Duty55,000 MilesN/AFirestone Destination AT2

BF Goodrich Trail Terrain T/A

On Road All Terrain TireReviewYesElegantElegantDecentElegantElegantDecentDecentAverageDecentAverageLight-Duty60,000N/ABF Goodrich Trail Terrain T/A
Toyo Open Country R/T TrailRugged Terrain TireReviewYesDecentDecentDecentDecentDecentDecentDecentDecentElegantDecentHeavy-Duty45,000 Miles45,000 MilesToyo Open Country R/T Trail
Falken Wildpeak R/TRugged Terrain TireReviewNoDecentDecentAverageAverageDecentDecentDecentDecentElegantDecentHeavy-Duty50,000 Miles50,000 MilesFalken Wildpeak R/T
Pathfinder AT TireOn Road All Terrain TireReviewYesAverageAverageDecentDecentDecentDecentDecentAverageDecentAverageLight-Duty55,00050,000Discount Tire Exclusive Product
Nitto Ridge GrapplerRugged Terrain TireReviewNoDecentDecentDecentElegantDecentDecentDecentDecentElegantDecentHeavy-DutyN/AN/ANitto Ridge Grappler
General Grabber APTOn Road All Terrain TireReviewYesDecentDecentAverageDecentDecentDecentDecentAverageDecentFairy WellMedium-Duty60,000 Miles60,000 MilesGeneral Grabber APT
Vredestein Pinza ATOn Road All Terrain TireReviewYesElegantDecentDecentElegantDecentDecentDecentDecentDecentAverageMedium-Duty70,000 Miles50,000 MilesVredestein Pinza AT
Nitto Recon GrapplerOff Road All Terrain TireReviewNoDecentDecentDecentDecentDecentDecentDecentAverageElegantDecentMedium-Duty65,000 Miles55,000 MilesNitto Recon Grappler
Michelin Defender LTX M/SHighway TireReviewNoElegantElegantElegantDecentElegantDecentDecentFairy WellDecentFairy WellHeavy-Duty55,000 – 70,000 Miles55,000 – 70,000 MilesMichelin Defender LTX M/S
Kenda Klever R/TRugged Terrain TireReviewNoAverageDecentAverageDecentDecentDecentDecentFairy WellDecentDecentHeavy-DutyN/AN/AKenda Klever R/T
Goodyear Wrangler Territory ATOn Road All Terrain TireReviewNoDecentDecentDecentDecentDecentDecentDecentAverageElegantDecentMedium-DutyN/AN/AGoodyear Wrangler Territory AT
Goodyear Wrangler UltraTerrain ATOff Road All Terrain TireReviewYesDecentDecentDecentDecentDecentDecentDecentAverageDecentFairy WellMedium-DutyN/AN/ADiscount Tire Exclusive Product
Continental Terrain Contact H/THighway TireReviewNoElegantElegantElegantElegantElegantDecentAveragePoorDecentPoorHeavy-Duty70,000 Miles60,000 MilesContinental TerrainContact H/T
Patriot R/TRugged Terrain TireReviewYesAverageAverageAverageDecentDecentDecentDecentDecentDecentDecentMedium-DutyN/AN/APatriot R/T+
Kenda Klever AT2Off Road All Terrain TireReviewYesDecentAverageAverageDecentDecentDecentDecentAverageDecentAverageMedium-Duty60,000 Miles50,000 MilesKenda Klever AT2
Yokohama Geolander AT G015On Road All Terrain TireReviewYesElegantDecentAverageElegantElegantDecentDecentAverageAveragePoorLight-Duty60,000 Miles50,000 MilesYokohama Geolandar AT G015
Mickey Thompson Baja Boss ATRugged Terrain TireReviewYes (315 or narrower width)DecentDecentAverageDecentElegantDecentDecentDecentElegantDecentMedium-Duty50,000 Miles60,000 MilesMickey Thompson Baja Boss AT

For those who prefer a more textual representation and dislike sifting through tables of data:

A couple of popular size analyses:

Want to learn more about all-terrain tires:

I hope you found this article helpful! If you need any further information or have more questions, feel free to reach out. Have a safe and smooth ride!

Firestone Destination XT vs Falken Wildpeak AT3W

Updated: by Leave a Comment

Falken Wildpeak AT3W and the Firestone Destination X/T are both excellent choices for those in need of E or F-load range tires. However, it’s important to note that they are designed for different purposes. In our testing and through the hands-on experiences of our drivers, we’ve gathered some insightful observations about these tires. Let’s delve into these results and experiences to better understand how each tire performs under various conditions and which might be the best fit for your specific needs.

Falken Wildpeak AT3W on duty!

Drawing from my experience as a former Bridgestone engineer, I believe the Falken Wildpeak AT3W is a superior choice for winter conditions. The differences in noise and riding comfort between the Falken Wildpeak AT3W and the Firestone Destination X/T are quite negligible. However, each tire has its own strengths. The Firestone Destination X/T excels in fuel efficiency and longevity, making it a great option for those who prioritize these features. Meanwhile, the Falken Wildpeak AT3W stands out for its wet performance and visual appeal.

