TireTerrain

All Terrain Tires

Do New All-Terrain Tires Perform Better? A Side-by-Side Comparison

Updated: by Leave a Comment

The all-terrain tire market has seen quite the action in 2024. Leading brands like BF Goodrich and Falken have both rolled out exciting new hero products, raising the stakes in an already competitive space. In this article, I’ll dive into the standout features of these new releases and explore how they stack up against their predecessors. Let’s get started!

Table of Contents

All-Terrain Tire Segmentation

To better grasp the all-terrain tire market, let’s take a brief look at the key segments:

  • On-Road All-Terrain Tires
    Designed for 80% on-road and 20% off-road use. These tires can handle light off-road conditions like gravel and dirt, making them ideal for everyday driving with occasional off-road detours.

  • Off-Road All-Terrain Tires
    Balanced for 50% on-road and 50% off-road usage. These can tackle most terrains, except for deep mud, offering a versatile option for drivers who spend equal time on both paved roads and rugged trails.

  • Rugged All-Terrain Tires
    Offering a 40% on-road and 60% off-road split, these are great if you want an aggressive, off-road look without sacrificing too much

  • Commercial All-Terrain Tires
    Built for heavy-duty use with a 30% on-road and 70% off-road ratio. Known for their superior durability, they’re mostly available in LT (Light Truck) sizes and can withstand tougher conditions, perfect for commercial or industrial applications.

BF Goodrich All-Terrain T/A KO3

BF Goodrich began rolling out popular sizes of the highly anticipated All-Terrain T/A KO3 earlier this year, completing the release process in August 2024. As the most popular brand in the U.S., it naturally caught our attention. We decided to put the KO3 to the test and conducted some in-depth research to see how it performs.

Looking at the BF Goodrich All-Terrain KO3 on the left and the KO2 on the other left, you'll notice a subtle difference—specifically, the KO3 has a slightly higher land-to-groove ratio. This means the KO3 features more rubber in contact with the road, which contributes to its improved on-road performance.

As a former Bridgestone engineer, I consider the BF Goodrich KO3 to be one of the top contenders in the all-terrain tire market. However, it’s important to note that this tire is currently only available in LT sizes, which may result in a slightly stiffer ride if you’re switching from P-metric sizes.

That said, the KO3 is a bit narrower compared to the KO2, which enhances its ride quality and reduces road noise—an impressive feat for an off-road-focused tire. Just keep in mind, if you primarily drive on-road, there are better-suited options for your needs.

BF Goodrich KO3 vs. KO2: Key Differences

Side-by-side comparison shot: Fresh BF Goodrich KO3 on the left, showing off its new tread pattern, and the seasoned KO2 on the right, with visible wear, revealing more voids
At first glance, you might not notice a major difference between the BF Goodrich KO3 and KO2. However, when you dive into the specs, a few key distinctions stand out:
  • Weight: The KO3 is a heavier tire.
  • Tread Pattern: The KO3 features a narrower tread pattern, which impacts its handling.
  • On-Road Performance: The KO3 offers better on-road manners, providing a smoother and quieter ride.
  • Off-Road Traction: The KO2 excels in loose-ground traction, making it the superior choice for rugged terrains.
  • Wet Traction: Thanks to improved hydroplaning resistance, the KO3 outperforms the KO2 on wet roads.
  • Winter Performance: In my experience, the KO2 is the better option for winter conditions, offering superior traction in snow and ice.

For a more detailed comparison, check out the full review here.

Falken Wildpeak AT4W

In early 2024, Falken released Wildpeak AT4W. Unlike BF Goodrich, suprisingly, they build a completely new tire. 

New set of Falken Wildpeak AT4W

The Falken Wildpeak AT4W is a robust tire designed for durability, making it an excellent choice, especially for 3/4-ton vehicles and above. Unlike its predecessor, the AT4W is heavier and features more aggressive lugs along with a stiffer rubber compound. This design not only enhances its off-road capabilities but also contributes to its overall strength.

While the AT4W excels in off-road performance, it’s worth noting that this added toughness comes at a cost: it offers a slightly stiffer ride on paved roads. Additionally, its premium construction might stretch your budget a bit. Nevertheless, if you’re seeking a tire that can handle rugged terrains without compromising durability, the Falken Wildpeak AT3W is a strong contender.

Falken Wildpeak AT4W vs AT3W

The KO3 tread design features an “S” pattern down the center, accompanied by distinct “C” and “Z” shaped lugs. The “C” type lugs are full depth, offering consistent performance over time. In contrast, the “Z” type lugs are angled out more aggressively, making them shallower compared to those on the Falken Wildpeak AT3W.

However, when comparing the Falken Wildpeak AT4W to its predecessor, the AT3W, Falken seems to have made some key sacrifices.

  • Strength: The AT4W is noticeably stronger overall. Its lugs are more robust, and the tire’s durability is superior.
  • Mud Traction: The side lugs on the AT4W are designed for better mud traction, being deeper and more staggered than those on the AT3W.

In short, the Falken Wildpeak AT4W is clearly more off-road oriented. It’s almost like there’s a fight in the market: Falken is targeting BF Goodrich KO2 users, while BF Goodrich is going after Falken Wildpeak AT3W drivers.

