• Skip to primary navigation
  • Skip to main content
  • Skip to primary sidebar

TireTerrain

  • Home
  • Comparisons & Reviews
  • All-Terrain Tire Decision Tool
  • Pro Tips
  • About

Comparisons

Nitto Ridge Grappler vs Falken Wildpeak AT3W: Reviewed by a Former Bridgestone Engineer — Which Tire Truly Balances Rugged Grip with All-Season Comfort?

Updated: November 11, 2025 by Emrecan Gurkan Leave a Comment

Real test data, off-road insights, and daily-driving impact — from a former Bridgestone engineer.

The Nitto Ridge Grappler and Falken Wildpeak AT3W represent two very different takes on all-terrain performance. The Ridge Grappler falls into the Rugged-Terrain category — a hybrid between A/T and mud-terrain — giving trucks and Jeeps a bold stance, blockier tread, and stronger loose-surface bite, though comfort and fuel economy take a hit. The Wildpeak AT3W, by contrast, is a proven Off-Road A/T that’s become a top pick for 4Runners, F-150s, and crossovers thanks to dependable wet grip, tread life, and its 3PMSF rating for winter traction. If you’re curious how it stacks up against Falken’s latest release, check our Falken Wildpeak AT4W vs AT3W comparison.

That’s the real trade-off here — bold hybrid style vs year-round balance. In the sections ahead, we’ll break down how they compare across dry, wet, snow, and off-road testing, and you can also line them up in our All-Terrain Tire Decision Tool for quick recommendations by SUV, CUV, or truck class.

⚡ Quick Verdict – Who Wins What?

Close-up of a Nitto Ridge Grappler tire mounted on a black truck, showcasing its deep tread blocks and rugged hybrid terrain design.
Nitto Ridge Grappler — blending mud-terrain aggression with all-terrain comfort.

The Falken Wildpeak A/T3W is the sharper and safer on-road choice, with confident dry grip (126.6-ft stop, 0.80 g), shorter wet stops (176 ft, 0.57 g), and standout snow traction (72-ft stop, 43.5-ft launch). It even edges the Ridge Grappler on ice (47.5 ft vs 55.7 ft), while staying one of the quietest A/Ts (8.2/10 comfort) with 45–50k miles of even wear. The Nitto Ridge Grappler, meanwhile, dominates off-road (9.0 dirt / 8.5 sand / 9.3 mud / 9.2 rock), delivering a stiffer, more planted feel under heavy trucks. It sacrifices wet and winter grip and grows louder as tread wears, but excels for ¾-ton and HD towing, rugged trails, and drivers who value aggressive looks.

Nitto Ridge Grappler

Nitto Ridge Grappler tire
Compare prices:
Amazon
Prime shipping Direct from brands
Tire Rack
Free road-hazard coverage Backed by Discount Tire
SimpleTire
Financing options Local installers

Falken Wildpeak A/T3W

Falken Wildpeak AT3W tire
Compare prices:
Amazon
Prime shipping Direct from brands
Tire Rack
Free road-hazard coverage Backed by Discount Tire
SimpleTire
Financing options Local installers

Tire Decision Tool

For those in a hurry: this tool makes it easy. Just pick your vehicle and what matters most to you, and it’ll instantly suggest the best tire options.

Click Show to see tire recommendations. (After that, changes update automatically.)
No matching tires found. Try another selection.

    Raw Test Data

    Tire Test Data

    Pick categories to show metrics, then open ☰ to pick tires. Optional chart is hidden by default.

    Parentheses show the rank among the currently displayed tires (1 = best for that metric).
    Left axis lists metrics. Top axis is used for g-force metrics so they scale clearly.
    Note: Lower is better for Stopping & Acceleration; higher is better for g-force, comfort, traction & off-road ratings. Parentheses show the rank among the currently displayed tires (1 = best for that metric).
    Sources worth checking
    Tire Rack AT Tire Test Tire Rack On-Road A/T Ratings Tire Rack Off-Road A/T Ratings SimpleTire Reviews Amazon SUV/LT Tires

    🔬 Construction & Tech Breakdown

    Falken Wildpeak AT3W is a taller tire

    🛠️ Ridge Grappler: Hybrid Brawler

    • Rugged terrain tread pattern with deep voids

    • Reinforced sidewalls and staggered shoulder blocks

    • Available in P-metric and LT up to Load F

    🧠 Root Cause: Built to fill the gap between all-terrain and mud-terrain tires. The aggressive lugs and lateral grooves enhance self-cleaning and mud evacuation.

    🏁 Verdict: Choose Ridge Grappler if your trails get messy and you want a tougher profile without going full MT.

    🛠️ Wildpeak AT3W: Snow-Rated Swiss Army Knife

    • 3PMSF-certified for extreme winter grip

    • Full-depth sipes and silica-enriched tread compound

    • Heat diffuser tech in the lower sidewall

    🧠 Root Cause: Falken focused on year-round balance — deep tread siping + silica = winter grip; heat diffuser = towing stability.

    🏁 Verdict: Pick AT3W if you want comfort, snow performance, and durability in one tire.

    Dry Performance — Falken Feels Nimble, Ridge Grappler Locks Down

    This comparison draws from the dataset I’ve built — merging structured results, community feedback, and my own short driving impressions. On dry pavement, the Falken A/T3W stopped in 126.6 feet with 0.80 g cornering, while the Ridge Grappler came in at 130 feet with 0.75 g. Behind the wheel, Falken feels like a sneaker on pavement — light, quick to respond, and sharp in corners. The Ridge Grappler is more like a pair of work boots — heavier to steer, slower into turns, but once it’s set, it doesn’t budge.

    Community voices match this. Falken drivers on Tacoma forums often describe it as “cornering flatter” and “braking like a sporty A/T,” while Ridge Grappler owners highlight its “planted and confident” feel. From an engineering perspective, Falken’s dense siping and softer carcass add grip and agility, while Ridge’s stiffer casing and larger tread blocks prioritize stability.

    • SUVs & crossovers: Falken’s sharper handling fits better

    • ½-tons: Falken more nimble day-to-day, Ridge steadier when loaded

    • ¾-ton & HD trucks: Ridge is the better match, stability outweighs Falken’s agility

    👉 Verdict: Falken feels lighter and sharper; Ridge Grappler holds the line with more authority under weight.

    Wet Performance — Falken Inspires Confidence, Ridge Needs Margin

    The siped pattern on the Falken Wildpeak AT3W offers exceptional wet grip

    In heavy rain, the difference grows. Falken posted a 176-foot stop with 0.57 g traction, while Ridge stretched to 203 feet with 0.47 g. Driving them back-to-back, Falken felt like fresh wipers clearing glass — sharp and reassuring. Ridge behaved more like older blades: it still worked, but you had to slow down and give yourself space.

    Owners echo this. On Reddit, Falken drivers call it “planted in downpours,” while Ridge users admit it’s “fine if you slow down in a storm.” That’s the harder rubber compound at work — Ridge prioritizes durability and off-road toughness, while Falken’s silica-rich mix and siping density generate better wet adhesion.

    • SUVs & crossovers: Falken is the safer wet-weather pick

    • ½-tons: Falken wins for rain confidence, Ridge manageable with caution

    • ¾-ton & HD trucks: Ridge tracks straight under weight but still stretches distances

    👉 Verdict: Falken is the stronger wet performer, especially for lighter rigs. Ridge demands extra margin when storms roll in.

    Note from the Expert: When it comes to rain, I always emphasize two things: compound grip and water evacuation. You can see the full details in my analysis, but if you take just one thing away, remember that an AT tire’s stiff nature makes achieving top-tier wet performance a constant battle. This is why the question, Are All-Terrain Tires Good in Rain?, requires a nuanced answer that balances tread design against rubber stiffness.

    Winter & Snow — Falken Digs, Ridge Struggles on Pack

    Snow reveals an even clearer split. Falken stopped in 72 feet and launched in 43.5 feet, while Ridge stretched to 78 feet and 47.7 feet. In my own short test, Falken felt like skis with fresh edges — quick to bite into packed snow. Ridge was more like sliding on dull skis — steady once it settled, but slower to grab.

    Drivers echo this. Falken owners on 4Runner forums often call it “the best snow A/T I’ve run,” while Ridge users admit it’s “fine for fresh snow but not as good on plowed roads.” That’s exactly what the design suggests: Falken’s 3PMSF rating, siping density, and flexible compound give it more bite, while Ridge’s blockier tread and harder rubber trade polish for durability.

    • SUVs & crossovers: Falken is the clear snow-belt choice

    • ½-tons: Falken safer for daily winter driving, Ridge okay for occasional snow

    • ¾-ton & HD trucks: Ridge steadier under load, Falken may feel softer when towing

    👉 Verdict: Falken takes snow performance, especially in commuter conditions. Ridge is serviceable but not snow-optimized.

    Note from the Expert: Our discussions often boil down to the core tradeoff. On one hand, you must understand why all-terrain tires are truly effective in deep snow, but not on ice. On the other hand, you face the 3PMSF Paradox—the hidden cost of that badge. The short answer is: The 3PMSF badge certifies traction, but it costs you durability. Dive into our full analysis on the critical 3PMSF rating for severe winter and off-road service, and its hidden costs, before you risk your rig on the trail.

    Ice — Falken Grabs Earlier, Ridge Slides Longer

    On ice, Falken stopped in 47.5 feet, while Ridge needed 55.7 feet. That margin shows up quickly on frosty mornings. Falken gives earlier grip, while Ridge slides further, though it does so predictably rather than snapping loose.

    Owners describe it the same. Falken users say it “grabs earlier and holds,” while Ridge drivers call it “okay if you tip-toe.” My own impression matches: Falken’s compound and siping deliver micro-bite, while Ridge’s tougher rubber lets it glide further but with a steady, manageable fade.

    • SUVs & crossovers: Falken is much safer for icy commutes

    • ½-tons: Falken grips earlier, Ridge forgives with gradual slide

    • ¾-ton & HD trucks: Ridge steadies heavy rigs, Falken feels twitchier under weight

    👉 Verdict: Falken is the better ice tire for light rigs; Ridge trades shorter grip for predictable slides.

    Off-Road — Ridge Grappler’s Home Turf

    Nitto Ridge Grappler is narrow but beefy!

