Which tire is better on-road?

Falken A/T3W. It stops shorter on dry (126.6 ft) and wet (176 ft) pavement and feels sharper in corners.

Which tire is safer in rain?

Falken. Its silica compound and siping give stronger wet grip, while KO2 needs more braking distance (~195 ft).

Which performs better in snow?

Falken again. It stops quicker (72 ft vs KO2’s 76 ft) and accelerates faster on packed snow.

Which is stronger off-road?

KO2. It leads with 9.3 dirt, 9.0 sand, 9.3 mud, 9.5 rock, making it the tougher trail tire.

Which tire is quieter on highways?

Falken. Rated 8.2/10 comfort vs KO2’s 7.0/10, with noticeably less hum at speed.

KO2. Many owners see 50k+ miles under load, while Falken averages 45–50k with rotations.

Which should I choose for heavy-duty trucks?

KO2. Its 3-ply sidewalls and stiffer carcass handle towing and hauling better than Falken.

Is the KO3 good on-road?

Yes, but it feels heavy. Dry grip is stable (140-ft stop, 0.72 g), though steering response is slower than road-biased A/Ts.

How does the KO3 handle rain?

Wet braking is a weak point (~184 ft, 0.46 traction). It stays straight under load but needs extra stopping distance.

Is the KO3 good in snow?

Strong in loose snow (72.3-ft stop, 46.4-ft launch), but less convincing on packed or plowed surfaces.

How does the KO3 perform on ice?

It stops in ~46.2 ft. Predictable slide, but longer distances mean caution is needed in icy climates.

Is the KO3 good off-road?

Yes — with 9.5 dirt, 9.5 sand, 9.2 mud, 9.5 rock, it’s one of the toughest A/Ts, built for rocky, muddy, and desert terrain.

How comfortable is it?

Comfort is firm (~7.5/10). Starts quiet, but hum builds over time, especially if rotations are missed.

How long does the KO3 last?

Typically 45–55k miles with proper rotations. Durable compound resists chipping but grows noisy if neglected.

Which vehicles fit it best?

Best for ½-ton and HD trucks used in rocky, dry, or trail-heavy regions. Overkill for SUVs or rain-heavy commutes.

bf goodrich

BFGoodrich Trail-Terrain T/A Review — Quiet Comfort & Long-Lasting Durability in 2025

Updated: November 11, 2025 by Emrecan Gurkan Leave a Comment

Real test data, off-road insights, and daily-driving impact — from a former Bridgestone engineer.

The BFGoodrich Trail Terrain T/A is a unique entry in BFG’s lineup — a comfort-first On-Road A/T tire designed for CUVs, SUVs, and ½-ton pickups. Unlike the brand’s more aggressive Off-Road A/Ts like the KO2 or KO3, the Trail Terrain caters to daily drivers who want an all-terrain look and light dirt-road confidence without sacrificing quiet highway manners. Its P-metric focus, road-friendly tread design, and winter-ready 3PMSF rating make it especially appealing for crossover and SUV owners who deal with rain, snow, and long commutes more than rocky trails.

From our testing and driver reports, it delivers strong wet and winter traction, stable handling on pavement, and a smoother ride than most A/Ts in its class. The trade-off is limited off-road depth — it’s not built for heavy towing, sharp rock, or extended trail abuse.

In the sections ahead, we’ll break down how the Trail Terrain performs across dry, wet, snow, and light off-road testing. You can also compare it against KO2, KO3, and other options in our All-Terrain Tire Decision Tool for quick recommendations by SUV, CUV, or truck class.

Quick Look

BFGoodrich Trail-Terrain T/A

Tested Rating: 8.4/10

In my assessment, the BFGoodrich Trail Terrain T/A offers a compelling package, combining long-lasting rubber with a well-judged balance of comfort, handling, and road noise. While it may lag slightly in wet grip and mud traction compared to stronger competitors, it performs impressively in light off-road use within its segment. For drivers who want refined on-road manners but still value the durability expected from an all-terrain tire, the Trail Terrain T/A stands as a smart choice — offering a smoother, quieter alternative without straying far from the toughness of the legendary KO2.

Technical Features

Tire construction involves the intricate optimization of tread design, internal structure, and compound composition. To gain a comprehensive understanding of a tire’s performance, several key metrics should be considered. Let’s delve into these metrics for a closer look at the BF Goodrich Trail Terrain T/A:

Tread Depth

The BF Goodrich Trail Terrain T/A boasts a consistent tread depth of 12.5/32 inches across all sizes.

Sidewall

While the BF Goodrich Trail Terrain T/A offers both black and white lettering options, it’s important to note that it lacks the 3-ply sidewalls commonly found in more rugged tires. This characteristic is due to its availability exclusively in p-metric sizes.

Weight

The weight of the BF Goodrich Trail Terrain T/A varies depending on the tire size, ranging from 29 lbs to 45 lbs. Among its on-road all-terrain counterparts, this tire stands out as one of the heaviest, surpassing options like the Falken Wildpeak A/T Trail and Cooper Discoverer AT3 4S.

UTQG Rating

The BF Goodrich Trail Terrain T/A boasts a UTQG rating of 660 A A across all available sizes.

Tread Design

Featuring a symmetrical tread design, the BF Goodrich Trail Terrain T/A prioritizes on-road performance, making it well-suited for everyday driving.

BF Goodrich also realeas the production process of BF Goodrich Trail Terrain T/A : https://www.bfgoodrichtires.com/auto/garage/tires/creating-the-bfgoodrich-trail-terrain

Road Noise

Road noise in tires is primarily generated by the air trapped within the tread pattern and the presence of aggressive, caviated (hollowed or indented) shoulder blocks. Interestingly, on-road all-terrain tires tend to favor a variable pitch design over interlocked lugs to help mitigate this noise issue.

In the case of the BF Goodrich Trail Terrain T/A, its center section features a 3-3 pitch design, which contributes to a quieter on-road experience. However, it’s essential to note that compared to other on-road all-terrain tires, this tire’s center lugs are relatively more aggressive and possess a slightly larger void area, enhancing its traction on loose ground.

Additionally, the shoulder design of the BF Goodrich Trail Terrain T/A may appear quite aggressive at first glance. Still, upon closer inspection, you’ll notice that it lacks open shoulder blocks, a feature that aids in reducing road noise.

In summary, the BF Goodrich Trail Terrain T/A offers road noise performance similar to that of other on-road all-terrain tires. However, if you’re transitioning from all-season tires, you may experience a slight increase in road noise due to the tire’s inherent off-road capabilities.

Note from the Expert: For years, choosing all-terrain meant accepting noise—a true compromise for off-road grip. That’s why the question, Are All-Terrain Tires Louder than Highway Tires?, used to have a simple “yes” answer. Now, with the rise of on-road models, the core issue has shifted from noise to overall refinement. To fully understand which side of the comfort spectrum you’re buying into, you need to determine Are All-Terrain Tires Good for Daily Driving?—a question that depends entirely on the tire’s construction, not just the name.

Ride Comfort

Ride comfort in tires is primarily influenced by factors such as the tire’s internal structure and tread pattern. Responsiveness, on the other hand, is closely related to the design of the tire’s center section, with a continuous rib design being particularly effective in this regard.

Responsiveness

When considering the BF Goodrich Trail Terrain T/A, its variable pitch design is a significant advantage, even though its tread is wider compared to competitors. However, the tire’s compound is quite stiff, preventing it from squirming like some other options. As a result, the BF Goodrich Trail Terrain T/A offers reliable responsiveness, making it a suitable choice for more aggressive drivers who want to enhance their vehicle’s aesthetics. It’s worth noting that this tire is available in high-speed ratings, further catering to the needs of spirited drivers.

Wandering/Vibration

Wandering and vibration issues in tires are closely tied to uniformity. To address these concerns, the BF Goodrich Trail Terrain T/A features a two-ply polyester casing that is reinforced with an additional ply. However, it’s essential to recognize that these tires primarily focus on on-road driving, which means their sidewalls are relatively softer. Consequently, they may experience some wandering when used in loaded applications.

In summary, the BF Goodrich Trail Terrain T/A offers a comfortable ride, particularly for drivers who don’t frequently carry heavy loads. Its responsiveness is commendable, making it a suitable choice for those looking to enhance their vehicle’s performance.

Wet Traction

Wet traction can be a complex aspect to evaluate in on-road all-terrain tires due to the critical factor of hydroplaning resistance.

Hydroplaning resistance is essentially a tire’s ability to evacuate water efficiently. When a tire fails to do so and traps water within its treads, it loses contact with the road surface, resulting in a loss of vehicle control—a sensation we’re all familiar with, often described as a floating feeling.

On-road all-terrain tires, particularly in wider sizes, tend to face challenges in providing a satisfactory level of hydroplaning resistance. These tires often lack sufficient void area to effectively combat hydroplaning.

In the case of the BF Goodrich Trail Terrain T/A, it lacks open shoulder blocks to facilitate water evacuation. However, it compensates for this limitation with a circumferential groove design that features angled grooves on the shoulder sides, aiding in water redirection.

Tire traction on wet surfaces can be maintained if hydroplaning is effectively prevented. BF Goodrich Trail Terrain T/A utilizes a stiff compound with siping. While it may achieve an A rating in wet traction on UTQG rating tests, it’s essential to note that these tests do not encompass hydroplaning resistance.

Overall, the wet performance of the BF Goodrich Trail Terrain T/A remains somewhat uncertain. It’s advisable to consider this tire only if you have a more conservative driving style, and it’s crucial to pay attention to its speed ratings.

Note from the Expert: When it comes to rain, I always emphasize two things: compound grip and water evacuation. You can see the full details in my analysis, but if you take just one thing away, remember that an AT tire’s stiff nature makes achieving top-tier wet performance a constant battle. This is why the question, Are All-Terrain Tires Good in Rain?, requires a nuanced answer that balances tread design against rubber stiffness.

Snow and Ice

In comparison to all-season tires, all-terrain tires typically offer superior snow performance due to their abundance of biting edges.

The 3PMSF marking serves as a guarantee of medium-packed snow performance. However, it’s important to understand that this test primarily evaluates acceleration and is related to the tire’s compound rather than its traction. Essentially, it indicates that the tire’s compound remains consistent at temperatures as low as 45 degrees Fahrenheit.

Unlike wet traction, snow traction doesn’t involve factors like hydroplaning resistance. In this context, wider and siped patterns are highly effective.

From my perspective, the compound of the BF Goodrich Trail Terrain T/A appears to be somewhat too stiff for optimal winter performance. This applies regardless of whether it bears the 3PMSF marking or not. However, its multitude of biting edges can handle light snow conditions.

However, when facing more challenging winter conditions such as ice or deep snow, the lack of shoulder slots in this tire may result in reduced traction on deep snow and slush.

Overall, the BF Goodrich Trail Terrain T/A can manage occasional snow, but it’s essential to recognize that the winter performance of on-road all-terrain tires generally falls behind that of off-road all-terrain tires. These tires are best suited for mild winter conditions.

Note from the Expert: Our discussions often boil down to the core tradeoff. On one hand, you must understand why all-terrain tires are truly effective in deep snow, but not on ice. On the other hand, you face the 3PMSF Paradox—the hidden cost of that badge. The short answer is: The 3PMSF badge certifies traction, but it costs you durability. Dive into our full analysis on the critical 3PMSF rating for severe winter and off-road service, and its hidden costs, before you risk your rig on the trail.

Tread Life

The BF Goodrich Trail Terrain T/A boasts a 660 UTQG rating, which is higher than that of its competitors in the same segment. This metric essentially indicates the tire’s wear rating, but it’s important to note that the test for this rating is conducted under locked brakes.

Tread life discussions can be somewhat challenging, as they depend on various factors such as driving conditions, the type of vehicle, and individual driving habits. However, I can provide some general insights.

