General Grabber ATX and BF Goodrich KO2 are versatile off-road all terrain tires suitable for various vehicles like pickup trucks, SUVs, and Jeeps. The ongoing debate about which one is superior is a testament to their popularity because of their similar tread patterns. In this article, I’ll compare these to tires and explain what to expect from them.
BF Goodrich KO2 | General Grabber AT/X | |
---|---|---|
Better for | Dry regions, Muddy surfaces, Daily driving | Squishy and snowy regions, Heavy-duty applications, rocky surfaces |
Pros | Riding comfort | Wet performance |
Cons | Just slightly noisy | It’s a bit stiff tire overall |
Leveraging my experience as a former Bridgestone engineer, it’s evident that the General Grabber ATX takes the spotlight with its aggressive appearance and slightly more durable sidewalls. This makes it the superior choice for tackling rocky conditions and excelling in hauling and towing applications. Moreover, its wet performance is more predictable than the BF Goodrich KO2, thanks to better hydroplaning resistance. On the other hand, the BF Goodrich KO2 stands out for its daily driving capability and superior comfort. However, it’s important to note that both of these rugged tires can generate some noise due to their aggressive tread designs. The silver lining here is that these very designs also make them some of the best all-terrain tires for conquering winter conditions.
All-Terrain Tires Cheat Sheet
Finding the ideal all-terrain tire among the plethora of options available can be overwhelming. But don’t worry, my team and I have taken on this challenge head-on. Besides our hands-on experiences with these tires, we also analyze thousands of customer reviews and test reports.
We also analyzed ‘What customer complains more about all-terrain tires?’. Even though some of these complains are coming from the nature of all-terrain tires, there is still way to prevent yourself from these issues. Below, you can see articles about, hydroplaning, tire noise
- How to reduce tire noise?
https://www.discounttire.com/learn/tire-noise - Tire Vibration
https://www.discounttire.com/learn/tire-vibration - Tire Air Pressure – How to Decide?
https://www.discounttire.com/learn/tire-air-pressure-info
Please note that: Light-Duty is 1500 series, Medium-Duty is 2500 series and Heavy-Duty is 3500 series. If you do towing or hauling, I recommend considering at least Medium-Duty tires.
Mobile users can scroll the table to the left to see the whole data.
Name | Category | Articles | 3PMSF | Road Noise | Mileage | Fuel Economy | Riding Comfort | Responsiveness | Wet Performance | Mild Winter | Severe Winter | Mild Off-Road | Severe Off-Road | Best Fit by Pickup Truck Classification | Warranty (SL or XL) | Warranty (LT) | Product Page |
---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
Off Road All Terrain Tire | Review | Yes | Decent | Decent | Poor | Decent | Decent | Decent | Elegant | Elegant | Decent | Average | Light-Duty | 55,000 Miles | 55,000 Miles | Wildpeak AT3W | |
Toyo Open Country AT3 | Off Road All Terrain Tire | Review | Yes | Average | Elegant | Decent | Decent | Decent | Decent | Elegant | Decent | Elegant | Decent | Medium-Duty | 65,000 Miles | 50,000 Miles | Toyo Open Country AT3 |
General Grabber ATX | Off Road All Terrain Tire | Review | Yes | Average | Decent | Decent | Decent | Decent | Decent | Decent | Decent | Elegant | Elegant | Heavy-Duty | 60,000 Miles | 50,000 Miles | General Grabber ATX |
BF Goodrich KO2 | Off Road All Terrain Tire | Review | Yes | Decent | Decent | Decent | Decent | Elegant | Decent | Decent | Decent | Elegant | Elegant | Heavy-Duty | N/A | 50,000 Miles | BF Goodrich All-Terrain T/A KO2 |
Sumitomo Encounter AT | Off Road All Terrain Tire | Review | Yes | Decent | Decent | Average | Decent | Decent | Decent | Elegant | Average | Decent | Average | Light-Duty | 60,000 Miles | 60,000 Miles | Sumitomo Encounter AT |
Firestone Destination XT | Off Road All Terrain Tire | Review | Yes | Average | Decent | Elegant | Decent | Elegant | Decent | Decent | Average | Decent | Decent | Heavy-Duty | N/A | 50,000 Miles | Firestone Destination X/T |