    The tables turn off-road. Ridge scored 9.0 dirt / 8.5 sand / 9.3 mud / 9.2 rock, while Falken came in at 7.3 / 7.4 / 7.5 / 7.4. On trails, Ridge felt like a bulldog — biting hard and pulling through mud and rock. Falken, by contrast, was more of a trail horse — steady and comfortable, but less aggressive when things got technical.

    Community chatter confirms it. Ridge owners rave it’s a “beast in the mud” and “grips where others spin,” while Falken drivers admit it “rides great on fire roads but doesn’t dig as deep in mud.” The reason is clear: Ridge’s reinforced sidewalls, big staggered blocks, and stone ejectors give it more bite and toughness, while Falken’s casing smooths bumps but lacks the same aggression.

    • SUVs & crossovers: Falken fits light trails; Ridge is overkill

    • ½-tons: Ridge is weekend-ready for trails, Falken better for forest roads

    • ¾-ton & HD trucks: Ridge is the superior off-road partner, stable even under towing

    👉 Verdict: Ridge dominates in dirt, mud, and rock. Falken is the gentler choice for mild off-road.

    Note from the Expert: Every successful day on the trail is about preparation and physics, because tire longevity is earned, not given. Before you even start, you must master the critical link between tire pressure and load range for every rig to maximize your contact patch. Once moving, remember your ultimate off-road armor is your sidewall protection against the inevitable pinch flat. And finally, your traction on the obstacle is dictated by choosing the right aggressive vs hybrid tread pattern for your terrain. Master those three steps, and your rig will be ready for anything.

    Comfort & Noise — Falken Stays Quieter, Ridge Grows Loud

    On-road comfort splits too. Falken rates 8.2/10, Ridge 6.8/10. Early on, Ridge hums lightly, but as tread wears, it grows louder — much like a relationship where quirks only show over time. Falken, on the other hand, starts quiet and stays calmer deeper into tread life.

    Owners say the same. Falken is often described as “whisper quiet for an A/T,” while Ridge drivers note it’s “quiet for how it looks — at first,” but noise builds if rotations slip. That’s because Falken’s wider tread spacing and softer carcass dampen resonance, while Ridge’s rigid RT construction transmits more vibration into the cabin.

    • SUVs & crossovers: Falken is the refined daily choice

    • ½-tons: Falken quieter, Ridge acceptable if you want style and bite

    • ¾-ton & HD trucks: Ridge noise blends into diesel and road roar, Falken can feel soft when towing

    👉 Verdict: Falken is the better everyday tire for comfort. Ridge demands you accept more hum in exchange for its off-road bite.

    Note from the Expert: For years, choosing all-terrain meant accepting noise—a true compromise for off-road grip. That’s why the question, Are All-Terrain Tires Louder than Highway Tires?, used to have a simple “yes” answer. Now, with the rise of on-road models, the core issue has shifted from noise to overall refinement. To fully understand which side of the comfort spectrum you’re buying into, you need to determine Are All-Terrain Tires Good for Daily Driving?—a question that depends entirely on the tire’s construction, not just the name.

    Tread Life & Longevity — Ridge Built Tough, Falken Ages Gracefully

    Both wear well, but in different ways. Falken averages 45–50k miles with relatively even wear, while Ridge goes 40–50k under heavy use but can get noisy and irregular if rotations slip. In my impressions, Ridge felt like heavy equipment — built to take punishment but demanding maintenance. Falken was more forgiving, wearing evenly until noise crept in near the end.

    Reddit threads echo this. Falken drivers say it “held strong for 50k but got louder late,” while Ridge owners mention “45k with towing and still going.” That’s the compound difference: Falken softer and steady, Ridge harder and chip-resistant.

    • SUVs & crossovers: Falken’s even wear is more forgiving

    • ½-tons: both last similar miles, Falken stays quieter

    • ¾-ton & HD trucks: Ridge resists abuse better under weight

    👉 Verdict: Both are durable, but Ridge is built for punishment; Falken wears with more refinement.

    Where They Fit Best

    The Ridge Grappler and Falken A/T3W chase different drivers. Falken is the balanced commuter A/T — refined, quiet, safer in wet and snow. Ridge is the aggressive hybrid A/T — louder, longer to stop in storms, but unmatched for style and trail grip.

    • SUVs & crossovers: Falken is the daily driver’s pick; Ridge is overkill unless trails are common

    • ½-tons: Falken fits mixed pavement and weekend dirt; Ridge fits trucks that spend more time on job sites or trails

    • ¾-ton & HD trucks: Ridge is the stronger partner for towing and rough terrain; Falken fits better if comfort matters

    👉 Regional fit:

    • Falken shines in the Pacific Northwest, Northeast snow belt, and Midwest — where rain, snow, and ice dominate.

    • Ridge thrives in the Southwest deserts, Mountain West, and rural gravel-heavy states like Montana, Texas, and Alberta.

    👉 Bottom line: Pick Falken if you want all-weather safety and comfort. Pick Ridge if you want off-road bite and aggressive presence, and don’t mind more noise on the road.

    Tire Size Selection: The Basics You Can’t Skip

    Even the best tread design can’t rescue a tire that’s built too weak. Back when I was testing tires at Bridgestone, I saw all-terrain models that should’ve performed but fell short — simply because the basics (size, load strength, and speed rating) weren’t matched to the vehicle.

    P-Metric vs. LT (Light Truck) Tires

    The first step is knowing whether you need LT or passenger tires. LT (Light Truck) tires are built with extra reinforcement and stiff sidewalls, designed for towing, hauling, or off-road use. Passenger (P-metric) tires are lighter, smoother, and tuned for daily comfort and fuel efficiency — but they’ll flex more under load.

    Understanding Tire Load Range: XL vs. E-Load

    Then comes the tire load index and load range — essentially your tire’s strength rating. Here’s where things split between passenger XL and LT E:

    • XL (Extra Load) is a passenger tire with reinforced sidewalls. It can handle a bit more pressure (~41 PSI) than a standard SL tire and is perfect for SUVs, crossovers, or light trucks that carry extra gear, passengers, or small trailers. XL tires ride softer and quieter than LT options, making them ideal for daily use.

    • E Load Range is an LT tire class built with a much thicker casing. E-rated tires can handle far more pressure (up to ~80 PSI) and heavier loads, which makes them essential for ¾-ton and 1-ton trucks towing trailers or hauling close to max capacity. The trade-off is weight, stiffer ride, more road noise, and a small drop in fuel efficiency.

    Put simply: XL is for “extra luggage and family,” while E is for “truck bed full of bricks or a car trailer.”

    Why the Tire Speed Rating Matters for Safety

    Finally, don’t overlook the tire speed rating. It’s not just about top speed — it measures how well a tire handles heat and stress at highway pace. Lower ratings (like S) tend to ride softer and last longer, while higher ratings (H, T) feel more stable and responsive under sharp maneuvers. Heat build-up is the silent killer of tires, and speed rating is your safeguard.

    Bottom line: Match your tire’s construction (LT vs P-metric), load range (XL vs E), and speed rating to your vehicle’s demands. Get those right, and everything else — off-road grip, winter traction, comfort — will finally perform the way it was designed to.

    🏁 Final Verdict: Which One Would I Actually Buy?

    If you want a daily-friendly A/T that’s quiet, refined, and dependable in rain and snow, the Falken A/T3W is the safer bet — perfect for SUVs, crossovers, and ½-ton trucks in the Pacific Northwest, Northeast, or Midwest.
    If your priority is off-road bite, towing stability, and rugged style, the Ridge Grappler is the tougher partner — best for ¾-ton and HD trucks in the Southwest, Mountain West, or rural states with heavy gravel and trail use.

    👉 Bottom line: Falken for all-weather safety and comfort. Ridge Grappler for aggressive off-road strength and presence.

    Frequently Asked Questions: Falken A/T3W vs Nitto Ridge Grappler

    • Which tire is better on-road?
      Falken A/T3W. It stops shorter on dry (126.6 ft) and wet (176 ft) pavement, with sharper handling and quieter ride.

    • Which tire handles snow and ice better?
      Falken. It stops quicker in snow (72 ft vs Ridge’s 78 ft) and grabs earlier on ice (47.5 ft vs 55.7 ft).

    • Which tire is stronger off-road?
      Ridge Grappler. With scores of 9.0 dirt, 9.3 mud, and 9.2 rock, it digs deeper and holds up better on trails.

    • Which tire lasts longer?
      Both average 45–50k miles, but Falken wears more evenly, while Ridge resists chipping better under heavy loads.

    • Which tire is quieter?
      Falken A/T3W. It rates 8.2/10 for comfort, while Ridge starts mild but grows louder over time (6.8/10).

    • Which vehicles suit Falken A/T3W?
      Best for SUVs, crossovers, and ½-ton trucks that need daily comfort, rain/snow safety, and light-trail ability.

    • Which vehicles suit Ridge Grappler?
      Best for ¾-ton & HD trucks needing towing stability, off-road muscle, and aggressive styling.

    Filed Under: All Terrain Tires Tagged With: Comparisons, falken, falken wildpeak at3w, nitto, nitto ridge grappler

    BFGoodrich KO2 vs Falken Wildpeak AT3W: Reviewed by a Former Bridgestone Engineer — Which All-Terrain Tire Actually Handles It All?

    Updated: November 11, 2025 by Emrecan Gurkan Leave a Comment

    Falken Wildpeak AT3W has a compact pattern that offers smooth ride

    Real-world test data, technical breakdowns, and use-case recommendations — from a former Bridgestone test engineer.

    The BFGoodrich KO2 and Falken Wildpeak AT3W represent two of the most popular Off-Road A/T tires in North America. I’ve logged thousands of miles on both — from rocky desert trails to icy morning commutes. The KO2 built its reputation on brute sidewall strength, long tread life, and aired-down control, making it a go-to for Wranglers, Tacomas, and ½-ton pickups. It’s also 3PMSF-rated, though it rides firmer and louder on pavement. If you want to see how it stacks up against its successor, check out my BFGoodrich KO3 vs KO2 breakdown.

    The Falken Wildpeak AT3W, by contrast, is tuned with a silica-rich compound, deeper tread, and a 3PMSF rating that makes it a favorite for winter driving. Popular among 4Runners, Silverados, and crossovers in snowy regions, it delivers strong wet braking and year-round stability. And if you’re considering Falken’s newest release, don’t miss my Falken Wildpeak AT4W vs AT3W review.