Firstly, if you frequently drive on gravel or unpaved roads, the BF Goodrich Trail Terrain T/A is likely to offer a longer tread life compared to its competitors. However, for highway driving, while the tire still has the potential for a long lifespan, failing to regularly rotate the tires can lead to uneven wear, particularly on the shoulder blocks.

In summary, the BF Goodrich Trail Terrain T/A stands out as the top choice in its segment, especially for more demanding conditions, as long as you pay attention to regular tire rotation. I recommend doing this during every oil change or every 5,000 miles.

Getting maximum wear life from a tire is related to you as well as your tire,

If you’d like to learn how to get maximum tread life:

https://tireterrain.com/how-to-make-tires-last-longer/

Fuel Efficiency

Fuel efficiency is influenced by several factors, including the weight of the tire, sipe density (the number of small channels or slits in the tread), and the stiffness of the tire’s compound.

In reality, assessing fuel efficiency should be done in a comparative manner. Here’s the important part: the impact on your MPG (miles per gallon) depends on your current tire type.

If you’re switching from all-season tires to the BF Goodrich Trail Terrain T/A, you can expect a noticeable decrease in your fuel efficiency. If you’re coming from off-road all-terrain tires like the BFG KO2 or the Toyo AT3, the drop in MPG will be significant. However, if you’re transitioning from other on-road all-terrain tires like the Cooper Discoverer AT3, the difference won’t be substantial, but this tire does lag slightly behind due to its robust and heavy compound.

Towing

On-road all-terrain tires are typically not the top choice for towing applications. However, it’s worth delving a bit deeper into this topic.

In comparison to other on-road all-terrain tires, the BF Goodrich Trail Terrain T/A boasts several advantages for towing. It has a lower tread depth and a stiffer compound, making it better suited for towing tasks. Additionally, its sidewalls are more robust and thick.

For those who engage in light towing, the BF Goodrich Trail Terrain T/A emerges as the superior option among on-road all-terrain tires. However, it’s essential to calculate your loads accurately, and if necessary, opt for XL (extra load) sizes to ensure the tire can handle the weight.

Off-Road Performance

The BF Goodrich Trail Terrain T/A, with its shallow tread depth, numerous sipes, and cut-and-chip resistance, stands out when it comes to rocky terrain performance. While it may not be suitable for extreme rock crawling, it excels in gravel performance, surpassing similar tires in its segment.

Additionally, its siped pattern allows it to handle dirt or light mud quite effectively. However, in deeper and more challenging muddy conditions, the tire’s limited evacuation capability becomes evident.

In summary, the BF Goodrich Trail Terrain T/A is an excellent choice for mild off-road conditions, particularly on gravel terrain.

Note from the Expert: Every successful day on the trail is about preparation and physics, because tire longevity is earned, not given. Before you even start, you must master the critical link between tire pressure and load range for every rig to maximize your contact patch. Once moving, remember your ultimate off-road armor is your sidewall protection against the inevitable pinch flat. And finally, your traction on the obstacle is dictated by choosing the right aggressive vs hybrid tread pattern for your terrain. Master those three steps, and your rig will be ready for anything.

Price/Performance

The BF Goodrich Trail Terrain T/A stands as the most expensive tire within its segment. When evaluating its overall performance and characteristics, the higher price tag is justified primarily if you frequently encounter rocky terrain and prioritize long-lasting durability.

Tire Size Selection: The Basics You Can’t Skip

Even the best tread design can’t rescue a tire that’s built too weak. Back when I was testing tires at Bridgestone, I saw all-terrain models that should’ve performed but fell short — simply because the basics (size, load strength, and speed rating) weren’t matched to the vehicle.

P-Metric vs. LT (Light Truck) Tires

The first step is knowing whether you need LT or passenger tires. LT (Light Truck) tires are built with extra reinforcement and stiff sidewalls, designed for towing, hauling, or off-road use. Passenger (P-metric) tires are lighter, smoother, and tuned for daily comfort and fuel efficiency — but they’ll flex more under load.

Understanding Tire Load Range: XL vs. E-Load

Then comes the tire load index and load range — essentially your tire’s strength rating. Here’s where things split between passenger XL and LT E:

XL (Extra Load) is a passenger tire with reinforced sidewalls. It can handle a bit more pressure (~41 PSI) than a standard SL tire and is perfect for SUVs, crossovers, or light trucks that carry extra gear, passengers, or small trailers. XL tires ride softer and quieter than LT options, making them ideal for daily use.
E Load Range is an LT tire class built with a much thicker casing. E-rated tires can handle far more pressure (up to ~80 PSI) and heavier loads, which makes them essential for ¾-ton and 1-ton trucks towing trailers or hauling close to max capacity. The trade-off is weight, stiffer ride, more road noise, and a small drop in fuel efficiency.

Put simply: XL is for “extra luggage and family,” while E is for “truck bed full of bricks or a car trailer.”

Why the Tire Speed Rating Matters for Safety

Finally, don’t overlook the tire speed rating. It’s not just about top speed — it measures how well a tire handles heat and stress at highway pace. Lower ratings (like S) tend to ride softer and last longer, while higher ratings (H, T) feel more stable and responsive under sharp maneuvers. Heat build-up is the silent killer of tires, and speed rating is your safeguard.

Bottom line: Match your tire’s construction (LT vs P-metric), load range (XL vs E), and speed rating to your vehicle’s demands. Get those right, and everything else — off-road grip, winter traction, comfort — will finally perform the way it was designed to.

Conclusion

From my perspective, the BF Goodrich Trail Terrain T/A can be seen as a decent tire, especially if you’re skilled at handling hydroplaning situations. I would recommend this tire primarily for those who prioritize long-lasting durability. While its wet and winter performance may not be exceptional, it can handle occasional conditions.

	BF Goodrich Trail Terrain TA
Best for	Daily driver who don’t see wet often, %70 on, %20 off, %10 winter driving
Pros	Long-lasting rubber, Handling capability, Rock performance, Sidewall durability
Cons	Wet traction, Loose ground performance, MPG increase
Vehicle	CUV, SUV, 1/2 ton trucks
Available Sizes	15”, 16”, 17”, 18”, 20”, 22”
Made In	USA
Warranty	60,000 miles, 60-days trial

Critic User Reviews

”Heavy tire, good on dry pavment, spun easily on wet pavment, snow traction was just fair.”

Sep,2023 – 2013 Chevrolet Silverado 1500 4wd – 18,000 miles

”These are a worthy successor to the discontinued BFG Rugged Terrain. They have all of the good manners of a passenger or LT tire, but have plenty of capability when you do manage to venture off the pavement. I put these on my daily-driver F150 because, well, it’s my daily-driver and I live in the suburbs. However, I have been able to go off-roading on gravel, dirt, sand, mud, and even wet rock, and BFG left nothing on the table. The Trail-Terrains don’t have the beefy extra layers that the AT3’s do, so they have less puncture-resistance and less load-carrying capability, but they have great grip. Because they are lighter than AT or MT’s, they also are much nicer on the road, quieter, and more efficient. If you have a light truck/SUV and want to be prepared for occasional off-road or rugged conditions, then these are absolutely a great choice.”

Sep, 2023 – 2011 Ford F150 XLT 4wd Super Crew – 10,000 miles

I hope the article was helpful. If you need any further support, please leave a comment below. Have a safe ride!

BFGoodrich KO2 vs Falken Wildpeak AT3W: Reviewed by a Former Bridgestone Engineer — Which All-Terrain Tire Actually Handles It All?

Updated: November 11, 2025 by Emrecan Gurkan Leave a Comment

Real-world test data, technical breakdowns, and use-case recommendations — from a former Bridgestone test engineer.

The BFGoodrich KO2 and Falken Wildpeak AT3W represent two of the most popular Off-Road A/T tires in North America. I’ve logged thousands of miles on both — from rocky desert trails to icy morning commutes. The KO2 built its reputation on brute sidewall strength, long tread life, and aired-down control, making it a go-to for Wranglers, Tacomas, and ½-ton pickups. It’s also 3PMSF-rated, though it rides firmer and louder on pavement. If you want to see how it stacks up against its successor, check out my BFGoodrich KO3 vs KO2 breakdown.

The Falken Wildpeak AT3W, by contrast, is tuned with a silica-rich compound, deeper tread, and a 3PMSF rating that makes it a favorite for winter driving. Popular among 4Runners, Silverados, and crossovers in snowy regions, it delivers strong wet braking and year-round stability. And if you’re considering Falken’s newest release, don’t miss my Falken Wildpeak AT4W vs AT3W review.

That’s the real choice buyers face — toughness vs modern comfort. In the sections ahead, we’ll break down dry, wet, snow, and off-road performance, and you can also line them up in our All-Terrain Tire Decision Tool for quick recommendations by SUV, CUV, or truck class.

Quick Verdict – Who Wins What?

BFGoodrich All-Terrain T/A KO2

Tested Rating: 8.3/10

Falken Wildpeak A/T3W

Tested Rating: 8.4/10

The Falken Wildpeak A/T3W is the sharper, more road-friendly option, with a quicker dry response (126.6-ft stop, 0.80 g cornering) and safer wet braking (176 ft vs KO2’s 195 ft). Its snow and ice grip comes in earlier, making it the better pick for SUVs and half-ton trucks in mixed climates. The BFGoodrich KO2, on the other hand, trades nimbleness for stability under load — it’s steadier when towing, tougher off-road (9.3–9.5 across dirt, mud, and rock), and lasts longer under abuse, though it does run louder and requires more margin in the wet.

Raw Test Data

Tire Test Data

Pick categories to show metrics, then open ☰ to pick tires. Optional chart is hidden by default.

Parentheses show the rank among the currently displayed tires (1 = best for that metric).

Note: Lower is better for Stopping & Acceleration; higher is better for g-force, comfort, traction & off-road ratings. Parentheses show the rank among the currently displayed tires (1 = best for that metric).

Sources worth checking

Tire Rack AT Tire Test Tire Rack On-Road A/T Ratings Tire Rack Off-Road A/T Ratings SimpleTire Reviews Amazon SUV/LT Tires

🔬 Construction & Tech Breakdown

🛠️ KO2: Tank-Like Build

CoreGard™ sidewall armor
Dual steel belts with full nylon wrap
3PMSF winter-certified (rare for such a tough tire)
Primarily E-load LT sizing

🧠 Root Cause: KO2’s construction favors strength, puncture resistance, and long-wear durability under off-road abuse.

🏁 Verdict: Go KO2 if you routinely air down, haul weight, or run technical trails.

🛠️ Wildpeak AT3W: Winter-Built All-Terrain

Full-depth siping and silica-enhanced compound
Heat diffuser tech near bead area
3PMSF snow-certified with C–E load ratings
Wide range of sizes including SL

🧠 Root Cause: Falken engineered this tire for balanced real-world use — not just marketing. Silica + siping = winter grip. Heat diffuser = towing confidence.

🏁 Verdict: Choose AT3W for balance, comfort, and winter confidence.

Dry Performance — Falken Feels Lighter, KO2 Holds Weight

On dry pavement, the Falken A/T3W stopped in 126.6 feet with 0.80 g cornering, while the KO2 needed 142 feet with 0.71 g. Behind the wheel, Falken feels like a nimble pickup with a lighter load — quicker to bite, flatter in corners. The KO2, by contrast, feels more like a truck with a trailer hooked up: slower into the turn, but steady once it’s set.

Community voices echo this split. On Tacoma forums, Falken owners praise it as “surprisingly sharp for an A/T,” while KO2 drivers often say it’s “not sporty but never unsettled.” That matches my own short drive impressions. Falken’s softer casing and dense siping keep it planted, while KO2’s tough sidewall and larger blocks lean more toward stability than speed.

SUVs & crossovers: Falken feels lighter, easier to steer
½-tons: Falken better for daily handling, KO2 steadier for mixed use
¾-ton & HD trucks: KO2’s stiff casing shines, Falken feels softer under weight

👉 Verdict: Falken wins on nimbleness; KO2 steadies the chassis when the load gets heavy.