Nitto Terra Grappler G3

The Nitto Terra Grappler G3 is the latest evolution in Nitto’s on-road all-terrain lineup. Compared to its predecessor, the Terra Grappler G2, the G3 boasts larger lugs for improved traction and durability. Additionally, Nitto has upped the ante with a higher mileage warranty, making the G3 a more long-lasting option for those seeking both on-road comfort and off-road capability.

Nitto Terra Grappler G3 looks dope!

The Nitto Terra Grappler G3 stands out for offering a quiet and comfortable ride, setting it apart from the other options discussed in this article. While the G3 features a 3-2 lug design (compared to the 3-3 design of its predecessor), this adjustment increases the amount of rubber in contact with the road.

For severe off-road enthusiasts, this may not be ideal, as it slightly reduces off-road aggressiveness. However, for heavy-duty users, this tire could become a new favorite. It’s also worth noting that the G3 carries an A temperature rating for its H-speed-rated models, meaning it generates less heat, which in turn leads to less wear and longer tire life.

Nitto Terra Grappler G2 vs Nitto Terra Grappler G3

A weared Nitto Terra Grappler G2 and brand new Nitto Terra Grappler G3

Both the Nitto Terra Grappler G2 and G3 are excellent choices for on-road driving, but each has its own set of advantages:

  • The Nitto Terra Grappler G3 offers higher mileage, especially for 3/4-ton or larger vehicles.
  • In terms of durability, the G3 is the more robust option.
  • Both the G2 and G3 deliver an equally comfortable and quiet ride.
  • For winter-oriented driving, I recommend the Terra Grappler G3 for its better performance in colder conditions.
  • On wet roads, the G2 has a slight edge, providing better traction.

Cooper Discoverer Road + Trail AT

The Cooper Discoverer Road + Trail AT is a new-generation all-terrain tire, designed to broaden Cooper’s already strong presence in the market. While Cooper has earned a stellar reputation with the Discoverer AT3 4S, they aim to expand their lineup with the Road + Trail AT, offering drivers even more versatile options for both on-road and off-road adventures.

Road + Trail on 2017 SuperCrew

The Cooper Discoverer Road + Trail AT is a dependable all-terrain tire that provides a solid amount of off-road traction. Compared to the Discoverer AT3, this tire has a more aggressive tread design, which translates to superior traction, especially on rugged terrain. While it performs exceptionally well on both wet and dry surfaces, its ice-stopping distance falls slightly behind the competition due to the increased void area in the tread.

Cooper Discoverer AT3 4S vs Road + Trail AT

The Cooper Discoverer AT3 4S is a fantastic option for those who prioritize on-road performance, though it leans more towards the appearance of an all-season tire. However, market demands have shifted towards more aggressive-looking all-terrain options for on-road use, which led to the release of the Cooper Discoverer Road + Trail AT.

Compared to the AT3 4S, the Road + Trail AT offers:

  • Better traction on wet and dry surfaces
  • A more aggressive appearance
  • Less longevity due to its more rugged design
  • Improved off-road capability
  • Slightly worse responsiveness on-road

Yokohama Geolander AT4

The Yokohama Geolandar AT4 is a new on-road all-terrain tire and the successor to the Geolandar AT G015. Its design strikes a balance between the rugged Yokohama Geolandar X-AT and the more road-oriented G015, offering a versatile option for drivers who need a tire that performs well both on the road and off.

Perfectly balanced tire

Much like Cooper, Yokohama is shifting its focus toward a more aggressive tread design, enhancing the tire’s visual appeal. In my opinion, the Geolandar AT4 is one of the best-optimized all-terrain tires for those who want to balance on-road performance with mild off-road capability and a comfortable driving experience.

However, just like with the Cooper Discoverer Road + Trail AT, the more aggressive tread pattern of the AT4 results in slightly reduced tread life, as it prioritizes traction and performance over longevity.

Conclusion

All-terrain tires are evolving. While many manufacturers are shifting their focus towards on-road performance and appearance, brands like BF Goodrich continue to prioritize durability above all.

In my opinion, it’s crucial to identify your specific needs if you want to get the most out of your all-terrain tires. Whether you’re looking for enhanced on-road comfort, rugged off-road capabilities, or a balance of both, knowing your priorities will help you achieve maximum performance.

The document below will guide you through this decision-making process. Please note, however, that it currently does not include the latest all-terrain tire releases.

I hope you found this article helpful! If you need any further information or have more questions, feel free to reach out. Have a safe and smooth ride!

Falken Wildpeak AT4W vs Destination X/T: Which Tire Dominates the Snow Test?

Updated: by Leave a Comment

Stack of Falken Wildpeak AT4W HD all-terrain tires labeled LT285/70R17 Load Range E on display beside alloy wheels in an auto showroom.
Falken Wildpeak AT4W HD — Load Range E tires ready for trucks, towing rigs, and overland builds.

Data-driven technical analysis verified by a former Bridgestone test engineer, synthesizing LT application performance.