When it comes to off-roading, both tires perform commendably in light conditions. But for more challenging off-road scenarios, I tend to lean towards the Firestone Destination X/T for its enhanced capabilities in severe environments.

Table of Contents

Tread Appearance

Falken Wildpeak AT3W has a compact pattern that offers smooth ride

In our tests using LT285/60R20 tires, both the Falken Wildpeak AT3W and Firestone Destination X/T presented well. Personally, I found the Falken Wildpeak AT3W to appear much more aggressive in person than in pictures. While the Firestone Destination X/T also looks good, its slightly less aggressive pattern, particularly in the shoulder blocks, is noticeable.

Focusing on the shoulder blocks, the Falken Wildpeak AT3W’s wider blocks might not be an issue for smaller sizes, but for our test size, it contributed to a somewhat rough and noisy ride. That said, I’m not implying that the Firestone Destination XT is quiet – I’ll delve into that more in the noise section.

Looking at the center section, the Firestone Destination X/T has 3-3 similarly shaped center lugs that not only look good but also contribute to a smoother riding experience. In contrast, the Falken Wildpeak AT3W’s 3-2 lug design has less void area, which, in my experience, provides better on-road traction.

As for the sidewalls, the Firestone Destination XT boasts deeper sidewall biters that perform excellently in air-down conditions. However, aesthetically, it’s not my favorite. The Falken Wildpeak AT3W, on the other hand, has a more appealing look to me.

Riding Experience

In this section, I’ll delve into our on-road riding experience with these tires, breaking down the analysis into two distinct parts for a more detailed examination. This approach will allow us to explore different aspects of their performance on the road, providing a comprehensive understanding of how each tire behaves under various on-road conditions. Let’s begin with the first part.

Noise

Many reviews praise the quietness and comfort of the Falken Wildpeak AT3W, often attributed to its availability in p-metric sizes, which are favored for superior on-road performance. However, in my experience, I found the Firestone Destination X/T to be slightly quieter, which I attribute to two main factors.

Firstly, the wider shoulder blocks of the Falken Wildpeak AT3W tend to produce more noise. Also, the deeper tread depth (18/32” for Falken versus 16/32” for Firestone) makes it more challenging to mitigate airborne noise within the tread. While the difference isn’t drastic, the Falken is a bit noisier.

On the other hand, the Firestone Destination X/T, with its wide void area in the center section, isn’t silent either and does produce some tread noise.

Overall, despite both tires generating some level of noise or hum, which is expected given their aggressive design and size, they still stand out as decent options in this category.

Riding Comfort

In this scenario, both the Falken Wildpeak AT3W and the Firestone Destination X/T feature designs that contribute to a reasonably comfortable ride. Given that these are high-profile tires, ride comfort is generally not a major concern.

However, if I had to choose, I’d give a slight edge to the Firestone Destination X/T, mainly due to its tread depth. But honestly, the difference in comfort between the two tires is so subtle that it’s unlikely to be noticeable in everyday driving.

Overall, I consider both the Falken Wildpeak AT3W and the Firestone Destination X/T to be decent options in terms of ride comfort and design.

Handling

In determining the better tire between these two, my focus is on steering response and cornering stability.

In terms of steering responsiveness, the Firestone Destination X/T has an advantage due to its lighter weight and lower tread depth, which contribute to a quicker response. However, the difference is not substantial.

When it comes to cornering stability, both the Falken Wildpeak AT3W and the Firestone Destination X/T impress with their strong sidewalls. This feature makes both tires quite reliable for high-speed cornering, offering a stable and secure driving experience.

Wet Performance

As anticipated, the wet performance of the Falken Wildpeak AT3W and Firestone Destination X/T doesn’t quite meet high expectations.

When assessing hydroplaning resistance, I found the Falken Wildpeak AT3W to be marginally better, likely due to its higher tread depth and angled shoulder blocks, which seem more effective at water evacuation.

In terms of wet traction, the Falken Wildpeak AT3W also edges out slightly ahead. Its zigzag shoulder sipes, which enhance lateral traction, are a key factor here. The Firestone Destination X/T is certainly capable, with its zigzag siping on the center section, but doesn’t quite match up to the Wildpeak AT3W.

The crucial factor for me in this category is wet stopping ability. In this regard, the Falken Wildpeak AT3W outperforms the Firestone Destination X/T. The harder compound of the Destination X/T does provide grip, but it doesn’t offer the same level of friction as the Wildpeak AT3W, resulting in longer stopping distances.

Overall, for those who prioritize wet performance, the Falken Wildpeak AT3W is the preferable choice.

Winter Performance

Both the Falken Wildpeak AT3W and the Firestone Destination X/T are marked with the 3PMSF (Three-Peak Mountain Snowflake) symbol, which is a positive indication for their performance in light snow conditions.

In light snow, there isn’t a significant difference between the two, but I give a slight edge to the Falken Wildpeak AT3W due to its softer compound, which tends to perform better in these conditions.