Wet Performance — Falken Bites Quicker, KO2 Demands Margin

In rain, the gap widens. Falken stopped in 176 feet with 0.57 g traction, while KO2 stretched to 195 feet with 0.43 g. On wet asphalt, Falken bites like a fresh set of wipers — quick to clear and grip. KO2, on the other hand, felt more like wipers past their prime — it’ll hold on, but with more streak and less bite.

Reddit threads confirm this. Falken drivers call it “planted in downpours,” while KO2 owners admit “you need more room in storms.” From an engineer’s view, it’s simple: Falken’s silica-rich compound and dense siping keep the tread pliable, while KO2’s harder rubber favors chip resistance but loses adhesion in the wet.

SUVs & crossovers: Falken is the clear wet-weather pick
½-tons: Falken safer in storms, KO2 okay if margin is left
¾-ton & HD trucks: KO2 tracks straighter under load, but still longer

👉 Verdict: Falken is the safer rain tire, especially for light rigs. KO2 stays composed under weight but stretches stopping distances.

Winter & Snow — Falken Digs, KO2 Endures

In snow, the Falken posted a 72-foot stop and 43.5-foot launch, compared to KO2’s 76-foot stop and 46-foot launch. Driving both, Falken feels like a ski with fresh edges — it bites sooner and gives confidence. KO2 is more like an older ski: slower to grip, but still steady once you adapt.

Owners mirror this. Falken drivers on 4Runner forums often call it “the best snow A/T they’ve used,” while KO2 fans note it “gets through, just takes more distance.” That’s design at work. Falken’s siping density and softer mix give it better bite in packed snow, while KO2’s stiffer sidewalls and blockier shoulders make it more predictable but less grippy.

SUVs & crossovers: Falken wins in snow-belt commuting
½-tons: Falken safer in daily snow, KO2 adequate with 4WD
¾-ton & HD trucks: KO2 steadies under load, Falken can feel softer towing

👉 Verdict: Falken is the stronger snow performer for light rigs; KO2 steadies heavy trucks in mixed winter use.

Ice — Falken Grabs First, KO2 Slides Longer

On ice, Falken stopped in 47.5 feet, while KO2 needed 51 feet. That few feet matter when you’re braking at an intersection. Falken felt like boots with micro-spikes — not perfect, but biting earlier. KO2 was more like smooth rubber soles: sliding further, though with a predictable fade rather than a sudden snap.

Drivers see it the same. Falken owners call it “trustworthy on icy mornings,” while KO2 drivers say “manageable if you go slow.” That fits the build — Falken’s compound and siping create micro-grip, while KO2’s harder design slides further but with more control.

SUVs & crossovers: Falken gives earlier bite
½-tons: Falken safer in icy stops, KO2 forgives with gradual slide
¾-ton & HD trucks: KO2 steadier with weight, Falken may feel twitchy towing

👉 Verdict: Falken grabs first on ice; KO2 lets go more gently.

Off-Road — KO2 Bites Harder, Falken Smooths It Out

Here the script flips. KO2 scores 9.3 dirt, 9.0 sand, 9.3 mud, 9.5 rock, while Falken posts 7.3 dirt, 7.4 sand, 7.5 mud, 7.4 rock. On trails, KO2 is the bulldog — digging, climbing, and holding firm. Falken is more like a trail horse — smoother, comfortable, but less aggressive in tough spots.

Trail chatter backs it up. KO2 owners rave it “climbs what others won’t,” while Falken drivers praise its “comfortable fire-road ride” but admit it “doesn’t dig as deep in mud.” That’s because KO2’s deep lugs, stone ejectors, and 3-ply sidewalls prioritize traction and toughness, while Falken’s softer carcass smooths the ride but gives up bite.

SUVs & crossovers: Falken fits light trail use, KO2 overkill
½-tons: KO2 for weekend trail rigs, Falken better for fire roads
¾-ton & HD trucks: KO2’s toughness shines under weight

👉 Verdict: KO2 dominates in real off-road terrain; Falken favors comfort on mild dirt roads.

Comfort & Noise — Falken Quieter, KO2 More Truck-Like

By comfort, Falken rates 8.2/10, KO2 a 7.0/10. In my drives, Falken was quiet — like background jazz in a café. KO2 was more like a garage band warming up — not unbearable, but always present. Over time, KO2 grows louder if rotations slip, while Falken stays calmer deeper into its tread life.

Owners agree. Falken is often called “whisper quiet at 65 mph,” while KO2 drivers describe it as “noticeable hum but normal for an A/T.” That’s because Falken’s tread spacing dampens resonance, while KO2’s stiffer casing transmits more vibration.

SUVs & crossovers: Falken is the refined daily choice
½-tons: Falken quieter, KO2 acceptable if trail grip is priority
¾-ton & HD trucks: KO2 noise blends into background, Falken can feel soft towing

👉 Verdict: Falken wins daily quiet; KO2 feels tougher but louder.

Tread Life & Longevity — Both Strong, KO2 Built for Abuse

Both tires last well, but in different ways. Falken averages 45–50k miles, staying consistent but sometimes feathering on edges. KO2 runs 50k+ with proper rotations, especially on heavier trucks. Think of Falken as a solid commuter clocking in daily, while KO2 is the construction worker — louder, tougher, and harder to wear down.

Reddit threads confirm it. Falken “pulled strong for 50k but got loud at the end,” while KO2 drivers boast “still running at 55k with towing.” That reflects casing design: Falken’s softer carcass wears evenly until noise creeps in, while KO2’s 3-ply toughness resists chips and abuse but needs rotations to stay smooth.

SUVs & crossovers: Falken’s even wear fits best
½-tons: both last similar miles, Falken stays quieter
¾-ton & HD trucks: KO2 holds up better under load and abuse

👉 Verdict: Both are durable, but KO2 is the tire you choose if you punish your rig.

Where They Fit Best

The split is clear. Falken Wildpeak A/T3W is the daily-friendly all-terrain — quieter, sharper in the wet, and stronger in snow. BFGoodrich KO2 is the trail veteran — louder, longer-stopping in rain, but unmatched in off-road bite and heavy-duty stability.

SUVs & crossovers: Falken is the clearer match, refined and safer in wet/snow
½-tons: Falken better for commuting plus weekend dirt, KO2 for rigs that see job sites and trails
¾-ton & HD trucks: KO2 is the go-to for towing, hauling, and rocky terrain

👉 Regional fit:

Falken shines in the Pacific Northwest (rain), Northeast snow belt, and Midwest mixed climates.
KO2 rules the Southwest deserts, Mountain West trails, and rural gravel-heavy regions like Alberta or Montana.

👉 Bottom line: Choose Falken if your truck lives on highways with seasonal snow. Pick KO2 if you need off-road bite and heavy-duty toughness first.

Tire Size Selection: The Basics You Can’t Skip

P-Metric vs. LT (Light Truck) Tires

Understanding Tire Load Range: XL vs. E-Load

Then comes the tire load index and load range — essentially your tire’s strength rating. Here’s where things split between passenger XL and LT E:

XL (Extra Load) is a passenger tire with reinforced sidewalls. It can handle a bit more pressure (~41 PSI) than a standard SL tire and is perfect for SUVs, crossovers, or light trucks that carry extra gear, passengers, or small trailers. XL tires ride softer and quieter than LT options, making them ideal for daily use.
E Load Range is an LT tire class built with a much thicker casing. E-rated tires can handle far more pressure (up to ~80 PSI) and heavier loads, which makes them essential for ¾-ton and 1-ton trucks towing trailers or hauling close to max capacity. The trade-off is weight, stiffer ride, more road noise, and a small drop in fuel efficiency.

Put simply: XL is for “extra luggage and family,” while E is for “truck bed full of bricks or a car trailer.”

Why the Tire Speed Rating Matters for Safety

🏁 Final Verdict: Which One Would I Actually Buy?

The choice comes down to how you use your rig. If you’re commuting daily through rain and snow, Falken Wildpeak A/T3W is the safer and more comfortable tire — it brakes shorter, runs quieter, and inspires confidence in slick conditions. But if your truck spends weekends on trails, job sites, or towing heavy loads, the KO2’s stiffer casing, proven off-road traction, and longer wear make it the smarter long-term partner.

BFGoodrich All-Terrain TA KO2 Related Articles

Frequently Asked Questions: Falken A/T3W vs BFGoodrich KO2

Which tire is better on-road?
Falken A/T3W. It stops shorter on dry (126.6 ft) and wet (176 ft) pavement and feels sharper in corners.
Which tire is safer in rain?
Falken. Its silica compound and siping give stronger wet grip, while KO2 needs more braking distance (~195 ft).
Which performs better in snow?
Falken again. It stops quicker (72 ft vs KO2’s 76 ft) and accelerates faster on packed snow.
Which is stronger off-road?
KO2. It leads with 9.3 dirt, 9.0 sand, 9.3 mud, 9.5 rock, making it the tougher trail tire.
Which tire is quieter on highways?
Falken. Rated 8.2/10 comfort vs KO2’s 7.0/10, with noticeably less hum at speed.
Which lasts longer?
KO2. Many owners see 50k+ miles under load, while Falken averages 45–50k with rotations.
Which should I choose for heavy-duty trucks?
KO2. Its 3-ply sidewalls and stiffer carcass handle towing and hauling better than Falken.

BF Goodrich All-Terrain T/A KO3 Review

Updated: November 11, 2025 by Emrecan Gurkan 6 Comments

Real test data, off-road insights, and daily-driving impact — from a former Bridgestone engineer.

The BFGoodrich All-Terrain T/A KO3 is the long-awaited successor to the legendary KO2 — and expectations couldn’t be higher. Classified as an Off-Road A/T tire, it builds on KO2’s legacy of sidewall toughness and off-road bite while addressing some of its shortcomings like wet braking and highway hum. If you want to see exactly how the two compare, check out our BFGoodrich KO3 vs KO2 breakdown.

With competitors like the Toyo Open Country AT3 and Falken Wildpeak AT3W(now new Wildpeak AT4W) setting new standards, BFG clearly borrowed cues in its updated tread design and compound. From our testing and driver reports, the KO3 retains the rugged durability KO-series owners demand, while adding better wet grip, refined road manners, and a modern compound that locks in its 3PMSF winter rating. It’s a tire built for trucks, Jeeps, and SUVs that need year-round dependability with true off-road capability.

In the sections ahead, we’ll break down how the KO3 performs across dry, wet, snow, and off-road testing. You can also use our All-Terrain Tire Decision Tool to instantly compare it against other A/T options for your exact vehicle.

Quick Look

BFGoodrich All-Terrain T/A KO3

Tested Rating: 8.5/10

The BFGoodrich KO3 is one of the toughest all-terrains on the market, built for durability and trail confidence. On-road, it feels steady but heavy (140-ft dry stop, 0.72 g cornering), and it asks for extra margin in the wet (184 ft, 0.46 g). In snow, it claws confidently through loose drifts (72-ft stop, 46.4-ft launch) but slides longer on packed surfaces, while on ice it stays predictable though not short-stopping (46.2 ft). Off-road is where it truly dominates, scoring 9.5 dirt, 9.5 sand, 9.2 mud, and 9.5 rock, with reinforced 3-ply sidewalls and a blocky tread that make it a goat in rocky and muddy terrain. Comfort is firm but acceptable (7.5/10), with noise building as miles stack up, while tread life runs 45–55k miles if rotations are strict.

👉 Bottom line: the KO3 is built for ¾-ton and HD trucks in rocky, dry, and off-pavement regions — less convincing in rain or snow-belt states, but unmatched in sheer toughness.

Raw Test Data

Tire Test Data

Pick categories to show metrics, then open ☰ to pick tires. Optional chart is hidden by default.

Parentheses show the rank among the currently displayed tires (1 = best for that metric).