The Falken Wildpeak AT4W and Firestone Destination XT are top-tier Off-Road All-Terrain tires. While both carry the 3PMSF rating and target the heavy-duty truck market, they represent radically different engineering priorities. The Firestone Destination XT, known as the lightest tire in its category, prioritizes ride comfort and low-speed winter grip. The AT4W, conversely, mandates longevity and maximum casing strength to handle heavy loads. This guide breaks down the data to see which one is the mandatory upgrade for your LT truck.

NOTE: While some AT4W test figures are P-Metric, this analysis is structurally focused on the LT requirements of both tires to deliver the most relevant comparison.

Quick Look

Firestone Destination XT

Firestone Destination XT tire
Tested Rating: 8.2/10

Falken Wildpeak A/T4W

Falken Wildpeak AT4W tire
Tested Rating: 8.4/10

Choosing between these two LT giants is a strategic decision between Pavement Endurance and Maximal Traction. The Firestone Destination XT is the optimal design for highway life: its compact tread and shallower depth minimize block squirm, providing superior subjective Ride Comfort , and making it the better choice for towing stability and pavement longevity. The FDXT reinforces this focus with class-leading Ice Braking ( ft stop), though it comes with a shorter -mile LT warranty. The Falken Wildpeak AT4W, however, is the non-negotiable structural upgrade. Built with a 3-ply casing and a superior -mile LT warranty, its deeper, aggressive tread ensures mandatory superiority in Wet Traction, Deep Snow pull, and Off-Road Durability ( Rock Score). While the AT4W’s deeper tread compromises some highway stability, its structural toughness and severe-weather performance are necessary for safety and abuse.

Tread Design & Visual Cues: Traction Complexity vs Pavement Efficiency

In a direct line-up, the visual design of these two tires immediately clarifies their functional intent. The Falken Wildpeak AT4W is built to look and act like the heavy-duty champion, focusing on traction complexity. Its center section uses a lower void ratio and blocks that are not in a straight sequence, a deliberate design choice that creates significantly more grip points—this geometry is mandatory for superior wet and winter performance. This aggression is amplified by the deeper tread and robust sidewall, signaling the Falken Wildpeak AT4W’s mandate for severe-duty abuse.

The Firestone Destination XT, conversely, embodies pavement efficiency. Its pattern is visibly cleaner and utilizes a more compact center design which is highly effective at reducing noise and promoting highway stability—a crucial factor in its superior subjective comfort scores. While the Firestone Destination XT’s shallower, more streamlined design enhances pavement longevity and reduces tread squirm during towing, it structurally sacrifices the maximal severe-duty traction the Falken Wildpeak AT4W demands. Ultimately, the Falken Wildpeak AT4W’s raw bulk and complex tread geometry are its commitment to severe weather dominance, whereas the Firestone Destination XT prioritizes road refinement and light-duty endurance.

Dry Performance: Agility vs Rigidity

As a test engineer, I immediately look at the dry performance numbers, and they tell the story of two distinct LT philosophies. The Firestone Destination XT is built for pavement efficiency, stopping from 50 mph in ft with g lateral grip. Its shallower tread and compact design should minimize block squirm, which is key for highway stability. However, drivers noted a frustrating steering vagueness on-center—a consequence of the Firestone Destination XT’s lighter overall construction.

The core technical trade-off for the Falken Wildpeak AT4W is clear: its massive, deeper tread and complex block design sacrifice some pavement stability for outright traction. While its stiffer 3-ply casing attempts to mitigate the tread squirm, the Falken Wildpeak AT4W’s focus on maximum traction complexity means it cannot match the Firestone Destination XT’s pavement stability, making the FDXT the better feeling choice for an unloaded daily driver.

Wet Performance: Confidence vs Caution

When rain hits the asphalt, the Falken Wildpeak AT4W is mandated by engineering to deliver dominant safety. The Falken Wildpeak AT4W’s aggressive lower-void center and non-straight block sequence are specifically designed to create maximum grip points and superior water evacuation. This structural advantage ensures superior confidence under hard wet braking.

The Firestone Destination XT, while acceptable, requires caution. It stopped from 50 mph in a mid-pack ft, with low g lateral cornering grip. Drivers noted they “had to be more careful with brake pedal application.” This performance deficit is the cost of its simpler, compact tread design, which simply cannot evacuate or grip water with the same efficiency as the Falken Wildpeak AT4W’s complex, traction-first geometry. Ultimately, the Falken Wildpeak AT4W is the mandatory choice for wet-weather safety.

Note from the Expert: When it comes to rain, I always emphasize two things: compound grip and water evacuation. You can see the full details in my analysis, but if you take just one thing away, remember that an AT tire’s stiff nature makes achieving top-tier wet performance a constant battle. This is why the question, Are All-Terrain Tires Good in Rain?, requires a nuanced answer that balances tread design against rubber stiffness.

Snow & Ice Performance: The Winter Specialist vs The All-Rounder

Firestone Destination X/T looks good and decent option for increase on MPG

In severe winter conditions, the difference is immediate: the Firestone Destination XT is the Ice Specialist, and the Falken Wildpeak AT4W is the Deep Snow/Durability All-Rounder.