When it comes to deep snow, both tires are quite capable. However, the Firestone Destination X/T, with its more straightforward tread design, seems to be a bit more effective.

On ice, neither tire is exceptional, but they perform adequately. The Falken Wildpeak AT3W, with its more compact tread pattern, provides reasonable traction on ice. Its shoulder blocks also perform well in slushy conditions.

In summary, for overall winter performance, including light snow, deep snow, and icy conditions, I would recommend the Falken Wildpeak AT3W as the preferable choice.

Fuel Consumption

Firestone Destination X/T looks good and decent option for increase on MPG

Although we haven’t had the opportunity for a long-term test, I’ve drawn some conclusions from various reports regarding these tires.

Firstly, the Falken Wildpeak AT3W is nearly 20% heavier than its counterpart. This increased weight leads to higher rolling resistance, which typically results in lower fuel efficiency.

Additionally, the Falken’s deeper tread depth and softer compound are not conducive to fuel economy. These factors tend to exacerbate fuel consumption.

Therefore, if fuel efficiency is a key consideration for you, the Firestone Destination XT emerges as the more suitable choice based on these attributes.

Longevity

While I can’t provide a definitive statement on longevity, I can offer my expectations based on the design and features of these tires.

The Falken Wildpeak AT3W’s step-down feature does help to mitigate uneven wear to an extent. However, to truly maximize its lifespan, regular tire rotations are crucial. Proper maintenance is key to getting the most out of the Falken Wildpeak AT3W.

In contrast, the design of the Firestone Destination X/T seems more oriented towards longevity. Its 3-3 center section design promotes even wear, and the lower tread depth means less motion within the tread, reducing wear. Additionally, the stiffer compound of the Firestone Destination X/T also contributes to its durability.

So, while longevity can vary depending on specific usage conditions, my expectation is that the Firestone Destination X/T is likely to last longer under comparable circumstances.

Warranty

Indeed, the Falken Wildpeak AT3W comes with a 55,000-mile treadwear warranty, which is a testament to its expected durability. On the other hand, the Firestone Destination X/T offers a slightly lower treadwear warranty at 50,000 miles. These warranties reflect the manufacturers’ confidence in the longevity of their tires and can be a significant factor for consumers when deciding between these two options.

Off-Road Performance

I’ll be segmenting this section into two distinct parts: severe off-road and light off-road scenarios. The light off-road analysis will cover conditions like gravel and dirt, where standard tire setups are typically sufficient. On the other hand, the severe off-road portion will focus on more challenging terrains like rock and mud, where airing down your tires is often necessary for optimal performance. This approach will allow for a more detailed and specific evaluation of the tires’ capabilities in varied off-road conditions.

Light Off-Road Performance

Shoudler notched that I'm talking about

In light off-road conditions, both the Falken Wildpeak AT3W and the Firestone Destination X/T deliver quite satisfying performance.

On dirt, they both perform exceptionally well. Given their high quality, there’s not much to differentiate them in this terrain.

Gravel can be challenging for some tires, but I’ve found that most all-terrain tires, including these two, handle it competently. The real factor to consider here is stone retention. With the Firestone Destination XT, I’ve noticed that its shoulder notches sometimes trap small stones. However, these stones are typically ejected over time without causing harm to the vehicle or other tires. The Falken Wildpeak AT3W doesn’t seem to have this issue.

In summary, for light off-road activities such as driving on dirt and gravel, both tires perform admirably.

Severe Off-Road Performance

When it comes to rock crawling, I would lean towards the Firestone Destination XT as the better option. Its sidewall biters and lower tread depth play a crucial role here. The lower tread depth reduces the bending of the tire, which in turn provides better traction when navigating over rocks.

However, when it comes to mud, neither tire excels exceptionally. But, based on their design, the Firestone Destination X/T has a slight advantage in terms of mud evacuation. Its tread pattern seems to handle the challenging task of shedding mud a bit more effectively than the Falken Wildpeak AT3W.

Value for Money

In my evaluation, both the Falken Wildpeak AT3W and the Firestone Destination X/T justify their price tags, but they excel in different areas. For example, if fuel efficiency is a top priority, the Falken Wildpeak AT3W may not be the most sensible choice. Its design and construction, particularly factors like weight and tread design, can impact fuel consumption. In such cases, it’s crucial to weigh the specific advantages of each tire against your primary needs and preferences to make the best decision

Conclusion

Falken Wildpeak AT3W and Firestone Destination X/T are decent options. While Falken is better for winter, Firestone is better for efficiency.

I hope the article was helpful. Let me know if you have any further questions. Safe travel folks!

Goodyear Wrangler UltraTerrain AT vs Falken Wildpeak AT3W

Updated: by Leave a Comment

As a tire enthusiast, I find that the Discount Tire exclusive Goodyear Wrangler UltraTerrain AT and the Falken Wildpeak AT3W are both dependable off-road all-terrain tires, offering a satisfying balance of on-road and off-road performance. Given that both are categorized as off-road all-terrain tires, there’s quite a bit to consider when comparing these two. Each has its unique strengths and nuances that are important to evaluate for anyone looking to make an informed choice.