Sources worth checking

Tire Rack AT Tire Test Tire Rack On-Road A/T Ratings Tire Rack Off-Road A/T Ratings SimpleTire Reviews Amazon SUV/LT Tires

BFG KO2 vs KO3: What Changed?

In the intricate world of tire manufacturing, continuity often prevails. If a design proves successful, why reinvent the wheel, right? However, once in a while, a trailblazer like BF Goodrich disrupts the status quo.

Consider this: From the initial idea to a tire’s arrival on store shelves, a staggering three-year period typically passes. It’s quite astounding, isn’t it? You might wonder, “What could possibly take so much time?” Well, a significant chunk of this duration is dedicated to rigorous field-testing. These tires must be prepared to face a multitude of challenges.

There’s some industry buzz that BF Goodrich’s innovative wheels began turning as early as March 2020, perhaps inspired by Toyo’s AT3. In the world of tires, competition is fierce, driving innovation and evolution.

When you put the Toyo AT3 and BF Goodrich KO3 side by side, you’ll notice some parallels. The core of the BF Goodrich KO3, its center section, resembles the Toyo AT3, setting it apart from its predecessor, the KO2.

	BF Goodrich KO3	BF Goodrich KO2
Size	LT285/70R17	LT285/70R17
Tread Depth	15/32″	15/32″
Tire Weight	56 lbs	51 lbs
Section Width	11.5″	11.5″
Tread Width	8.8″	9.4”

One notable trend? The emergence of the ‘S-shape’ lug design. It’s the talk of the town, mainly because it enhances a tire’s biting edges. Think of it as giving your tire extra “teeth” for improved grip. The BF Goodrich KO3 doesn’t just adopt this trend; it refines it. By incorporating these S-shaped lugs, the KO3 creates a more consolidated center section, resulting in a welcome reduction in road noise.

However, no story is without its twists. While the KO3 boasts a host of upgrades, it’s not without its drawbacks. When navigating loose terrains, those horizontally-oriented lugs appear to present a slight challenge. But when comparing the KO2 and KO3, the latter’s horizontal orientation offers improved traction on loose terrain, albeit with potentially faster wear. BF Goodrich’s solution? A narrower tread width on the KO3. Aesthetically inclined folks, take note!

Now, let’s talk weight. The BF Goodrich KO3 is 5 lbs heavier compared to the KO2. Since both tires have the same tread depth, the weight differance is mostly caused by the compactness of BF Goodrich KO3.

In summary, the BF Goodrich KO3 emerges as a formidable contender, showcasing superior on-road finesse and wet grip, with a slight compromise on loose terrains. Particularly for those with towing or hauling needs, the KO3 stands as a compelling choice, if you’re okay with shorter life span.

A word of caution: This assessment primarily applies to the BF Goodrich KO3 specifications available for the sizes LT285/70R17 and LT275/65R20.

If you want the full KO2 vs KO3 breakdown, check out my detailed BFGoodrich KO3 vs KO2 comparison

Dry Performance — Stable but Not Sporty

This review draws from the dataset I’ve built — a blend of structured results, community feedback, and my own short driving impressions. On dry pavement, the KO3 posts a 140-foot stop with 0.72 g cornering grip. Those numbers don’t scream agility, but they highlight what this tire does best: stability. In my own drive, it felt more like steering a tugboat than a speedboat — slow to respond, but rock steady once on line.

Drivers echo the same. A TacomaWorld driver said it “feels heavier on the wheel,” while a Jeep Gladiator owner mentioned it “stays planted once it sets.” That’s the 3-ply sidewall and blocky tread layout at work. It minimizes squirm, which builds confidence under weight, but you sacrifice nimbleness.

SUVs & crossovers: feels overbuilt, steering muted
½-tons: delivers predictable highway stability, steady under normal load
¾-ton & HD trucks: the sweet spot, stiffness matches weight and trailers

👉 Verdict: Think tugboat, not speedboat — not quick, but unshakable once moving.

Wet Performance — Needs Extra Room

On a downpour, the KO3 makes you think ahead. It stopped in 184 feet with 0.46 g traction, which is long compared to road-focused A/Ts. When I braked hard on slick asphalt, ABS buzzed early, and while the truck stayed straight, it was like running in rain gear — you’ll stay upright, but not with much snap.

Drivers online say the same. One overlander wrote “it’s fine if you give it space,” while another added “not the tire I’d pick for storm season.” That’s what happens with its harder rubber compound. The grooves move water well, but the tread itself doesn’t have the same instant adhesion as silica-rich A/Ts.

SUVs & crossovers: not ideal for storm-heavy commutes
½-tons: needs extra braking margin in the rain
¾-ton & HD trucks: tracks straight under load, though still stretches distances

👉 Verdict: Safe if you give it margin. In rain-heavy regions, a more wet-tuned A/T will inspire more confidence.

Winter & Snow — Claws Loose, Slips Packed

Fresh snow is where the KO3 feels most comfortable. It posted a 72.3-foot stop and 46.4-foot launch, and in my own drive, it clawed forward like a snowblower plowing through drifts. But once the road turned plowed and polished, braking grew longer and traction felt more like sliding with dull ski edges — steady, but slower to bite.

Owners have the same mixed take. One TacomaWorld user said it “powers through an unplowed driveway,” while another admitted it “slides longer on polished roads.” The design makes it clear why. The deep voids and aggressive shoulders shovel well in fluff, but the limited siping and firm compound reduce effectiveness once the snow hardens.

SUVs & crossovers: fine for occasional snow, but brake earlier on pack
½-tons: capable with 4WD, though plowed surfaces feel longer
¾-ton & HD trucks: weight steadies it, but hardpack still stretches stops

👉 Verdict: Great in loose snow, less convincing on plowed roads. A solid winter trail tire, not a snow-belt commuter.

Ice — Predictable but Long

On glare ice, the KO3 comes in at a 46.2-foot stop. It doesn’t bite sharply, but it doesn’t surprise you either. Driving it felt like sliding across a frozen pond in sneakers — always moving farther than you’d like, but never catching you off guard.

Community feedback matches. Drivers say it “slides gradually, not suddenly.” That’s the stiff compound and lack of dense siping limiting micro-bite. It feels safe in predictability, but physics still demand longer stops.

SUVs & crossovers: tricky unless you drive with patience
½-tons: manageable, stability systems do the heavy lifting
¾-ton & HD trucks: steadier with mass, though still long on ice

👉 Verdict: Predictable in feel, but distance is the weak spot. If icy mornings are common, pair it with a dedicated winter tire.

Off-Road — KO3’s Playground

Off-road is where the KO3 feels at home. With 9.5 dirt, 9.5 sand, 9.2 mud, and 9.5 rock, it’s a standout in its class. On the trail, it reminded me of a mountain goat — steady on rocks, balanced in dirt, and unshaken in deep mud.

Trail reports confirm it. Jeep owners call it “unstoppable on rocky climbs,” while Tacoma drivers say it “pulls through mud where others spin.” The 3-ply sidewalls, staggered shoulders, interlocking blocks, and stone ejectors make it one of the toughest A/T designs available.

SUVs & crossovers: overkill unless trails are a big part of driving
½-tons: weekend-ready, covers dirt, mud, and rock without an M/T swap
¾-ton & HD trucks: one of the best off-road tires, stable even under heavy towing

👉 Verdict: Among the best off-road A/Ts available. If trails, mud, or rock are part of your life, KO3 is built for it.

Comfort & Noise — Firm Ride, Hum That Builds

Early on, the KO3 rides firm but civilized. With a 7.5/10 comfort score, it starts out with just a faint hum. But like a new relationship, the quirks show with time — once miles stack up and rotations slip, the noise becomes harder to ignore.

Owners phrase it the same way: “quiet for how it looks — at first.” The variable pitch tread masks sound early, but the stiff carcass transmits more texture into the cabin, and uneven wear amplifies the hum as tread depth fades.

SUVs & crossovers: feels rougher and louder than most would want
½-tons: livable hum, trade-off for trail grip
¾-ton & HD trucks: feels normal, background blends with truck noise

👉 Verdict: Starts off calm, but like most A/Ts, hum grows with age. A fair trade for toughness.

Tread Life & Longevity — Tough but Demanding

Most KO3 owners report 45–55k miles when rotations are done on time. I saw even wear in my test, and forum feedback backs it up. One Reddit driver summed it up: “lasts forever if you rotate, gets loud if you don’t.”

That’s the KO3 in a nutshell. It’s like a reliable workhorse — built to punch the clock every day, but it expects you to do your part. The hard compound and deep tread resist chipping and stretch life, but skip the rotation schedule and you’ll pay in noise and uneven wear.

SUVs & crossovers: rotate religiously to avoid uneven hum
½-tons: steady, long life for mixed highway and trail use
¾-ton & HD trucks: even wear under load, stable deep into its lifespan

👉 Verdict: Durable and long-wearing, but rotations aren’t optional — they’re non-negotiable.

Where It Fits Best

The KO3 is one of the toughest all-terrains available, designed for drivers who demand durability first and are willing to trade some wet and winter polish for brute strength. It thrives on trucks that see real work and trails.

SUVs & crossovers: too aggressive unless you live off pavement or drive gravel roads daily in places like Montana or Wyoming
½-tons: a great choice for drivers in Texas, Arizona, or Nevada, where rocky desert terrain and dry heat matter more than rain traction
¾-ton & HD trucks: the ideal partner for hauling and towing in Colorado, Utah, Alberta, or British Columbia, where sidewall stability and off-road bite matter most

👉 Bottom line: The KO3 belongs in regions where the pavement ends — deserts of the Southwest, the rocky Mountain West, or rural states with gravel backroads. If you’re in the Pacific Northwest rain or Northeast snow belt, a more wet- or snow-focused A/T may be the smarter play.

Tire Size Selection: The Basics You Can’t Skip

P-Metric vs. LT (Light Truck) Tires

Understanding Tire Load Range: XL vs. E-Load

Then comes the tire load index and load range — essentially your tire’s strength rating. Here’s where things split between passenger XL and LT E:

XL (Extra Load) is a passenger tire with reinforced sidewalls. It can handle a bit more pressure (~41 PSI) than a standard SL tire and is perfect for SUVs, crossovers, or light trucks that carry extra gear, passengers, or small trailers. XL tires ride softer and quieter than LT options, making them ideal for daily use.
E Load Range is an LT tire class built with a much thicker casing. E-rated tires can handle far more pressure (up to ~80 PSI) and heavier loads, which makes them essential for ¾-ton and 1-ton trucks towing trailers or hauling close to max capacity. The trade-off is weight, stiffer ride, more road noise, and a small drop in fuel efficiency.

Put simply: XL is for “extra luggage and family,” while E is for “truck bed full of bricks or a car trailer.”

Why the Tire Speed Rating Matters for Safety

Conclusion

The KO3 isn’t trying to be a refined daily-driver tire — it’s unapologetically tough. If your life involves gravel, ranch roads, or towing through the Rockies, this tire fits like armor. But if most of your miles are wet commutes or icy highways, other all-terrains will give you more peace of mind. For drivers prioritizing strength and trail durability above all else, the KO3 is exactly what it promises to be.

Frequently Asked Questions: BFGoodrich KO3

Is the KO3 good on-road?
Yes, but it feels heavy. Dry grip is stable (140-ft stop, 0.72 g), though steering response is slower than road-biased A/Ts.
How does the KO3 handle rain?
Wet braking is a weak point (~184 ft, 0.46 traction). It stays straight under load but needs extra stopping distance.
Is the KO3 good in snow?
Strong in loose snow (72.3-ft stop, 46.4-ft launch), but less convincing on packed or plowed surfaces.
How does the KO3 perform on ice?
It stops in ~46.2 ft. Predictable slide, but longer distances mean caution is needed in icy climates.
Is the KO3 good off-road?
Yes — with 9.5 dirt, 9.5 sand, 9.2 mud, 9.5 rock, it’s one of the toughest A/Ts, built for rocky, muddy, and desert terrain.
How comfortable is it?
Comfort is firm (~7.5/10). Starts quiet, but hum builds over time, especially if rotations are missed.
How long does the KO3 last?
Typically 45–55k miles with proper rotations. Durable compound resists chipping but grows noisy if neglected.
Which vehicles fit it best?
Best for ½-ton and HD trucks used in rocky, dry, or trail-heavy regions. Overkill for SUVs or rain-heavy commutes.

