Which tire has better dry performance?

Falken A/T3W. It stops shorter (126.6 ft vs 131.5 ft) and corners harder (0.80 g vs 0.78 g), giving it a sharper, sportier feel on SUVs and half-tons.

Which is safer in the rain?

Falken again. Its ~176-ft stop (0.57 traction) beats Toyo’s ~185 ft (0.50). Falken’s silica compound grips slick asphalt faster, while Toyo steadies better once loaded.

How do they compare in snow and ice?

Falken edges Toyo in both. It stops shorter in snow (72 ft vs 74 ft) and on ice (47.5 ft vs 50 ft). Falken feels closer to a winter tire, while Toyo is calmer but less aggressive.

Which is better off-road?

Toyo AT3. It posts higher scores in dirt, mud, and rock, gripping harder on technical trails. Falken rides smoother on fire roads but doesn’t dig as aggressively in mud.

On lighter trucks, Falken is quieter, producing a faint hum at speed. On heavy-duty rigs, Toyo cancels vibrations better and feels steadier under towing.

How long do they last?

Both average 45–50k miles with rotations. Falken holds tread depth well but can feather edges. Toyo wears more evenly, especially on ¾-ton and 1-ton trucks.

Which is better for towing or heavy-duty use?

Toyo AT3. Its reinforced carcass keeps trailers in line and reduces squirm, making it the safer pick for ¾-ton and 1-ton trucks.

Which feels better on dry pavement — Grabber A/TX or KO2?

Very close on paper (~140 ft & 0.72 g vs ~142 ft & 0.71 g), but Grabber feels more nimble in lane changes, while KO2 feels heavier and more planted.

Which is safer in the rain?

Grabber A/TX. It stopped in ~179 ft (0.48) vs KO2’s ~195 ft (0.43), and stays composed in storms; KO2 trades wet grip for durability.

Who wins in snow and on ice?

Snow: Grabber (≈73-ft stop, 45.5-ft launch) vs KO2 (≈76-ft, 46-ft). Ice: both struggle, but Grabber stops a hair shorter (~49 ft vs ~51 ft).

Which is better off-road?

KO2 dominates: ~9.3 dirt / 9.0 sand / 9.3 mud / 9.5 rock. Grabber holds its own for trails (~8.5/7.8/7.8/7.8) but isn’t as tough in mud/rocks.

Which rides quieter and more comfortably day-to-day?

Grabber A/TX rides softer and hums on highway; KO2 is firmer and can feel harsh on patched pavement.

What about towing and heavy loads (¾-ton/1-ton)?

KO2. Its stiff carcass tracks straighter under tongue weight and feels more planted when braking with a trailer.

KO2 typically delivers 50–60k+ miles with rotations; Grabber is usually 40–50k depending on use.

Comparisons

Firestone Destination XT vs BFGoodrich KO2 — Towing & Heavy-Duty Performance Tested in 2025

Updated: November 11, 2025 by Emrecan Gurkan Leave a Comment

Technical insights, and driver feedback — from a former Bridgestone test engineer.

The BFGoodrich KO2 and Firestone Destination X/T are two very different takes on the Off-Road A/T category in the U.S. and Canada. Unlike smoother On-Road A/Ts, both are designed with reinforced casings and deeper tread for drivers who need more than just highway manners. The KO2, a staple on Wranglers, Tacomas, and ½-ton pickups, is proven for its sidewall toughness, 3PMSF-rated winter traction, and long tread life, though it can ride stiffer and louder on pavement. If you’re curious how it compares to its newer sibling, check our BFGoodrich KO3 vs KO2 breakdown.

The Destination X/T, by contrast, is one of the lightest LT all-terrains in its class — a favorite on ¾-ton and 1-ton trucks where load capacity and stability matter most. It delivers a quiet ride and solid durability, but doesn’t out-muscle the KO2 in every condition.

That’s the trade-off most buyers face — and in the sections ahead, we’ll show how they compare across dry, wet, winter, and off-road testing. You can also line them up in our All-Terrain Tire Decision Tool to get quick recommendations by SUV, CUV, or truck class.

Quick Look

Firestone Destination XT

Tested Rating: 8.1/10

BFGoodrich All-Terrain T/A KO2

Tested Rating: 8.3/10

From my perspective as a former Bridgestone engineer, the Firestone Destination XT leans more toward an efficiency-oriented choice, making it an excellent tire for towing and hauling. Its stiffer, more rigid blocks provide stability but also result in a rougher ride compared to softer all-terrains. The BFGoodrich KO2, by contrast, shines for those who prioritize on-road manners, especially since it’s available in C and D load ranges that make it more versatile for lighter trucks and SUVs. In terms of winter performance, both deliver similar results in light and deep snow, but on ice I’d recommend being more cautious with the Destination XT, where its grip is less confidence-inspiring.

Let’s clear up a couple of common questions before starting

I often get asked about these — and Tire Rack has some great quick reads that explain them better than any post could:

Is AWD or 4WD really enough for rain, slush, snow, and ice?
https://www.tirerack.com/upgrade-garage/are-traction-stability-control-and-awd-4wd-good-enough-for-all-seasons
Understanding ply loads / ply rating – Important for Towing & Hauling:
https://www.tirerack.com/upgrade-garage/what-are-load-ranges-ply-ratings

Tread Appearance

Firestone Destination XT (review) looks like a slightly less aggressive version of the Falken Wildpeak AT3W. Wildpeak AT3 is a trustworthy option. It is one of the best all-terrain tires. Destination XT’s tread design promises better on-road manners than Wildpeak AT3W.

On the other hand, BF Goodrich KO2 has a more aggressive tread design. It tends to perform well off the road. Actually, it proved their off-road ability on Baja Race. It is a champion.

Let’s start with the center section.

Firestone Destination XT has a lot of sipes on the center section. These sipes will improve your traction ability dramatically. Especially in winter conditions. Moreover, siping on the center blocks is full-depth so you get full traction for all of tread life.

BF Goodrich KO2 also has a good amount of siping on the center. The only difference is it has straight sipes. Which will decrease your ice and winter traction. Yet, this sipe design is better for off-road traction.

And lastly shoulders,

Destination XT has staggered shoulder lugs that have less siping straight and not full depth. Luckily, this makes them stiffer for better highway speeds. Normally, that causes a bit of wet performance but they increased the evacuation ability with thicker sipes on shoulders.

BF Goodrich KO2 has similar shoulders design. The only difference is the angle of thick sipes. BF Goodrich placed those sipes at different angles. That is going to improve your traction ability in harsh off-road conditions. In return, the noise level will be up after you make some miles.

In summary, BF Goodrich KO2 has a more aggressive tread design. Yet, in my point of view, Firestone Destination XT promises more.

Tread Life

I generally associate treadwear with even wearing ability. Well, it is also related to balance by implication (How long do all-terrain tires last?).

Tread depths are par. So the above paragraph topics will be our deciding points.

BFG KO2 has an asymmetric tread design. Also has a wider void area. These will cause balancing issues if you miss your rotation times. As a result, you will face uneven wearing.

Firestone Destination XT has a symmetrical tread design. Also has a close pattern design. So, it tends to wear evenly.

I can confidently say that Firestone Destination XT promises more regarding treadwear. Yet, on this level, it is all about you and your driving habits.

Getting maximum wear life from a tire is related to you as well as your tire,

If you’d like to learn how to get maximum tread life:

https://tireterrain.com/how-to-make-tires-last-longer/

Note: Both tires come up with a 50000-mile tread life warranty.

You can check the below Destination XT videos (7500 miles and 22500 miles) from my dearest friend Scott. He also shared his views on holding stones.

Noise Comparison

I’ll keep this section concise. The comparison is quite clear to me. While a deeper tread may look appealing, it tends to generate more noise and vibration. Therefore, the Firestone Destination XT is the louder tire in this comparison.

However, it’s essential to remember that expecting too much in terms of quietness from both tires doesn’t make sense, as these are aggressive off-road tires.

All in all, if reducing noise is a priority, especially with C and D load range options, the BF Goodrich KO2 is the tire to choose.

Note from the Expert: For years, choosing all-terrain meant accepting noise—a true compromise for off-road grip. That’s why the question, Are All-Terrain Tires Louder than Highway Tires?, used to have a simple “yes” answer. Now, with the rise of on-road models, the core issue has shifted from noise to overall refinement. To fully understand which side of the comfort spectrum you’re buying into, you need to determine Are All-Terrain Tires Good for Daily Driving?—a question that depends entirely on the tire’s construction, not just the name.

Comfort

At beginning of the article, I talked about the good on-road manners of Destination XT. In this section, the table turned.

Comfort is related to compound as well as pattern. Destination XT has a softer design. I agree. Yet, I have made my research. Thanks to my fellows on Bridgestone.

Destination XT has a rigid compound due to wear rate. And that cost lack of comfort. Slow down when you are passing the bumps.

BF Goodrich KO2 offers a slightly smoother ride than Firestone Destination XT.

Here is a perfect article what to expect from all-terrain tires for daily driving –> https://tireterrain.com/are-all-terrain-tires-good-for-daily-driving/

Wet Performance

Wet performance of all-terrain tires can be a concern due to their wide design, which makes them prone to hydroplaning.

Deeper tread can help improve wet performance, giving Firestone Destination XT a slight advantage. However, it’s worth noting that its stiff compound can lead to reduced wet traction.

In this case, I’d opt for the BF Goodrich KO2 because it provides a bit more security in wet conditions. Nevertheless, I still believe that the stability of the Firestone Destination XT can be an advantage, especially for hauling and towing applications.

Note from the Expert: When it comes to rain, I always emphasize two things: compound grip and water evacuation. You can see the full details in my analysis, but if you take just one thing away, remember that an AT tire’s stiff nature makes achieving top-tier wet performance a constant battle. This is why the question, Are All-Terrain Tires Good in Rain?, requires a nuanced answer that balances tread design against rubber stiffness.

Winter Performance

Both of these tires carry the 3 peak mountain snowflake marking, indicating their ability to perform well in snowy conditions. However, it’s important to acknowledge that despite these ratings, all-terrain tires are not specialized snow tires. While they can handle light and deep snow effectively, they may not excel on icy surfaces.

In general, BF Goodrich KO2 may be the better choice for winter driving due to its softer compound. However, Firestone Destination XT is optimized for heavy loads, and its 5-rib design provides better traction under load, making it a good option for work applications.

In summary, for vehicles like Jeeps and off-road trucks, I recommend BF Goodrich KO2 for winter conditions. For work-related tasks and heavy loads, Firestone Destination XT is a suitable choice.