Wrangler UltraTerrain has a highly aggressive appearance

Drawing from my experience as a former Bridgestone engineer, I see the Falken Wildpeak AT3W as the better tire choice, particularly because of its longevity. Despite Goodyear Wrangler UltraTerrain AT having comparable performance in wet, dry, and winter conditions, the Wildpeak AT3W stands out with a more comfortable riding experience. This aspect, combined with its durability, makes it a preferable option in my professional opinion.

Tread Appearance

Goodyear Wrangler Ultraterrain AT has a wider shoulder blocks that increase its riding comfort
Falken Wildpeak AT3W has a compact pattern that offers smooth ride

Starting with the shoulder blocks, I personally find the wider shoulder blocks of Goodyear Wrangler UltraTerrain AT more aesthetically pleasing. Functionally, these blocks excel in loose ground traction. However, they do contribute to a slight increase in road noise.

Moving on to the sidewall scoops, or ‘biters’, Falken Wildpeak AT3W features beefier and deeper scoops compared to the thinner ones on the Goodyear Wrangler UltraTerrain AT, which might not perform as effectively in air-down situations.

In terms of the center section, the Goodyear Wrangler UltraTerrain AT has a 3-3 lug design, whereas the Falken Wildpeak AT3W presents a 3-2 design. Despite both having uniquely shaped lugs, the Wrangler UltraTerrain AT appears to have more void area, which often leads to more road noise. However, in terms of riding comfort, I believe it has an edge.

In summary, while both tires have a very aggressive look, for SL sizes, the higher tread depth of the Goodyear Wrangler Ultraterrain AT makes it a preferable option in my opinion. For LT sizes, I don’t see a significant difference between the two.

Noise Level

In my experience with all-terrain tires, it’s typical for both the Goodyear Wrangler UltraTerrain AT and the Falken Wildpeak AT3W to produce some noise, especially at high speeds.

At lower speeds, I’ve noticed that the Falken Wildpeak AT3W tends to have a slight edge in terms of noise reduction. This advantage can be attributed to its narrower and less aggressive shoulder blocks.

While I wouldn’t describe the Goodyear Wrangler UltraTerrain as excessively noisy, it does emit a bit more sound compared to the Falken Wildpeak AT3W. So, if noise level is a significant concern for you, you might find the Falken Wildpeak AT3W to be the quieter option.

Tread Depth and Weight

From my experience in evaluating these tires, I’ve found that both the Goodyear Wrangler Ultraterrain AT and the Falken Wildpeak AT3W are above the market average in terms of weight and tread depth. For the p-metric sizes, the Goodyear Wrangler Ultraterrain AT is notably taller and lighter. On the other hand, the Falken Wildpeak AT3W, while matching the tread depth of the Goodyear in LT sizes, is still the heavier of the two.

Cornering & Steering

In terms of cornering, there isn’t much difference between the Goodyear Wrangler UltraTerrain AT and the Falken Wildpeak AT3W, as both have 2-ply sidewalls. This isn’t a major concern unless you’re driving a truck heavier than 3/4 ton. From what I understand, the 2-ply construction of the Falken Wildpeak AT3W is comparable in thickness to some 3-ply tires, potentially making it a more suitable choice in certain cases.

When it comes to steering, the Falken Wildpeak AT3W’s more consistent center section design contributes to quicker steering response. On the other hand, the Goodyear Wrangler UltraTerrain AT, with its deeper tread and softer compound, tends to have a slower steering response.

Overall, while both tires are dependable, I would rank the Falken Wildpeak AT3W a bit higher in this aspect.

Wet Traction

When it comes to wet traction, hydroplaning resistance is a crucial factor, as it directly influences traction performance. Studies have shown that hydroplaning resistance is correlated with tread depth, with deeper treads generally offering better resistance.

Both the Goodyear Wrangler UltraTerrain AT and the Falken Wildpeak AT3W exhibit reliable hydroplaning resistance. Their aggressive and compact treads efficiently channel water to the shoulder slots, handling hydroplaning effectively. However, it’s important to remember that hydroplaning resistance also depends on driving habits, especially for aggressive drivers. No tire is completely immune to hydroplaning.

In terms of traction, I’ve found both tires to be very dependable. The softer compound of the Goodyear Wrangler UltraTerrain AT typically performs better in wet conditions, but the zigzag siping of the Falken Wildpeak AT3W is also quite effective.

Overall, based on wet performance, I regard both tires as reliable choices and among the best options available in the market.

Winter Performance

Both the Goodyear Wrangler UltraTerrain AT and the Falken Wildpeak AT3W carry the 3PMSF (Three-Peak Mountain Snowflake) marking, which is a strong indicator of their winter performance capabilities.

In light snow conditions, I’ve noticed that both tires excel, thanks to their relatively soft compounds and ample biting edges. They provide excellent performance on light snow.