The Firestone Destination XT uses its lighter construction and softer compound to dominate the icy, low-traction reality of plowed roads, stopping shorter on ice at ft (12-0 mph). The Falken Wildpeak AT4W, however, is the structural superior for Deep Snow and Structural Integrity. Its aggressive shoulder and complex low-void blocks dominate snow braking ( ft stop) and acceleration ( s accel), making it the safer choice when heavy snow or durability is the primary concern.

Tread Life & Longevity: The Longevity Dilemma

This is where the trade-off of tread depth becomes a longevity dilemma. The Firestone Destination XT‘s shallower tread and compact design reduce block squirm, contributing to predictable pavement longevity. The Falken Wildpeak AT4W’s deeper tread and aggressive shoulder, while giving it a superior -mile LT warranty (vs FDXT’s miles), can introduce squirm on pavement, potentially accelerating wear on highway miles.

From an engineering view, the AT4W’s longevity is due to its 3-ply DURASPEC sidewall and chip-resistant compound, ensuring longer LT life under abuse. The FDXT‘s longevity is due to reduced pavement squirm—a superior choice for trucks spending of their time on highway asphalt.

Off-Road & Durability: Puncture Resistance vs Light-Trail Confidence

The commitment to structural protection is the final arbiter. The Falken Wildpeak AT4W is mandatory for severe off-road use. The AT4W’s 3-ply DURASPEC Sidewall is the ultimate insurance policy, achieving an overwhelming Rock Score due to its resistance to punctures and casing fatigue.

The Firestone Destination XT, while excellent for light off-roading and trails, is built with a lighter-duty casing and tread compound that simply lacks the armor for jagged rock, deep ruts, or prolonged abuse. The AT4W’s armor is non-negotiable for serious off-road use.

Comfort & Noise: Highway Refinement vs Structural Integrity

In the subjective category of ride quality, the Firestone Destination XT’s comfort bias wins. Its lighter weight and compact, shallower tread design directly minimize noise and vibration transfer, making it the superior tire for highway refinement, scoring the highest Ride Quality () in its test group. The Falken Wildpeak AT4W’s comfort profile is the price of its durability: its stiffer 3-ply structure and aggressive tread make it noticeably firmer and noisier, sacrificing refinement for structural integrity.

Final Verdict: Which Tire is Mandatory for Your Truck?

This comparison reveals a perfect split in engineering priorities. The choice between the Falken Wildpeak AT4W and the Firestone Destination XT is the choice between Pavement Endurance and Severe Traction.

The Firestone Destination XT is engineered for the 90% pavement driver. Its shallow, compact tread minimizes squirm, giving it the superior subjective Ride Comfort () and making it the better choice for towing stability and pavement longevity—despite its lower -mile warranty. Its Ice Braking ( ft stop) is a massive advantage for general winter commuting.

The Falken Wildpeak AT4W is the mandatory upgrade for safety, longevity, and abuse. Its deep tread, 3-ply DURASPEC sidewall, and complex block geometry ensure maximum Wet Traction, superior Deep Snow pull, and overwhelming Off-Road Puncture Resistance (8.8 Rock Score). While its deep tread may compromise highway stability compared to the FDXT, the AT4W is the non-negotiable choice for safety and durability.

 

Goodyear Wrangler UltraTerrain AT vs Falken Wildpeak AT3W

Updated: by Leave a Comment

Real test data, off-road insights, and daily-driving impact — from a former Bridgestone engineer.

The Goodyear Wrangler UltraTerrain A/T, a Discount Tire exclusive, and the Falken Wildpeak AT3W are two dependable Off-Road A/T tires that cater to drivers who want balanced performance on and off the pavement. The UltraTerrain A/T emphasizes aggressive tread styling and dependable loose-surface traction while maintaining road comfort — making it a strong pick for SUVs and half-ton trucks looking for an affordable alternative to premium A/Ts. The Falken AT3W, meanwhile, is one of the most well-rounded choices in the segment, combining tread life, wet braking, and its snow-certified 3PMSF rating to deliver year-round dependability. If you’re curious how Falken’s updated design stacks up, check our Falken Wildpeak AT4W vs AT3W comparison.

That’s the real decision here — UltraTerrain for value-driven toughness vs AT3W for proven balance and winter confidence. In the sections ahead, we’ll compare them across dry, wet, snow, and off-road testing. You can also line them up in our All-Terrain Tire Decision Tool for quick recommendations by SUV, CUV, or truck class.

Wrangler UltraTerrain has a highly aggressive appearance

Drawing from my experience as a former Bridgestone engineer, I see the Falken Wildpeak AT3W as the better tire choice, particularly because of its longevity. Despite Goodyear Wrangler UltraTerrain AT having comparable performance in wet, dry, and winter conditions, the Wildpeak AT3W stands out with a more comfortable riding experience. This aspect, combined with its durability, makes it a preferable option in my professional opinion.