Cooper Discoverer AT3 XLT | On Road All Terrain Tire | Review | No | Decent | Decent | Decent | Decent | Elegant | Decent | Decent | Average | Elegant | Average | Heavy-Duty | N/A | 60,000 Miles | Cooper Discoverer AT3 XLT |
Falken Wildpeak AT Trail | On Road All Terrain Tire | Review | Yes | Decent | Decent | Decent | Decent | Decent | Elegant | Decent | Decent | Elegant | Average | Light-Duty | 65,000 Miles | N/A | Falken Wildpeak AT Trail |
Cooper Discoverer AT3 4S | On Road All Terrain Tire | Review | Yes | Elegant | Decent | Elegant | Elegant | Elegant | Elegant | Elegant | Decent | Decent | Fairy Well | Light-Duty | 65,000 Miles | N/A | Cooper Discoverer AT3 4S |
Firestone Destination AT2 | On Road All Terrain Tire | Review | Yes | Decent | Elegant | Elegant | Elegant | Elegant | Decent | Elegant | Average | Decent | Average | Light-Duty | 55,000 Miles | N/A | Firestone Destination AT2 |
On Road All Terrain Tire | Review | Yes | Elegant | Elegant | Decent | Elegant | Elegant | Decent | Decent | Average | Decent | Average | Light-Duty | 60,000 | N/A | BF Goodrich Trail Terrain T/A | |
Toyo Open Country R/T Trail | Rugged Terrain Tire | Review | Yes | Decent | Decent | Decent | Decent | Decent | Decent | Decent | Decent | Elegant | Decent | Heavy-Duty | 45,000 Miles | 45,000 Miles | Toyo Open Country R/T Trail |
Falken Wildpeak R/T | Rugged Terrain Tire | Review | No | Decent | Decent | Average | Average | Decent | Decent | Decent | Decent | Elegant | Decent | Heavy-Duty | 50,000 Miles | 50,000 Miles | Falken Wildpeak R/T |
Pathfinder AT Tire | On Road All Terrain Tire | Review | Yes | Average | Average | Decent | Decent | Decent | Decent | Decent | Average | Decent | Average | Light-Duty | 55,000 | 50,000 | Discount Tire Exclusive Product |
Nitto Ridge Grappler | Rugged Terrain Tire | Review | No | Decent | Decent | Decent | Elegant | Decent | Decent | Decent | Decent | Elegant | Decent | Heavy-Duty | N/A | N/A | Nitto Ridge Grappler |
General Grabber APT | On Road All Terrain Tire | Review | Yes | Decent | Decent | Average | Decent | Decent | Decent | Decent | Average | Decent | Fairy Well | Medium-Duty | 60,000 Miles | 60,000 Miles | General Grabber APT |
Vredestein Pinza AT | On Road All Terrain Tire | Review | Yes | Elegant | Decent | Decent | Elegant | Decent | Decent | Decent | Decent | Decent | Average | Medium-Duty | 70,000 Miles | 50,000 Miles | Vredestein Pinza AT |
Nitto Recon Grappler | Off Road All Terrain Tire | Review | No | Decent | Decent | Decent | Decent | Decent | Decent | Decent | Average | Elegant | Decent | Medium-Duty | 65,000 Miles | 55,000 Miles | Nitto Recon Grappler |
Michelin Defender LTX M/S | Highway Tire | Review | No | Elegant | Elegant | Elegant | Decent | Elegant | Decent | Decent | Fairy Well | Decent | Fairy Well | Heavy-Duty | 55,000 – 70,000 Miles | 55,000 – 70,000 Miles | Michelin Defender LTX M/S |
Kenda Klever R/T | Rugged Terrain Tire | Review | No | Average | Decent | Average | Decent | Decent | Decent | Decent | Fairy Well | Decent | Decent | Heavy-Duty | N/A | N/A | Kenda Klever R/T |
Goodyear Wrangler Territory AT | On Road All Terrain Tire | Review | No | Decent | Decent | Decent | Decent | Decent | Decent | Decent | Average | Elegant | Decent | Medium-Duty | N/A | N/A | Goodyear Wrangler Territory AT |
Goodyear Wrangler UltraTerrain AT | Off Road All Terrain Tire | Review | Yes | Decent | Decent | Decent | Decent | Decent | Decent | Decent | Average | Decent | Fairy Well | Medium-Duty | N/A | N/A | Discount Tire Exclusive Product |
Continental Terrain Contact H/T | Highway Tire | Review | No | Elegant | Elegant | Elegant | Elegant | Elegant | Decent | Average | Poor | Decent | Poor | Heavy-Duty | 70,000 Miles | 60,000 Miles | Continental TerrainContact H/T |
Patriot R/T | Rugged Terrain Tire | Review | Yes | Average | Average | Average | Decent | Decent | Decent | Decent | Decent | Decent | Decent | Medium-Duty | N/A | N/A | Patriot R/T+ |