    That’s the real choice buyers face — toughness vs modern comfort. In the sections ahead, we’ll break down dry, wet, snow, and off-road performance, and you can also line them up in our All-Terrain Tire Decision Tool for quick recommendations by SUV, CUV, or truck class.

    Quick Verdict – Who Wins What?

    BFGoodrich All-Terrain T/A KO2

    BFGoodrich KO2 tire
    Tested Rating: 8.3/10

    Trusted Retailers with Best Deals:

    Tire Rack
    Free road-hazard coverage Backed by Discount Tire
    Amazon
    Prime shipping Direct from brands

    Falken Wildpeak A/T3W

    Falken Wildpeak AT3W tire
    Tested Rating: 8.4/10

    Trusted Retailers with Best Deals:

    Tire Rack
    Free road-hazard coverage Backed by Discount Tire
    SimpleTire
    Financing options Local installers
    Amazon
    Prime shipping Direct from brands

    The Falken Wildpeak A/T3W is the sharper, more road-friendly option, with a quicker dry response (126.6-ft stop, 0.80 g cornering) and safer wet braking (176 ft vs KO2’s 195 ft). Its snow and ice grip comes in earlier, making it the better pick for SUVs and half-ton trucks in mixed climates. The BFGoodrich KO2, on the other hand, trades nimbleness for stability under load — it’s steadier when towing, tougher off-road (9.3–9.5 across dirt, mud, and rock), and lasts longer under abuse, though it does run louder and requires more margin in the wet.

      Raw Test Data

      Tire Test Data

      Pick categories to show metrics, then open ☰ to pick tires. Optional chart is hidden by default.

      Parentheses show the rank among the currently displayed tires (1 = best for that metric).
      Left axis lists metrics. Top axis is used for g-force metrics so they scale clearly.
      Note: Lower is better for Stopping & Acceleration; higher is better for g-force, comfort, traction & off-road ratings. Parentheses show the rank among the currently displayed tires (1 = best for that metric).
      Sources worth checking
      Tire Rack AT Tire Test Tire Rack On-Road A/T Ratings Tire Rack Off-Road A/T Ratings SimpleTire Reviews Amazon SUV/LT Tires

      🔬 Construction & Tech Breakdown

      After 63,000 KM (40,000 miles), KO2 still have most of its tread. You can see the minor chipping. Yet, it's totally fine at this wear level

      🛠️ KO2: Tank-Like Build

      • CoreGard™ sidewall armor

      • Dual steel belts with full nylon wrap

      • 3PMSF winter-certified (rare for such a tough tire)

      • Primarily E-load LT sizing

      🧠 Root Cause: KO2’s construction favors strength, puncture resistance, and long-wear durability under off-road abuse.

      🏁 Verdict: Go KO2 if you routinely air down, haul weight, or run technical trails.

      🛠️ Wildpeak AT3W: Winter-Built All-Terrain

      • Full-depth siping and silica-enhanced compound

      • Heat diffuser tech near bead area

      • 3PMSF snow-certified with C–E load ratings

      • Wide range of sizes including SL

      🧠 Root Cause: Falken engineered this tire for balanced real-world use — not just marketing. Silica + siping = winter grip. Heat diffuser = towing confidence.

      🏁 Verdict: Choose AT3W for balance, comfort, and winter confidence.

      Dry Performance — Falken Feels Lighter, KO2 Holds Weight

      On dry pavement, the Falken A/T3W stopped in 126.6 feet with 0.80 g cornering, while the KO2 needed 142 feet with 0.71 g. Behind the wheel, Falken feels like a nimble pickup with a lighter load — quicker to bite, flatter in corners. The KO2, by contrast, feels more like a truck with a trailer hooked up: slower into the turn, but steady once it’s set.

      Community voices echo this split. On Tacoma forums, Falken owners praise it as “surprisingly sharp for an A/T,” while KO2 drivers often say it’s “not sporty but never unsettled.” That matches my own short drive impressions. Falken’s softer casing and dense siping keep it planted, while KO2’s tough sidewall and larger blocks lean more toward stability than speed.

      • SUVs & crossovers: Falken feels lighter, easier to steer

      • ½-tons: Falken better for daily handling, KO2 steadier for mixed use

      • ¾-ton & HD trucks: KO2’s stiff casing shines, Falken feels softer under weight

      👉 Verdict: Falken wins on nimbleness; KO2 steadies the chassis when the load gets heavy.

      Wet Performance — Falken Bites Quicker, KO2 Demands Margin

      In rain, the gap widens. Falken stopped in 176 feet with 0.57 g traction, while KO2 stretched to 195 feet with 0.43 g. On wet asphalt, Falken bites like a fresh set of wipers — quick to clear and grip. KO2, on the other hand, felt more like wipers past their prime — it’ll hold on, but with more streak and less bite.

      Reddit threads confirm this. Falken drivers call it “planted in downpours,” while KO2 owners admit “you need more room in storms.” From an engineer’s view, it’s simple: Falken’s silica-rich compound and dense siping keep the tread pliable, while KO2’s harder rubber favors chip resistance but loses adhesion in the wet.

      • SUVs & crossovers: Falken is the clear wet-weather pick

      • ½-tons: Falken safer in storms, KO2 okay if margin is left

      • ¾-ton & HD trucks: KO2 tracks straighter under load, but still longer

      👉 Verdict: Falken is the safer rain tire, especially for light rigs. KO2 stays composed under weight but stretches stopping distances.

      Note from the Expert: When it comes to rain, I always emphasize two things: compound grip and water evacuation. You can see the full details in my analysis, but if you take just one thing away, remember that an AT tire’s stiff nature makes achieving top-tier wet performance a constant battle. This is why the question, Are All-Terrain Tires Good in Rain?, requires a nuanced answer that balances tread design against rubber stiffness.

      Winter & Snow — Falken Digs, KO2 Endures

      In snow, the Falken posted a 72-foot stop and 43.5-foot launch, compared to KO2’s 76-foot stop and 46-foot launch. Driving both, Falken feels like a ski with fresh edges — it bites sooner and gives confidence. KO2 is more like an older ski: slower to grip, but still steady once you adapt.

      Owners mirror this. Falken drivers on 4Runner forums often call it “the best snow A/T they’ve used,” while KO2 fans note it “gets through, just takes more distance.” That’s design at work. Falken’s siping density and softer mix give it better bite in packed snow, while KO2’s stiffer sidewalls and blockier shoulders make it more predictable but less grippy.

      • SUVs & crossovers: Falken wins in snow-belt commuting

      • ½-tons: Falken safer in daily snow, KO2 adequate with 4WD

      • ¾-ton & HD trucks: KO2 steadies under load, Falken can feel softer towing

      👉 Verdict: Falken is the stronger snow performer for light rigs; KO2 steadies heavy trucks in mixed winter use.

      Note from the Expert: Our discussions often boil down to the core tradeoff. On one hand, you must understand why all-terrain tires are truly effective in deep snow, but not on ice. On the other hand, you face the 3PMSF Paradox—the hidden cost of that badge. The short answer is: The 3PMSF badge certifies traction, but it costs you durability. Dive into our full analysis on the critical 3PMSF rating for severe winter and off-road service, and its hidden costs, before you risk your rig on the trail.

      Ice — Falken Grabs First, KO2 Slides Longer

      On ice, Falken stopped in 47.5 feet, while KO2 needed 51 feet. That few feet matter when you’re braking at an intersection. Falken felt like boots with micro-spikes — not perfect, but biting earlier. KO2 was more like smooth rubber soles: sliding further, though with a predictable fade rather than a sudden snap.

      Drivers see it the same. Falken owners call it “trustworthy on icy mornings,” while KO2 drivers say “manageable if you go slow.” That fits the build — Falken’s compound and siping create micro-grip, while KO2’s harder design slides further but with more control.

      • SUVs & crossovers: Falken gives earlier bite

      • ½-tons: Falken safer in icy stops, KO2 forgives with gradual slide

      • ¾-ton & HD trucks: KO2 steadier with weight, Falken may feel twitchy towing

      👉 Verdict: Falken grabs first on ice; KO2 lets go more gently.

      Off-Road — KO2 Bites Harder, Falken Smooths It Out

      Here the script flips. KO2 scores 9.3 dirt, 9.0 sand, 9.3 mud, 9.5 rock, while Falken posts 7.3 dirt, 7.4 sand, 7.5 mud, 7.4 rock. On trails, KO2 is the bulldog — digging, climbing, and holding firm. Falken is more like a trail horse — smoother, comfortable, but less aggressive in tough spots.

      Trail chatter backs it up. KO2 owners rave it “climbs what others won’t,” while Falken drivers praise its “comfortable fire-road ride” but admit it “doesn’t dig as deep in mud.” That’s because KO2’s deep lugs, stone ejectors, and 3-ply sidewalls prioritize traction and toughness, while Falken’s softer carcass smooths the ride but gives up bite.

      • SUVs & crossovers: Falken fits light trail use, KO2 overkill

      • ½-tons: KO2 for weekend trail rigs, Falken better for fire roads

      • ¾-ton & HD trucks: KO2’s toughness shines under weight

      👉 Verdict: KO2 dominates in real off-road terrain; Falken favors comfort on mild dirt roads.

      Note from the Expert: Every successful day on the trail is about preparation and physics, because tire longevity is earned, not given. Before you even start, you must master the critical link between tire pressure and load range for every rig to maximize your contact patch. Once moving, remember your ultimate off-road armor is your sidewall protection against the inevitable pinch flat. And finally, your traction on the obstacle is dictated by choosing the right aggressive vs hybrid tread pattern for your terrain. Master those three steps, and your rig will be ready for anything.

      Comfort & Noise — Falken Quieter, KO2 More Truck-Like

      By comfort, Falken rates 8.2/10, KO2 a 7.0/10. In my drives, Falken was quiet — like background jazz in a café. KO2 was more like a garage band warming up — not unbearable, but always present. Over time, KO2 grows louder if rotations slip, while Falken stays calmer deeper into its tread life.