Important Note on the AT3W Legacy:

You may have searched for the discontinued Falken Wildpeak AT3W. While production has ceased, some closeout stock is still available. This comparison is based on some popular-sized sized can still be found on retailers like Tire Rack:

Click here for the Full Technical Breakdown: AT4W vs Discontinued AT3W Test Results

Table of Contents

Tread Appearance

Goodyear Wrangler Ultraterrain AT has a wider shoulder blocks that increase its riding comfort
Falken Wildpeak AT3W has a compact pattern that offers smooth ride

Starting with the shoulder blocks, I personally find the wider shoulder blocks of Goodyear Wrangler UltraTerrain AT more aesthetically pleasing. Functionally, these blocks excel in loose ground traction. However, they do contribute to a slight increase in road noise.

Moving on to the sidewall scoops, or ‘biters’, Falken Wildpeak AT3W features beefier and deeper scoops compared to the thinner ones on the Goodyear Wrangler UltraTerrain AT, which might not perform as effectively in air-down situations.

In terms of the center section, the Goodyear Wrangler UltraTerrain AT has a 3-3 lug design, whereas the Falken Wildpeak AT3W presents a 3-2 design. Despite both having uniquely shaped lugs, the Wrangler UltraTerrain AT appears to have more void area, which often leads to more road noise. However, in terms of riding comfort, I believe it has an edge.

In summary, while both tires have a very aggressive look, for SL sizes, the higher tread depth of the Goodyear Wrangler Ultraterrain AT makes it a preferable option in my opinion. For LT sizes, I don’t see a significant difference between the two.

Noise Level

In my experience with all-terrain tires, it’s typical for both the Goodyear Wrangler UltraTerrain AT and the Falken Wildpeak AT3W to produce some noise, especially at high speeds.

At lower speeds, I’ve noticed that the Falken Wildpeak AT3W tends to have a slight edge in terms of noise reduction. This advantage can be attributed to its narrower and less aggressive shoulder blocks.

While I wouldn’t describe the Goodyear Wrangler UltraTerrain as excessively noisy, it does emit a bit more sound compared to the Falken Wildpeak AT3W. So, if noise level is a significant concern for you, you might find the Falken Wildpeak AT3W to be the quieter option.

Tread Depth and Weight

From my experience in evaluating these tires, I’ve found that both the Goodyear Wrangler Ultraterrain AT and the Falken Wildpeak AT3W are above the market average in terms of weight and tread depth. For the p-metric sizes, the Goodyear Wrangler Ultraterrain AT is notably taller and lighter. On the other hand, the Falken Wildpeak AT3W, while matching the tread depth of the Goodyear in LT sizes, is still the heavier of the two.

Cornering & Steering

In terms of cornering, there isn’t much difference between the Goodyear Wrangler UltraTerrain AT and the Falken Wildpeak AT3W, as both have 2-ply sidewalls. This isn’t a major concern unless you’re driving a truck heavier than 3/4 ton. From what I understand, the 2-ply construction of the Falken Wildpeak AT3W is comparable in thickness to some 3-ply tires, potentially making it a more suitable choice in certain cases.

When it comes to steering, the Falken Wildpeak AT3W’s more consistent center section design contributes to quicker steering response. On the other hand, the Goodyear Wrangler UltraTerrain AT, with its deeper tread and softer compound, tends to have a slower steering response.

Overall, while both tires are dependable, I would rank the Falken Wildpeak AT3W a bit higher in this aspect.

Wet Traction

When it comes to wet traction, hydroplaning resistance is a crucial factor, as it directly influences traction performance. Studies have shown that hydroplaning resistance is correlated with tread depth, with deeper treads generally offering better resistance.

Both the Goodyear Wrangler UltraTerrain AT and the Falken Wildpeak AT3W exhibit reliable hydroplaning resistance. Their aggressive and compact treads efficiently channel water to the shoulder slots, handling hydroplaning effectively. However, it’s important to remember that hydroplaning resistance also depends on driving habits, especially for aggressive drivers. No tire is completely immune to hydroplaning.

In terms of traction, I’ve found both tires to be very dependable. The softer compound of the Goodyear Wrangler UltraTerrain AT typically performs better in wet conditions, but the zigzag siping of the Falken Wildpeak AT3W is also quite effective.

Overall, based on wet performance, I regard both tires as reliable choices and among the best options available in the market.

Winter Performance

Both the Goodyear Wrangler UltraTerrain AT and the Falken Wildpeak AT3W carry the 3PMSF (Three-Peak Mountain Snowflake) marking, which is a strong indicator of their winter performance capabilities.

In light snow conditions, I’ve noticed that both tires excel, thanks to their relatively soft compounds and ample biting edges. They provide excellent performance on light snow.

For deeper snow, my recommendation leans towards the Goodyear Wrangler UltraTerrain AT, particularly in p-metric sizes (SL or XL) due to its higher tread depth. Apart from that, there’s not much difference between the two – both are above average in this respect. They both exhibit good self-cleaning capabilities and sufficient void area for effective traction.

When it comes to ice, no all-terrain tire is perfect, but I’ve found the Falken Wildpeak AT3W to be quite satisfactory for icy conditions. The softer compound of the Wrangler Ultraterrain AT offers good traction on ice, though in terms of handling, it doesn’t quite match up to the Wildpeak AT3W.