Kenda Klever AT2 | Off Road All Terrain Tire | Review | Yes | Decent | Average | Average | Decent | Decent | Decent | Decent | Average | Decent | Average | Medium-Duty | 60,000 Miles | 50,000 Miles | Kenda Klever AT2 |
Yokohama Geolander AT G015 | On Road All Terrain Tire | Review | Yes | Elegant | Decent | Average | Elegant | Elegant | Decent | Decent | Average | Average | Poor | Light-Duty | 60,000 Miles | 50,000 Miles | Yokohama Geolandar AT G015 |
Mickey Thompson Baja Boss AT | Rugged Terrain Tire | Review | Yes (315 or narrower width) | Decent | Decent | Average | Decent | Elegant | Decent | Decent | Decent | Elegant | Decent | Medium-Duty | 50,000 Miles | 60,000 Miles | Mickey Thompson Baja Boss AT |
For those who prefer a more textual representation and dislike sifting through tables of data:
- https://tireterrain.com/best-all-terrain-tires/
- https://tireterrain.com/best-all-terrain-tires-for-snow/
- https://tireterrain.com/best-1-2-ton-truck-tires/
- https://tireterrain.com/best-3-4-ton-truck-tires/
- https://tireterrain.com/best-rt-tires/
- https://tireterrain.com/best-tires-for-snow-plowing/
A couple of popular size analyses:
- https://tireterrain.com/best-35×12-50r20-all-terrain-tires/
- https://tireterrain.com/best-285-70r17-all-terrain-tires/
- https://tireterrain.com/best-275-55r20-all-terrain-tires/
- https://tireterrain.com/best-275-65r18-all-terrain-tires/
Want to learn more about all-terrain tires:
- https://tireterrain.com/highway-tires-vs-all-terrain-vs-mud-terrain/
- https://tireterrain.com/all-season-vs-all-terrain-tires/
- https://tireterrain.com/tire-load-index-and-load-range/
- https://tireterrain.com/lt-tires-vs-passenger-tires/
- https://tireterrain.com/are-all-terrain-tires-good-for-daily-driving/
- https://tireterrain.com/are-all-terrain-tires-good-in-snow/
- https://tireterrain.com/are-all-terrain-tires-loud/
- https://tireterrain.com/how-long-do-all-terrain-tires-last/
- https://tireterrain.com/are-all-terrain-tires-good-in-rain/
- https://tireterrain.com/off-road-tire-pressure-load-range-for-every-rig/
I highly recommend checking the below pages out before making any purchase:
- DiscountTire Deals:
https://www.discounttire.com/promotions - TireRack Deals:
https://www.tirerack.com/specialoffers - SimpleTire Deals:
https://simpletire.com/tire-deals
Table of Contents
Off-Road Performance
Assessing the off-road capabilities of all-terrain tires can seem somewhat arbitrary, as many of these tires are proficient on gravel, dirt, and sand, which covers the basics for most non-enthusiast off-road driving.
When considering off-road performance, two key factors come into play: cut and chipping durability, and mud traction.
In the case of cut and chipping resistance, the General Grabber ATX stands out due to its stiffer, larger, and more shaped lugs compared to the BF Goodrich KO2. These robust lugs offer better durability, making the General Grabber ATX a slightly superior choice for rugged, rocky terrains.
On the other hand, when dealing with mud, lateral traction becomes crucial. This term refers to the tire’s ability to prevent your vehicle from sliding left or right when attempting to move through muddy terrain. Here, the variable pitch design and specific shoulder claw design of the BF Goodrich KO2 shine, offer improved performance.
In summary, the General Grabber ATX excels on rocky surfaces, while the BF Goodrich KO2 is the better choice for loose, muddy ground.
Here’s a little bonus: If you’re on the hunt for the best all-terrain tires tailored to your vehicle or usage, this article is pure gold – check it out at https://tireterrain.com/best-all-terrain-tires/.
Daily Driving
Daily driving with all-terrain tires is an experience worth knowing about. These tires, by nature, come with certain characteristics that drivers should anticipate.
First and foremost, all-terrain tires tend to produce some level of noise due to their design. Secondly, they offer a relatively smooth ride, capable of handling uneven road surfaces with ease. Additionally, these tires are high-profile, allowing them to hold more air, which contributes to a comfortable driving experience.