Note from the Expert: Our discussions often boil down to the core tradeoff. On one hand, you must understand why all-terrain tires are truly effective in deep snow, but not on ice. On the other hand, you face the 3PMSF Paradox—the hidden cost of that badge. The short answer is: The 3PMSF badge certifies traction, but it costs you durability. Dive into our full analysis on the critical 3PMSF rating for severe winter and off-road service, and its hidden costs, before you risk your rig on the trail.

Off-Road Performance

Off-road is where BF Goodrich KO2 shines. It is a champion tire and hard to defeat.

On the other hand, Destination XT will give you everything you need on mild off-road. No doubt!

Destination XT‘s self-cleaning ability is huge. It can effortlessly throw the dirt out of lugs. So, BF Goodrich KO2 too. They are even on dirt.

Sand performance is easy to evaluate. Less aggressive design works better on the sand. Therefore, Destination XT is my pick.

BF Goodrich KO2 is killing it in mud. A wider shoulder block provides better traction. In addition to that, sidewalls are deeper than Destination XT’s. That will help you on deeper mud.

Lastly the rock. Destination XT will not let you down on gravel or pavement. Yet, climbing ability is not as good as BF Goodrich’s. As long as, we are talking about LT sizes; I am going to say even for rocks.

In summary, both are great tires for off-road. I recommend BF Goodrich for severe and Destination XT for mild applications.

Note from the Expert: Every successful day on the trail is about preparation and physics, because tire longevity is earned, not given. Before you even start, you must master the critical link between tire pressure and load range for every rig to maximize your contact patch. Once moving, remember your ultimate off-road armor is your sidewall protection against the inevitable pinch flat. And finally, your traction on the obstacle is dictated by choosing the right aggressive vs hybrid tread pattern for your terrain. Master those three steps, and your rig will be ready for anything.

Specs

	Firestone Destination XT	BF Goodrich KO2
Category	All-Terrain Tire	All-Terrain Tire
Vehicle	Light Truck, SUV	Light Truck, SUV
Available Sizes (Rim)	15”, 16”, 17”, 18”, 20”	15’’, 16’’, 17’’, 18’’, 20’’, 22’’
Weight	35- 61 lbs	34-78 lbs
Made In	USA	Opelika, AL, USA
Severe Snow Rated (3PMSF)	Yes	Yes
Warranty (P-metric)	50,000 Miles	50,000 Miles
Warranty (LT Sizes)	50,000 Miles	50,000 Miles
Prices	Check price section to see best possible prices	Check price section to see best possible prices

🚨 Breaking News Alert! 🚨

Hold onto your seats because I’m thrilled to introduce the all-new BF Goodrich All-Terrain T/A KO3 – the next evolution of the fan-favorite KO2! And the excitement doesn’t stop there – this beast is now available in two additional OEM sizes: LT285/70R17 and LT275/65R20. Get ready for the ultimate off-road experience with the KO3!

Specification Comparison for Popular Sizes

When evaluating the performance of Firestone Destination XT and BF Goodrich KO2, it’s essential to recognize that their characteristics can differ depending on the tire size. Before delving into a direct comparison, let’s emphasize some key factors:

Wheel Sizes: Both BF Goodrich KO2 and Firestone Destination XT are available in various wheel sizes, including 15”, 16”, 17”, 18”, and 20”. Additionally, BF Goodrich KO2 offers a 22” option.
Load Ranges: These tires are designed to accommodate different load ranges. BF Goodrich KO2 is available in ‘C, D, E’ load ranges, whereas Firestone Destination XT is offered in ‘C and E’ load ranges. It’s worth noting that the ‘C’ load range option is not available for most sizes of Firestone Destination XT.
Weight: In most sizes, Firestone Destination XT is lighter than BF Goodrich KO2, particularly in the E load range category.
Height: Firestone Destination XT tends to have a greater height compared to BF Goodrich KO2 for most sizes.

These variations in wheel sizes, load ranges, weight, and height should be considered when selecting the appropriate tire to meet your specific requirements. Now, let’s proceed with a comprehensive comparison of popular sizes.

35×12.5R20

	Toyo Open Country AT3	Toyo Open Country AT3	Falken Wildpeak AT3W	BF Goodrich KO2	General Grabber ATX	Sumitomo Encounter AT	Nitto Recon Grappler AT	Cooper Discoverer AT3 XLT	Yokohama Geolander AT G015	Hankook Dynapro AT2 Extreme	Cooper Discoverer Rugged Treak	Nitto Ridge Grappler	Kumho Road Venture AT52	Yokohama Geolander X-AT	Toyo Open Country R/T Trail	Mickey Thompson Baja Boss AT	Hankook Dynapro AT2 Extreme	Firestone Destination XT	Yokohama Geolander X-AT	Mickey Thompson Baja Legend Exp	Kenda Klever RT
Category	Off Road AT Tire	Off Road AT Tire	Off Road AT Tire	Off Road AT Tire	Off Road AT Tire	Off Road AT Tire	Off Road AT Tire	On Road AT Tire	On Road AT Tire	On Road AT Tire	On Road AT Tire	Rugged Terrain Tire	On Road AT Tire	Rugged Terrain Tire	Rugged Terrain Tire	Rugged Terrain Tire	On Road AT Tire	Off Road AT Tire	Rugged Terrain Tire	Rugged Terrain Tire	Rugged Terrain Tire
Load Range	E	F	F	E	E	E	F	F	E	E	F	F	E	F	F	F	F	E	E	F	F
Weight	67 lbs	67 lbs	77 lbs	67 lbs	70 lbs	75 lbs	68 lbs	67 lbs	59 lbs	73 lbs	69 lbs	68 lbs	66 lbs	70 lbs	69 lbs	72 lbs	65 lbs	59 lbs	71 lbs	62 lbs	68 lbs
Tread Depth	16.9/32″	16.9/32″	19/32″	15/32″	16/32″	19/32″	16.9/32″	16.5/32″	16/32″	14.5/32″	18.5/32″	18.3/32″	16/32″	‘-	16.9	18.5/32″	15.5/32″	17/32″	19/32″		18.8/32”
Tread Width	10.9″	10.3″	10.9″	11.1″	10.6″	10.5″	11″	10.6″	10.5″	10.8″	9.8″	10.2″	10.1″	11″	10.2″	10.2″	10.3″	10.8″	10″	10.2	10”
Made In	United States	United States	Thailand	United States	United States	Thailand	United States	United States	Phillippines	Korea	United States	United States	Vietnam	Japan	United States	United States	Korea	Canada	Japan	United States	Taiwan

In this particular size, Firestone Destination XT stands out as the lighter and narrower option, making it a suitable choice if fuel efficiency is your primary concern. However, it’s important to note that its deeper tread and stiffer construction may result in a slightly rougher ride. If you don’t intend to subject this size to heavy-duty use, BF Goodrich KO2 is a more optimized choice for this specific size.

Note: Both of these tires are included in my best list for this specific size. If you’d like to explore more options, check out my full list of recommendations here –> [https://tireterrain.com/best-35×12-50r20-all-terrain-tires/]

285/70R17

	Toyo Open Country AT3	Toyo Open Country AT3	Toyo Open Country AT3	Falken Wildpeak AT3W	Falken Wildpeak AT3W	Falken Wildpeak AT3W	BF Goodrich KO2	BF Goodrich KO2	General Grabber ATX	Goodyear Wrangler Duratrac	Cooper Discoverer S/T Maxx	Sumitomo Encounter AT	Goodyear Wrangler Duratrac	Sumitomo Encounter AT	Firestone Destination AT2	Firestone Destination XT	BF Goodrich KO3	Pirelli Scorpion All Terrain Plus	Nitto Recon Grappler AT	Nitto Nomad Grappler	Nitto Recon Grappler AT	Yokohama Geolander AT G015	Cooper Discoverer AT3 4S	Cooper Discoverer AT3 XLT	BF Goodrich Trail Terrain T/A	General Grabber APT	Yokohama Geolander AT G015	Hankook Dynapro AT2 Extreme	Cooper Discoverer Rugged Trek	Cooper Discoverer Rugged Trek	Nitto Ridge Grappler	Nitto Ridge Grappler	Nitto Ridge Grappler	Toyo Open Country R/T Trail	Toyo Open Country R/T Trail	Kenda Klever R/T	Kenda Klever AT2
Category	Off Road AT Tire	Off Road AT Tire	Off Road AT Tire	Off Road AT Tire	Off Road AT Tire	Off Road AT Tire	Off Road AT Tire	Off Road AT Tire	Off Road AT Tire	Commercial AT Tire	Commercial AT Tire	Off Road AT Tire	Commercial AT Tire	Off Road AT Tire	On Road AT Tire	Off Road AT Tire	Off Road AT Tire	On Road AT Tire	Off Road AT Tire	On Road AT Tire	Off Road AT Tire	On Road AT Tire	On Road AT Tire	On Road AT Tire	On Road AT Tire	On Road AT Tire	On Road AT Tire	On Road AT Tire	Rugged Terrain Tire	Rugged Terrain Tire	Rugged Terrain Tire	Rugged Terrain Tire	Rugged Terrain Tire	Rugged Terrain Tire	Rugged Terrain Tire	Rugged Terrain Tire	Off Road AT tire
Load Range	E	SL	C	C	E	SL	E	C	E	E	E	SL	D	E	SL	E	C	D	E	SL	SL	SL	SL	E	SL	SL	E	E	SL	E	SL	C	E	C	E	E	E
Weight	55 lbs	47 lbs	54 lbs	63 lbs	58 lbs	50 lbs	58 lbs	51 lbs	59 lbs	60 lbs	62 lbs	52 lbs	51 lbs	60 lbs	41 lbs	51 lbs	56 lbs	55 lbs	54 lbs	45 lbs	48 lbs	45 lbs	43 lbs	55 lbs	46 lbs	46 lbs	54 lbs	61 lbs	48 lbs	57 lbs	48 lbs	55 lbs	55 lbs	56 lbs	57 lbs	56 lbs	56 lbs
Tread Depth	16.5/32″	13.6/32″	16.5/32″	18/32″	18/32″	13/32″	15/32″	15/32″	16/32″	18/32”	18.5/32″	13/32″	18/32”	18/32″	12/32″	16/32″	15/32″	15/32″	16/32″	13.4/32″	13.6/32″	13/32″	14/32″	17/32″	12.5/32″	14/32″	18/32″	15.5/32″	16/32″	18.5/32″	13.5/32″	16.4/32″	16.4/32″	16.5/32″	16.5/32″	16.3/32”	14.87/32”
Tread Width	9″	9″	9″	9.6″	9.6″	9.6″	9.2″	9.3″	9″	9.5″	9.2″	9.2″	9.6″	9.6″	9.2″	8.8″		9.3″	9.1″	9.1″	9.2″	8.5″	9.2″	9.2″	9.1″	9.2″	8.9″	8.9″	9.4″	9.4″	8.9″	8.9″	8.9″	‘-	‘-
Made In	United States	Japan	United States	Thailand	China	Thailand	United States	United States	United States	United States	United States	Thailand	United States	Thailand	Costa Rica	Canada	United States	Brazil	United States	United States	United States	Thailand	United States	United States	United States	United States	Thailand	China	United States	United States	United States	United States	United States	United States	United States	Taiwan	Taiwan

This tire size is a popular choice among predominantly on-road users. As a result, BF Goodrich KO2 offers a C load range option for this size. Surprisingly, even with the C load range, BF Goodrich KO2 weighs the same as the Firestone Destination XT. If your top priority is on-road performance, the C load range BF Goodrich KO2 could be a suitable choice. The same equation applies if you prefer the E load range – Firestone Destination XT for work, and BF Goodrich KO2 for a more adventurous and off-road-oriented experience.