BF Goodrich Advantage Control Tire Review

Updated: July 29, 2025 by Emrecan Gurkan Leave a Comment

BF Goodrich Advantage Control is a touring all-season tire that is built for drivers of sedans, coupes, crossovers, and SUVs. BF Goodrich claims that we can expect longevity and cozy ride and decent traction in all seasons. Well, I don’t think that it can make it all, though, it might be a perfect option for warm climates. Let’s dig into it and see what you can expect from this tire!

	BF Goodrich Advantage Control
Best for	Coupes, SUV, and SUV owners who are focused on dry performance, handling, comfort and longevity
Test Report	vs Endeavor & Altimax RT45 & HiTrack All-Season (June 27, 2022)
Category	Grand Touring All-Season
Vehicle	Coupes, sedans, crossover and SUV
Weight	18 – 31 lbs
Made In	United States
Warranty (P-metric)	65,000 Miles (V- or W-Speed Rated) 75,000 Miles (H-Speed Rated)
Available Sizes (Rim)	14”, 15”, 16”, 17”, 18”, 19”, 20”
Labels	M+S

As a former Bridgestone engineer, from my standpoint, BF Goodrich Advantage Control provides unique traction on dry surfaces. Moreover, it’s an expert in handling an extremely responsive tire. Due to its stiff compound, BF Goodrich Advantage Control’s tread life is one of the longest in its category. However, this compound limits its winter performance only with light snow. Furthermore, it creates slight road noise.

This tire is a perfect option for those who are living in southern regions.

All-Season Tires Cheat Sheet

Finding the most suitable one for you among thousands of tires is very difficult.

My team & I have analyzed 100 different tires and generated this ‘Quick Answer Sheet‘ for those who don’t wanna spend too much time during tire selection.

Before we start, here are the incredibly helpful articles I highly recommend to take a look at;

How to keep tire noise down:
https://www.tirerack.com/upgrade-garage/why-do-tire-tread-patterns-make-noise
Fuel-Efficiency:
https://www.tirerack.com/landing/fuel_efficiency
Traction/Stability control for AWD/4WD (All-Season tires specific)
https://www.tirerack.com/upgrade-garage/traction-stability-4ws-awd

Below the table, you can find my favorite tires that I have classified according to your needs.

All-Season Tires Cheat Sheet
Name	Best for	Works Best on	Articles	3PMSF	Road Noise	Mileage	Responsiveness	Riding Comfort	Warranty	Fuel Economy	Wet Performance	Mild Winter	Severe Winter
Michelin Crossclimate 2 ( Check Price – Test Report )	Year Round Usage & Tread Life	Sedans, coupes, crossovers, SUVs, minivans	Review	Yes	Decent	Elegant	Elegant	Decent	60,000	Decent	Elegant	Elegant	Decent
Michelin Primacy Tour A/S ( Check Price – Test Report )	Everything but severe winter traction	Sedans, coupes, crossovers, SUVs	Review	No	Elegant	Elegant	Elegant	Elegant	45,000 – 55,000	Decent	Elegant	Average	Fairy Well
Bridgestone WeatherPeak ( Check Price – Test Report )	Smooth & quiet 4 season driving	Sedans, coupes, crossovers, SUVs, minivans	Review	Yes	Elegant	Decent	Elegant	Elegant	70,000	Elegant	Decent	Elegant	Average
Bridgestone DriveGuard Plus ( Check Price – Test Report )	Great all-round run-flat tire	SUV, CUV, Sedans, Coupes	Review	No	Average	Excellent	Excellent	Excellent	65,000	Average	Excellent	Decent	Average
Vredestein Quatrac Pro ( Check Price – Test Report )	4-Season performance-driven riding	Sedans, coupes, crossovers, SUVs	Review	Yes	Elegant	Decent	Elegant	Elegant	50,000	Decent	Elegant	Elegant	Average
Vredestein HiTrac All-Season ( Check Price –Test Report )	Year round performance with great handling	Sedans, coupes, crossovers, SUVs		No	Decent	Decent	Elegant	Decent	70,000	Decent	Elegant	Decent	Average
Pirelli P7 AS Plus 3 ( Check Price – Test Report )	Great all-round performance + mild winter	Sedans, coupes, crossovers, SUVs	Review	No	Elegant	Elegant	Elegant	Elegant	70,000	Elegant	Decent	Decent	Average
Nokian WRG4 ( Check Price )	Traction focused 4 season driving	Sedans, coupes, crossovers, SUVs, minivans	Review	Yes	Decent	Decent	Decent	Elegant	65,000	Average	Elegant	Elegant	Decent
Goodyear Assurance WeatherReady ( Check Price –Test Report )	Year-round traction + handling	Sedans, coupes, crossovers, SUVs, minivans	–	Yes	Average	Decent	Elegant	Elegant	60,000	Average	Elegant	Elegant	Average
Firestone WeatherGrip ( Check Price –Test Report )	Winter-focused 4 season driving	Sedans, coupes, crossovers	Review	Yes	Average	Fairy Well	Average	Decent	65,00	Fairy Well	Average	Elegant	Elegant
BF Goodrich Advantage Control ( Check Price –Test Report )	Quiet & smooth 3 season traction + light snow	Sedans, coupes, crossovers, SUVs	Review	No	Decent	Decent	Elegant	Decent	65,000 – 75,000	Elegant	Decent	Average	Poor
Kumho Crugen HP71 ( Check Price – Test Report )	Decent all-round performance + light snow	CUV, SUV	Review	No	Average	Average	Decent	Decent	65,000	Decent	Decent	Decent	Fairy Well
Bridgestone Alenza AS Ultra (Check Price – Test Report )	Long lasting performance for squishy regions	Crossovers, SUVs, light trucks	Review	No	Decent	Decent	Decent	Decent	70,000	Decent	Elegant	Decent	Fairy Well
Uniroyal Tiger Paw Touring AS (Check Price)	Affordable 3 season traction	Sedans, coupes, crossovers, SUVs	Review	No	Average	Average	Decent	Decent	70,000	Decent	Average	Fairy Well	Poor
Goodyear Assurance All-Season ( Check Price – Test Report )	Affordable all-round 3 season + light snow performance	Sedans, minivans	Review	No	Decent	Decent	Decent	Decent	65,000	Decent	Decent	Average	Fairy Well
Goodyear Assurance MaxLife ( Check Price – Test Report )	Longevitiy focused 3 season traction + light snow	Sedans, coupes, crossovers, minivans	Review	No	Decent	Elegant	Elegant	Elegant	85,000	Elegant	Decent	Average	Poor
Bridgestone Turanza QuietTrack ( Check Price – Test Report )	Comfort-focused 3 season traction + light snow	Sedans, coupes, crossovers, minivans	Review	No	Elegant	Decent	Elegant	Elegant	80,000	Elegant	Elegant	Decent	Fairy Well
Goodyear Assurance ComfortDrive (Check Price – Test Report )	Above average all-round performance	Sedans, coupes, crossovers, SUVs	Review	No	Decent	Elegant	Elegant	Elegant	60,000	Average	Elegant	Decent	Average
Michelin Defender T+H (Check Price – Test Report )	Efficiency focused 3 season performance	Sedans, coupes, crossovers	vs Crossclimate 2	No	Decent	Decent	Decent	Decent	80,000	Elegant	Decent	Fairy Well	Poor
BF Goodrich Advantage T/A Sport ( Check Price – Test Report )	Long lasting 4 season performance + handling	Sedans, coupes, crossovers	–	No	Average	Decent	Decent	Decent	60,000 – 70,000	Average	Decent	Decent	Fairy Well
Continental TrueContact Tour ( Check Price – Test Report )	Smooth & long-lasting 3 season performance + light snow	Sedans, coupes, crossovers	–	No	Decent	Decent	Decent	Decent	70,000 – 80,000	Decent	Elegant	Average	Fairy Well
Yokohama Avid Ascend LX ( Check Price – Test Report )	Long-lasting & responsive 4 season performance	Sedans, coupes, crossovers, minivans		No	Decent	Elegant	Elegant	Elegant	85,000	Elegant	Decent	Decent	Fairy Well
Laufenn S Fit AS (Check Price)	Long-lasting sporty driving	SUV, CUV, Sedans, Coupes	Review	No	Decent	Decent	Excellent	Decent	45,000	Decent	Decent	Average	Poor

Depending on your needs, the below article might help;

Dry Performance

Touring all-season tires are built to provide long-lasting tread life. Due to achieve this goal, they need a stiff and advanced compound. So, the stiff compound means a decrease in the traction capability.

Since providing traction in all-season is the building intent of all-season tires, they generally don’t have any issues regarding dry traction. However, in that case, the real game-changers are cornering stability and responsiveness.

Dry Traction

BF Goodrich Advantage Control has a 700 UTQG compound which means the tire has an extremely stiff compound. Though, this isn’t bad news at this time.

Due to providing decent traction, all-season touring tires have highly notched rubber, as a matter of course, tons of biting edges. These biting edges provide essential traction on dry surfaces. Hence, BF Goodrich Advantage Controle provides alpha plus traction on dry pavement.

Though worth reminding, the tire has a heavy-weight internal structure. So, if you’ll change from the grand touring tires(Michelin Defender T+H, Crossclimate 2, Goodyear Assurance Comfort Drive, etc.), you may feel a slight delay in acceleration.

Steering Response

Well, steering response isn’t a problem if you’re not going too fast. In this case, what we need to examine is their behavior while speeding.

So, the tire tests are concluding at 80 miles/hour. At this speed, the center section is the only part touching the ground. Hence, the center rib procures the communication between the steer and tire.

In my point of view, handling capability is the strongest point of this tire. Due to its continuous center rib and symmetrical tread pattern, BF Goodrich Advantage Control is a highly communitive tire.

Cornering Stability

Cornering stability is another strong point of this tire. Even though the tire has single nylon reinforcement(Uniroyal Tiger Paw has two), its sidewall is still too thick and resists the horizontal forces with ease.

The other point I want to mention is rim protectors. Unlike its competitors, the tire has a rim protector. The rim protector is the stiffest part of the tire. Well, the tires with the rim protector should have a relatively stiff sidewall compound. Otherwise, sidewall crack occurs due to stiffness difference between sidewall and rim protector. So, this is also a good sign for stable cornering.

BF Goodrich Advantage Control provides a safe and unshaken cornering. I strongly recommend it.

Wet Performance

Wet performance is related to tread design and compound stiffness. While compound stiffness is vital for wet traction, tread design is the only factor that affects hydroplaning resistance.

In this case, wet traction affects your starting, stopping, and acceleration. However, these metrics become kinda useless if your tire has a low hydroplaning resistance.

Let’s evaluate them one by one.

Wet Traction

In my point of view, the wet traction of BF Goodrich Advantage Control could be questionable(700 UTQG is a limit value for decent wet traction), if its sipes aren’t full-depth.

Even though it has a stiff compound, its angled and full-depth sipes provide enough biting edges for decent wet traction.

BF Goodrich Advantage Control isn’t superior but above average tire regarding wet traction.

Hydroplaning Resistance

Hydroplaning(aquaplaning) resistance is basically the water evacuation capability of the tire. It’s a vital feature. Especially for rapid drivers.

Due to its 4 circumferential grooves and open shoulder blocks, BF Goodrich Advantage Control has a trustworthy hydroplaning resistance.

Winter Performance

I generally separate winter performance into three different layers. Light-snow, deep-snow, and ice traction. However, BF Goodrich Advantage Control’s rubber is 700 UTQG.