Comparing the two, both the General Grabber ATX and the BF Goodrich KO2 provide above-average comfort. However, the General Grabber ATX’s 3-3 design, while excellent for traction, tends to generate more vibration. On the other hand, the BF Goodrich KO2’s variable pitch design and shallower tread help dampen vibration more effectively.
In terms of noise, the General Grabber ATX’s stiffness and blocky shoulder blocks make it a noisier option. In contrast, although the variable pitch design of the BF Goodrich KO2 can disrupt airflow within the tread and provide some noise reduction, the high void area ratio makes it impossible to achieve a completely quiet ride.
Overall, the BF Goodrich KO2 offers a slightly smoother and quieter driving experience for daily use.
Wet Performance
When it comes to on-road driving, wet performance takes center stage. You see, off-road compounds often falter when faced with wet terrain. To circumvent this issue, manufacturers make an interesting move – they incorporate additional sipes on the tread surface. The catch here lies in the depth of these sipes, and it can make all the difference (Are all-terrain tires good in rain?).
So, let’s dive into the specifics. The General Grabber ATX boasts full-depth sipes, and this feature is a game-changer when it comes to ensuring wet traction and stability.
Here’s the deal:
- The General Grabber ATX shines when it comes to gripping wet surfaces, providing significantly better traction and biting.
- Moreover, it excels in handling and cornering on wet roads.
Now, it’s not like the BF Goodrich KO2 is a slouch in wet conditions, but the General Grabber ATX is renowned for its wet and winter performance. So, if your journey involves a lot of splashy regions, our recommendation leans toward the General Grabber ATX.
Note: Hydroplaning is vital for a safe ride under the pouring rain. However, it might occur even with the best tire. Maybe you can’t prevent it but if you know what it is and how to deal with it, you can easily stay on the safe side.
Here is an extremely efficient guide about ‘How to Deal with Hydroplaning?‘ –> https://www.discounttire.com/learn/hydroplaning
Winter Performance
When it comes to winter performance, all-terrain tires face a pivotal test. It’s one thing to earn the M+S (Mud and Snow) mark, but the coveted 3-peak mountain snowflake symbol is a whole different level of excellence.
In the ring, we have two strong contenders, the General Grabber ATX and the BF Goodrich KO2, both proudly displaying that prized 3-peak mountain snowflake marking. What sets them apart? It’s their remarkable snow evacuation capability. These tires excel at clearing snow from their grooves, ensuring consistent traction on winter roads (Are all-terrain tires good in snow?).
So, here’s the verdict:
- You can confidently choose either of these tires for winter driving.
A side note here: Understanding the snow performance of all-terrain tires can be quite challenging. For those who find it perplexing, I’d like to direct your attention to a helpful resource: “6 Best All-Terrain Tires for Snow by AT Tire Category“ This article is specifically designed to assist you in making informed decisions regarding all-terrain tires in snowy conditions.
Durability, Wear Life, Fuel Efficiency
Durability plays a pivotal role in evaluating all-terrain tires, and the sidewall structure is a key factor in this aspect. The General Grabber ATX takes the lead here with its beefier sidewalls and stiffer compound, giving it an edge in terms of durability.
This durability factor extends to tread life as well. The General Grabber ATX’s stiffer compound and larger blocks result in a more rigid tire, generating less heat and thereby wearing down at a slower rate.
Efficiency, however, can vary depending on the tire size. In general, the General Grabber ATX tends to be the lighter option. Additionally, the 3-3 pitch design of the General Grabber ATX contributes to its efficiency.
Overall, the General Grabber ATX shines in terms of durability and efficiency, though the differences may not be significant across the board.
Head to Head Comparison for Popular Sizes
BF Goodrich KO2 and General Grabber ATX share many similarities in terms of their overall performance. However, it appears that each tire excels in different size categories.
35×12.5R20
BF Goodrich KO2 | General Grabber ATX |
---|---|
Off Road AT Tire | Off Road AT Tire |
E | E |
67 lbs | 70 lbs |
15/32″ | 16/32″ |
11.1″ | 10.6″ |
United States | United States |
Unlike tires such as the Toyo Open Country AT3, both the BF Goodrich KO2 and General Grabber ATX are exclusively available in the E load range. If you’re in need of an F load range tire, I’d recommend checking out the BF Goodrich KO2 vs Toyo Open Country AT3 comparison article.