For deeper snow, my recommendation leans towards the Goodyear Wrangler UltraTerrain AT, particularly in p-metric sizes (SL or XL) due to its higher tread depth. Apart from that, there’s not much difference between the two – both are above average in this respect. They both exhibit good self-cleaning capabilities and sufficient void area for effective traction.

When it comes to ice, no all-terrain tire is perfect, but I’ve found the Falken Wildpeak AT3W to be quite satisfactory for icy conditions. The softer compound of the Wrangler Ultraterrain AT offers good traction on ice, though in terms of handling, it doesn’t quite match up to the Wildpeak AT3W.

Tread Life

Falken Wildpeak AT3W wears better on rocky terrains

When considering tread life, both the Goodyear Wrangler UltraTerrain AT and the Falken Wildpeak AT3W offer commendable longevity. However, it’s important to note that tread life is greatly influenced by your driving conditions and habits.

Take the Goodyear Wrangler UltraTerrain AT, for instance. Its softer compound may lead to quicker wear, but it also has a deep tread depth that extends its service life. That said, I’ve found that this softer compound often doesn’t fare as well on vehicles heavier than 3/4 ton.

Conversely, the Falken Wildpeak AT3W is exceptionally well-designed for durability. Its step-down feature is particularly beneficial for heavier vehicles. Additionally, its UTQG rating is higher for p-metric sizes (ranging from 600 to 500), indicating better wear resistance.

In summary, if you’re prioritizing tread life, I’d lean towards the Falken Wildpeak AT3W as the safer choice.

Warranty

While Falken Wildpeak AT3W offer 60,000 miles tread wear warranty, Wrangler UltraTerrain AT doesn’t have any.

Off-Road Performance

Both the Goodyear Wrangler UltraTerrain AT and the Falken Wildpeak AT3W have deep treads, which contribute to their solid performance on loose ground.

In my experience with gravel, both tires perform admirably. However, the softer compound of the Wrangler UltraTerrain tends to wear more quickly on gravel, though both tires handle it well enough.

When it comes to mud, the Wrangler UltraTerrain AT has a slight edge, thanks to its wider shoulder blocks. It’s almost on par with a rugged terrain tire in muddy conditions. Therefore, for muddy environments, I’d lean towards

the Wrangler UltraTerrain AT as the better option.

In rock crawling scenarios, while neither tire is my top recommendation, if I had to choose one, it would be the Wrangler UltraTerrain AT.

Overall, both tires are competent for mild off-road activities, but for more severe off-roading, the Wrangler UltraTerrain AT has a slight advantage. Nonetheless, I wouldn’t specifically recommend either tire for extreme off-road conditions.

Value for Money

Given that the Falken Wildpeak AT3W and the Goodyear Wrangler UltraTerrain AT are similarly priced, the tread wear warranty of the Wildpeak AT3W makes it a more appealing choice in my view. The assurance of a 60,000-mile warranty adds significant value.

If, however, you have a preference for tires made in the USA and don’t mind spending a bit more, I would suggest considering options like Toyo Open Country AT3 or  BFGoodrich KO2. Both of these brands offer quality performance and are known for their reliable products.

Conclusion

From my perspective, while the p-metric options of both tires are comparable, I strongly recommend the Falken Wildpeak AT3W for LT sizes. Its combination of durability, performance, and warranty coverage makes it a standout choice in this category.

I hope you found this article informative and helpful. Should you have any more questions or need additional insights, please feel free to leave a comment below. Safe travels, folks!

Falken Wildpeak AT3W vs Yokohama Geolandar X-AT

Updated: by Leave a Comment

In my experience, both the Yokohama Geolandar X-AT and Falken Wildpeak AT3W offer good on-road and off-road performance. However, the Geolandar X-AT excels in rugged terrain, and Wildpeak AT3W is better for general onn-road use, each in line with its design as a rugged-terrain tire and an off-road all-terrain tire, respectively.

Falken Wildpeak AT3W has a compact pattern that offers smooth ride

As a former Bridgestone engineer, I’ve observed that Falken Wildpeak AT3W is the superior choice for those seeking a smooth and quiet ride. Additionally, it offers better lateral traction in mild snow and wet conditions. While it may not have the aggressive look of Yokohama Geolandar X-AT and doesn’t excel in extremely challenging terrains like mud or rock crawling, its longevity is a significant advantage.

Conversely, Yokohama Geolandar X-AT is a powerhouse in terms of traction. It effortlessly handles the harshest terrains. Despite its aggressive tread pattern, its on-road manners are surprisingly decent, making it a viable option, particularly for larger vehicles.

Table of Contents

Sidewall Analysis - Inner Structure

In my analysis, the WildPeak A/T3W‘s unique feature is its heat diffusing technology in the lower sidewall, designed to dissipate heat during heavy towing or hauling. It also has twin steel belts and two robust polyester body plies, reinforced with a secondary bead apex, ensuring confident handling and extra protection in dynamic off-road environments. A polyamide reinforcement ply further enhances its high-speed handling.