Tread Life

Falken Wildpeak AT3W wears better on rocky terrains

When considering tread life, both the Goodyear Wrangler UltraTerrain AT and the Falken Wildpeak AT3W offer commendable longevity. However, it’s important to note that tread life is greatly influenced by your driving conditions and habits.

Take the Goodyear Wrangler UltraTerrain AT, for instance. Its softer compound may lead to quicker wear, but it also has a deep tread depth that extends its service life. That said, I’ve found that this softer compound often doesn’t fare as well on vehicles heavier than 3/4 ton.

Conversely, the Falken Wildpeak AT3W is exceptionally well-designed for durability. Its step-down feature is particularly beneficial for heavier vehicles. Additionally, its UTQG rating is higher for p-metric sizes (ranging from 600 to 500), indicating better wear resistance.

In summary, if you’re prioritizing tread life, I’d lean towards the Falken Wildpeak AT3W as the safer choice.

Warranty

While Falken Wildpeak AT3W offer 60,000 miles tread wear warranty, Wrangler UltraTerrain AT doesn’t have any.

Off-Road Performance

Both the Goodyear Wrangler UltraTerrain AT and the Falken Wildpeak AT3W have deep treads, which contribute to their solid performance on loose ground.

In my experience with gravel, both tires perform admirably. However, the softer compound of the Wrangler UltraTerrain tends to wear more quickly on gravel, though both tires handle it well enough.

When it comes to mud, the Wrangler UltraTerrain AT has a slight edge, thanks to its wider shoulder blocks. It’s almost on par with a rugged terrain tire in muddy conditions. Therefore, for muddy environments, I’d lean towards

the Wrangler UltraTerrain AT as the better option.

In rock crawling scenarios, while neither tire is my top recommendation, if I had to choose one, it would be the Wrangler UltraTerrain AT.

Overall, both tires are competent for mild off-road activities, but for more severe off-roading, the Wrangler UltraTerrain AT has a slight advantage. Nonetheless, I wouldn’t specifically recommend either tire for extreme off-road conditions.

Value for Money

Given that the Falken Wildpeak AT3W and the Goodyear Wrangler UltraTerrain AT are similarly priced, the tread wear warranty of the Wildpeak AT3W makes it a more appealing choice in my view. The assurance of a 60,000-mile warranty adds significant value.

If, however, you have a preference for tires made in the USA and don’t mind spending a bit more, I would suggest considering options like Toyo Open Country AT3 or  BFGoodrich KO2. Both of these brands offer quality performance and are known for their reliable products.

Conclusion

From my perspective, while the p-metric options of both tires are comparable, I strongly recommend the Falken Wildpeak AT3W for LT sizes. Its combination of durability, performance, and warranty coverage makes it a standout choice in this category.

I hope you found this article informative and helpful. Should you have any more questions or need additional insights, please feel free to leave a comment below. Safe travels, folks!

Falken Wildpeak AT4W vs Yokohama Geolandar X-AT: Load Handling, Mud, and Winter Traction Compared

Updated: by Leave a Comment

Updated for 2025: Comparing Falken’s Toughest All-Terrain against Yokohama’s Rugged-Terrain Standard

The Falken Wildpeak AT3W was a long-time favorite for balanced performance, but its replacement, the Falken Wildpeak AT4W, signals a major shift. The AT4W is built with a stiffer, more durable carcass and a chip-resistant compound, pushing it firmly into the heavy-duty segment.

This update turns the comparison from “Durability vs. Versatility” into a true “Durability vs. Rugged-Terrain” showdown:

  • The Yokohama Geolandar X-AT is a true Rugged-Terrain (RT) tire, prioritizing extreme off-road bite, aggressive looks, and established rock-crawling capabilities.

  • The Falken Wildpeak AT4W is the new Off-Road A/T standard, now designed for heavier trucks, superior load handling, excellent wet/winter safety (3PMSF), and maximum chip resistance.

Falken Wildpeak AT3W has a compact pattern that offers smooth ride

As a former Bridgestone engineer, my analysis shows that the Wildpeak AT4W is the superior choice for drivers of heavy rigs (3/4-ton+), those who prioritize highway wet braking confidence, and anyone needing year-round severe snow rated performance. Conversely, the Geolandar X-AT remains the tire of choice for maximum performance in thick mud and severe rock crawling, where its dedicated RT design still offers an edge.

Tire CategoryOff-Road All-Terrain (A/T)Rugged-Terrain (R/T)
Severe Snow Rated (3PMSF)YesNo
Warranty (P-metric/SL)55,000 Miles45,000 Miles
Warranty (LT Sizes)55,000 Miles45,000 Miles
Sidewall ConstructionStiffer Casing/Dual-Layer3-Ply Sidewall
Tread Life/WearBetter (Chip Resistant Compound)Good (Prone to center wear if under-inflated)
Wet BrakingSuperior (Tested Shorter than AT3W)Good
Target DriverHeavy-duty trucks, overlanding, winter exposure, on-road safety focus.Dedicated off-roaders, mud & rock enthusiasts, aggressive aesthetics.

Table of Contents

Off-Road Performance & Durability

I've observed that the Yokohama Geolandar X-AT features an symmetrical tread pattern, a design choice that notably enhances its riding comfort.