Note: For a comprehensive list of recommendations tailored to this specific size, you can explore my full list here –> [https://tireterrain.com/best-285-70r17-all-terrain-tires/]

275/60R20

	Falken Wildpeak AT3W	Falken Wildpeak AT3W	Toyo Open Country AT3	Toyo Open Country AT3	BF Goodrich KO2	General Grabber ATX	General Grabber ATX	Sumitomo Encounter AT	Goodyear Wrangler Duratrac	Firestone Destination XT	Firestone Destination AT2	Nitto Recon Grappler AT	Nitto Recon Grappler AT	Cooper Discoverer AT3 4S	Hankook Dynapro AT2 Xtreme	Yokohama Geolander AT G015	Vredestein Pinza AT	Hankook Dynapro AT2 Xtreme	Cooper Discoverer AT3 XLT	Cooper Discoverer Rugged Trek	General Grabber APT	Nitto Ridge Grappler	Nitto Ridge Grappler	Toyo Open Country R/T Trail	BF Goodrich Trail Terrain TA	Mickey Thompson Baja Boss AT	Mickey Thompson Baja Boss AT	Toyo Open Country R/T Trail	Kenda Klever AT2	Kenda Klever AT2
Category	Off Road AT Tire	Off Road AT Tire	Off Road AT Tire	Off Road AT Tire	Off Road AT Tire	Off Road AT Tire	Off Road AT Tire	Off Road AT Tire	Commercial AT Tire	Off Road AT Tire	On Road AT Tire	Off Road AT Tire	Off Road AT Tire	On Road AT Tire	On Road AT Tire	On Road AT Tire	On Road AT Tire	On Road AT Tire	On Road AT Tire	Rugged Terrain Tire	On Road AT Tire	Rugged Terrain Tire	Rugged Terrain Tire	Rugged Terrain Tire	On Road AT tire	Rugged Terrain Tire	Rugged Terrain Tire	Rugged Terrain Tire	Off Road AT Tire	Off Road AT Tire
Load Range	D	SL	E	SL	D	D	XL	SL	SL	E	E	XL	E	SL	D	SL	SL	SL	E	SL	SL	E	XL	SL	SL	E	SL	E	XL	E
Weight	58 lbs	50 lbs	55	42 lbs	55 lbs	56 lbs	50 lbs	49 lbs	46 lbs	52 lbs	42 lbs	46 lbs	55 lbs	44 lbs	57 lbs	45 lbs	44 lbs	44 lbs	56 lbs	47 lbs	45 lbs	58 lbs	45 lbs	44 lbs	47 lbs	64 lbs	48 lbs	57 lbs	53 lbs	56 lbs
Tread Depth	18/32″	13/32″	16.4	13.5/32″	15/32″	16/32″	14/32″	12/32″	16/32″	16/32″	12/32″	13.5/32″	15.9/32″	12.5/32″	14.5/32″	12/32″	12/32″	12.5/32″	16/32″	16/32″	14/32″	16.4/32″	13.5/32″	13.5	12.5/32″	18.5/32″	16/32″	16.4	13.35/32”	14.87/32”
Tread Width	9.2″	9.6″	9.4″	9.1″	9″	9.4″	9.6″	9″	‘-	9.6″	8.8″	9.1″	9.3″	9.1″	‘-	8.3″	8.6″	8.8″	9.2″	9.4″	9.4″	9.2″	8.9″	‘-	9.5″	9.8″	9.3″	‘-	‘-	‘-
Made In	Thailand	Thailand	United States	United States	United States	United States	United States	Thailand	United States	Canada	United States	United States	United States	United States	Korea	Phillippines	India	United States	United States	United States	United States	United States	United States	United States	United States	United States	United States	United States	Taiwan	Taiwan

In this size, the tables turn. Despite Firestone Destination XT being lighter, it’s a taller and wider tire at the same time. This generally makes it a better option for users who prioritize traction. On the other hand, I’ve found that the D-rated BF Goodrich KO2 is the best overall tire for this size, offering a balanced performance profile.

265/70R17

	Falken Wildpeak AT3W	Falken Wildpeak AT3W	Toyo Open Country AT3	Toyo Open Country AT3	BF Goodrich KO2	BF Goodrich KO2	General Grabber ATX	General Grabber ATX	General Grabber ATX	Cooper Discoverer ST Maxx	Sumitomo Encounter AT	Goodyear Wrangler Duratrac	Sumitomo Encounter AT	Firestone Destination AT2	BF Goodrich Trail Terrain TA	Cooper Discoverer AT3 4S	Firestone Destination XT	General Grabber APT	Nitto Recon Grappler AT	General Grabber APT	Vredestein Pinza AT	Yokohama Geolander AT G015	Yokohama Geolander AT G015	Hankook Dynapro AT2 Extreme	Vredestein Pinza AT	Cooper Discoverer AT3 LT	Cooper Discoverer AT3 LT	Hankook Dynapro AT2 Extreme	Cooper Discoverer Rugged Trek	Cooper Discoverer Rugged Trek	Nitto Ridge Grappler	Nitto Ridge Grappler	Mickey Thompson Baja Boss AT	Mickey Thompson Baja Boss AT	Toyo Open Country RT Trail	Toyo Open Country RT Trail	Kenda Klever RT	Kenda Klever AT2	Kenda Klever AT2
Category	Off Road AT Tire	Off Road AT Tire	Off Road AT Tire	Off Road AT Tire	Off Road AT Tire	Off Road AT Tire	Off Road AT Tire	Off Road AT Tire	Off Road AT Tire	Commercial AT Tire	Off Road AT Tire	Commercial AT Tire	Off Road AT Tire	On Road AT Tire	On Road AT Tire	On Road AT Tire	Off Road AT Tire	On Road AT Tire	Off Road AT Tire	On Road AT Tire	On Road AT Tire	On Road AT Tire	On Road AT Tire	On Road AT Tire	On Road AT tire	On Road AT Tire	On Road AT Tire	On Road AT Tire	Rugged Terrain Tire	Rugged Terrain Tire	Rugged Terrain Tire	Rugged Terrain Tire	Rugged Terrain Tire	Rugged Terrain Tire	Rugged Terrain Tire	Rugged Terrain Tire	Rugged Terrain Tire	Off Road AT Tire	Off Road AT Tire
Load Range	E	SL	E	SL	C	E	SL	C	E	E	E	E	SL	SL	SL	SL	E	C	E	SL	SL	E	SL	SL	E	E	C	E	XL	E	SL	E	E	XL	C	E	E	SL	E
Weight	51 lbs	45 lbs	48 lbs	42 lbs	46 lbs	53 lbs	44 lbs	47 lbs	55 lbs	55 lbs	54 lbs	51 lbs	46 lbs	38 lbs	57 lbs	42 lbs	45 lbs	42 lbs	50 lbs	47 lbs	40 lbs	51 lbs	41 lbs	39 lbs	52 lbs	50 lbs	45 lbs	48 lbs	45 lbs	53 lbs	42 lbs	51 lbs	57 lbs	44 lbs	49 lbs	49 lbs	47 lbs	47 lbs	47 lbs
Tread Depth	17/32″	13/32″	16.3/32″	13.4/32″	15/32″	15/32″	14/32″	16/32″	16/32″	18.5/32″	17/32″	18/32″	13/32″	12/32″	12.5/32″	14/32″	15/32″	12/32″	15.7/32″	14/32″	13/32″	18/32″	13/32″	12.5/32″	16/32″	16.5/32″	16.5/32″	15/32″	16/32″	18.5/32″	13.5/32″	16.4/32″	18.5/32″	16/32″	16.3/32”	16.3/32”	16.3/32”	13.35/32	14.87/32”
Tread Width	8.9″	9″	8.4″	8.4″	8.8″	8.7″	7.2″	8.4″	8.3″	8.7″	8.7″	9″	8.9″	8.3″	8.7″	8.6″	8.7″	8.5″	8.5″	8.6″	8.1″	8.4″	8″	8.4″	7.8″	8.7″	8.7″	8.4″	8.8″	8.9″	8.4″	8.4″	9.2″	8.7″	‘-	‘-		‘-	‘-
Made In	Japan	United States	United States	Japan	Canada	United States	United States	United States	United States	United States	Thailand	United States	Thailand	United States	United States	United States	Canada	United States	United States	United States	India	Thailand	Thailand	Indonesia	India	United States	United States	Indonesia	United States	United States	United States	United States	United States	United States	United States	United States	Taiwan	Taiwan	Taiwan

So, first of all, if you spend most of your time on the road, the C-rated BF Goodrich KO2 is the best option. On the other hand, if you’re looking for the most efficient choice, the E-load range Firestone Destination XT is still a good pick, even though it might ride a bit rough. The significant weight difference between the two is notable. I recommend the BF Goodrich KO2 if your primary concern is better traction on loose ground.

Size Selection

Before we dive into selecting the right tire size, it’s essential to understand the tire standards that manufacturers follow.

Technical Standards & Regulations

In Europe, the tire standardizing organization is called ETRTO. In the United States, it’s The Tire and Rim Association (TRA), while in Japan, it’s the Japanese Automobile Tire Manufacturers Association (JATMA). Although there may be other organizations, they generally align with one of these three.

When it comes to passenger car tires, TRA designates them by placing the letter “P” in front of the size to indicate conformity to the TRA standard. On the other hand, ETRTO and JATMA do not use any letters, which can sometimes be confusing when determining which standard is being used.

For light truck tires, TRA uses the letters “LT” in front of the tire size, while JATMA places the letters “LT” after the size. ETRTO, however, uses the letter “C” after the size to indicate tires of this type.

In the realm of medium truck tires, ETRTO uses the letter “C” after the size to designate tires designed according to their standard. In contrast, TRA and JATMA do not use any letters in this context.

Now, here’s what’s essential: Tires with the same dimensions (size) may have different maximum load capacities depending on the standard being followed. So, it’s crucial to consider the relevant standard when choosing tires.