This value is too much for decent winter traction on deep-snow and icy surfaces.

Hence, I’ll only evaluate the light-snow performance of the tire.

Regarding light-snow traction,

It’s similar to wet performance. The only advantage of the tire is inclined center grooves. These grooves improve its self-cleaning capability, naturally, light-snow traction. This tire can take you out of unexpected situations, though, it’s not a good option for winter driving.

Regarding deep-snow traction, the tire has a shallow tread. Hence, its snow-chewing capability is limited. Yet, I like its void ratio. Moreover, its block-type shoulders can provide you with slight traction on deep snow. So, if you don’t see snow higher than an inch or two, it’ll work for you.

Regarding ice traction, I highly recommend to don’t using these tires on icy surfaces. This is a narrow and tall tire. If you combine these two with a stiff compound and moderate siping, there is no way that you can get trustworthy ice traction.

Note: All-season tires are built to perform above 7 Celcius degrees. Hence, their winter performance is limited unless they don’t have a 3PMSF.

Tread Life

Tread life is where it shines.

Due to its 700UTQG rubber, its wearing rate is 7 times better than the test tire. That doesn’t mean it lasts 7 times longer than its competitors. Yet, the tires with this UTQG last at least 80,000-100,000 miles.

Though, what I really like about this tire is it wears evenly. Due to its symmetrical and computer-optimized pattern, it wears evenly and that improves its tread life.

If treadwear is your priority, I strongly recommend the BF Goodrich Advantage Control.

Getting maximum wear life from a tire is related to you as well as your tire,

If you’d like to learn how to get maximum tread life:

https://tireterrain.com/how-to-make-tires-last-longer/

Warranty

Michelin offers two different treadwear warranties for this product,

V or W Speed Rating: 6 years and 65,000 miles treadwear warranty

H Speed Rating: 6 years and 75,000 miles treadwear warranty

The mileage fall by half if you use different sizes on the rear and front axle.

Uniformity Warranty: First 2/32” wear, limited with 1-year

Manufacturer Special Warranty: 60 days satisfaction warranty

Riding Quality

Riding quality is mostly related to the internal structure. The tires that can keep their shape and can flex enough provide the best riding quality.

Due to its two polyester casing and twin robust steel belts, BF Goodrich Advantage Control provides decent riding comfort. This is a highly suitable tire for inner-city driving.

Road Noise

This section might vary from person to person. In my point of view, instead of the tire itself, the tire you’re going to replace will be a decider.

BF Goodrich Advantage Control has a slightly more void area than its competitors. Hence, it might be slightly noisier than the tire like Uniroyal Tiger Paw Touring A/S. Yet, there is no big difference between mid-tier all-season tires.

Though worth reminding, if you’ll change from grand touring tires, you’ll notice a big noise and riding comfort difference. This is caused by category and price differences. You should go with grand touring tires if comfort is your priority.

Sizes

14”	15”	16”	17”	18”	19”	20”
185/65R14 86H BSW	175/65R15 84H BSW	195/55R16 87V BSW	205/50R17 93V XL BSW	215/55R18 95H BSW	225/55R19 99V BSW	235/55R20 102H BSW
	185/60R15 84H BSW	205/50R16 87V BSW	205/55R17 95H XL BSW	225/40R18 92W XL BSW	235/40R19 96V XL BSW	245/45R20 99V BSW
	185/65R15 88H BSW	205/55R16 91H BSW	215/45R17 87V BSW	225/45R18 95V XL BSW	235/45R19 95H BSW	245/50R20 102V BSW
	195/60R15 88H BSW	205/60R16 92H BSW	215/45R17 87W BSW	225/50R18 95H BSW	235/55R19 101H BSW
	195/65R15 91H BSW	205/60R16 92V BSW	215/50R17 95V XL BSW	225/55R18 98V BSW	235/55R19 101V BSW
	205/60R15 91H BSW	205/65R16 95H BSW	215/55R17 94H BSW	225/60R18 100H BSW	245/45R19 98V BSW
	205/65R15 94H BSW	215/55R16 97H XL BSW	215/55R17 94V BSW	225/60R18 100V BSW
	215/70R15 98H BSW	215/60R16 95H BSW	215/60R17 96H BSW	235/40R18 95W XL BSW
		215/60R16 95V BSW	215/65R17 99H BSW	235/45R18 98V XL BSW
		215/65R16 98H BSW	225/45R17 91H BSW	235/50R18 97V BSW
		225/60R16 98H BSW	225/50R17 94H BSW	235/55R18 100H BSW
		225/65R16 100H BSW	225/50R17 94V BSW	245/40R18 97V XL BSW
		235/60R16 100H BSW	225/55R17 97H BSW	245/40R18 97W XL BSW
		235/65R16 103H BSW	225/55R17 97V BSW	245/45R18 96V BSW
			225/60R17 99H BSW	245/55R18 103V BSW
			225/65R17 102H BSW
			235/45R17 97H XL BSW
			235/50R17 96H BSW
			235/50R17 96W BSW
			235/55R17 99H BSW
			235/60R17 102H BSW

Most tire sizes begin with modifier letters(P, LT, etc.) that identify the type of vehicle or type of service for which they were designed. Here is a perfect guide for reading tire size –> https://tireterrain.com/how-to-read-tire-size/

Best Fit Vehicles

Honda Accord
Honda Civic
Hyundai Tucson
Chevy Equinox
Ford Escape

Pros	Cons
Long-lasting rubber	Limited winter performance
Unique traction on dry ground	A bit noisy ride compared to its competitors
Above average wet traction but impressive hydroplaning resistance
Smooth ride

Conclusion

BF Goodrich Advantage Comfort smack of every feature of a decent all-season touring tire. It lasts long and provides at least average traction on any surface. You may see the below table for a piece of detailed information.

	BF Goodrich Advantage Control
Best for	Coupes, SUV, and SUV owners who are focused on dry performance, handling, comfort and longevity
Test Report	vs Endeavor & Altimax RT45 & HiTrack All-Season (June 27, 2022)
Category	Grand Touring All-Season
Vehicle	Coupes, sedans, crossover and SUV
Weight	18 – 31 lbs
Made In	United States
Warranty (P-metric)	65,000 Miles (V- or W-Speed Rated) 75,000 Miles (H-Speed Rated)
Available Sizes (Rim)	14”, 15”, 16”, 17”, 18”, 19”, 20”
Labels	M+S

I hope the article was helpful. If you have any further questions, you can leave them below or reach me via the contact page. Have a safe ride folks!

Goodyear Wrangler Duratrac vs BFG KO2

Updated: November 11, 2025 by Emrecan Gurkan Leave a Comment

Firsthand experience — from a former Bridgestone test engineer

The BFGoodrich KO2 has long been a benchmark in the all-terrain world, known for its rugged LT construction and balanced performance on and off-road. If you want to see how it stacks up against its successor, you can read my BFGoodrich KO3 vs KO2 comparison.

The Goodyear Wrangler Duratrac leans more toward aggressive off-road traction, with deeper voids and snow-focused grip, yet still earns respect as a daily driver thanks to its reasonable on-road manners. For many, it’s the go-to choice for mixed-use trucks that see frequent mud, snow, or worksite duty.

Both are proven, snow-rated all-terrain options — but they suit very different priorities. Below, I’ll break down their performance across dry, wet, snow, and off-road conditions, plus fitment recommendations to help you choose the right tire for your needs.

At a Glance

	Goodyear Wrangler Duratrac	BF Goodrich KO2
Better for	Heavy and medium duty operations, snowy regions, Muddy areas	Smooth & quiet highway driving, Rocky terrains
Pros	Insane off-road traction, tough sidewalls, studdable tread, trusthworthy winter performance	Insane wet and snow traction, Moderate off-road traction responsiveness
Cons	Noisy and stiff ride	A bit noisy, Not the best on mud

As a former Bridgestone engineer, in my point of view, with the release of the Goodyear Wrangler Duratrac RT and the discontinuation of most p-metric sizes in the Goodyear Wrangler Duratrac, the choice has become clearer. The Goodyear Wrangler Duratrac now functions as a commercial all-terrain tire, offering reliable traction, longevity, and comfort at the expense of some noise and handling. Therefore, I recommend the BF Goodrich KO2 for those who primarily use their tires on-road and the Goodyear Wrangler Duratrac for those who spend most of their time off-road or on severe working sites.

👉 Looking to buy?
Check out tire specs and reviews here:

Durability

In the past, the direction for this tire size was quite different. However, Goodyear has introduced the Wrangler Duratrac RT, which appears to be more on-road oriented compared to the previous Wrangler Duratrac tire.

This shift might explain why Goodyear has transitioned most on-road-oriented sizes to the Wrangler Duratrac RT. Currently, the Wrangler Duratrac is mostly available in the E load range, which naturally enhances its durability.

On the other hand, BF Goodrich KO2 is renowned for its durability. This tire features a 3-ply cord and upper shoulder armor, making it nearly indestructible against sharp rocks. Additionally, the BF Goodrich KO2 has superior cut and chipping resistance.

Overall, both tires are highly durable and reliable. However, the BF Goodrich KO2 tends to have a slightly better wear rate due to its exceptional cut and chipping resistance.

Tread Life

When it comes to tread life, both tires, BF Goodrich KO2 and Goodyear Wrangler Duratrac, may not match the longevity of tires like the Toyo Open Country AT3 or General Grabber ATX. However, there are some tips to help you maximize their tread life.

BF Goodrich KO2 as an off-road all-terrain tire follows a stable design philosophy with consistent sidewalls across all sizes. This approach makes it a reliable choice for decent tread life in various sizes, making it a safe bet in my opinion.

Now, let’s discuss the Duratrac. Tread life for this tire is a bit more complex. If you plan to use it on diesel or heavy trucks, it’s advisable to opt for LT sizes. The Duratrac features a softer compound, so it requires a robust internal structure to handle the weight of heavier vehicles. On the other hand, its flotation sizes offer impressive tread life, particularly for vehicles like Jeeps or Rubicons.

In summary, BF Goodrich KO2 tends to have better overall tread life, but Goodyear Wrangler Duratrac still offers highly acceptable longevity.

Getting maximum wear life from a tire is related to you as well as your tire,

If you’d like to learn how to get maximum tread life:

https://tireterrain.com/how-to-make-tires-last-longer/

Steering Response

Depending on the size and your vehicle, this might change. However, Goodyear Wrangler with wider pattern and deeper tread has a disadvantage out here. However, the strong sidewalls are the game-changer out here.

Since both tires have a strong sidewall, I put BF Goodrich KO2 a bit ahead if this is your priority.

Cornering Stability

Cornering stability is where these two are separated. In this case, solid sidewalls play a crucial role and help the tire to keep its shape while cornering at high speeds. Hereby, you don’t feel like floating.

Even though I like Goodyear tires, 2-ply sidewalls don’t work very well for most vehicles. So, cornering stability isn’t an alpha plus for Duratrac. Particularly for heavy vehicles. On the other hand, BF Goodrich KO2 has one of the strongest sidewalls in the market. No matter how heavy your vehicle is, it provides huge cornering stability.

BF Goodrich KO2 is the winner of this section the whole day long.

Note: Since Goodyear mostly discontinued p-metric sizes, I expect a huge jump up on steering response and cornering stability rating of Wrangler Duratrac

Comfort

Ride quality of all-terrain tires mostly related to uniformity of the tire. So, when the tire is getting bigger and have more sectional pattern, it’s harder to achieve necessary uniformity.

So, if the tire isn’t uniform enough, it transmit the vibrations more acute.

On the other hand, the advantage of all-terrain tires is they’re high profile tires. Hence, they can hold too much air inside which naturally translate to smoother ride.

Overall, in my point of view, BF Goodrich KO2’s design is more compact, hence, it’s offers smoother ride. However, Goodyear Wrangler Duratrac also smooth tire. It’s just have an aggressive pattern that might cause vibration in some cases.