The Geolandar X-AT, on the other hand, benefits from Yokohama’s Geo-Shield™ Construction. With three polyester body plies and a strong hexagonal bead, it creates an elliptical contact patch for balanced off-road traction and longevity. Two high-strength steel belts, supported by a full-width nylon cap, add to its durability.

So, while the Geolander X-AT boasts a 3-ply sidewall compared to the Wildpeak AT3W’s 2-ply sidewall, this doesn’t necessarily mean the Wildpeak AT3W has weaker sidewalls. Its second bead apex and heat diffusing technology are quite effective, especially for towing and hauling. However, for severe off-roading, my preference leans towards the Yokohama Geolandar X-AT.

Available Sizes

Yokohama Geolandar X-ATFalken Wildpeak AT3W
CategoryRugged-Terrain TireOff-Road All Terrain tire
Available Sizes (Rim)15”, 16”, 17”, 18”, 20”, 22”15”, 16”, 17”, 18”, 20”, 22”
Weight35 lbs to 84 lbs40 lbs to 83 lbs
Made InJapanThailand, China, Japan
Severe Snow Rated (3PMSF)NoYes
Warranty (P-metric)45,000 Miles55,000 Miles
Warranty (LT Sizes)45,000 Miles55,000 Miles

In comparing the size options, I found that the Falken Wildpeak AT3W is available in a wider range of sizes, totaling 76 different options. In contrast, the Yokohama Geolandar X-AT offers 46 different sizes. This disparity largely stems from the availability of p-metric sizes like XL and SL load ranges in the Wildpeak AT3W.

Notably, the Yokohama Geolandar X-AT is only available in the XL load range for one p-metric size, specifically the 265/60R18. This limited p-metric size range for the Geolandar X-AT contrasts with the broader selection offered by the Wildpeak AT3W.

Tread Appearance

Falken Wildpeak AT3W has less aggressive shoulder block design
I've observed that the Yokohama Geolandar X-AT features an symmetrical tread pattern, a design choice that notably enhances its riding comfort.

Both the Yokohama Geolandar X-AT and Falken Wildpeak AT3W offer an aggressive look, but in my opinion, the Geolandar X-AT appears slightly more aggressive due to its larger lugs and more aggressive shoulder design. However, both have highly aggressive sidewall scoops that enhance traction in air-down conditions on loose ground.

On the other hand, the Falken Wildpeak AT3W’s smaller and more numerous center lugs boost its biting capability. Additionally, its increased number of sipes on the shoulder and center lugs enhance performance in wet conditions and light snow.

While the Geolandar X-AT’s larger lugs and greater void area provide superior performance on loose ground, I’ve noticed that its elliptical contact patch tends to wear more quickly in the center section. Therefore, maintaining the correct air pressure is crucial for this tire.

In summary, while both tires have an aggressive appearance, I’m not a fan of the elliptical contact patch design of the Yokohama Geolandar X-AT, as it can impact the tire’s longevity.

On-Road Performance

For me, on-road performance is a critical factor when considering all-terrain tires. Considering that most drivers, including those who aren’t hardcore off-roaders, spend the majority of their time on paved roads, it’s a game-changer. Therefore, the key metrics I focus on are wet performance, lateral grip, and handling capability. These aspects are crucial for everyday driving and overall driving safety and comfort.

Wet Performance

From my perspective, when it comes to hydroplaning resistance, both the Yokohama Geolandar X-AT and the Falken Wildpeak AT3W excel, and there are two main reasons for this. First, their deep treads enhance hydroplaning resistance. The angled shoulder blocks and elliptical contact patch of the Geolandar X-AT are particularly effective. Meanwhile, the Wildpeak AT3W’s zigzag lateral grooves are also impressive in water evacuation from the tread.

As for wet braking, I don’t notice a significant difference between the two, thanks to the soft compound of the Geolandar X-AT, even with its lack of siping. However, when it comes to lateral wet traction, the 3D siping technology of the Wildpeak AT3W really shines. The differently shaped lugs and notches of the Geolandar X-AT perform well, but they don’t quite match up to the Wildpeak AT3W in this regard.

Overall, while both tires provide a decent level of wet performance, for more aggressive drivers, the Falken Wildpeak AT3W’s superior lateral traction could be a deciding factor.

Handling

When it comes to steering response and cornering stability, these are my main considerations. Both the Falken Wildpeak AT3W and Yokohama Geolandar X-AT have similar tread depth and width, but I lean towards the Wildpeak AT3W for its stiffer compound and more compact tread pattern, which I find enhances responsiveness. However, the Geolandar X-AT’s elliptical pattern also provides impressive responsiveness.

In terms of cornering stability, the strong sidewall of the Yokohama Geolandar X-AT is well-recognized. The Falken Wildpeak AT3W holds up well in this aspect too. There’s not a huge difference, but for larger vehicles, the Geolandar X-AT might be the better choice due to its sidewall strength.

Overall, both tires offer excellent handling characteristics. My recommendation would be the Falken Wildpeak AT3W for its quicker response time and the Yokohama Geolandar X-AT for more secure cornering, especially in larger vehicles.