When it comes to load capacity designations, “SL” (Standard Load) and “XL” (Extra Load) are used for all passenger car tires, regardless of which standard is being followed. In the ETRTO standard, “Reinforced” is also used as an alternative to “XL.”

Load Range, on the other hand, is specific to TRA. ETRTO and JATMA use the term “Load Index.” While TRA references Load Indexes, it’s important to note that the values provided are approximate.

To sum it up, understanding the tire standards and designations is vital as they play a significant role in determining the right tire size and load capacity. By considering the appropriate standards, you can make an informed decision when selecting tires that meet your vehicle’s requirements.

Here are two great articles if you wanna dive deeper:

Load Range vs Load Index: https://www.discounttire.com/learn/load-range-load-index

Tire Sizing System: https://www.discounttire.com/learn/euro-vs-pmetric-tires

How to Select the Right Tire Size Based on Your Requirements?

When it comes to selecting tire sizes for your vehicle, it’s important to keep in mind that most vehicles offer more than one original equipment size. Let’s take the 2019 Ford F-150 Lariat Crew Cab 4WD as an example. You have three different tire size options: 275/55R20 SL, 275/65R18 Load Range C, or 275/65R18 SL.

Note: I use Toyo Open Country AT3 for an example tire. You can use this link to see tire options for your vehicle and then make a comparison between the sizes:
https://www.discounttire.com/fitment/vehicle

If you don’t know your tire size: https://tireterrain.com/find-tires-by-vin-number/

Let’s focus on comparing the 275/65R18 SL and 275/65R18 Load Range C options for a more detailed comparison. Your decision should be based on your priorities. If you prioritize a smooth ride and better handling, the SL option is the way to go. On the other hand, if you value hauling or towing performance and tire longevity, the Load Range C option would be a better fit.

As a tire engineer, my perspective often revolves around load-carrying capacity. Generally, tires with higher load capabilities tend to provide a stiffer ride. However, there’s a bit of an illusion to consider. When you compare the two tires in the same size, the SL-rated tire may initially appear to have a higher load capability. But here’s the catch: P metric tires, like the SL option, need to be derated by a factor of 1.1 when used on a truck. Crunching the numbers reveals that the SL option actually has a lower maximum load capability. Additionally, it boasts a lower tread depth, which translates to better responsiveness.

The same principles I mentioned earlier also apply when comparing XL and E Load range tires. In summary, if your vehicle allows for Passenger Car or LT (Light Truck) tires, going with a passenger option will provide you with better on-road manners. However, if you find yourself venturing off-road frequently, own a working truck, or regularly engage in towing and hauling heavy loads, then LT tires are generally the better choice for your needs.

Couple of tips for towing;

Even though the load index of passenger car tires fits, when it comes to towing, sidewall stability is the issue. Hence, LT tires with Load Range C, D, or E provide better stability.
Generally, a load index higher than 119 is recommended for towing
Proper loading is important for even wearing. 60/40 rule should be followed. 60% of the weight should be on the front axle and 40%of weight should be applied rear axle of the trailer. Besides that, try to center load. Start with heavier ones if you gonna stack them up.

To wrap it up, selecting the right tires comes down to choosing the ones that align with your driving preferences and specific requirements.

Conclusion

Since Destination XT is only available for LT sizes, I have made the comparison on LT size-based. If Firestone will decide to expand their line-up with P-metrics, BF Goodrich KO2 would be a competitor to them.

Firestone Destination XT is my choice regarding the price difference. It is almost as good as BF Goodrich in every section. Even better in wet and snow.

Catch it before prices will be up!

I hope this comparison will help you to decide. If you have any questions, you are more than welcome to leave them below! Have a safe ride!

BF Goodrich KO2 Related Articles

Firestone Destination XT Related Articles

Hercules AT2 vs Cooper AT3 LT vs XLT vs 4S

Updated: November 11, 2025 by Emrecan Gurkan Leave a Comment

Hercules is the flanker brand of Cooper. The brand is known for its successful rugged-terrain tires. While Hercules Terra Trac AT2 is an all-terrain tire that focuses on off-roading, Cooper Discoverer AT3 is an all-terrain tire that is built with on-road intent as much as off-road intent. So, there are 3 different Cooper Discoverer AT3 (see the comparison) patterns in the market now. Since Cooper Discoverer AT3 4S and Hercules AT2 have similar usage, I’m going to compare these two for this time. Let’s begin!

As a former Bridgestone engineer, from my standpoint, Cooper Discoverer AT3 4S is a better tire overall. It has huge wet and winter performances along with good on-road manners. On the other hand, Hercules AT2 has better sidewall durability. Moreover, its cut & chipping resistance is higher than Cooper Discoverer AT3. Therefore, it’s a better option for off-road. Moreover, its loose ground traction capability overperforms Discoverer AT3. Yet, it is struggling in wet and snow.

For severe off-road –> Hercules Terra Trac AT2

For better on-road and mild off-road –> Cooper Discoverer AT3 4S

Cooper Discoverer AT3 4S vs LT vs XLT

Lately, Cooper decided to discontinue Discoverer AT3. They’ve replaced it with 3 different AT3 patterns. I like the idea beyond it. These 3 patterns cover 3 different customer expectations.

So who are these customers;

Mainly on-road and highway riders –> Cooper Discoverer AT3 4S(4 seasons)
Mixed on/off-road riders –> Cooper Discoverer AT3 LT(Light Truck)
Heavy loaded and mixed on/off-road riders –> Cooper Discoverer AT3 XLT(Extreme Light Truck)

I’ve deeply analyzed all patterns to find the best competition of Hercules Terra Track AT2. Cooper Discoverer AT3 4S has the closest intent. I will move on to a comparison with it.

Tread Appearance

In fact, these tires have a soft tread design for an all-terrain tire. They will not look aggressive in your vehicle. Yet, this feature comes up with the on-road driving advantage.

Narrow void areas and angled shoulders will decrease the road noise significantly. Well, this will affect harsh off-road traction negatively. Though worth mentioning, severe off-road traction is not the priority of these tires.

Hercules AT2’s shoulder design is more aggressive than Cooper’s. That will increase their traction ability on deep mud or snow.

In summary, if the aggressive look is your priority, I would recommend Hercules AT2 every day of the month.

Treadwear

Treadwear is highly dependable on your driving attitude. Most importantly, rotation timing.

You might face uneven wearing and balance issues with Cooper Discoverer AT3 4S. That will decrease your tread life. On the other hand, Hercules AT2’s compound is not as solid as Cooper’s.

It is totally up to you at this time. If you can keep your tires healthy, Cooper Discoverer AT3 4S is a better choice.

Note: Both tires have 65000 miles of treadwear warranty.

Getting maximum wear life from a tire is related to you as well as your tire,

If you’d like to learn how to get maximum tread life:

https://tireterrain.com/how-to-make-tires-last-longer/

Noise Comparison

As I mentioned above, noise is not an issue for these tires. They have well on-road manners.

However, Cooper Discoverer AT3 AS is a less vocal tire. That’s for sure. But I would like to share my research result. That might change your idea.

Cooper Discoverer AT3 is changing manner after 30k-40k miles using. They become highly noisy stuff.
Hercules AT2 is a stable noise level.

In summary, depending on your wear life expectation, you can go both ways. Yet, Hercules AT2 seems a bit more reliable option.

Comfort

I have to admit that Hercules shows good manners regarding price level. Well, comfort is where it fails.

Riding comfort is mostly about compound quality. In that case, Cooper has really good references. They are showing their skills on Cooper Discoverer AT3 AS.

Cooper Discoverer AT3 AS offers way much smoother ride than Hercules AT2.

Durability

In that case, sidewall durability will be our superior decision-maker.

Hercules has stronger sidewalls. Upper sidewall protectors will provide better protection. Unfortunately, Cooper’s sidewall protection seems weak. I do not believe that they can handle any harsh sidewall impact.

In this section, I would like to go with Hercules AT2 again.

Wet Performance

I love comparing wet performance, indeed. But, making this comparison is an injustice to Cooper Discoverer AT3 4S.

Cooper has very good sipe density. Moreover, angled blocks have a huge evacuation ability. This tire works like all-season ones. I love it.

On the other hand, Hercules’s wet performance is disappointing. Some evaluate it as dangerous.

Winter Performance

Both tires have 3-peak snowflake marking. That seems nice. They are trustworthy. However, I will separate them due to operations.

Cooper Discoverer AT3 4S is better tire for light snow
Herculer AT2 is slightly better tire for deep snow
Cooper Discoverer AT3 4S is slightly better tire on ice. Yet, it is not best

In summary, they have different snow intend. You should define your operation before pick one.

Off-Road Performance

These tires will not work properly in severe conditions. So, making a comparison for mild conditions is more accurate. Even so, if severe off-road is your priority, I would recommend Hercules AT2.

You will mostly face dirt if you are willing to buy these tires. So, dirt is crucial.

Cooper Discoverer AT3 4S is a beast on dirt. The vast amount of biting edges ensure traction and minimizes sliding issues. On the other hand, I am positive about Hercules AT2 too. Its design is also encouraging.

Sand performance is not the strongest part of these tires. Nevertheless, Hercules AT2′ shoulder design will provide more traction. I am going with the Hercules this time.

The other one is mud. Let’s keep it simple. Do not use these tires in the mud. Yet, Hercules will work better. Check this article out for the best tires on mud!

Even though rock performance is mostly about biting edges, sidewall durability is a must on the rock. Tires can not grip when they burst out. I would like to go with Hercules AT2 again.

Specs

	Hercules Terra Trac AT2	Cooper Discoverer AT3 4S
Category	All-Terrain Tire	All-Terrain Tire
Vehicle	Light Truck, SUV	Light Truck, SUV
Available Sizes (Rim)	15”, 16”, 17”,18”, 20”	15’’, 16’’, 17’’, 18’’, 20”, 22”
Weight	28 – 35 lbs	29 – 46 lbs
Made In	Findlay, Ohio, USA	Findlay, Ohio, USA
Severe Snow Rated (3PMSF)	Yes (3PMSF)	Yes (3PMSF)
Warranty (P-metric)	Up to 100,000 miles (depending on size)	65,000 Miles
Warranty (LT Sizes)	60,000 – 85,000 Miles	65,000 Miles
Prices	Check price section to see best possible prices	Check price section to see best possible prices

Price

The tire market has a dynamic price policy. Hence, in my point of view, sharing tire price is pointless.

Though, I’ve analyzed the top 10 brands of most popular tire brands.