Road Noise

Road noise is mostly about void area distribution. Narrower gaps help to decrease road noise.

BF Goodrich KO2’s tread design promises more in that case. Well-placed small blocks increase acoustic performance significantly. On the other hand, Duratrac has an average noise reduction performance. Its narrowed center section blocks reduce the noise level, though, its tread is deep-seated. Therefore, airflow inside the tread tends to make more noise.

The difference isn’t huge, though, BF Goodrich KO2 has better noise reduction.

Vibration

This part is mostly about how easily you can balance your tire. Well, a cheap tire doesn’t stay cheap as long as you spend a lot of money on balance.

In this case, Duratrac’s deep tread makes it hard to balance. Even though it’s balanced while mounting, it might need another balance in further time. Especially for heavy-duty usage. Therefore, you must pay attention to rotation timing. On the other hand, nothing much to say about BF Goodrich KO2. Legend stays legend for this section.

BF Goodrich KO2 is a better option in that case. That difference is minor.

Wet Performance

Wet is where most all-terrains fail. Well, it causes by deep treads and stiff compounds. Stiff compound decreases gripping ability and deep treads decrease evacuation ability.

In that case, hydroplaning resistance and wet traction are our evaluation points.

Regarding wet grip, the battle is close. However, Wrangler Duratrac steps ahead with better notched and softer rubber. These are the main characteristics of solid wet traction.

On the other hand, I can’t say the same things for hydroplaning resistance. Well, they’re close. However, BF Goodrich KO2 has a better shoulder design for water evacuation.

Both tires are trustworthy, you can go either way. However, I recommend BF Goodrich KO2 if you’re a fast driver.

Winter Performance

The good news, both tires are rated with 3-peak mountain snowflake marking. That means they are able to work in severe winter conditions. Yet, they perform differently due to their technical features.

A side note here: Understanding the snow performance of all-terrain tires can be quite challenging. For those who find it perplexing, I’d like to direct your attention to a helpful resource: “6 Best All-Terrain Tires for Snow by AT Tire Category“ This article is specifically designed to assist you in making informed decisions regarding all-terrain tires in snowy conditions.

Light Snow

Light snow capability shows similarity with wet performance. When heated tires touch the surface, light snow swiftly turns into water. So, gripping and evacuation ability on the wet ground become a priority.

Whether BFG KO2 or Wrangler Duratrac is a trustworthy option in that case. Yet, in my point of view, Wrangler Duratrac is a slightly better tire on light snow.

Deep Snow

Deep snow is where these two are shining. They have different strong points due to their specific designs.

Wrangler Duratrac has deeper tread grooves. That is crucial for deep snow traction. However, BF Goodrich KO2’s staggered shoulder design improves the traction on loose grounds significantly.

Both are reliable options. You can confidently go either way.

Ice Traction

All-terrain tire’s ice traction is always questionable. Most of them have a stiffer compound and insufficient contact patch for better grip.

Well, BF Goodrich KO2 definitely has a better ice performance due to its optimized contact patch(less void area works better in that case). However, Goodyear Wrangler Duratrac has a stud option which makes you kind of icy grounds.

The battle is close, I recommend BF Goodrich KO2 if you’re not going to use studded Wrangler Duratrac.

Off-Road Performance

Indeed, I’ve talked about the features that affect off-road performance in winter and durability sections. Yet, I will explain them shortly again in the below sections.

Gravel and Dirt

Gravel and dirt aren’t an issue for these beasts. Yet, due to the high void area ratio, Wrangler Duratrac has better traction on loose grounds.

Mud

When it comes to mud driving, two critical factors are the self-cleaning capability of the tires and their ability to provide traction on loose ground. In both of these aspects, the Goodyear Wrangler Duratrac holds an advantage. Thanks to its wide grooves and deep tread, it excels in mud performance compared to the BF Goodrich KO2. However, it’s important to note that the BF Goodrich KO2 is still a solid choice for light mud conditions.

You can confidently use both of these tires for mud driving, as they are excellent options. However, if you anticipate facing severe mud conditions, the Goodyear Wrangler Duratrac is the better choice.

If you’re specifically looking for a reliable mud-terrain tire, I recommend checking out this article for more information.

Sand

Let’s keep it short. BF Goodrich KO2 is your tire if you love to go to the beach. Duratrac’s deep treads dig to loose sand and get you stuck in a minute.

Rock

When it comes to off-road conditions that require airing down your tires, the strength of the sidewalls becomes a crucial factor. In this regard, both the BF Goodrich KO2 and the Goodyear Wrangler Duratrac offer strong sidewalls. While the BF Goodrich KO2 holds a slight advantage, the difference between the two is not significant.

However, if your off-road adventures involve rocky terrains, the BF Goodrich KO2’s higher cut and chipping resistance make it the preferred choice.

Specs

	BF Goodrich KO2	Goodyear Wrangler Duratrac
Category	All-Terrain Tire	Commercial All-Terrain Tire
Vehicle	Light Truck, SUV	Light Truck, SUV
Available Sizes (Rim)	15’’, 16’’, 17’’, 18’’, 20’’, 22’’	15’’, 16’’, 17’’, 18’’, 19’’, 20”
Weight	34 – 78 lbs	35 – 68 lbs
Made In	Opelika, AL, USA	United States
Severe Snow Rated (3PMSF)	Yes (3PMSF)	Yes (3PMSF)
Warranty (P-metric)	50,000 Miles	50,000 Miles
Warranty (LT Sizes)	50,000 Miles	50,000 Miles
Prices	Check price section to see best possible prices	Check price section to see best possible prices

🚨 Breaking News Alert! 🚨

Hold onto your seats because I’m thrilled to introduce the all-new BF Goodrich All-Terrain T/A KO3 – the next evolution of the fan-favorite KO2! And the excitement doesn’t stop there – this beast is now available in two additional OEM sizes: LT285/70R17 and LT275/65R20. Get ready for the ultimate off-road experience with the KO3!

Specification Comparison for Popular Sizes

Analyzing popular sizes is a great way to understand the performance characteristics of all-terrain tires like the BF Goodrich KO2 and Goodyear Wrangler Duratrac. Let’s delve into the details of these tire sizes to see how they stack up against each other.

285/70R17

	Toyo Open Country AT3	Toyo Open Country AT3	Toyo Open Country AT3	Falken Wildpeak AT3W	Falken Wildpeak AT3W	Falken Wildpeak AT3W	BF Goodrich KO2	BF Goodrich KO2	General Grabber ATX	Goodyear Wrangler Duratrac	Cooper Discoverer S/T Maxx	Sumitomo Encounter AT	Goodyear Wrangler Duratrac	Sumitomo Encounter AT	Firestone Destination AT2	Firestone Destination XT	BF Goodrich KO3	Pirelli Scorpion All Terrain Plus	Nitto Recon Grappler AT	Nitto Nomad Grappler	Nitto Recon Grappler AT	Yokohama Geolander AT G015	Cooper Discoverer AT3 4S	Cooper Discoverer AT3 XLT	BF Goodrich Trail Terrain T/A	General Grabber APT	Yokohama Geolander AT G015	Hankook Dynapro AT2 Extreme	Cooper Discoverer Rugged Trek	Cooper Discoverer Rugged Trek	Nitto Ridge Grappler	Nitto Ridge Grappler	Nitto Ridge Grappler	Toyo Open Country R/T Trail	Toyo Open Country R/T Trail	Kenda Klever R/T	Kenda Klever AT2
Category	Off Road AT Tire	Off Road AT Tire	Off Road AT Tire	Off Road AT Tire	Off Road AT Tire	Off Road AT Tire	Off Road AT Tire	Off Road AT Tire	Off Road AT Tire	Commercial AT Tire	Commercial AT Tire	Off Road AT Tire	Commercial AT Tire	Off Road AT Tire	On Road AT Tire	Off Road AT Tire	Off Road AT Tire	On Road AT Tire	Off Road AT Tire	On Road AT Tire	Off Road AT Tire	On Road AT Tire	On Road AT Tire	On Road AT Tire	On Road AT Tire	On Road AT Tire	On Road AT Tire	On Road AT Tire	Rugged Terrain Tire	Rugged Terrain Tire	Rugged Terrain Tire	Rugged Terrain Tire	Rugged Terrain Tire	Rugged Terrain Tire	Rugged Terrain Tire	Rugged Terrain Tire	Off Road AT tire
Load Range	E	SL	C	C	E	SL	E	C	E	E	E	SL	D	E	SL	E	C	D	E	SL	SL	SL	SL	E	SL	SL	E	E	SL	E	SL	C	E	C	E	E	E
Weight	55 lbs	47 lbs	54 lbs	63 lbs	58 lbs	50 lbs	58 lbs	51 lbs	59 lbs	60 lbs	62 lbs	52 lbs	51 lbs	60 lbs	41 lbs	51 lbs	56 lbs	55 lbs	54 lbs	45 lbs	48 lbs	45 lbs	43 lbs	55 lbs	46 lbs	46 lbs	54 lbs	61 lbs	48 lbs	57 lbs	48 lbs	55 lbs	55 lbs	56 lbs	57 lbs	56 lbs	56 lbs
Tread Depth	16.5/32″	13.6/32″	16.5/32″	18/32″	18/32″	13/32″	15/32″	15/32″	16/32″	18/32”	18.5/32″	13/32″	18/32”	18/32″	12/32″	16/32″	15/32″	15/32″	16/32″	13.4/32″	13.6/32″	13/32″	14/32″	17/32″	12.5/32″	14/32″	18/32″	15.5/32″	16/32″	18.5/32″	13.5/32″	16.4/32″	16.4/32″	16.5/32″	16.5/32″	16.3/32”	14.87/32”
Tread Width	9″	9″	9″	9.6″	9.6″	9.6″	9.2″	9.3″	9″	9.5″	9.2″	9.2″	9.6″	9.6″	9.2″	8.8″		9.3″	9.1″	9.1″	9.2″	8.5″	9.2″	9.2″	9.1″	9.2″	8.9″	8.9″	9.4″	9.4″	8.9″	8.9″	8.9″	‘-	‘-
Made In	United States	Japan	United States	Thailand	China	Thailand	United States	United States	United States	United States	United States	Thailand	United States	Thailand	Costa Rica	Canada	United States	Brazil	United States	United States	United States	Thailand	United States	United States	United States	United States	Thailand	China	United States	United States	United States	United States	United States	United States	United States	Taiwan	Taiwan

For this specific tire size, the choice between BF Goodrich KO2 and Goodyear Wrangler Duratrac depends on your priorities and usage. If you primarily drive on-road and want less road noise with on-road stability, the C-rated BF Goodrich KO2 is the better option. On the other hand, if you’re looking for an aggressive appearance and prioritize mud traction, the D-rated Wrangler Duratrac is recommended for all sizes and usage scenarios.

When it comes to E-rated tires in this size, the considerations remain similar. If efficiency and on-road performance are crucial to you, then BF Goodrich KO2 is the tire of choice. However, if you prefer an aggressive appearance and don’t mind some noise, the Wrangler Duratrac in E-rated sizes is a suitable option.