Winter Performance

Falken Wildpeak AT3W is reliable option for winter driving

In my assessment of winter performance, self-cleaning capability is crucial, and the Yokohama Geolandar X-AT excels in this regard, particularly in slush and deep snow conditions. However, in lighter snow conditions on paved roads, its lack of ground contact and lower sipe density puts it at a disadvantage compared to other options.

The Falken Wildpeak AT3W, with its 3PMSF-rated compound and more compact contact patch, provides more reliable handling and braking in light snow conditions. This tire offers superior wet and ice traction on paved roads.

Overall, while the Yokohama Geolandar X-AT delivers a very acceptable winter performance, especially in harsher conditions, I find the Falken Wildpeak AT3W to be a safer and more reliable option for winter driving, particularly on icy roads.

Road Noise & Riding Comfort

n terms of ride quality, even though both tires can handle bumps easily, my preference leans towards the Falken Wildpeak AT3W for a couple of reasons.

Firstly, the Yokohama Geolandar X-AT’s highly aggressive shoulder design and angular offset center blocks aren’t as effective at reducing airborne noise inside the tread, resulting in a slightly noisier ride. Additionally, its elliptical design can be problematic if you don’t maintain the right tire pressure. For me, that’s too much hassle.

Secondly, the step-down feature of the Falken Wildpeak AT3W impresses me. The tire blocks don’t squirm as much, which significantly enhances riding comfort, particularly when the vehicle is loaded.

Overall, if road noise and riding comfort are your top priorities, I definitely recommend the Falken Wildpeak AT3W. However, the Yokohama Geolandar X-AT still stands out as a decent option, particularly for its aesthetic appeal.

Fuel Efficiency

In this scenario, while both the Yokohama Geolandar X-AT and the Falken Wildpeak AT3W have similar tread depths, there are differences affecting fuel consumption. The Geolandar X-AT, with its more aggressive shoulder blocks and softer compound, tends to have higher rolling resistance, which in my experience, can lead to increased fuel usage.

However, it’s worth noting that the Falken Wildpeak AT3W is not necessarily a standout in this aspect either. In fact, it might even be less efficient among LT off-road all-terrain tires.

Overall, while the difference is subtle, I find the Falken Wildpeak AT3W to be slightly better regarding fuel efficiency, but it’s a minor advantage.

Mileage

In my experience, mileage greatly varies depending on the tire size. However, I’ve consistently observed that off-road all-terrain tires tend to last longer than rugged terrain tires, primarily for two reasons.

Firstly, these tires usually feature a more elastic and soft compound, which might seem prone to quicker wear. However, this doesn’t necessarily lead to increased susceptibility to chucking or cracking; in fact, quite the opposite. Their high silica compound also significantly boosts resistance to chipping.

When it comes to p-metric sizes, I can confidently state that the Falken Wildpeak AT3W stands out as a superior option.

For LT sizes, while the 3PMSF compound may reduce mileage by about 10-15% due to higher rolling resistance, I still believe the Falken Wildpeak AT3W offers better wear and, consequently, a longer tread life.

The design of the Yokohama Geolandar X-AT is excellent for traction, but it poses challenges in terms of wear. So, if longevity is a major concern for you, I strongly recommend the Falken Wildpeak AT3W.

Off-Road Performance

Right before mounting

In my analysis, both the Falken Wildpeak AT3W and the Yokohama Geolandar X-AT handle mild off-road conditions like dirt and gravel quite effectively, largely thanks to their self-cleaning capabilities. However, I believe it’s important to consider different off-road conditions individually for a more comprehensive understanding of each tire’s performance in specific environments.

On Mud

On mud, as a rugged terrain tire, the Yokohama Geolander X-AT has an advantage due to its angled, differently shaped, and aggressive shoulder blocks and sidewall biters. 

While more void area works perfectly regarding evacuation, Yokohama Geolandar X-AT’s strong and 3-ply sidewalls works better on air-down conditions.

Overal, for a challenging and thick mud, I definitely recommend Yokohama Geolandar X-AT.

On Gravel

In my experience with gravel roads, both the Falken Wildpeak AT3W and the Yokohama Geolandar X-AT handle them quite well.

Personally, when driving on gravel, I tend to favor higher tire pressure over lower to avoid bulging. So, if you’re like me and prefer not to frequently adjust PSI, then the Yokohama Geolandar X-AT would be your go-to tire.

That said, the Falken Wildpeak AT3W also delivers excellent traction on gravel roads. Plus, a notable point for both tires is their tendency not to retain stones.

Overall, I find both tires to be strong contenders for gravel conditions.

On Sand

In my opinion, if you’re not venturing into challenging dunes, the Falken Wildpeak AT3W should more than suffice for your needs. It’s a robust tire for standard off-road conditions.

However, for those who aim to tackle more challenging terrains, I’d recommend the Yokohama Geolandar X-AT as the safer choice. It allows for a greater reduction in PSI, offering a wider contact patch, which is crucial in tough off-road environments.