The core difference now lies in the structural design and intended off-road priority.

Sidewall and Casing

The Falken Wildpeak AT3W’s main drawback against the X-AT was its relative structural softness. The AT4W directly addresses this with a much stiffer carcass, a dual-layer polyester casing, and a thicker nylon overlay. This structural change is critical for stability under load and resistance to pinch flats from sharp rocks.

However, the Geolandar X-AT is built as a Rugged-Terrain tire, boasting a proven 3-ply polyester sidewall for robust puncture resistance. While the AT4W is now excellent for load handling, the X-AT still offers the highest potential protection for extreme rock-crawling and when airing down to very low PSI.

Verdict: The AT4W has closed the durability gap and is the better choice for heavy towing/hauling on rough roads. The X-AT remains the ultimate choice for maximum low-PSI puncture resistance in severe terrain.

Mud, Sand, and Gravel

The Geolandar X-AT maintains an advantage in thick, challenging mud due to its larger tread voids, more aggressive shoulder design, and the elliptical contact patch which aids in self-cleaning.

The AT4W, however, is a massive improvement over the AT3W in loose terrain. The revised shoulder blocks and new void geometry clear mud better and provide superior side-bite. Furthermore, the AT4W’s new chip-resistant compound makes it significantly better than the X-AT for high-mileage use on coarse gravel and rocky trails, where the X-AT’s softer compound can take more damage.

Verdict: For heavy mud and ultimate bite, choose the X-AT. For the best performance on gravel, rocky, and mixed terrain with less chipping, choose the AT4W.

On-Road Performance and Comfort

The new stiffness of the AT4W has cost it some of the AT3W’s legendary comfort.

Road Noise & Riding Comfort

The Wildpeak AT3W was notably quieter and smoother than the X-AT. The AT4W’s stiffer casing and more open tread pattern have increased road noise and reduced riding comfort. It no longer holds the definitive comfort advantage over the X-AT.

The Geolandar X-AT is inherently noisy due to its aggressive tread, but its softer compound can sometimes absorb small bumps better.

Verdict: If noise and comfort are high priorities, both tires are a compromise. The AT4W is likely still marginally quieter, but the difference is minimal, and the stiffness may be noticeable on smaller vehicles.

Dry Handling and Responsiveness

The AT3W was a leader in dry handling. The AT4W traded some of that dry grip for durability, resulting in a slightly longer dry braking distance and lower cornering g-force than its predecessor.

Even so, the AT4W remains the superior tire for on-road handling and responsiveness compared to the X-AT. The Geolandar X-AT’s aggressive lug design and soft compound lead to more flex and less planted stability during hard cornering and evasive maneuvers.

Verdict: The AT4W offers more confident highway stability and sharper steering response.

Wet & Winter Performance

Right before mounting

This is the category where the AT4W establishes a clear, safety-focused advantage over the X-AT.

Wet Performance

While the AT3W excelled in wet cornering, the AT4W delivers a significantly shorter straight-line wet braking distance. This is a crucial safety factor for emergency stops in heavy rain. The AT4W’s siping technology and improved compound give it a decisive edge.

The Geolandar X-AT performs decently for a Rugged-Terrain tire, but it simply cannot match the wet-weather engineering and compound sophistication of a premium, 3PMSF-rated All-Terrain like the AT4W.

Verdict: AT4W wins definitively. It provides superior confidence in both straight-line wet braking and hydroplaning resistance.

Winter Performance

The Falken Wildpeak AT4W carries the Three-Peak Mountain Snowflake (3PMSF) rating, which confirms its severe snow performance. The Yokohama Geolandar X-AT does not carry the 3PMSF rating, classifying it as a capable, but not severe, winter tire.

While the AT4W is slightly less capable in deep snow than the retired AT3W, it is still engineered for reliable handling and braking on packed snow and ice. The X-AT delivers decent traction in deep snow thanks to its large voids, but its non-rated compound is less reliable on icy or packed winter roads.

Verdict: AT4W wins. For anyone in a “snowbelt” region or who values official severe winter capability, the 3PMSF-rated AT4W is the only logical choice.

Conclusion

The new Falken Wildpeak AT4W is no longer just a balanced all-terrain; it is a direct competitor in the heavy-duty, durability-first segment. Your choice now depends on your primary driving environment:

Choose the Falken Wildpeak AT4W if you…

  1. Drive a heavy-duty truck (2500/3500) or tow/haul frequently. The AT4W’s stiffer casing offers superior load stability.

  2. Need proven, 3PMSF-rated severe winter capability for snow and ice.

  3. Prioritize on-road safety with superior wet braking performance.

  4. Drive frequently on sharp gravel or abrasive terrain where the chip-resistant compound will extend tread life.

Choose the Yokohama Geolandar X-AT if you…

  1. Prioritize maximum traction in the thickest mud. Its Rugged-Terrain design gives it the edge in this specific environment.

  2. Focus on the most aggressive aesthetic and sidewall look.

  3. Regularly air down for rock crawling or demanding off-road excursions, where its dedicated 3-ply sidewall structure offers high-level puncture defense.