Returning to our comparison, although the General Grabber ATX is slightly heavier by 3 pounds, it boasts a narrower design, largely due to its deeper tread. This has several implications. Firstly, it makes the General Grabber ATX easier to balance, thanks to its combination of tread pattern and dimensions. Additionally, the deeper tread and narrower pattern contribute to enhanced hydroplaning resistance, resulting in improved performance in wet and mild winter conditions. This also translates to better responsiveness, especially during maneuvers, and increased towing and hauling capacity. On the flip side, the wider pattern of the BF Goodrich KO2 may perform better in winter conditions and off-road situations like mud or gravel.
Note: If you’re interested in exploring my full list of recommendations for the best 35×12.50R20 all-terrain tires, you can find it here –> [https://tireterrain.com/best-35×12-50r20-all-terrain-tires/]
This addition provides readers with the option to access more detailed information about tire choices for this specific size.
285/70R17
BF Goodrich KO2 | BF Goodrich KO2 | General Grabber ATX |
---|---|---|
Off Road AT Tire | Off Road AT Tire | Off Road AT Tire |
E | C | E |
58 lbs | 51 lbs | 59 lbs |
15/32″ | 15/32″ | 16/32″ |
9.2″ | 9.3″ | 9″ |
United States | United States | United States |
When comparing the General Grabber ATX and BF Goodrich KO2 in the E load range, they exhibit highly similar characteristics. However, it’s worth noting that the BF Goodrich KO2 offers a C load range option, which is better suited for daily drivers. The weight difference between the E and C load ranges is 7 pounds. So, if you’re efficiency-oriented, go with BF Goodrich KO2. On the other hand, if you prioritize general traction and don’t mind a rougher ride, the General Grabber ATX is the tire for you in the E-load range.
Note: Depending on your specific needs, you may want to explore my list of the best tires for the 285/70R17 size, which can be found here –> [https://tireterrain.com/best-285-70r17-all-terrain-tires/]
275/60R20
BF Goodrich KO2 | General Grabber ATX | General Grabber ATX |
---|---|---|
Off Road AT Tire | Off Road AT Tire | Off Road AT Tire |
D | D | XL |
55 lbs | 56 lbs | 50 lbs |
15/32″ | 16/32″ | 14/32″ |
9″ | 9.4″ | 9.6″ |
United States | United States | United States |
In this tire size, optimizing for daily driving is relatively straightforward, and you have the option of choosing between D load range or P-metric sizes.
However, it’s important to note that BF Goodrich KO2 is not available in P-metric sizes, which gives the General Grabber ATX a slight advantage in terms of riding comfort due to its availability in the XL load range.
When it comes to load-carrying capability, there isn’t a dramatic difference between the D load range and XL load range. Therefore, you shouldn’t expect significant changes in comfort regard.
In the D load range, BF Goodrich KO2 stands out as my favorite among all-terrain tires for daily driving-oriented users. However, if you find yourself off-road more often and prioritize traction over riding comfort, the General Grabber ATX is the tire for you.
265/70R17
BF Goodrich KO2 | BF Goodrich KO2 | General Grabber ATX | General Grabber ATX | General Grabber ATX |
---|---|---|---|---|
Off Road AT Tire | Off Road AT Tire | Off Road AT Tire | Off Road AT Tire | Off Road AT Tire |
C | E | SL | C | E |
46 lbs | 53 lbs | 44 lbs | 47 lbs | 55 lbs |
15/32″ | 15/32″ | 14/32″ | 16/32″ | 16/32″ |
8.8″ | 8.7″ | 7.2″ | 8.4″ | 8.3″ |
Canada | United States | United States | United States | United States |
This particular tire size adds a layer of complexity to the decision-making process. General Grabber ATX is available in the SL load range, which comes with a narrower pattern. This design is advantageous for fuel efficiency but may pose traction challenges in various conditions.
For the C load range, especially if you prioritize daily driving, BF Goodrich KO2 is the better choice. However, if you’re unwilling to compromise on towing or hauling stability and still prefer a C-rated tire, the stronger General Grabber ATX is a better fit. This principle also holds true for the E load range.
Size Selection
Before we dive into selecting the right tire size, it’s essential to understand the tire standards that manufacturers follow.
Technical Standards & Regulations
In Europe, the tire standardizing organization is called ETRTO. In the United States, it’s The Tire and Rim Association (TRA), while in Japan, it’s the Japanese Automobile Tire Manufacturers Association (JATMA). Although there may be other organizations, they generally align with one of these three.