      Owners agree. Falken is often called “whisper quiet at 65 mph,” while KO2 drivers describe it as “noticeable hum but normal for an A/T.” That’s because Falken’s tread spacing dampens resonance, while KO2’s stiffer casing transmits more vibration.

      • SUVs & crossovers: Falken is the refined daily choice

      • ½-tons: Falken quieter, KO2 acceptable if trail grip is priority

      • ¾-ton & HD trucks: KO2 noise blends into background, Falken can feel soft towing

      👉 Verdict: Falken wins daily quiet; KO2 feels tougher but louder.

      Note from the Expert: For years, choosing all-terrain meant accepting noise—a true compromise for off-road grip. That’s why the question, Are All-Terrain Tires Louder than Highway Tires?, used to have a simple “yes” answer. Now, with the rise of on-road models, the core issue has shifted from noise to overall refinement. To fully understand which side of the comfort spectrum you’re buying into, you need to determine Are All-Terrain Tires Good for Daily Driving?—a question that depends entirely on the tire’s construction, not just the name.

      Tread Life & Longevity — Both Strong, KO2 Built for Abuse

      Both tires last well, but in different ways. Falken averages 45–50k miles, staying consistent but sometimes feathering on edges. KO2 runs 50k+ with proper rotations, especially on heavier trucks. Think of Falken as a solid commuter clocking in daily, while KO2 is the construction worker — louder, tougher, and harder to wear down.

      Reddit threads confirm it. Falken “pulled strong for 50k but got loud at the end,” while KO2 drivers boast “still running at 55k with towing.” That reflects casing design: Falken’s softer carcass wears evenly until noise creeps in, while KO2’s 3-ply toughness resists chips and abuse but needs rotations to stay smooth.

      • SUVs & crossovers: Falken’s even wear fits best

      • ½-tons: both last similar miles, Falken stays quieter

      • ¾-ton & HD trucks: KO2 holds up better under load and abuse

      👉 Verdict: Both are durable, but KO2 is the tire you choose if you punish your rig.

      Where They Fit Best

      The split is clear. Falken Wildpeak A/T3W is the daily-friendly all-terrain — quieter, sharper in the wet, and stronger in snow. BFGoodrich KO2 is the trail veteran — louder, longer-stopping in rain, but unmatched in off-road bite and heavy-duty stability.

      • SUVs & crossovers: Falken is the clearer match, refined and safer in wet/snow

      • ½-tons: Falken better for commuting plus weekend dirt, KO2 for rigs that see job sites and trails

      • ¾-ton & HD trucks: KO2 is the go-to for towing, hauling, and rocky terrain

      👉 Regional fit:

      • Falken shines in the Pacific Northwest (rain), Northeast snow belt, and Midwest mixed climates.

      • KO2 rules the Southwest deserts, Mountain West trails, and rural gravel-heavy regions like Alberta or Montana.

      👉 Bottom line: Choose Falken if your truck lives on highways with seasonal snow. Pick KO2 if you need off-road bite and heavy-duty toughness first.

      Tire Size Selection: The Basics You Can’t Skip

      Even the best tread design can’t rescue a tire that’s built too weak. Back when I was testing tires at Bridgestone, I saw all-terrain models that should’ve performed but fell short — simply because the basics (size, load strength, and speed rating) weren’t matched to the vehicle.

      P-Metric vs. LT (Light Truck) Tires

      The first step is knowing whether you need LT or passenger tires. LT (Light Truck) tires are built with extra reinforcement and stiff sidewalls, designed for towing, hauling, or off-road use. Passenger (P-metric) tires are lighter, smoother, and tuned for daily comfort and fuel efficiency — but they’ll flex more under load.

      Understanding Tire Load Range: XL vs. E-Load

      Then comes the tire load index and load range — essentially your tire’s strength rating. Here’s where things split between passenger XL and LT E:

      • XL (Extra Load) is a passenger tire with reinforced sidewalls. It can handle a bit more pressure (~41 PSI) than a standard SL tire and is perfect for SUVs, crossovers, or light trucks that carry extra gear, passengers, or small trailers. XL tires ride softer and quieter than LT options, making them ideal for daily use.

      • E Load Range is an LT tire class built with a much thicker casing. E-rated tires can handle far more pressure (up to ~80 PSI) and heavier loads, which makes them essential for ¾-ton and 1-ton trucks towing trailers or hauling close to max capacity. The trade-off is weight, stiffer ride, more road noise, and a small drop in fuel efficiency.

      Put simply: XL is for “extra luggage and family,” while E is for “truck bed full of bricks or a car trailer.”

      Why the Tire Speed Rating Matters for Safety

      Finally, don’t overlook the tire speed rating. It’s not just about top speed — it measures how well a tire handles heat and stress at highway pace. Lower ratings (like S) tend to ride softer and last longer, while higher ratings (H, T) feel more stable and responsive under sharp maneuvers. Heat build-up is the silent killer of tires, and speed rating is your safeguard.

      Bottom line: Match your tire’s construction (LT vs P-metric), load range (XL vs E), and speed rating to your vehicle’s demands. Get those right, and everything else — off-road grip, winter traction, comfort — will finally perform the way it was designed to.

      🏁 Final Verdict: Which One Would I Actually Buy?

      The choice comes down to how you use your rig. If you’re commuting daily through rain and snow, Falken Wildpeak A/T3W is the safer and more comfortable tire — it brakes shorter, runs quieter, and inspires confidence in slick conditions. But if your truck spends weekends on trails, job sites, or towing heavy loads, the KO2’s stiffer casing, proven off-road traction, and longer wear make it the smarter long-term partner.

      BFGoodrich All-Terrain TA KO2 Related Articles

      Read Review
      Compare with:
      vs BFGoodrich All-Terrain T/A KO3 vs Falken Wildpeak A/T3W vs Falken Wildpeak A/T4W vs Firestone Destination XT vs General Grabber ATX vs Nitto Ridge Grappler vs Toyo Open Country A/T III vs Yokohama Geolandar A/T4

      Frequently Asked Questions: Falken A/T3W vs BFGoodrich KO2

      • Which tire is better on-road?
        Falken A/T3W. It stops shorter on dry (126.6 ft) and wet (176 ft) pavement and feels sharper in corners.

      • Which tire is safer in rain?
        Falken. Its silica compound and siping give stronger wet grip, while KO2 needs more braking distance (~195 ft).

      • Which performs better in snow?
        Falken again. It stops quicker (72 ft vs KO2’s 76 ft) and accelerates faster on packed snow.

      • Which is stronger off-road?
        KO2. It leads with 9.3 dirt, 9.0 sand, 9.3 mud, 9.5 rock, making it the tougher trail tire.

      • Which tire is quieter on highways?
        Falken. Rated 8.2/10 comfort vs KO2’s 7.0/10, with noticeably less hum at speed.

      • Which lasts longer?
        KO2. Many owners see 50k+ miles under load, while Falken averages 45–50k with rotations.

      • Which should I choose for heavy-duty trucks?
        KO2. Its 3-ply sidewalls and stiffer carcass handle towing and hauling better than Falken.

      Filed Under: All Terrain Tires Tagged With: bf goodrich, bf goodrich ko2, Comparisons, falken, falken wildpeak at3w

      Bridgestone Weatherpeak vs Michelin Crossclimate 2

      Updated: July 31, 2025 by Emrecan Gurkan 2 Comments

      These two tire models sport distinctly different tread patterns, meaning they're conceptualized for diverse driving needs

      Bridgestone Weatherpeak and Michelin Crosslimate 2 stand as the premier frontrunners in the all-weather tire arena. Given that both these tires cater to a wide range of passenger vehicles, from sedans to SUVs and CUVs, and boast their association with premium brands, the debate on which one reigns supreme has become quite the buzz. In this piece, I’ll delve deep into the technical aspects of each tire, offering insights into their optimal conditions. Let’s dive in!

      At a Glance

      Michelin Crossclimate 2Bridgestone Weatherpeak
      Better forFor those of you cruising the city streets in coupes and sedans, chasing that thrilling, sporty driving sensation, this insight’s for you. Whether you’re navigating urban jungles or stretching the legs of your ride on open roads, here’s what you need to know.For all you SUV and CUV enthusiasts navigating tougher terrains, especially those who prioritize winter performance, here’s some vital intel tailored just for you. Whether you’re tackling the rugged trails or gearing up for snowy adventures, dive into these insights.
      ProsAll-weather traction,
      Responsiveness,
      Quiet ride
      All-weather traction(winter-oriented),
      Smooth ride,
      Fuel-efficiency
      ConsWinter traction is limited,
      A bit rough ride
      Slightly noisy,
      Not that responsive

      Michelin’s Crossclimate 2 and Bridgestone’s Weatherpeak are unparalleled contenders. For those hitting highways or zipping around cities, Michelin stands out. Yet, when venturing between city streets and challenging terrains, especially during those frosty winter months, Bridgestone takes the lead, particularly on slushy or muddy paths. Both are formidable in rainy conditions, but for SUVs and CUVs, Bridgestone gets the nod. On the flip side, Michelin is the go-to for sedans and coupes. Both promise a smooth, quiet ride, yet Bridgestone edges ahead with its marginally smoother feel. A heads-up for electric vehicle enthusiasts: mileage considerations suggest these might not be your first pick. So, while Michelin is tailored for the sporty, spirited drivers of lighter vehicles, Bridgestone’s design speaks to the rugged heart of heavier vehicle owners.

      All-Season Tires Cheat Sheet

      Finding the most suitable one for you among thousands of tires is very difficult.

      My team & I have analyzed 100 different tires and generated this ‘Quick Answer Sheet‘ for those who don’t wanna spend too much time during tire selection.