  4. Are willing to accept a shorter tread warranty and lack of a 3PMSF rating for the sake of ultimate off-road bite.

Falken Wildpeak AT3W vs Falken Wildpeak AT3WA

Updated: by Leave a Comment

Falken Wildpeak AT3W is designed as a 50-50 all-terrain tire, balanced for both off-road and on-road use. In contrast, the Falken Wildpeak AT3W A leans more toward on-road orientation. While both tires perform exceptionally in their respective areas, they diverge in certain aspects, catering to different driving needs and conditions.

If you want to see how the AT3W stacks up against its newer evolution, check out our Falken Wildpeak AT4W vs AT3W comparison.

Falken Wildpeak AT3W A has a highway oriented tread pattern

Falken Wildpeak AT3W A is an excellent tire for on-road driving in all respects. However, in my observation, its lifespan is shorter since it’s an OEM tire. This shorter lifespan is often due to OEM tires being designed to align with vehicle manufacturers’ homologation tests, which can mean a sacrifice in tread life. So, if longevity and superior loose ground performance aren’t your primary concerns, the Falken Wildpeak AT3W A is a good choice. Otherwise, I would definitely recommend the Falken Wildpeak AT3W.

Important Note on the AT3W Legacy:

You may have searched for the discontinued Falken Wildpeak AT3W. While production has ceased, some closeout stock is still available. This comparison is based on some popular-sized sized can still be found on retailers like Tire Rack:

Click here for the Full Technical Breakdown: AT4W vs Discontinued AT3W Test Results

Falken Wildpeak AT3W Overview

Falken Wildpeak AT3W stands out as an excellent all-around replacement tire, adeptly handling both on-road and off-road conditions. The only notable drawback is its lateral traction capability in wet and snowy conditions, particularly during hard cornering.

Falken Wildpeak AT3W A Overview

In my experience, the Falken Wildpeak AT3W A is an on-road oriented all-terrain tire, often used as original equipment by manufacturers. This has led to a diverse range of feedback from users, largely influenced by the specific tire size.

From what I’ve observed, it’s an excellent choice for on-road conditions, but when it comes to off-road capabilities, it doesn’t quite live up to the Falken Wildpeak AT3W.

It’s worth noting, especially for my European readers, that the Falken Wildpeak AT3W isn’t available in Europe, but the AT3W A is. It’s crucial to remember that these are distinct models with different performance attributes.

On Road Performance

In my assessment, while the Falken Wildpeak AT3W delivers impressive on-road performance for a tire with an aggressive tread, the Falken Wildpeak AT3W A is superior for a few reasons.

Firstly, the Falken Wildpeak AT3W A features a more compact tread pattern, allowing for greater rubber contact with the road. This, combined with a softer rubber composition, results in better performance in wet conditions and mild snow, particularly in terms of lateral traction.

Additionally, the less aggressive and interconnected shoulder blocks, along with a continuous center rib, enhance the responsiveness of the Falken Wildpeak AT3W A. However, it’s important to note that despite its narrower pattern, which is advantageous for towing and hauling stability, it does have a weaker sidewall that may flex more during cornering.

The Falken Wildpeak AT3W A also tends to produce less road noise, thanks to the tie-bars I mentioned earlier and its reduced void area.

Overall, if aesthetics are not your primary concern, the Falken Wildpeak AT3W A is a better choice for daily driving. However, the Falken Wildpeak AT3W still offers respectable performance, considering its more aggressive design.

Tread Wear

In this comparison, the stiffer compound and deeper tread of the Falken Wildpeak AT3W give it an advantage. Despite its higher rolling resistance, I’ve found it to be the better option in terms of wear.

Conversely, the Falken Wildpeak AT3W A tends to wear more evenly. Therefore, if you’re not a frequent driver and prefer not to rotate your tires often, the Falken Wildpeak AT3W A could be a suitable choice for you.

Fuel Efficiency

Falken Wildpeak AT3W A is both lighter and less aggressive than its counterpart. This results in lower rolling resistance, which, in my experience, leads to better fuel efficiency. If fuel efficiency is a top priority for you, I’d recommend the Falken Wildpeak AT3W A based on these attributes.

Off-Road Performance

Falken Wildpeak AT3W has a compact pattern that offers smooth ride

In terms of loose ground performance, the Falken Wildpeak AT3W unquestionably outshines the AT3W A. While the AT3W handles mild winter conditions well, it struggles with slush and deep snow due to its limited void area, affecting self-cleaning. Therefore, in such conditions, the Falken Wildpeak AT3W is the clear winner.

Regarding dirt, I haven’t noticed a significant difference between the two tires. However, in muddy conditions, the AT3W definitely has the upper hand.

Lastly, both tires perform adequately on gravel, but given its more cut-and-chipping resistant compound, the Falken Wildpeak AT3W is the more durable choice for longevity.

Conclusion

Although the Falken Wildpeak AT3W A is a solid choice for daily driving, it’s important to note that there are other options in the market that may be more suitable, especially in terms of longevity. As an OEM tire, the AT3W A typically doesn’t last as long as replacement tires.

I hope you found this article informative and useful. If you have any further questions or need additional assistance, please feel free to reach out.