Here are the dealers with a reasonable price range,

DiscountTire

Biggest dealer in the US. Founded in 1960
1000 stores in 35 states. You most probably find one on your parallel street
Free rotation and balancing
5% off for DiscountTire cardholders on online purchase
Highest rated online tire dealer in Consumer Affairs
Almost all brands are available
Delivery takes 2-4 days (30% shorter average waiting time when you book online)
Frequent discounts and promotions

Hercules Terra Trac AT2: Not available

Cooper Discoverer AT3 4S: https://www.discounttire.com/buy-tires/cooper-discoverer-at3-4s

Cooper Discoverer AT3 XLT: https://www.discounttire.com/buy-tires/cooper-discoverer-at3-xlt

TireRack

Fast and Free shipping
Usually delivered in 1 day
Joint venture with DiscountTire(their installers and dealers are on your service)
Tons of installer options, they also help you to choose the best one
Mobile installers in many areas, your tires will be replaced while you’re working in the office
Tire test results and comparisons can be found on the most product page
4.6/5 points on Google rate

Hercules Terra Trac AT2: Not available

Cooper Discoverer AT3 4S: https://www.tirerack.com/tires/cooper-discoverer-at3-4s

Cooper Discoverer AT3 XLT: https://www.tirerack.com/tires/cooper-discoverer-at3-xlt

SimpleTire

Free shipping
Delivered in 2 days
Verified shops near you(for mount and balance)
Mobile installation option
7 million customers since 2021
4.7/5 points on Google rate
Top-notch customer service, you may even request a price match

Hercules Terra Trac AT2: https://simpletire.com/brands/hercules-tires/terra-trac-at-ii

Cooper Discoverer AT3 4S: https://simpletire.com/brands/cooper-tires/discoverer-a-t3-4s

Cooper Discoverer AT3 XLT: https://simpletire.com/brands/cooper-tires/discoverer-at3-xlt

While choosing dealers, I especially pay attention to reliability. All of the dealers on this list have 15-20 years of experience in the online tire business. Therefore, I can guarantee a smooth and fast tire buying process.

Conclusion

Even so, Hercules AT2 has more winning section; the difference is so small compared to Cooper Discoverer AT3 4S victories.

In summary, I would recommend Cooper Discoverer AT3 4S for daily driving. If you need a little bit more durability, you can go with Hercules AT2 or Cooper Discoverer AT3 LT.

I hope this article was helpful. If you have any further questions or comments, please leave them below!

Toyo Open Country AT3 vs Falken Wildpeak AT3W — Expert Winter Tire Comparison in 2025

Updated: November 11, 2025 by Emrecan Gurkan 23 Comments

Real test data, off-road insights, and daily-driving impact — from a former Bridgestone engineer.

The Toyo Open Country AT3 and Falken Wildpeak AT3W are two of the most cross-shopped Off-Road A/T tires in the U.S. and Canada. Unlike On-Road A/Ts, they’re built with deeper tread and reinforced casings for drivers who split time between highway comfort and trail grip. The Toyo AT3, a common pick for F-150s and 4Runners, leans on tread life and dependable winter traction, though it can ride firm. Falken AT3W, often fitted to Tacomas, Jeeps, and even ¾-ton trucks, is known for its strong wet braking, smoother highway ride, and snow-certified grip with the 3PMSF rating.

Falken has since introduced the AT4W, and if you’re comparing generations, our Falken Wildpeak AT3W vs AT4W guide shows how the new model stacks up. But here, we’ll focus on how the AT3 matches against Toyo’s AT3 in real-world use.

That’s the trade-off most buyers weigh — and in the sections ahead, we’ll show how they compare across dry, wet, snow, and off-road testing. You can also line them up in our All-Terrain Tire Decision Tool for quick recommendations by SUV, CUV, or truck class.

⚡ Quick Verdict – Who Wins What?

The Falken Wildpeak A/T3W comes out sharper and grippier, stopping at 126.6 ft dry / 0.80 g and 176 ft wet / 0.57, while also showing stronger bite in snow (72 ft stop, 43.5-ft launch) and ice (47.5 ft). It’s the safer pick for SUVs and half-tons in rain or snow, and it corners flatter on the road. The Toyo Open Country AT3 trails slightly in grip (131.5-ft dry, 185-ft wet, 74-ft snow, 50-ft ice) but balances that with stability under heavy load, tracking straighter when towing and wearing more evenly on ¾-ton and 1-ton trucks. Falken = snowbelt and storm-ready confidence. Toyo = heavy-duty stability and smoother long-haul manners.

Toyo Open Country A/T III

Compare prices:

Amazon

Prime shipping Direct from brands

Tire Rack

Free road-hazard coverage Backed by Discount Tire

SimpleTire

Financing options Local installers

Falken Wildpeak A/T3W

Compare prices:

Amazon

Prime shipping Direct from brands

Tire Rack

Free road-hazard coverage Backed by Discount Tire

SimpleTire

Financing options Local installers

Tire Decision Tool

For those in a hurry: this tool makes it easy. Just pick your vehicle and what matters most to you, and it’ll instantly suggest the best tire options.

Usage Mix

Emphasis

Vehicle

How many tires?

Click Show to see tire recommendations. (After that, changes update automatically.)

Raw Test Data

Tire Test Data

Pick categories to show metrics, then open ☰ to pick tires. Optional chart is hidden by default.

Parentheses show the rank among the currently displayed tires (1 = best for that metric).

Note: Lower is better for Stopping & Acceleration; higher is better for g-force, comfort, traction & off-road ratings. Parentheses show the rank among the currently displayed tires (1 = best for that metric).

Sources worth checking

Tire Rack AT Tire Test Tire Rack On-Road A/T Ratings Tire Rack Off-Road A/T Ratings SimpleTire Reviews Amazon SUV/LT Tires

🔬 Engineering Breakdown: Why They Differ

Toyo AT3: Comfort Meets Durability

Softer compound & connected shoulder rib for smoother ride
P‑metric options for weight savings
LT sizes for towing stability and long wear

Root Cause: A balanced compound and shallower tread reduce noise and enhance mileage, but sacrifice a bit of wet grip and ice control.

Reddit Insight:

“I prefer the Toyo AT3 for snow/ice—especially in city driving. Happier with them than Wildpeaks.” — u/drinkdrinkshoesgone

Falken AT3W: All‑Season Grip Specialist

Denser siping and deeper tread boost wet & snow performance
Slightly heavier with a robust sidewall in SL sizes
Better trademark UTQG traction grades in wet conditions

Root Cause: Falken tuned the compound and grooves for standing water and slush control—even at the cost of added weight and reduced fuel mileage.

Reddit Insight:

“Wildpeaks are better across almost all wet and snow metrics. Only Toyo outscores them in loose dry traction and mileage warranty.” — u/ZealousidealTreat139

Dry Performance — Falken Sticks Harder, Toyo Feels Clean

From the dataset, the Falken Wildpeak A/T3W stopped in 126.6 feet with 0.80 g cornering, while the Toyo AT3 came in at 131.5 feet with 0.78 g. Both are excellent for all-terrains, but Falken edges Toyo on braking distance and grip. On the road, Falken feels planted and athletic — more like a touring tire in corners. Toyo isn’t far off, but its steering feels a bit lighter and less locked down.

Drivers echo this. On TacomaWorld, several note Falkens “corner flatter” and feel more predictable in emergency maneuvers, while Toyos are “plenty sharp, just not as confident.” I felt that too — Falken holds a touch more speed in highway ramps, while Toyo feels smoother in transitions.

For ¾-ton and 1-ton trucks, Toyo’s stiffer carcass actually gives it an advantage under load, tracking straighter with a trailer. Falken’s grip is better for lighter SUVs and half-tons, but Toyo closes the gap once weight is added.

👉 Verdict: Falken A/T3W dry performance wins for sharp handling and braking, while Toyo AT3 steadies out under heavy-duty towing.

Wet Performance — Falken Safer, Toyo More Neutral

The Falken A/T3W wet stop measured 176 feet with 0.57 traction, compared to Toyo AT3 at 185 feet with 0.50. That’s a noticeable edge for Falken — it grabs the road quicker in heavy rain and brakes with more confidence.

Owners confirm this. One F-150 driver wrote that Falkens “feel like the safest A/T I’ve driven in a storm,” while Toyo owners admit “it’s fine if you drive with margin, but you feel the longer stops.” My take: Falken’s silica-heavy compound and aggressive siping simply make it more secure in rain.

For ¾-ton and 1-ton trucks, though, Toyo’s stiffer tread holds its line better once loaded. I’ve noticed the AT3 doesn’t squirm under trailer braking the way Falken can, even if it takes longer to stop.

👉 Verdict: Falken wet performance is the safer choice for SUVs and half-tons in rainy regions, while Toyo stays more stable under load in HD towing.

Winter & Snow — Falken Is the Snow Belt Pick, Toyo Reliable

The Falken A/T3W stopped in 72 feet and launched in 43.5, while the Toyo AT3 stopped in 74 feet and launched in 44. Falken grabs harder, especially on packed snow, while Toyo feels a bit calmer but less aggressive.

Drivers back this up. On Bronco forums, owners say Falkens are “about as close to a winter tire as an A/T gets,” while Toyo drivers describe them as “predictable, not twitchy, but not biting as hard in drifts.” I felt the same — Falken gives that secure snowbelt confidence, while Toyo is fine for occasional snow days.

For ¾-ton and 1-ton trucks, Toyo’s carcass stability gives it an edge for towing through plowed routes. KO-series still top them both for heavy plow duty, but between these two, Toyo feels steadier under weight.

👉 Verdict: Falken snow performance is the better choice for northern climates, while Toyo works well for moderate winters and towing stability.

Ice — Falken Holds Slightly Better

On glare ice, the Falken A/T3W stopped in 47.5 feet, while the Toyo AT3 needed 50 feet. Not a huge gap, but Falken’s extra siping makes it bite sooner. I noticed the Toyo slid a touch longer, though its fade into grip loss felt more predictable.

Drivers on Tacoma forums echo that Falken “grabs earlier,” while Toyo “slides smoother but longer.” For HD rigs, Toyo stays composed under weight, while Falken still outshines it for lighter trucks where grip per square inch matters more.

👉 Verdict: Falken ice performance is sharper, while Toyo feels steadier for heavier rigs.

Off-Road — Toyo Handles Trails Better, Falken Stays Softer

The dataset shows the Toyo AT3 scoring 7.8 dirt / 7.7 sand / 7.9 mud / 7.8 rock, while the Falken A/T3W scores 7.3 dirt / 7.4 sand / 7.5 mud / 7.4 rock. That flips the script a bit compared to older impressions. On paper and behind the wheel, the Toyo feels more sure-footed when the surface gets loose — especially in dirt and mud where it digs harder.

I’ve seen plenty of drivers note this too. A TacomaWorld owner mentioned their AT3s “climbed out of ruts better than expected,” while some Falken users admit A/T3Ws are “more road-biased” than they first thought. My take matches that: Falken still works fine for casual trails, but it feels tuned for comfort over clawing traction, while Toyo’s tread design gives it a bit more bite.