When it comes to passenger car tires, TRA designates them by placing the letter “P” in front of the size to indicate conformity to the TRA standard. On the other hand, ETRTO and JATMA do not use any letters, which can sometimes be confusing when determining which standard is being used.
For light truck tires, TRA uses the letters “LT” in front of the tire size, while JATMA places the letters “LT” after the size. ETRTO, however, uses the letter “C” after the size to indicate tires of this type.
In the realm of medium truck tires, ETRTO uses the letter “C” after the size to designate tires designed according to their standard. In contrast, TRA and JATMA do not use any letters in this context.
Now, here’s what’s essential: Tires with the same dimensions (size) may have different maximum load capacities depending on the standard being followed. So, it’s crucial to consider the relevant standard when choosing tires.
When it comes to load capacity designations, “SL” (Standard Load) and “XL” (Extra Load) are used for all passenger car tires, regardless of which standard is being followed. In the ETRTO standard, “Reinforced” is also used as an alternative to “XL.”
Load Range, on the other hand, is specific to TRA. ETRTO and JATMA use the term “Load Index.” While TRA references Load Indexes, it’s important to note that the values provided are approximate.
To sum it up, understanding the tire standards and designations is vital as they play a significant role in determining the right tire size and load capacity. By considering the appropriate standards, you can make an informed decision when selecting tires that meet your vehicle’s requirements.
Here are two great articles if you wanna dive deeper:
Load Range vs Load Index: https://www.discounttire.com/learn/load-range-load-index
Tire Sizing System: https://www.discounttire.com/learn/euro-vs-pmetric-tires
How to Select the Right Tire Size Based on Your Requirements?
When it comes to selecting tire sizes for your vehicle, it’s important to keep in mind that most vehicles offer more than one original equipment size. Let’s take the 2019 Ford F-150 Lariat Crew Cab 4WD as an example. You have three different tire size options: 275/55R20 SL, 275/65R18 Load Range C, or 275/65R18 SL.
Note: I use Toyo Open Country AT3 for an example tire. You can use this link to see tire options for your vehicle and then make a comparison between the sizes:
https://www.discounttire.com/fitment/vehicle
If you don’t know your tire size: https://tireterrain.com/find-tires-by-vin-number/
Let’s focus on comparing the 275/65R18 SL and 275/65R18 Load Range C options for a more detailed comparison. Your decision should be based on your priorities. If you prioritize a smooth ride and better handling, the SL option is the way to go. On the other hand, if you value hauling or towing performance and tire longevity, the Load Range C option would be a better fit.
As a tire engineer, my perspective often revolves around load-carrying capacity. Generally, tires with higher load capabilities tend to provide a stiffer ride. However, there’s a bit of an illusion to consider. When you compare the two tires in the same size, the SL-rated tire may initially appear to have a higher load capability. But here’s the catch: P metric tires, like the SL option, need to be derated by a factor of 1.1 when used on a truck. Crunching the numbers reveals that the SL option actually has a lower maximum load capability. Additionally, it boasts a lower tread depth, which translates to better responsiveness.
The same principles I mentioned earlier also apply when comparing XL and E Load range tires. In summary, if your vehicle allows for Passenger Car or LT (Light Truck) tires, going with a passenger option will provide you with better on-road manners. However, if you find yourself venturing off-road frequently, own a working truck, or regularly engage in towing and hauling heavy loads, then LT tires are generally the better choice for your needs.
Couple of tips for towing;
- Even though the load index of passenger car tires fits, when it comes to towing, sidewall stability is the issue. Hence, LT tires with Load Range C, D, or E provide better stability.
- Generally, a load index higher than 119 is recommended for towing
- Proper loading is important for even wearing. 60/40 rule should be followed. 60% of the weight should be on the front axle and 40%of weight should be applied rear axle of the trailer. Besides that, try to center load. Start with heavier ones if you gonna stack them up.
To wrap it up, selecting the right tires comes down to choosing the ones that align with your driving preferences and specific requirements.
Conclusion
To sum it all up, the General Grabber ATX and the BF Goodrich KO2 are both standout tires that can serve you well. They’ve been thoroughly examined from every angle, and here’s what we’ve found.
Take-Home Points:
So, there you have it! We hope you’ve enjoyed this article and found it helpful. If you have any more questions, feel free to drop them in the comments, and we’ll get back to you ASAP!
Leave a Reply