Conclusion

In my assessment, both the Falken Wildpeak AT3W and the Yokohama Geolandar X-AT are reliable and well-crafted for their intended purposes. The Yokohama Geolandar X-AT excels in challenging terrains, while the Falken Wildpeak AT3W is superior in terms of on-road performance.

I hope you found this article informative. If there are any further questions or if you need additional support, please feel free to leave a comment below. Safe travels, folks!

Falken Wildpeak AT3W vs Falken Wildpeak AT3WA

Updated: by Leave a Comment

Falken Wildpeak AT3W is designed as a 50-50 all-terrain tire, balanced for both off-road and on-road use. In contrast, the Falken Wildpeak AT3W A leans more toward on-road orientation. While both tires perform exceptionally in their respective areas, they diverge in certain aspects, catering to different driving needs and conditions.

Falken Wildpeak AT3W A has a highway oriented tread pattern

Falken Wildpeak AT3W A is an excellent tire for on-road driving in all respects. However, in my observation, its lifespan is shorter since it’s an OEM tire. This shorter lifespan is often due to OEM tires being designed to align with vehicle manufacturers’ homologation tests, which can mean a sacrifice in tread life. So, if longevity and superior loose ground performance aren’t your primary concerns, the Falken Wildpeak AT3W A is a good choice. Otherwise, I would definitely recommend the Falken Wildpeak AT3W.

Falken Wildpeak AT3W Overview

Falken Wildpeak AT3W stands out as an excellent all-around replacement tire, adeptly handling both on-road and off-road conditions. The only notable drawback is its lateral traction capability in wet and snowy conditions, particularly during hard cornering.

Falken Wildpeak AT3W A Overview

In my experience, the Falken Wildpeak AT3W A is an on-road oriented all-terrain tire, often used as original equipment by manufacturers. This has led to a diverse range of feedback from users, largely influenced by the specific tire size.

From what I’ve observed, it’s an excellent choice for on-road conditions, but when it comes to off-road capabilities, it doesn’t quite live up to the Falken Wildpeak AT3W.

It’s worth noting, especially for my European readers, that the Falken Wildpeak AT3W isn’t available in Europe, but the AT3W A is. It’s crucial to remember that these are distinct models with different performance attributes.

On Road Performance

In my assessment, while the Falken Wildpeak AT3W delivers impressive on-road performance for a tire with an aggressive tread, the Falken Wildpeak AT3W A is superior for a few reasons.

Firstly, the Falken Wildpeak AT3W A features a more compact tread pattern, allowing for greater rubber contact with the road. This, combined with a softer rubber composition, results in better performance in wet conditions and mild snow, particularly in terms of lateral traction.

Additionally, the less aggressive and interconnected shoulder blocks, along with a continuous center rib, enhance the responsiveness of the Falken Wildpeak AT3W A. However, it’s important to note that despite its narrower pattern, which is advantageous for towing and hauling stability, it does have a weaker sidewall that may flex more during cornering.

The Falken Wildpeak AT3W A also tends to produce less road noise, thanks to the tie-bars I mentioned earlier and its reduced void area.

Overall, if aesthetics are not your primary concern, the Falken Wildpeak AT3W A is a better choice for daily driving. However, the Falken Wildpeak AT3W still offers respectable performance, considering its more aggressive design.

Tread Wear

In this comparison, the stiffer compound and deeper tread of the Falken Wildpeak AT3W give it an advantage. Despite its higher rolling resistance, I’ve found it to be the better option in terms of wear.

Conversely, the Falken Wildpeak AT3W A tends to wear more evenly. Therefore, if you’re not a frequent driver and prefer not to rotate your tires often, the Falken Wildpeak AT3W A could be a suitable choice for you.

Fuel Efficiency

Falken Wildpeak AT3W A is both lighter and less aggressive than its counterpart. This results in lower rolling resistance, which, in my experience, leads to better fuel efficiency. If fuel efficiency is a top priority for you, I’d recommend the Falken Wildpeak AT3W A based on these attributes.

Off-Road Performance

Falken Wildpeak AT3W has a compact pattern that offers smooth ride

In terms of loose ground performance, the Falken Wildpeak AT3W unquestionably outshines the AT3W A. While the AT3W handles mild winter conditions well, it struggles with slush and deep snow due to its limited void area, affecting self-cleaning. Therefore, in such conditions, the Falken Wildpeak AT3W is the clear winner.

Regarding dirt, I haven’t noticed a significant difference between the two tires. However, in muddy conditions, the AT3W definitely has the upper hand.

Lastly, both tires perform adequately on gravel, but given its more cut-and-chipping resistant compound, the Falken Wildpeak AT3W is the more durable choice for longevity.

Conclusion

Although the Falken Wildpeak AT3W A is a solid choice for daily driving, it’s important to note that there are other options in the market that may be more suitable, especially in terms of longevity. As an OEM tire, the AT3W A typically doesn’t last as long as replacement tires.

I hope you found this article informative and useful. If you have any further questions or need additional assistance, please feel free to reach out.