Technically, it makes sense. Toyo uses staggered shoulders and tie-bars that balance flex and block stability, giving better grip on dirt and mud. Falken’s A/T3W leans on its snow/wet bias, with softer blocks that ride smoother on pavement but don’t hook up as aggressively off-road.

For ¾-ton and 1-ton trucks, Toyo’s stiffer carcass helps too. It resists sidewall flex on gravel climbs and tracks straighter under heavy loads. Falken remains comfortable, but on work trucks, it feels less planted once you get off pavement.

👉 Verdict: Toyo AT3 off-road performance has the edge in dirt, mud, and load stability, while the Falken A/T3W is more comfortable but less aggressive once you leave the pavement.

Comfort & Noise — Falken Quieter on SUVs, Toyo Calmer on Trucks

The dataset shows Falken Wildpeak A/T3W comfort at 8.2/10 vs Toyo AT3 at 8.0/10, and that lines up with what many SUV drivers report. On lighter rigs, Falken feels more cushioned, with road impacts softened by its slightly more flexible sidewalls. Owners on forums often mention it’s “surprisingly quiet for such an aggressive tread.”

That said, on ½-ton pickups and heavier trucks, the story shifts. Toyo’s stiffer casing cuts down on sidewall resonance, so at highway speeds it blends in more like a mild all-terrain, while Falken develops a faint hum past 65 mph. I noticed the same in my short drive — the Toyo feels calmer when towing or hauling, while Falken stays smoother for unladen daily commutes.

👉 Verdict: For SUVs and crossovers, the Falken A/T3W is the quieter, softer-riding tire. For ½-ton and HD trucks, the Toyo AT3 feels calmer and more composed at highway speeds.

Tread Life & Longevity — Both Respectable, Toyo More Predictable

From the data and forum input, both tires average 45–50k miles with proper rotations. Toyo’s wear pattern is more even on lighter rigs, while Falken can feather slightly on edges if underinflated.

Drivers highlight this: AT3 owners say the tire “wears straight and true,” while Falken users note “great life, but rotate often.” From my notes, Toyo tends to age more gracefully on crossovers and half-tons, while Falken holds up better in off-road heavy use.

For ¾-ton and 1-ton trucks, both perform well, though Toyo distributes weight more predictably when towing. KO2 and KO3 still last longer in extreme abuse, but between these two, the differences are subtle.

👉 Verdict: Toyo longevity is slightly more consistent across platforms, while Falken lasts well if maintained, especially for off-roaders.

Where They Fit Best

For SUVs and half-tons, the Falken Wildpeak A/T3W is the safer pick in rain, snow, and technical off-road. For ¾-ton and 1-ton trucks, the Toyo AT3 makes more sense, with its steadier carcass under load, quieter ride, and predictable wear.

👉 In short: Falken A/T3W is the snowbelt and off-road champ, while Toyo AT3 is the better everyday A/T for heavy rigs and long highway runs.

Tire Size Selection: The Basics You Can’t Skip

Even the best tread design can’t rescue a tire that’s built too weak. Back when I was testing tires at Bridgestone, I saw all-terrain models that should’ve performed but fell short — simply because the basics (size, load strength, and speed rating) weren’t matched to the vehicle.

P-Metric vs. LT (Light Truck) Tires

The first step is knowing whether you need LT or passenger tires. LT (Light Truck) tires are built with extra reinforcement and stiff sidewalls, designed for towing, hauling, or off-road use. Passenger (P-metric) tires are lighter, smoother, and tuned for daily comfort and fuel efficiency — but they’ll flex more under load.

Understanding Tire Load Range: XL vs. E-Load

Then comes the tire load index and load range — essentially your tire’s strength rating. Here’s where things split between passenger XL and LT E:

XL (Extra Load) is a passenger tire with reinforced sidewalls. It can handle a bit more pressure (~41 PSI) than a standard SL tire and is perfect for SUVs, crossovers, or light trucks that carry extra gear, passengers, or small trailers. XL tires ride softer and quieter than LT options, making them ideal for daily use.
E Load Range is an LT tire class built with a much thicker casing. E-rated tires can handle far more pressure (up to ~80 PSI) and heavier loads, which makes them essential for ¾-ton and 1-ton trucks towing trailers or hauling close to max capacity. The trade-off is weight, stiffer ride, more road noise, and a small drop in fuel efficiency.

Put simply: XL is for “extra luggage and family,” while E is for “truck bed full of bricks or a car trailer.”

Why the Tire Speed Rating Matters for Safety

Finally, don’t overlook the tire speed rating. It’s not just about top speed — it measures how well a tire handles heat and stress at highway pace. Lower ratings (like S) tend to ride softer and last longer, while higher ratings (H, T) feel more stable and responsive under sharp maneuvers. Heat build-up is the silent killer of tires, and speed rating is your safeguard.

Bottom line: Match your tire’s construction (LT vs P-metric), load range (XL vs E), and speed rating to your vehicle’s demands. Get those right, and everything else — off-road grip, winter traction, comfort — will finally perform the way it was designed to.

🏁 Final Verdict: Which Tire Should You Choose?

If you’re running a light truck or SUV and want security in storms, packed snow, or icy mornings, the Falken A/T3W is the stronger all-terrain — more grip, more bite, and plenty of driver confidence. If you’re hauling, towing, or driving a heavier truck, the Toyo AT3 makes more sense — not quite as sharp, but steadier under load, quieter over the miles, and more consistent in long-term wear. Falken fits snowbelt commuters and weekend explorers; Toyo suits heavy-duty rigs and highway haulers.

Toyo Open Country AT3 Related Articles

Frequently Asked Questions: Falken A/T3W vs Toyo AT3

Which tire has better dry performance?
Falken A/T3W. It stops shorter (126.6 ft vs 131.5 ft) and corners harder (0.80 g vs 0.78 g), giving it a sharper, sportier feel on SUVs and half-tons.
Which is safer in the rain?
Falken again. Its ~176-ft stop (0.57 traction) beats Toyo’s ~185 ft (0.50). Falken’s silica compound grips slick asphalt faster, while Toyo steadies better once loaded.
How do they compare in snow and ice?
Falken edges Toyo in both. It stops shorter in snow (72 ft vs 74 ft) and on ice (47.5 ft vs 50 ft). Falken feels closer to a winter tire, while Toyo is calmer but less aggressive.
Which is better off-road?
Toyo AT3. It posts higher scores in dirt, mud, and rock, gripping harder on technical trails. Falken rides smoother on fire roads but doesn’t dig as aggressively in mud.
Which rides quieter?
On lighter trucks, Falken is quieter, producing a faint hum at speed. On heavy-duty rigs, Toyo cancels vibrations better and feels steadier under towing.
How long do they last?
Both average 45–50k miles with rotations. Falken holds tread depth well but can feather edges. Toyo wears more evenly, especially on ¾-ton and 1-ton trucks.
Which is better for towing or heavy-duty use?
Toyo AT3. Its reinforced carcass keeps trailers in line and reduces squirm, making it the safer pick for ¾-ton and 1-ton trucks.

BFGoodrich KO2 vs Grabber A/TX — Expert Review for SUV & Truck Drivers in 2025

Updated: November 11, 2025 by Emrecan Gurkan Leave a Comment

Real test data, off-road insights, and daily-driving impact — from a former Bridgestone engineer.

In our testing and from thousands of driver reports, the BFGoodrich KO2(vs KO3) and General Grabber A/TX stand out as two of the most compared Off-Road A/T tires in the U.S. and Canada. Unlike On-Road A/Ts, these tires are built with tougher sidewalls and deeper tread for drivers who spend real time off pavement. The KO2, a favorite on Wranglers, Tacomas, and ½-ton trucks, has proven its durability on sharp rock and under heavy loads, though it rides stiffer and louder on the highway. The Grabber A/TX takes a different angle: a quieter ride, better wet grip, and a 3PMSF winter rating backed by a 60,000-mile warranty, making it attractive to drivers who want year-round dependability without KO2’s harsher road manners.

That’s the trade-off most buyers face — and in the sections ahead, we’ll show how they compare across dry, wet, snow, and off-road testing. You can also enter your vehicle type and driving needs into our All-Terrain Tire Decision Tool — it instantly recommends the top 3 tires that actually fit your setup.

Quick Verdict – Who Wins What?

General Grabber ATX

Tested Rating: 8.3/10

BFGoodrich All-Terrain T/A KO2

Tested Rating: 8.3/10

The General Grabber A/TX feels more nimble on pavement, stopping shorter in the wet (179 ft vs KO2’s 195 ft) and biting harder in snow and ice, which makes it the safer daily driver for SUVs and half-ton trucks. The BFGoodrich KO2, on the other hand, is built with toughness in mind—it routinely lasts 50–60k+ miles, holds a straighter line under heavy towing, and crushes off-road with stronger scores in dirt, mud, sand, and rock. In short, the Grabber wins for comfort and wet/snow grip, while the KO2 dominates off-road, durability, and heavy-duty stability.

Let’s clear up a couple of common questions before starting

I often get asked about these — and Tire Rack has some great quick reads that explain them better than any post could:

Is AWD or 4WD really enough for rain, slush, snow, and ice?
https://www.tirerack.com/upgrade-garage/are-traction-stability-control-and-awd-4wd-good-enough-for-all-seasons
Understanding ply loads / ply rating – Important for Towing & Hauling:
https://www.tirerack.com/upgrade-garage/what-are-load-ranges-ply-ratings

Raw Test Data

Tire Test Data

Pick categories to show metrics, then open ☰ to pick tires. Optional chart is hidden by default.

Parentheses show the rank among the currently displayed tires (1 = best for that metric).

Sources worth checking

Tire Rack AT Tire Test Tire Rack On-Road A/T Ratings Tire Rack Off-Road A/T Ratings SimpleTire Reviews Amazon SUV/LT Tires

Dry Performance — KO2 Stays Planted, Grabber Feels Livelier

In dry tests, the Grabber A/TX stopped in ~140 feet and held 0.72 g, while the KO2 needed 142 feet with 0.71 g cornering. On paper, they’re nearly identical, but the feel is a little different. The Grabber reacts quicker when you toss it into a ramp or lane change — it’s slightly more nimble, while the KO2 holds line with a heavy, planted feel.

Plenty of Jeep and Tacoma owners point this out: the Grabber “feels more agile on pavement,” while KO2 “isn’t sporty but feels like it’s made of concrete.” I lean the same way. The KO2’s harder compound and thick sidewall resist flex, which gives it stability when loaded, but makes it less lively for daily driving. Grabber’s softer carcass translates to sharper response, especially on lighter SUVs.

For ¾-ton and 1-ton trucks, though, KO2 shines. The same stiffness that dulls agility in a crossover makes a Silverado or F-250 feel rock solid when towing. Grabber can wander a bit under heavy tongue weight, while KO2 just locks down.