      Before we start, here are the incredibly helpful articles I highly recommend to take a look at;

      • How to keep tire noise down:
        https://www.tirerack.com/upgrade-garage/why-do-tire-tread-patterns-make-noise
      • Fuel-Efficiency:
        https://www.tirerack.com/landing/fuel_efficiency
      • Traction/Stability control for AWD/4WD (All-Season tires specific)
        https://www.tirerack.com/upgrade-garage/traction-stability-4ws-awd
      Below the table, you can find my favorite tires that I have classified according to your needs.
      All-Season Tires Cheat Sheet
      NameBest forWorks Best onArticles3PMSFRoad NoiseMileageResponsivenessRiding ComfortWarrantyFuel EconomyWet PerformanceMild WinterSevere Winter

      Michelin Crossclimate 2
      ( Check Price – Test Report )

      Year Round Usage & Tread LifeSedans, coupes, crossovers, SUVs, minivansReviewYesDecentElegantElegantDecent60,000DecentElegantElegantDecent
      Michelin Primacy Tour A/S
      ( Check Price – Test Report )
      Everything but severe winter tractionSedans, coupes, crossovers, SUVsReviewNoElegantElegantElegantElegant45,000 – 55,000DecentElegantAverageFairy Well
      Bridgestone WeatherPeak
      ( Check Price – Test Report )
      Smooth & quiet 4 season drivingSedans, coupes, crossovers, SUVs, minivansReviewYesElegantDecentElegantElegant70,000ElegantDecentElegantAverage
      Bridgestone DriveGuard Plus
      ( Check Price – Test Report )
      Great all-round run-flat tireSUV, CUV, Sedans, CoupesReviewNoAverageExcellentExcellentExcellent65,000AverageExcellentDecentAverage
      Vredestein Quatrac Pro
      ( Check Price – Test Report )
      4-Season performance-driven ridingSedans, coupes, crossovers, SUVsReviewYesElegantDecentElegantElegant50,000DecentElegantElegantAverage
      Vredestein HiTrac All-Season
      ( Check Price –Test Report )
      Year round performance with great handlingSedans, coupes, crossovers, SUVsNoDecentDecentElegantDecent70,000DecentElegantDecentAverage
      Pirelli P7 AS Plus 3
      ( Check Price – Test Report )
      Great all-round performance + mild winterSedans, coupes, crossovers, SUVsReviewNoElegantElegantElegantElegant70,000ElegantDecentDecentAverage
      Nokian WRG4
      ( Check Price )
      Traction focused 4 season drivingSedans, coupes, crossovers, SUVs, minivansReviewYesDecentDecentDecentElegant65,000AverageElegantElegantDecent
      Goodyear Assurance WeatherReady
      ( Check Price –Test Report )
      Year-round traction + handlingSedans, coupes, crossovers, SUVs, minivans–YesAverageDecentElegantElegant60,000AverageElegantElegantAverage
      Firestone WeatherGrip
      ( Check Price –Test Report )
      Winter-focused 4 season drivingSedans, coupes, crossoversReviewYesAverageFairy WellAverageDecent65,00Fairy WellAverageElegantElegant
      BF Goodrich Advantage Control
      ( Check Price –Test Report )
      Quiet & smooth 3 season traction + light snowSedans, coupes, crossovers, SUVsReviewNoDecentDecentElegantDecent65,000 – 75,000ElegantDecentAveragePoor
      Kumho Crugen HP71
      ( Check Price – Test Report )
      Decent all-round performance + light snowCUV, SUVReviewNoAverageAverageDecentDecent65,000DecentDecentDecentFairy Well
      Bridgestone Alenza AS Ultra
      (Check Price – Test Report )
      Long lasting performance for squishy regionsCrossovers, SUVs, light trucksReviewNoDecentDecentDecentDecent70,000DecentElegantDecentFairy Well
      Uniroyal Tiger Paw Touring AS
      (Check Price)
      Affordable 3 season tractionSedans, coupes, crossovers, SUVsReviewNoAverageAverageDecentDecent70,000DecentAverageFairy WellPoor
      Goodyear Assurance All-Season
      ( Check Price – Test Report )
      Affordable all-round 3 season + light snow performanceSedans, minivansReviewNoDecentDecentDecentDecent65,000DecentDecentAverageFairy Well
      Goodyear Assurance MaxLife
      ( Check Price – Test Report )
      Longevitiy focused 3 season traction + light snowSedans, coupes, crossovers, minivansReviewNoDecentElegantElegantElegant85,000ElegantDecentAveragePoor
      Bridgestone Turanza QuietTrack
      ( Check Price – Test Report )
      Comfort-focused 3 season traction + light snowSedans, coupes, crossovers, minivansReviewNoElegantDecentElegantElegant80,000ElegantElegantDecentFairy Well
      Goodyear Assurance ComfortDrive
      (Check Price – Test Report )
      Above average all-round performanceSedans, coupes, crossovers, SUVsReviewNoDecentElegantElegantElegant60,000AverageElegantDecentAverage
      Michelin Defender T+H
      (Check Price – Test Report )
      Efficiency focused 3 season performanceSedans, coupes, crossoversvs Crossclimate 2NoDecentDecentDecentDecent80,000ElegantDecentFairy WellPoor
      BF Goodrich Advantage T/A Sport
      ( Check Price – Test Report )
      Long lasting 4 season performance + handlingSedans, coupes, crossovers–NoAverageDecentDecentDecent60,000 – 70,000AverageDecentDecentFairy Well
      Continental TrueContact Tour
      ( Check Price – Test Report )
      Smooth & long-lasting 3 season performance + light snowSedans, coupes, crossovers–NoDecentDecentDecentDecent70,000 – 80,000DecentElegantAverageFairy Well
      Yokohama Avid Ascend LX
      ( Check Price – Test Report )
      Long-lasting & responsive 4 season performanceSedans, coupes, crossovers, minivansNoDecentElegantElegantElegant85,000ElegantDecentDecentFairy Well
      Laufenn S Fit AS
      (Check Price)
      Long-lasting sporty drivingSUV, CUV, Sedans, CoupesReviewNoDecentDecentExcellentDecent45,000DecentDecentAveragePoor

      Depending on your needs, the below article might help;

      • https://tireterrain.com/best-all-weather-tires-for-snow/
      • https://tireterrain.com/bridgestone-vs-michelin/
      • https://tireterrain.com/best-michelin-tires-for-suv/

      Table of Contents

      Dry Performance

      In the realm of all-weather tires, dry grip stands out prominently, largely attributed to the extensive biting edges and their typically blocky patterns. But, when we get down to the nitty-gritty, two crucial factors that influence performance emerge: cornering stability and steering response. And though they seem distinct, they’re quite interconnected due to specific technical features.

      Pitting two giants of the all-weather tire world against each other — the Bridgestone Weatherpeak and the Michelin Crossclimate 2 — offers a clear view of these nuances. The structural differences between these titans are remarkable. The Weatherpeak employs a single-ply polyester casing backing two steel belts, with an added layer of nylon reinforcement for heightened high-speed stability. In contrast, the Crossclimate 2 uses a more robust two-ply polyester casing supporting its steel belts, enhanced further with polyamide reinforcement. The burning question then: where exactly do they differ?

      Interestingly, nylon is a type of polyamide. So, while the materials may sound different, they aren’t drastically so. The game-changer here is the polyester casing’s ply rate. The dual-ply polyester casing often associated with performance tires aids in retaining the tire’s shape, promoting better cornering stability and honed steering response. This isn’t to downplay the capabilities of the Bridgestone Weatherpeak, but in a head-to-head on internal structure, the Michelin Crossclimate 2 seems to have an edge.

      However, the competition is neck-and-neck when we examine tread design, a pivotal aspect influencing steering response. Both these tires feature symmetrical pattern designs, heralding rapid steering response. Yet, the Weatherpeak’s blockier pattern may be less optimal on smoother, paved roads compared to the Crossclimate 2.

      In summation, for those seeking enhanced highway performance and assertive driving, Michelin’s Crossclimate 2 is a top contender. But for those venturing between city streets and the wild yonder, Bridgestone’s Weatherpeak showcases its mettle, especially on less-beaten paths.

      Wet Performance

      In the vast realm of tire performance, understanding wet conditions is paramount. The stiffness of a tire’s compound is a primary influencer of wet traction. So, when you’re assessing a tire’s ability to grip wet surfaces, it’s this compound stiffness that plays a crucial role. But traction isn’t the only factor at play here; hydroplaning resistance is just as vital. To simplify, hydroplaning is when your tire loses touch with the road due to water interference in the tread pattern, which effectively reduces traction.

      Taking center stage in all-weather tire excellence are the Michelin Crossclimate 2 and the Bridgestone Weatherpeak. The standout feature of both? Their superior hydroplaning resistance. Michelin Crossclimate 2 boasts a V-shaped pattern coupled with open shoulder blocks, offering impressive resistance. On the flip side, Bridgestone Weatherpeak incorporates angled blocks, circumferential grooves, and its own set of open shoulder blocks. A notable distinction is Weatherpeak’s slightly narrower tread width, providing it a slight advantage over the Crossclimate 2.

      Now, shifting our lens to wet traction, the differences between the two are quite subtle. One useful metric here is the UTQG (Uniform Tire Quality Grading) rating. Admittedly, the testing method can feel a tad dated, especially with the advent of ABS-equipped vehicles, but it remains a reliable reference.

      Michelin Crossclimate 2Bridgestone Weatherpeak
      Treadwear640700
      TractionBA
      TemperatureAA

      By assessing the compound through the lens of Treadwear, it’s evident that the Bridgestone Weatherpeak is a touch stiffer, attributed to its higher rating. But, based on my hands-on experience, any tire with a Treadwear of 700 or below usually offers commendable wet traction. Moreover, Bridgestone Weatherpeak’s superior traction grade (A) compared to Michelin Crossclimate 2’s B is largely due to its highly siped pattern, a feature that will shine even brighter in winter conditions.

      In summing up, both Bridgestone Weatherpeak and Michelin Crossclimate 2 stand as formidable contenders for rainy conditions. However, I’d give a slight nod to Bridgestone Weatherpeak. My recommendation? Opt for Bridgestone Weatherpeak for SUVs and CUVs, and lean towards Michelin Crossclimate 2 for sedans and coupes.

      Winter Performance

      Navigating the world of tire classifications can be tricky. Just because both these tires, the Bridgestone Weatherpeak and Michelin Crossclimate 2, come stamped with the 3PMSF mark and are branded as all-weather doesn’t instantly qualify them as dedicated snow tires.

      You might wonder: what’s the significance of the 3PMSF mark? It’s a testament to the compound’s resilience, indicating its capacity to perform efficiently even under 7°C (or 45°F). Most other compounds begin to falter and lose grip as temperatures drop. So, while the 3PMSF marking is undoubtedly an edge, whether it’s the chief asset the tire leans on is another matter.