275/60R20

	Falken Wildpeak AT3W	Falken Wildpeak AT3W	Toyo Open Country AT3	Toyo Open Country AT3	BF Goodrich KO2	General Grabber ATX	General Grabber ATX	Sumitomo Encounter AT	Goodyear Wrangler Duratrac	Firestone Destination XT	Firestone Destination AT2	Nitto Recon Grappler AT	Nitto Recon Grappler AT	Cooper Discoverer AT3 4S	Hankook Dynapro AT2 Xtreme	Yokohama Geolander AT G015	Vredestein Pinza AT	Hankook Dynapro AT2 Xtreme	Cooper Discoverer AT3 XLT	Cooper Discoverer Rugged Trek	General Grabber APT	Nitto Ridge Grappler	Nitto Ridge Grappler	Toyo Open Country R/T Trail	BF Goodrich Trail Terrain TA	Mickey Thompson Baja Boss AT	Mickey Thompson Baja Boss AT	Toyo Open Country R/T Trail	Kenda Klever AT2	Kenda Klever AT2
Category	Off Road AT Tire	Off Road AT Tire	Off Road AT Tire	Off Road AT Tire	Off Road AT Tire	Off Road AT Tire	Off Road AT Tire	Off Road AT Tire	Commercial AT Tire	Off Road AT Tire	On Road AT Tire	Off Road AT Tire	Off Road AT Tire	On Road AT Tire	On Road AT Tire	On Road AT Tire	On Road AT Tire	On Road AT Tire	On Road AT Tire	Rugged Terrain Tire	On Road AT Tire	Rugged Terrain Tire	Rugged Terrain Tire	Rugged Terrain Tire	On Road AT tire	Rugged Terrain Tire	Rugged Terrain Tire	Rugged Terrain Tire	Off Road AT Tire	Off Road AT Tire
Load Range	D	SL	E	SL	D	D	XL	SL	SL	E	E	XL	E	SL	D	SL	SL	SL	E	SL	SL	E	XL	SL	SL	E	SL	E	XL	E
Weight	58 lbs	50 lbs	55	42 lbs	55 lbs	56 lbs	50 lbs	49 lbs	46 lbs	52 lbs	42 lbs	46 lbs	55 lbs	44 lbs	57 lbs	45 lbs	44 lbs	44 lbs	56 lbs	47 lbs	45 lbs	58 lbs	45 lbs	44 lbs	47 lbs	64 lbs	48 lbs	57 lbs	53 lbs	56 lbs
Tread Depth	18/32″	13/32″	16.4	13.5/32″	15/32″	16/32″	14/32″	12/32″	16/32″	16/32″	12/32″	13.5/32″	15.9/32″	12.5/32″	14.5/32″	12/32″	12/32″	12.5/32″	16/32″	16/32″	14/32″	16.4/32″	13.5/32″	13.5	12.5/32″	18.5/32″	16/32″	16.4	13.35/32”	14.87/32”
Tread Width	9.2″	9.6″	9.4″	9.1″	9″	9.4″	9.6″	9″	‘-	9.6″	8.8″	9.1″	9.3″	9.1″	‘-	8.3″	8.6″	8.8″	9.2″	9.4″	9.4″	9.2″	8.9″	‘-	9.5″	9.8″	9.3″	‘-	‘-	‘-
Made In	Thailand	Thailand	United States	United States	United States	United States	United States	Thailand	United States	Canada	United States	United States	United States	United States	Korea	Phillippines	India	United States	United States	United States	United States	United States	United States	United States	United States	United States	United States	United States	Taiwan	Taiwan

For this specific tire size, it’s worth noting that Goodyear Wrangler Duratrac is available in only the SL size. However, this size is not widely available due to Goodyear’s discontinuation, shifting it to the Goodyear Wrangler RT. This move seems sensible as the SL size is tailored for on-road usage, and the Wrangler Duratrac RT appears to be better optimized for on-road performance.

If you can find the Goodyear Wrangler Duratrac in this size, it offers a great option to blend on-road manners with an aggressive appearance. However, for longevity and stability, I prefer the BF Goodrich KO2.

265/70R17

	Falken Wildpeak AT3W	Falken Wildpeak AT3W	Toyo Open Country AT3	Toyo Open Country AT3	BF Goodrich KO2	BF Goodrich KO2	General Grabber ATX	General Grabber ATX	General Grabber ATX	Cooper Discoverer ST Maxx	Sumitomo Encounter AT	Goodyear Wrangler Duratrac	Sumitomo Encounter AT	Firestone Destination AT2	BF Goodrich Trail Terrain TA	Cooper Discoverer AT3 4S	Firestone Destination XT	General Grabber APT	Nitto Recon Grappler AT	General Grabber APT	Vredestein Pinza AT	Yokohama Geolander AT G015	Yokohama Geolander AT G015	Hankook Dynapro AT2 Extreme	Vredestein Pinza AT	Cooper Discoverer AT3 LT	Cooper Discoverer AT3 LT	Hankook Dynapro AT2 Extreme	Cooper Discoverer Rugged Trek	Cooper Discoverer Rugged Trek	Nitto Ridge Grappler	Nitto Ridge Grappler	Mickey Thompson Baja Boss AT	Mickey Thompson Baja Boss AT	Toyo Open Country RT Trail	Toyo Open Country RT Trail	Kenda Klever RT	Kenda Klever AT2	Kenda Klever AT2
Category	Off Road AT Tire	Off Road AT Tire	Off Road AT Tire	Off Road AT Tire	Off Road AT Tire	Off Road AT Tire	Off Road AT Tire	Off Road AT Tire	Off Road AT Tire	Commercial AT Tire	Off Road AT Tire	Commercial AT Tire	Off Road AT Tire	On Road AT Tire	On Road AT Tire	On Road AT Tire	Off Road AT Tire	On Road AT Tire	Off Road AT Tire	On Road AT Tire	On Road AT Tire	On Road AT Tire	On Road AT Tire	On Road AT Tire	On Road AT tire	On Road AT Tire	On Road AT Tire	On Road AT Tire	Rugged Terrain Tire	Rugged Terrain Tire	Rugged Terrain Tire	Rugged Terrain Tire	Rugged Terrain Tire	Rugged Terrain Tire	Rugged Terrain Tire	Rugged Terrain Tire	Rugged Terrain Tire	Off Road AT Tire	Off Road AT Tire
Load Range	E	SL	E	SL	C	E	SL	C	E	E	E	E	SL	SL	SL	SL	E	C	E	SL	SL	E	SL	SL	E	E	C	E	XL	E	SL	E	E	XL	C	E	E	SL	E
Weight	51 lbs	45 lbs	48 lbs	42 lbs	46 lbs	53 lbs	44 lbs	47 lbs	55 lbs	55 lbs	54 lbs	51 lbs	46 lbs	38 lbs	57 lbs	42 lbs	45 lbs	42 lbs	50 lbs	47 lbs	40 lbs	51 lbs	41 lbs	39 lbs	52 lbs	50 lbs	45 lbs	48 lbs	45 lbs	53 lbs	42 lbs	51 lbs	57 lbs	44 lbs	49 lbs	49 lbs	47 lbs	47 lbs	47 lbs
Tread Depth	17/32″	13/32″	16.3/32″	13.4/32″	15/32″	15/32″	14/32″	16/32″	16/32″	18.5/32″	17/32″	18/32″	13/32″	12/32″	12.5/32″	14/32″	15/32″	12/32″	15.7/32″	14/32″	13/32″	18/32″	13/32″	12.5/32″	16/32″	16.5/32″	16.5/32″	15/32″	16/32″	18.5/32″	13.5/32″	16.4/32″	18.5/32″	16/32″	16.3/32”	16.3/32”	16.3/32”	13.35/32	14.87/32”
Tread Width	8.9″	9″	8.4″	8.4″	8.8″	8.7″	7.2″	8.4″	8.3″	8.7″	8.7″	9″	8.9″	8.3″	8.7″	8.6″	8.7″	8.5″	8.5″	8.6″	8.1″	8.4″	8″	8.4″	7.8″	8.7″	8.7″	8.4″	8.8″	8.9″	8.4″	8.4″	9.2″	8.7″	‘-	‘-		‘-	‘-
Made In	Japan	United States	United States	Japan	Canada	United States	United States	United States	United States	United States	Thailand	United States	Thailand	United States	United States	United States	Canada	United States	United States	United States	India	Thailand	Thailand	Indonesia	India	United States	United States	Indonesia	United States	United States	United States	United States	United States	United States	United States	United States	Taiwan	Taiwan	Taiwan

It appears that Goodyear has discontinued this tire size as well, likely due to the introduction of the Goodyear Wrangler Duratrac RT. As a result, my recommendation for this size would be the C-rated BF Goodrich KO2 for on-road performance and the E-rated BF Goodrich KO2 for durability and stability.

I haven’t conducted specific research on the Goodyear Wrangler Duratrac RT yet, but you can find more information about it through this link: Goodyear Wrangler Duratrac RT.

Conclusion

Both the BF Goodrich KO2 and the Goodyear Wrangler Duratrac offer commendable performance in their respective areas. The BF Goodrich KO2 excels in on-road usage, providing better comfort and reduced noise levels. It also performs well on rocky terrains.

On the other hand, the Goodyear Wrangler Duratrac stands out in terms of appearance, off-road capabilities, winter performance, and muddy surfaces.

	Goodyear Wrangler Duratrac	BF Goodrich KO2
Better for	Heavy and medium duty operations, snowy regions, Muddy areas	Smooth & quiet highway driving, Rocky terrains
Pros	Insane off-road traction, tough sidewalls, studdable tread, trusthworthy winter performance	Insane wet and snow traction, Moderate off-road traction responsiveness
Cons	Noisy and stiff ride	A bit noisy, Not the best on mud

I hope this article helps you to decide. If you have any further questions, please leave them below!

bf goodrich

Quick Look

BFGoodrich Trail-Terrain T/A

Technical Features

Tread Depth

Sidewall

Weight

UTQG Rating

Tread Design

Road Noise

Ride Comfort

Responsiveness

Wandering/Vibration

Wet Traction

Snow and Ice

Tread Life

Fuel Efficiency

Towing

Off-Road Performance

Price/Performance

Tire Size Selection: The Basics You Can’t Skip

P-Metric vs. LT (Light Truck) Tires

Understanding Tire Load Range: XL vs. E-Load

Why the Tire Speed Rating Matters for Safety

Conclusion

Critic User Reviews

Quick Verdict – Who Wins What?

BFGoodrich All-Terrain T/A KO2

Falken Wildpeak A/T3W

Raw Test Data

Tire Test Data

🔬 Construction & Tech Breakdown

🛠️ KO2: Tank-Like Build

🛠️ Wildpeak AT3W: Winter-Built All-Terrain

Dry Performance — Falken Feels Lighter, KO2 Holds Weight

Wet Performance — Falken Bites Quicker, KO2 Demands Margin

Winter & Snow — Falken Digs, KO2 Endures

Ice — Falken Grabs First, KO2 Slides Longer

Off-Road — KO2 Bites Harder, Falken Smooths It Out

Comfort & Noise — Falken Quieter, KO2 More Truck-Like

Tread Life & Longevity — Both Strong, KO2 Built for Abuse

Where They Fit Best

Tire Size Selection: The Basics You Can’t Skip

P-Metric vs. LT (Light Truck) Tires

Understanding Tire Load Range: XL vs. E-Load

Why the Tire Speed Rating Matters for Safety

🏁 Final Verdict: Which One Would I Actually Buy?

BFGoodrich All-Terrain TA KO2 Related Articles

Frequently Asked Questions: Falken A/T3W vs BFGoodrich KO2

Quick Look

BFGoodrich All-Terrain T/A KO3

Raw Test Data

Tire Test Data

BFG KO2 vs KO3: What Changed?

Dry Performance — Stable but Not Sporty

Wet Performance — Needs Extra Room

Winter & Snow — Claws Loose, Slips Packed

Ice — Predictable but Long

Off-Road — KO3’s Playground

Comfort & Noise — Firm Ride, Hum That Builds

Tread Life & Longevity — Tough but Demanding

Where It Fits Best

Tire Size Selection: The Basics You Can’t Skip

P-Metric vs. LT (Light Truck) Tires

Understanding Tire Load Range: XL vs. E-Load

Why the Tire Speed Rating Matters for Safety

Conclusion

Frequently Asked Questions: BFGoodrich KO3

All-Season Tires Cheat Sheet

Table of Contents

Dry Performance

Dry Traction

Steering Response

Cornering Stability

Wet Performance

Wet Traction

Hydroplaning Resistance

Winter Performance

Tread Life

Warranty