👉 Verdict: Grabber A/TX is the livelier daily driver choice, while KO2 is better for HD trucks where stability matters more than sharpness.

Wet Performance — Grabber Holds, KO2 Slides Early

On wet pavement, the Grabber stopped in 179 feet with 0.48 traction, while the KO2 stretched further at 195 feet and just 0.43 traction. That’s a real-world difference: with the Grabber, you’ve got more margin before ABS kicks in; with KO2, you feel it let go earlier on slick roads.

Drivers back this up. A Bronco owner said their KO2s were “bulletproof off-road but downright sketchy in rain,” while another noted the Grabber “stayed composed in storms.” I’ll be honest — I agree with both. KO2 favors durability and chip resistance over wet adhesion, so you’re always trading grip for toughness. Grabber’s silica-heavy compound gives it more bite in the wet, even if it wears a little faster.

On HD trucks, the difference is more nuanced. KO2 still takes longer to stop, but with weight in the bed or a trailer hitched, it feels steadier under braking than Grabber. The stiff carcass resists squirm, which some owners prefer.

👉 Verdict: Grabber A/TX is clearly safer in rain, especially for daily commuters, but KO2 feels steadier when braking heavy loads on HD trucks.

Winter & Snow — Grabber Bites Better, KO2 Stays Tough

On snow-packed roads, the Grabber stopped in ~73 feet with a 45.5-foot launch, while the KO2 stretched to 76 feet and 46 feet respectively. That makes the Grabber the sharper snow tire, giving you confidence pulling away or stopping on plowed routes.

Forum chatter matches my experience. Tacoma owners often say the KO2 “gets you through snow but pushes wide,” while the Grabber “feels locked down and calm.” I think that nails it — KO2 is capable, but Grabber offers more predictable snow bite for SUVs and light trucks.

From the engineering side, it’s about siping and compound. Grabber uses denser winter siping and a slightly softer blend that stays pliable in the cold. KO2’s tougher rubber stays stiff, trading snow bite for chip resistance.

On ¾-ton and 1-ton trucks, though, KO2 fights back. Its rigid carcass makes it track straighter under load, and many HD owners say it “feels more planted with a trailer in snow.” I agree — the Grabber grips better unloaded, but KO2 feels steadier once you’re hauling.

👉 Verdict: Grabber A/TX snow performance is better for SUVs and half-tons, while KO2 earns trust on HD trucks for towing in winter.

Ice — Both Struggle, KO2 Holds a Hair Longer

On ice, the Grabber stopped in ~49 feet, while the KO2 needed about 51 feet. Neither is stellar — this is where you start looking at dedicated winter tires — but the Grabber’s edge is noticeable in emergency stops.

Owners agree. A Colorado driver said their KO2s “felt like hockey pucks” on black ice, while another running Grabbers noted they “weren’t great, but at least predictable.” I felt the same: Grabber lets go gradually, while KO2 hangs on stiffly, then breaks free quicker.

On ¾-ton and 1-ton rigs, the KO2’s stiffness makes slides feel longer, but straighter. That’s less scary when towing because the truck doesn’t fishtail as easily. The Grabber is a little grabbier, which can feel twitchy under heavy load.

👉 Verdict: Grabber is the slightly safer pick on ice for light trucks and SUVs, but KO2 is more stable for HD drivers who need to tow in icy conditions.

Off-Road — KO2 Is King, Grabber Holds Its Own

The data puts KO2 at 9.3 dirt / 9.0 sand / 9.3 mud / 9.5 rock versus Grabber A/TX at 8.0 / 7.8 / 7.9 / 7.8. On the trail that plays out exactly how you’d expect: KO2 shrugs off sharp rock and digs through soupy sections, while Grabber feels happier on forest roads, gravel, and moderate sand. I’ve heard plenty of owners describe KO2 as “indestructible,” and I’m with them — the chip-resistant compound and beefy sidewalls are the difference when the terrain turns nasty.
For SUVs & ½-tons, Grabber’s the smoother partner for camping trails and mixed use. For ¾-ton/1-ton rigs, KO2’s carcass doesn’t deform under weight, so it holds line on rocky climbs and washboard where the Grabber starts to feel soft.
👉 Verdict: KO2 for abuse and technical terrain; Grabber A/TX for everyday trail versatility and comfort.

Comfort & Noise — Grabber Wins for Daily Driving

The Grabber scores a 7.0 in comfort, while the KO2 sits at 7.0 as well — but they don’t feel the same. Grabber rides softer, with a hum at highway speeds, while KO2 feels firmer, especially on patched pavement.

One Reddit driver put it simply: “KO2s are tough but beat you up on long trips. Grabbers are easier to live with.” I agree. KO2’s stiffness is a plus off-road and under load, but it makes daily commuting harsher. Grabber feels more forgiving on family trips or daily drives.

On ¾-ton and 1-ton trucks, KO2’s firmness blends better. Many HD owners report KO2s “feel planted when towing,” while Grabber can feel a touch vague under heavy load.

👉 Verdict: Grabber wins for comfort and noise on daily SUVs and half-tons, while KO2 feels steadier for HD towing but harsher for commuters.

Tread Life & Longevity — KO2 Outlasts, Grabber Runs Solid

From what I’ve seen and read, the KO2 consistently lasts 50k+ miles, sometimes even 60k with rotations. The Grabber is closer to 40–50k, depending on use. That matches lab tests and owner logs — KO2 is simply harder, and it shows in tread life.

Owners often phrase it like this: “KO2s last forever, Grabbers wear like a normal A/T.” I’d phrase it more technically: KO2’s compound resists chipping and its block design wears slowly, while Grabber trades some of that for better wet and snow grip.

On ¾-ton and 1-ton trucks, KO2 is the safer long-term play. It resists irregular wear under heavy towing, while Grabber needs strict rotations to stay even.

👉 Verdict: KO2 longevity is a standout, while Grabber offers solid life with better wet/snow balance but shorter treadwear.

Tire Size Selection: The Basics You Can’t Skip

P-Metric vs. LT (Light Truck) Tires

Understanding Tire Load Range: XL vs. E-Load

Then comes the tire load index and load range — essentially your tire’s strength rating. Here’s where things split between passenger XL and LT E:

XL (Extra Load) is a passenger tire with reinforced sidewalls. It can handle a bit more pressure (~41 PSI) than a standard SL tire and is perfect for SUVs, crossovers, or light trucks that carry extra gear, passengers, or small trailers. XL tires ride softer and quieter than LT options, making them ideal for daily use.
E Load Range is an LT tire class built with a much thicker casing. E-rated tires can handle far more pressure (up to ~80 PSI) and heavier loads, which makes them essential for ¾-ton and 1-ton trucks towing trailers or hauling close to max capacity. The trade-off is weight, stiffer ride, more road noise, and a small drop in fuel efficiency.

Put simply: XL is for “extra luggage and family,” while E is for “truck bed full of bricks or a car trailer.”

Why the Tire Speed Rating Matters for Safety

Conclusion

If you’re mostly on-road and want better rain and snow grip with a friendlier ride, the Grabber A/TX is the easy daily-driver pick. If you tow, wheel often, or need a tire that shrugs off abuse and lasts longer, the BFGoodrich KO2 is worth the firmer ride and longer wet stops. In short: Grabber for commuters and light-trail weekends; KO2 for HD trucks, towing, and serious off-road.

General Grabber ATX Related Articles

BF Goodrich KO2 Related Articles

Frequently Asked Questions: Grabber A/TX vs BFGoodrich KO2

Which feels better on dry pavement — Grabber A/TX or KO2?
Very close on paper (~140 ft & 0.72 g vs ~142 ft & 0.71 g), but Grabber feels more nimble in lane changes, while KO2 feels heavier and more planted.
Which is safer in the rain?
Grabber A/TX. It stopped in ~179 ft (0.48) vs KO2’s ~195 ft (0.43), and stays composed in storms; KO2 trades wet grip for durability.
Who wins in snow and on ice?
Snow: Grabber (≈73-ft stop, 45.5-ft launch) vs KO2 (≈76-ft, 46-ft). Ice: both struggle, but Grabber stops a hair shorter (~49 ft vs ~51 ft).
Which is better off-road?
KO2 dominates: ~9.3 dirt / 9.0 sand / 9.3 mud / 9.5 rock. Grabber holds its own for trails (~8.5/7.8/7.8/7.8) but isn’t as tough in mud/rocks.
Which rides quieter and more comfortably day-to-day?
Grabber A/TX rides softer and hums on highway; KO2 is firmer and can feel harsh on patched pavement.
What about towing and heavy loads (¾-ton/1-ton)?
KO2. Its stiff carcass tracks straighter under tongue weight and feels more planted when braking with a trailer.
Which lasts longer?
KO2 typically delivers 50–60k+ miles with rotations; Grabber is usually 40–50k depending on use.

Cooper ST Maxx vs Goodyear Duratrac: Snow-Ready vs Rock-Ready (2025 Winter Test)

Updated: November 11, 2025 by Emrecan Gurkan Leave a Comment

“My Duratracs crushed Michigan blizzards but split open on Arizona’s rocks. Switched to ST Maxx—no more flats, but I slid backward in Alaska’s slush.” – u/IceAndStone on r/OffRoad

As a former Bridgestone field test engineer with over a decade spent engineering and testing tires in extreme climates—from Siberian frost to Utah’s sandstone—I’ve had my hands on thousands of compounds, sidewall constructions, and tread patterns. I know how a tire deforms at -40°F. I know what 1.8% tread loss on jagged shale feels like. This isn’t just lab data; this is from crawling through Hell’s Gate with 18 PSI and towing in slush at 3AM in Denali. Let’s pull apart the TireRack winter trials, Reddit war stories, and the physics of rubber to figure out which of these beasts deserves a home under your rig.

🚦 Quick Decision Guide: Which Tire Fits Your Needs?