      Rewind a bit to our discussion on wet performance, and you’ll recall the mention of the Bridgestone Weatherpeak’s higher traction rate. It’s time to delve deeper into why this matters for winter prowess. A closer examination of the Weatherpeak’s tread reveals a blocky pattern, interspersed generously with sipes, reminiscent of a dedicated winter tire. This combination shines in light snow and icy terrains, while the blocky design plows through deep snow with remarkable ease.

      In contrast, the Michelin Crossclimate 2 gives me pause. Its V-shaped and notched patterns, while admirable for colder wet and dry conditions (courtesy of the 3PMSF), can falter in deep snow. It handles consistent motion well, but the challenge arises if you halt on inclines or slight gradients and then attempt to restart. In such scenarios, I’m inclined to believe that the Weatherpeak offers superior traction.

      Summing it up, for those prioritizing winter performance, especially on irregular terrains sprinkled with slush or slight mud patches, Bridgestone Weatherpeak stands out. However, if your commute is predominantly on well-maintained streets or clear highways, Michelin Crossclimate 2 might just be the more suitable pick.

      Diving Into Winter Treads: Should you find yourself in need of specialized winter tires, don’t hesitate to explore our comprehensive comparison between Michelin and Bridgestone. It’s all about ensuring you get the optimal grip when the snow starts to fall!

      Comfort

      When diving into the realm of tire comfort, it’s essential to understand that we’re navigating through two intertwined layers: ride quality and road noise. Like two sides of the same coin, these elements deeply influence each other and thus deserve a collective assessment.

      Central to this discourse are two critical factors: the tire’s internal structure and its tread pattern. Both, in their unique ways, define the acoustic and tactile experience one gets while on the road.

      Let’s embark on this journey, breaking down each facet step by step.

      Riding Comfort

      A photo from Bridgestone's Instagram page

      The essence of riding comfort lies deep within a tire’s anatomy.

      Cast your mind back to our conversation about ply rates during the dry performance section. Michelin’s Crossclimate 2 boasts a 2-ply polyester casing, in contrast to the single-ply approach of Bridgestone’s Weatherpeak. While this additional layer endows the Crossclimate 2 with commendable stability, it does shave off a touch of comfort.

      Yet, let’s not forget the integral role of the tread pattern. Here, Bridgestone Weatherpeak’s blockier design doesn’t quite match up in the comfort stakes.

      To be fair, both tires have their quirks, an inherent trait of all-weather tires. But when we’re splitting hairs, Bridgestone Weatherpeak noses ahead with a marginally smoother ride than Michelin Crossclimate 2. Still, for many, the difference might be too subtle to discern.

      Road Noise

      Michelin Crossclimate 2 edges ahead, delivering that touch more of a silky-smooth journey

      When discussing the noise dynamics of all-weather tires, there’s an interesting paradox to unravel. Sure, many might have their say on this, but from where I stand, it’s evident that the noise department is where these all-weather champions have to make some trade-offs.

      Why is that? Well, longevity and year-round performance are non-negotiables for all-weather tires. This requirement nudges them towards more aggressive tread patterns, which in turn, naturally produces more road noise.

      Let’s put it in perspective. If you were to stack these two tires—Michelin Crossclimate 2 and Bridgestone Weatherpeak—against the broader spectrum of all-weather tires, you’d likely dub them as the “silent runners.” However, bring in contenders like the Vredestein Quatrac Pro or the Pirelli P7 AS Plus 3, and the noise comparison tilts quite dramatically.

      In the face-off between our two main contenders, let’s draw from prior insights. Michelin Crossclimate 2, with its design finesse, handles even terrains with aplomb. In contrast, Bridgestone Weatherpeak is more adept at absorbing the jolts of uneven terrains, which hints at potentially diminished road noise.

      Technically speaking, the epicenter of road noise is the tire’s central void area. A closer inspection of both contenders reveals their strategic moves to minimize this void. But Bridgestone Weatherpeak edges ahead, thanks to its innovative piano noise reduction tuning at the center. This intricate design interlocks, significantly reducing air infiltration into the tread. While the sectional center rib of the Weatherpeak might contribute a tad to the noise, its shoulder design, armed with a half rib, steps up the game by slicing through the air, thus minimizing noise.

      In wrapping this up, both the Michelin Crossclimate 2 and Bridgestone Weatherpeak emerge as surprisingly hushed performers within the all-weather category. However, the V-shaped pattern of the Michelin Crossclimate 2 gives it a slight acoustic advantage, making it the quieter choice of the two.

      Fuel Efficiency

      Fuel efficiency in tires is indeed a captivating subject. Treading this topic, it’s crucial to understand that the two primary culprits impacting fuel consumption are tire weight and tread pattern. Here’s the crux: an aggressive tread pattern offers commendable grip, but it also nudges up the rolling resistance.

      Diving deep into our two contenders—Bridgestone Weatherpeak and Michelin Crossclimate 2—the former clearly packs fewer pounds. Yet, its pronounced blocky pattern is a stark contrast to the more subtle design of the Michelin Crossclimate 2.

      Now, swinging the spotlight to the UTQG ratings, we find ourselves in a curious position. The lower treadwear of the Michelin Crossclimate 2, although not ideal, is juxtaposed with Bridgestone Weatherpeak’s higher traction rate—neither being particularly advantageous in the race for optimal fuel efficiency.

      Stepping back and evaluating the big picture, both the Michelin Crossclimate 2 and the Bridgestone Weatherpeak impress with their relatively low rolling resistance, given their assertive tread designs. But here’s a word of caution for those steering electric vehicles (EVs): due to mileage considerations, neither of these might be your top pick. However, if pinned to a choice, I’d personally tilt towards the Bridgestone Weatherpeak.

      Treadwear

      When it comes to tire longevity, the UTQG rating serves as a helpful barometer. Taking a glance at our contenders, the Bridgestone Weatherpeak clinches a slight advantage, boasting a treadwear rating of 700, outpacing the Michelin Crossclimate 2’s 640.

      But should you bank all your bets on this rating? Well, not entirely.

      See, treadwear isn’t a standalone factor. It’s influenced by myriad elements, from driving conditions to the very vehicle you’re piloting. Thus, simply crowning a winner based on UTQG can be misleading. Rather, understanding the essence of these tires, their unique characteristics, and how they fit into the tapestry of your driving needs provides a more insightful narrative.

      From our previous discussions, it’s evident that the Bridgestone Weatherpeak shines on rugged terrains, making it an ideal companion for crossovers and SUVs. This tire, with its robust compound and slightly more slender tread width, is specifically crafted for vehicles that command presence and size. Bridgestone appears to have a clear vision, not merely aiming for market supremacy, but catering to the specific needs of mid to large sedans and SUVs.

      Swinging our focus to the Michelin Crossclimate 2, it seems to resonate with those who have a zest for spirited driving or those behind the wheels of coupes and mid-sized sedans. Its compound, though softer, is well-suited to the lesser weight of these vehicles, providing an optimal balance.

      In sum, while numbers offer a good starting point, diving deeper into the intrinsic traits of these tires can help discern the right fit. Whether you’re navigating urban jungles or uncharted terrains, choosing the right tire is all about understanding its spirit and aligning it with your drive.

      Getting maximum wear life from a tire is related to you as well as your tire,

      If you’d like to learn how to get maximum tread life:

      https://tireterrain.com/how-to-make-tires-last-longer/

      Conclusion

      Absolutely, these two titans in the all-weather tire game, Bridgestone Weatherpeak and Michelin Crossclimate 2, are neck-and-neck in several categories. They’ve each got their high points and, naturally, a few areas where they give a little ground. But let’s be clear: both are exceptional choices in their category, offering stellar performance across the board. It’s like choosing between an iPhone and a top-end Android—different strokes for different folks, but you’re winning either way!

      Here’s the game-changer: a table designed to help you cut through the noise and make an informed decision. This isn’t just a rundown of specs; think of it as a curated guide to what really matters for you, the driver. Whether you prioritize winter performance, ride comfort, or longevity, this table serves as your quick reference.

      Michelin Crossclimate 2Bridgestone Weatherpeak
      Better forFor those of you cruising the city streets in coupes and sedans, chasing that thrilling, sporty driving sensation, this insight’s for you. Whether you’re navigating urban jungles or stretching the legs of your ride on open roads, here’s what you need to know.For all you SUV and CUV enthusiasts navigating tougher terrains, especially those who prioritize winter performance, here’s some vital intel tailored just for you. Whether you’re tackling the rugged trails or gearing up for snowy adventures, dive into these insights.
      ProsAll-weather traction,
      Responsiveness,
      Quiet ride
      All-weather traction(winter-oriented),
      Smooth ride,
      Fuel-efficiency
      ConsWinter traction is limited,
      A bit rough ride
      Slightly noisy,
      Not that responsive

      So, how do you choose? Well, if you’re steering an SUV or crossover, particularly over uneven terrains, Bridgestone Weatherpeak is your jam. It’s engineered for sturdiness with a higher UTQG rating and a blocky pattern that laughs in the face of rough conditions. Plus, its superior winter performance is a clincher for those tough, icy months.

      On the flip side, if you’re at the wheel of a coupe or mid-sized sedan and you enjoy a bit of spirited driving, Michelin Crossclimate 2 should be on your radar. Its V-shaped tread pattern is the key to its excellent wet performance, and its slightly softer compound makes for a comfortable ride.

      The bottom line? Both tires are headliners in the all-weather category. Your decision, then, boils down to your specific needs and vehicle type. Happy driving!

      Filed Under: All-Season, All-Weather Tires, Passenger Tires Tagged With: bridgestone weatherpeak, Comparisons, michelin crossclimate 2

      Bridgestone vs Michelin: Which Tire Brand Wins in 2025?

      Updated: August 4, 2025 by Emrecan Gurkan 2 Comments

      🔎 Tested, Simulated, and Reviewed by a Former Bridgestone Engineer

      When you’re comparing Bridgestone and Michelin, you’re not choosing between good and bad—you’re choosing between great and exceptional, depending on how you drive. I’ve tested these brands in the field, run AI simulations across dozens of driving scenarios, and pulled real-world results from recent TireRack benchmarks. Whether you daily drive, tow, hit snow, or crave razor-sharp handling, here’s your 2025 breakdown across all major tire categories.

      🏁 Quick Verdicts by Category

      Category
      Michelin Pick
      Bridgestone Pick
      Winner
      Summer Performance
      Michelin Pilot Sport All‑Season 4
      Bridgestone Potenza RE980AS Plus
      Michelin
      Touring Comfort
      Michelin Primacy Tour A/S
      Bridgestone Turanza QuietTrack
      Tie ⚖️
      All-Season (SUV)
      Michelin CrossClimate 2
      Bridgestone Alenza AS Ultra
      Michelin 🏆
      All-Weather
      Michelin CrossClimate 2
      Bridgestone WeatherPeak
      Michelin 🏆
      Winter/Snow
      Michelin X-Ice Snow
      Bridgestone Blizzak WS90
      Michelin 🏆
      Truck/Light Off-Road
      Michelin Defender LTX M/S2
      Bridgestone Dueler A/T Revo 3
      Tie ⚖️

      🔬 Category Breakdown with Test & Field Results

      This will be the mark you leave in the snow

      1. Summer/Ultra High Performance All-Season

      Michelin Pilot Sport All Season 4 vs Bridgestone Potenza RE980AS+
      Source: TireRack Performance All-Season Test (2024)

      Test MetricPilot Sport AS 4RE980AS+
      Dry Cornering (g)0.96g0.92g
      Wet Braking (60–0 mph)117 ft129 ft
      Comfort Score7.7/106.9/10
       

      What I Saw in the Field:
      Michelin simply grips better—especially on wet roads. The AS4 holds composure at high speeds and corners with sports-car confidence. Bridgestone’s RE980AS+ is quieter and more budget-friendly but can’t match AS4’s high-speed responsiveness.

      🏁 Winner: Michelin, especially for enthusiasts and performance sedans.

      2. Touring All-Season

      Michelin Primacy Tour A/S vs Bridgestone Turanza QuietTrack
      Source: TireRack Grand Touring Test (2024)

      Test MetricPrimacy Tour A/STuranza QuietTrack
      Dry Stop (60–0 mph)127 ft130 ft
      Noise Comfort8.3/108.5/10
      Wet Traction Score7.6/107.4/10
       

      My Analysis:
      Both offer buttery comfort and whisper-quiet cruising. QuietTrack has a slight edge in tread noise, while Michelin’s Primacy Tour feels more responsive under light braking and lane changes. This is one of the closest head-to-heads of any category.

      🏁 Verdict: Tie. If you want max comfort → Turanza. If you want a hint of control → Primacy.

      3. All-Season (SUV/CUV Focus)

      Michelin CrossClimate 2 vs Bridgestone Alenza AS Ultra
      Source: TireRack SUV/Crossover Touring Test (2024)

      Test MetricCrossClimate 2Alenza AS Ultra
      Wet Braking136 ft143 ft
      Snow Braking (20–0 mph)84.4 ft102.5 ft
      Dry Cornering (g)0.83g0.80g
       

      AI Insight:
      Simulations show CrossClimate 2 shines when temps drop. Its V-block tread and pliable compound dominate in snow and wet transitions. The Alenza rides smoother but lacks the same 3PMSF-certified grip.

      🏁 Winner: Michelin CrossClimate 2—especially for year-round versatility in SUV/CUVs.

      4. All-Weather

      Michelin CrossClimate 2 vs Bridgestone WeatherPeak
      Source: TireRack All-Weather Comparison (2024)

      Test MetricCrossClimate 2WeatherPeak
      Snow Acceleration6.2 sec6.6 sec
      Ice Braking46.2 ft49.8 ft
      Comfort Score7.5/107.4/10
       

      My Verdict:
      Bridgestone built a solid all-weather contender with the WeatherPeak, but Michelin’s years of refinement keep it ahead. I tested both in Vermont during slushy shoulder seasons—CrossClimate 2 consistently pulled shorter stops and cleaner cornering.

      🏁 Winner: Michelin CrossClimate 2, again.

      5. Winter/Snow

      Michelin X-Ice Snow vs Bridgestone Blizzak WS90
      Multiple third-party & Reddit-based tests reviewed

      Test MetricX-Ice SnowBlizzak WS90
      Ice Braking47.3 ft46.8 ft
      Snow Handling8.1/108.4/10
      Dry Noise7.4/107.1/10
       

      What I Know Firsthand:
      Blizzaks feel more “planted” in deep snow, especially on slushy roads. The X-Ice Snow has better ice predictability and slightly quieter tread hum. Both tires outperform cheap winters by miles.

      🏁 Verdict: Tie. Choose WS90 for heavy snow regions, X-Ice Snow for icy city roads.

      6. Truck / LT / Light Off-Road

      Michelin Defender LTX M/S2 vs Bridgestone Dueler A/T Revo 3
      Based on AI simulation + real-world testing

      Test MetricDefender LTXDueler Revo 3
      Wet Braking149 ft158 ft
      Tread Life Estimate75,000 mi65,000 mi
      Snow Traction Rating6.42/105.75/10
       

      Field Commentary:
      Michelin Defender LTX is my go-to for fleet vehicles and tow rigs. It’s tough, quiet, and holds up under torque. Dueler A/T Revo 3 is more trail-capable but sacrifices wet grip and longevity. Both tires resist wear better than off-brand competitors.

      🏁 Winner: Michelin Defender LTX M/S for daily use and durability.

      Bridgestone Tires Overview

      Each number represent symetrical lugs. Red line is where you take section.

      Bridgestone is a brand that can perfectly carry the promise of ‘safety’ with its quality, performance, and service guarantee from production to sale. Combining its ability to develop superior tire technology and the experience of producing tires suitable for the road conditions of 150 different countries of the world, Bridgestone offers superior performance and comfort for all types of vehicles and users, from motorcycles to automobiles, from construction machines to airplanes.

      As an insider, I would like to briefly talk about Bridgestone’s priorities. Let’s move on!

      Trust and Prestige

      Bridgestone, which is sold in approximately 150 countries around the world, from Japan to the USA, is the leader of the world tire market with its global know-how, suitability for all world roads, and high-standard and quality products. Producing tires suitable for all types of vehicles, from motorcycles to automobiles, from construction equipment to aircraft, Bridgestone has combined its strength and global experience with Firestone in the US.

      Innovation and Dynamism

      One of Bridgestone’s main goals is to transfer all of its huge investments in research & development over the years and the technology it has developed during many motorsport sponsorships to all its products. Being able to offer these distinguishing features to all its users is one of Bridgestone’s most important values. Bridgestone always carries the flag of innovation and dynamism with the highest scores in eco projects and independent tests.

      For instance, Bridgestone is the first company that uses ‘Run-Flat’ tire technology. Even though I don’t personally like run-flat tires, this is the biggest development in the tire industry in recent years. 

      Pro Tip: If you’d like to learn more about the difference between run-flat and regular tires, you can check this article out!

      Customer Satisfaction

      Developing a tire is a complex business. It takes at least three years.

      While the design phase takes a year, the remaining 2 years are spent on field tests.

      Well, I was part of this process. I can confidently tell you that customer satisfaction is the foremost main topic of these three years. Besides that, nothing changes after the product is released.

      So, I can’t tell you that you’re gonna satisfy with all Bridgestone tires, though, if you’ll have any issue, Bridgestone will fix it!

      History

      • Founded in 1930
      • The first time listed on the stock exchange was in 1961
      • Bridgestone acquired Firestone in 1988. So, yes, Bridgestone and Firestone are the same company
      • Bridgestone acquires Bandag, Inc. in 2007 (one of the world’s leading tire retread businesses)
      • Bridgestone acquired Europe’s largest digital fleet solutions provider, TomTom Telematics (currently Webfleet Solutions)

      Note: Numerically, Bridgestone is the biggest tire manufacturer.

      Michelin Tires Overview

      Michelin is the most popular and in my opinion best tire brand in the market.

      Unlike Bridgestone, they put comfort is the top of their ‘to-do list’. Besides that, the brand itself is a test killer. If you ever read a tire test report, Michelin is probably the winner of that test.

      But how can they do this? Here are the answers.

      Internal Testing

      Every tire manufacturer puts its tires to the test. In fact, this is a world-class necessity. Fulfilling this quality standard may be possible with standardized tests. However, Michelin has greatly exaggerated this event in order to understand in the best way what kind of difficult conditions the product it produces can actually withstand, and what kind of results it may encounter beyond the foreseen. In a year, Michelin tests its tires in such a way that 1 billion miles, yes you heard it right, 1 billion miles (1609344000 km) tire models are put to the test. This figure is equivalent to going around the planet 40 times.

      Unique Compound & Design

      When you are going to buy a tire, you may think about how much scientific studies have been done on it, but you cannot predict how detailed it can be. Thanks to the tread patterns developed by Michelin R&D engineers, you can provide superior performance and safety even in rainy and difficult weather conditions. This patented tread pattern, which belongs only to Michelin, has emerged with special design and design studies together with the tests. With models such as Michelin CrossClimate or Primacy you buy, you not only buy that model, but you also buy high Michelin technology.

      Zero-Defect Policy

      Michelin subjects it to many processes until it produces a tire. The most important of these is quality and control. Every product that is mass-produced in the world always produces faulty products. Michelin never sells faulty production from the production line. Incorrectly manufactured tires are immediately sent for recycling. Michelin has also produced its own patented machines in order to achieve the desired quality on the production line. Thanks to these special production machines, control safety has been increased and production error rates have been reduced. That’s why Michelin is the world’s best tire manufacturer today.

      History

      • Founded in 1889
      • Invented the first radial tire in 1949 (now, radial tire takes 100% of the market share)
      • Michelin acquired BF Goodrich in 1989. So, yes, BF Goodrich and Michelin are the same company
      • Michelin acquired Uniroyal US in 1989. Though, they’re not the same company because Bridgestone bought Uniroyal Australia in 1982.
      • Michelin acquired Camso in 2018
      • Michelin bought 99.64% of Achilles and Corsa Tires in 2019. Affordable Michelin brand is loading!!!

      Note: Numerically, Michelin is the second biggest tire manufacturer in the world.

      📌 Final Verdict: Which Brand Should You Choose?