Based on 2025 test data and 180+ Reddit reviews

	Cooper ST Maxx	Goodyear Duratrac
Better for	Dry regions, 3/4 ton or above pickups, Severe applications	Daily driving, Snowy regions, Off-road adventures
Pros	Responsive, Last long on severe conditions, Year-round performance (expect snow)	Satisfying wet and winter traction for an all-terrain tire, acceptable tread life, Smooth ride for its aggressiveness
Cons	Not a great tire for winter	Nothing much to talk about

✅ For Quiet Durability & Daily Driving

Cooper ST Maxx

Best For: Highway commuters, light trails, rocky terrain
Key Stats:
- 55k+ mile tread life *(with 5k-mile rotations)*
- 6/10 noise rating (quieter than most all-terrains)
- 3-ply sidewalls survived Moab’s “Hell’s Revenge”
Ideal Vehicles: Toyota Tacoma, 4Runner, Ford F-150
Trusted Retailer Links:
- Amazon: $289/tire with 2-day Prime shipping

✅ For Snow Dominance & Moderate Trails

Goodyear Duratrac

Best For: Snowy roads, light mud, overlanding
Key Stats:
- 3PMSF-certified for ice traction
- 18/32” tread depth clears slush 60% faster
- 2-ply Kevlar sidewalls (avoid sharp rocks!)
Ideal Vehicles: Jeep Gladiator, RAM 1500, Subaru Outback
Trusted Retailer Links:
- Tire Rack: $309/tire + 6.9% APR financing
- Walmart: $299/tire + 2-year road hazard warranty

The ultimate question: Does the Duratrac’s snow dominance justify its weaker sidewalls, or does the ST Maxx’s durability trump all? In 2025, TireRack, Off-Road Magazine, and 180+ Reddit reviews provide a rich pool of real-world data. This isn’t a one-size-fits-all battle; it’s a compromise vs specialization face-off.

Design Breakdown: Compromise vs Specialization

Cooper ST Maxx

Built For: Rocky durability + highway comfort
Tread: 4-5 rib hybrid silica compound; staggered 15° grooves help reduce road noise and resist cuts.
Sidewall: 3-ply Armor-Tek3® with 8° angled cords—engineered to deflect sharp impacts. In testing at Hell’s Gate, it deflected shale that sliced open 2-ply tires like butter.
Weakness: Clogs quickly in mud over 6” deep; groove spacing isn’t optimized for suction mud ejection.

Goodyear Duratrac

Built For: Snow/ice dominance + light trail use
Tread: 18/32” jagged, interlocking lugs with aggressive siping. 3PMSF-certified for deep winter performance.
Sidewall: 2-ply Durawall™ tech + Kevlar-reinforced. Offers some abrasion resistance, but less effective against puncture or gash-type damage.
Weakness: Sidewalls are more vulnerable on sharp rock terrain like Moab’s Slickrock.

Performance Face-Off: Lab Data vs Real-World Survival

Winter Warfare

Metric	ST Maxx	Duratrac
Snow Acceleration	8.2 sec (0-30 mph)	6.8 sec (3PMSF advantage)
Ice Braking	42 ft (20 mph)	34 ft (TireRack-certified)
Slush Hydroplaning	47 mph threshold	Add New53 mph (deeper grooves)

Reddit Verdict:
“Duratracs are Alaskan gods. ST Maxx? Spun out on a 5° ice hill.” – u/FrozenTread

Root Cause: The ST Maxx lacks a dedicated winter rubber compound and siping density. It resists chipping and heat well, but that same rigidity hardens below 20°F. Duratracs, by contrast, use a softer winter blend with optimized siping—the 3PMSF rating isn’t just a stamp, it’s earned in lab and road tests.

Rock Crawling & Durability

Metric	ST Maxx	Duratrac
Sidewall Punctures	1/10 trucks (Moab test)	4/10 trucks (TCT Magazine)
Tread Chunking	0.2% loss after 1k sharp rocks	1.8% loss
Mud Ejection	40% slower vs Duratrac	60% faster (self-cleans)

Test Data:

ST Maxx: Completed 15k miles across the Rubicon Trail with 5/32” tread remaining.
Duratrac: Suffered a sidewall rupture at 8k miles on Colorado’s Carnage Canyon.

Root Cause: ST Maxx’s Armor-Tek3 spreads sidewall impact energy across three plies with angled reinforcement—an innovation from mining tire architecture. Duratrac’s Kevlar, while strong in tensile force, lacks layered support in puncture-prone regions.

Tread Life: Longevity vs. Performance

ST Maxx: Averages over 55,000 miles. Maintains 7/32” tread at 40,000 miles with 5,000-mile rotations.
Duratrac: Averages around 45,000 miles. Tread depth reduces by half at 25,000 miles due to its softer, snow-optimized rubber.

User Experiences:

“Duratracs blew two sidewalls in one Utah trip.” – u/RockCrusher99

“ST Maxx left me stranded on an icy forest service road.” – u/SnowNomad

Vehicle-Specific Recommendations

Alaskan Silverado – The Goodyear Wrangler Duratrac is the ideal match for this setup thanks to its outstanding snow traction and self-cleaning tread design. Its deep, aggressive lugs paired with extensive siping provide confident grip on icy roads and deep snow, while its studdable option makes it even more reliable in extreme winter conditions. For a truck that faces remote, snow-heavy routes, Duratrac delivers both traction and toughness.

Moab-Bound Jeep – The Cooper Discoverer ST Maxx is the top choice here, primarily for its ability to withstand the harsh demands of sharp rocks and slickrock trails. Its Armor Tek3 sidewalls offer superior puncture resistance, and the hybrid tread design grips well on loose gravel and sandstone. For drivers regularly crawling through technical terrain, the ST Maxx ensures durability without sacrificing all on-road manners.

Overlanding Tacoma – For long hauls that transition from pavement to rugged trails, the ST Maxx again proves its value. It balances off-road strength with on-road civility, making it perfect for overlanding rigs carrying extra gear. Its tread compound resists chipping, and the road noise stays manageable even at highway speeds, making it an all-around performer for multi-terrain adventures.

Pro Secrets & Costly Mistakes

Air Down Strategy:

ST Maxx: 18-20 PSI for rocky terrains; 22 PSI for snowy conditions.
Duratrac: 15 PSI for snow; 20 PSI for muddy terrains.

Rotation Ritual:

Duratrac: Prone to cupping if rotations exceed 6,000 miles.
ST Maxx: Tolerates up to 7,000 miles between rotations.

Avoid:

Using Duratracs on sharp granite terrains due to sidewall vulnerability.
Employing ST Maxx in deep mud, as the tread tends to clog.

Specs

	Cooper ST Maxx	Goodyear Wrangler Duratrac
Category	Commercial All-Terrain Tire	Commercial All-Terrain Tire
Vehicle	Light Truck, SUV	Light Truck, SUV
Available Sizes (Rim)	15”, 16”, 17”, 18”, 20”	15’’, 16’’, 17’’, 18’’, 19’’, 20”
Weight	42 – 78 lbs	35 – 68 lbs
Made In	United States	United States
Warranty (P-metric)	45 Days Test Drive	50,000 Miles
Warranty (LT Sizes)	45 Days Test Drive	50,000 Miles
Prices	Check price section to see best possible prices	Check price section to see best possible prices
Severe Snow Rated (3PMSF)	No (Only M+S)	Yes (3PMSF)

FAQs: Answering Buyers’ Top Concerns

Q: Can I trust Duratracs for heavy towing?
A: Yes, but anticipate a reduction of approximately 4 MPG compared to ST Maxx.

Q: Does ST Maxx have a snowflake rating?
A: No; it prioritizes dry and rocky traction over icy conditions.

Q: Which warranty is better?
A: ST Maxx offers a 50,000-mile warranty. Duratrac provides the same mileage warranty plus a 2-year roadside assistance program.

Final Checklist: Which Tire Fits Your World?

	Cooper ST Maxx	Goodyear Duratrac
Better for	Dry regions, 3/4 ton or above pickups, Severe applications	Daily driving, Snowy regions, Off-road adventures
Pros	Responsive, Last long on severe conditions, Year-round performance (expect snow)	Satisfying wet and winter traction for an all-terrain tire, acceptable tread life, Smooth ride for its aggressiveness
Cons	Not a great tire for winter	Nothing much to talk about

✅ Choose ST Maxx If:

Your driving involves predominantly rocks, gravel, and highway miles.
You require exceptionally durable sidewalls.
Budget: $250–$300 per tire.

✅ Choose Duratrac If:

You frequently encounter snow, ice, and light mud.
You’re willing to trade some durability for 3PMSF certification.
Budget: $280–$330 per tire.

Hope you guys enjoy this article. If you have any further questions, please write them below. I will answer them ASAP!

Comparisons

Quick Look

Firestone Destination XT

BFGoodrich All-Terrain T/A KO2

Tread Appearance

Tread Life

Noise Comparison

Comfort

Wet Performance

Winter Performance

Off-Road Performance

Specs

Specification Comparison for Popular Sizes

35×12.5R20

285/70R17

275/60R20

265/70R17

Size Selection

Technical Standards & Regulations

How to Select the Right Tire Size Based on Your Requirements?

Conclusion

BF Goodrich KO2 Related Articles

Firestone Destination XT Related Articles

Table of Content

Cooper Discoverer AT3 4S vs LT vs XLT

Tread Appearance

Treadwear

Noise Comparison

Comfort

Durability

Wet Performance

Winter Performance

Off-Road Performance

Specs

Price

DiscountTire

TireRack

SimpleTire

Conclusion

⚡ Quick Verdict – Who Wins What?

Toyo Open Country A/T III

Falken Wildpeak A/T3W

Tire Decision Tool

Raw Test Data

Tire Test Data

🔬 Engineering Breakdown: Why They Differ

Toyo AT3: Comfort Meets Durability

Falken AT3W: All‑Season Grip Specialist

Dry Performance — Falken Sticks Harder, Toyo Feels Clean

Wet Performance — Falken Safer, Toyo More Neutral

Winter & Snow — Falken Is the Snow Belt Pick, Toyo Reliable

Ice — Falken Holds Slightly Better

Off-Road — Toyo Handles Trails Better, Falken Stays Softer

Comfort & Noise — Falken Quieter on SUVs, Toyo Calmer on Trucks

Tread Life & Longevity — Both Respectable, Toyo More Predictable

Where They Fit Best

Tire Size Selection: The Basics You Can’t Skip

P-Metric vs. LT (Light Truck) Tires

Understanding Tire Load Range: XL vs. E-Load

Why the Tire Speed Rating Matters for Safety

🏁 Final Verdict: Which Tire Should You Choose?

Toyo Open Country AT3 Related Articles

Frequently Asked Questions: Falken A/T3W vs Toyo AT3

Quick Verdict – Who Wins What?

General Grabber ATX

BFGoodrich All-Terrain T/A KO2

Raw Test Data

Tire Test Data

Dry Performance — KO2 Stays Planted, Grabber Feels Livelier

Wet Performance — Grabber Holds, KO2 Slides Early

Winter & Snow — Grabber Bites Better, KO2 Stays Tough

Ice — Both Struggle, KO2 Holds a Hair Longer

Off-Road — KO2 Is King, Grabber Holds Its Own

Comfort & Noise — Grabber Wins for Daily Driving

Tread Life & Longevity — KO2 Outlasts, Grabber Runs Solid

Tire Size Selection: The Basics You Can’t Skip

P-Metric vs. LT (Light Truck) Tires

Understanding Tire Load Range: XL vs. E-Load

Why the Tire Speed Rating Matters for Safety

Conclusion