      If you want:

      • 🛞 All-weather control, all-year confidence → Michelin

      • 🚗 Quiet comfort at cruising speeds → Bridgestone Touring (Turanza)

      • 🏁 Wet grip and handling → Michelin

      • ❄️ Deep snow or ice traction → Tie

      • 🛻 Towing/Heavy-duty hauling → Michelin Defender LTX

      🧠 My Take as a Test Engineer:

      Michelin tends to push the edge in compound science and shoulder design, while Bridgestone shines in comfort tuning and structural innovation. That said, Michelin wins 4 out of 6 categories here with test data to back it up—and that makes them the better all-around choice in 2025.

      Filed Under: Tips & Guides Tagged With: Comparisons, michelin vs bridgestone

      Nitto Exo Grappler vs Ridge Grappler

      Updated: November 11, 2025 by Emrecan Gurkan Leave a Comment

      Nitto Exo Grappler and Ridge Grappler are Nitto’s rugged-terrain tires. While Nitto Exo Grappler stands as ‘Commercial All-Weather Tire’, Nitto Ridge Grappler is a rugged terrain that has fulfilling on-road manners. At first, it looks like they meet different kinds of customer needs. Yet, they intersect in some applications. Let’s see what’re these applications and which one is a better fit for you!

      Nitto Exo Grappler is good choise for 3/4 ton trucks and Jeeps
      Nitto Ridge GrapplerNitto Exo Grappler
      Better forDry regions,
      mostly highway driving,
      SUVs, CUVs, and 1/2 ton trucks
      Squishy and icy regions,
      hauling & towing,
      heavy-duty working trucks,
      3/4 ton or above trucks
      full-size SUVs
      ProsSmooth and quiet ride,
      wet and dry traction
      Insane wet and snow traction,
      mild & severe off-road traction,
      durability
      ConsTread life is questionable for 3/4 ton or above working trucksCan be noisy for daily driving

      As a former Bridgestone engineer, from my standpoint, Nitto Ridge Grappler is lighter, quieter, and offers a smoother ride. It offers decent wet performance. Moreover, due to lower rolling resistance, it consumes less fuel which is highly important in terms of current gas prices. However, it can only handle mild off-road conditions. Nitto Exo Grappler is a more durable tire.  It has superior winter performance and a slightly better grip on wet. Furthermore, its tread lasts longer. I recommend it for 3/4 ton or above pickups and full-size SUVs.

      Table of Contents

      Sizes

      I generally start my articles with a dry traction section. Things are different this time. Nitto Exo Grappler has a limited product range. For this reason, I would like to share these sizes right now. If these sizes don’t match your vehicle, you might stop reading and enjoy the smooth ride of Nitto Ridge Grappler.

      17”18”20”
      LT235/80R17LT275/70R18LT275/65R20
      LT245/75R17LT285/70R18LT285/65R20
      LT265/70R17LT265/65R18LT275/60R20
      LT285/70R17LT275/65R18LT285/60R20
      37X13.50R17LTLT285/65R18LT325/60R20
      35X12.50R17LT35X12.50R18LT275/55R20
      LT285/55R20
      LT295/55R20
      LT305/55R20
      37X13.50R20LT
      35X12.50R20LT
      35X11.50R20LT
      Nitto Ridge Grappler Load Range
      LT285/70R17E & SL
      37X13.50R17LTE
      35X12.50R17LTE
      LT275/70R18E
      LT285/70R18E
      LT265/65R18E & XL
      LT275/65R18E & XL
      LT285/65R18E
      35X12.50R18F
      LT275/65R20E
      LT285/65R20E
      LT275/60R20E & XL
      LT285/60R20E
      LT325/60R20E
      LT275/55R20E & XL
      LT285/55R20E
      LT295/55R20E
      LT305/55R20F & SL
      37X13.50R20LTE
      35X12.50R20LTF

      Most tire sizes begin with modifier letters(P, LT, etc.) that identify the type of vehicle or type of service for which they were designed. Here is a perfect guide for reading tire size –> https://tireterrain.com/how-to-read-tire-size/

      Note: Nitto Exo Grappler AWT is only available for the E load range. 

      Technical Comparison

      • Nitto Ridge Grappler is a lighter tire(around 0-5 lbs depends on size)
      • Nitto Exo Grappler is a higher tire
      • Nitto Exo Grappler AWT is a slightly broader tire
      • Nitto Exo Grappler AWT  has a deeper tread groove (2mm deeper on average)
      • Nitto Exo Grappler AWT has groove teeth(increases grip on loose grounds)
      • Nitto Exo Grappler AWT has beefier sidewalls
      • Nitto Ridge Grappler AWT has stone ejectors
      • Nitto Exo Grappler AWT has a 3-peak mountain snowflake marking
      • Nitto Exo Grappler AWT has a stud option

      Tread Appearance

      Ridge Grappler is a great option for lifted vehicles

      Nitto Ridge Grappler and Exo Grappler have very similar tread appearances. They have some crucial differences that affect their performances.

      Let’s start with the center section. Nitto Ridge Grappler has a border center section with a narrower void area. Well, these features improve its on-road manners significantly. However, Nitto Exo Grappler has smaller center lugs with a broader void area. Well, its off-road performance promises more.

      Regarding the shoulder, things don’t change much. Nitto Exo Grappler has broader and vertically staggered shoulder lugs. These specific shoulder designs are generally used on mud-terrain tires. Due to its increased biting area, Nitto Exo Grappler has better loose ground performance. On the other hand, Nitto Ridge Grappler’s shoulders are a bit smoother. Yet, its shoulders are also staggered but horizontally. Thus, its loose ground performance is limited.

      Lastly sidewalls. Nitto Exo Grappler has tougher and thicker sidewall biters that are reinforced with a 3-ply cord. Furthermore, they look way much aggressive than Nitto Ridge Grappler.

      Dry Performance

      Dry performance can be evaluated under 3 different dimensions. Dry traction, steering response, and cornering stability. Due to their high traction capability, all-terrain and mud-terrain tires don’t have an issue with dry traction. So, I will focus on steering response and cornering stability for this section.

      Steering Response

      Nitto Ridge Grappler's compact center section offer quiet ride and increase handling

      Steering response is highly related to tires’ contact patch. So, tires with a bigger void area generally have a disadvantage. Well, in that case, Nitto Ridge Grappler is our winner. However, I will give Exo Grappler its due. Even though it has a super aggressive tread pattern, its solid and narrower center section blocks improve its steering response in a good way.

      Nitto Ridge Grappler and Exo Grappler AWT are both have quick steering responses. Yet, Ridge Grappler is slightly better.

      Cornering Stability

      Cornering stability is related to internal structure and sidewalls.

      These two have very similar internal structures. Furthermore, I’m making this comparison only for tires with an E load range. Well, their internal structure doesn’t have much to discuss. However, Nitto Exo Grappler steps ahead with its 3-ply sidewalls. Its sidewalls can tolerate horizontal force while cornering. 

      Nitto Exo Grappler has slightly better cornering stability. However, if Exo Grappler is a Superman, Ridge Grappler is a Batman. Both are very trustworthy options.

      Wet Performance

      Wet performance consists of 2 different features. Wet grip and hydroplaning resistance. Let’s examine them one by one.

      Wet Grip

      In that case, siping is crucial. These are off-road tires. These tires are somewhere between mud and all-terrain tires. Well, they have a lack of siping. Therefore, their wet grip abilities are limited.

      Nitto Exo Grappler is has a better siping and relatively slicker compound. Hence, it has a better-wet grip.

      Note: Nitto Ridge Grappler has a decent wet grip. Yet, I don’t recommend it for over 3/4 ton diesel pickups. It almost have no siping. Spinning is inevitable for heavy vehicles.

      Hydroplaning Resistance

      Hydroplaning resistance is crucial at high speeds. Even though, I don’t recommend using all-terrain and mud-terrain tires at high speeds, if you have to pick one go with Nitto Exo Grappler.

      Nitto Exo Grappler has very well-defined circumferential grooves and widely open shoulders that impros its water evacuation ability. I’m not saying Nitto Ridge Grappler is bad. Yet, its center section grooves are too narrow. Sometimes water evacuation takes time with these grooves.

      Nitto Exo Grappler has slightly better hydroplaning resistance.

      Winter Performance

      Nitto Exo Grappler has an AWT tail that means all-weather traction, well, it deserves this

      Winter performance is where these two are separating. AWT on Nitto Exo Grappler’s name means all-weather tire. So, it’s designed for massive winter performance. Furthermore, it’s labeled with 3PMSF which means it meets with industry severe-snow needs. Let’s dig into winter performance and see their performances for specific conditions.

      Light-Snow Performance

      Light-snow performance is similar to wet performance. It’s affected by the siping and self-cleaning ability.

      Nitto Exo Grappler is a better tire for light snow. It has better siping. Moreover, it has at least a 10% softer compound due to its 3PMSF marking. Therefore, its grip ability is also superior.

      Deep Snow

      There is no competition for this section. Due to its toothed and deeper grooves, it has better loose ground traction and self-cleaning ability.

      Nitto Exo Grappler is the only tire that pretends to the throne in this comparison.

      Ice

      You need a high contact patch and very well siping for decent ice performance. Well, both tires don’t meet these expectations. For this reason, I don’t recommend you to use them on freezing grounds. Yet, Nitto Exo Grappler will serve better with studs. Moreover, you should trust 3PMSF.

      You can check this article out for a solid performance on ice!

      Road Noise and Comfort

      Ridge Grappler is pure beauty. It draws attention even among all this art.

      As I’ve mentioned earlier, Nitto Ridge Grappler is mainly built for good on-road manners. Well, it’s the superior tire for this section.

      Due to its fewer center void area and more flexible structure, Nitto Ridge Grappler is a significantly less vocal and more cozy tire. Yet worth reminding, if comfort and road noise is your priority, you should go with XL or SL-rated tires. These tires have a better internal design for good on-road manners.

      Fuel-Efficiency

      Nitto Exo Grappler is a heavier tire. Moreover, it has a winter compound with more sipes. Its rolling resistance is way much higher than Nitto Ridge Grappler.

      If you don’t wanna hurt your MPG, go with Nitto Ridge Grappler.

      Tread Life and Durability

      Tread life is tricky. It changes depending on your operation, your driving style, or your vehicle. So, I will separate this comparison into some sections.

      For SUVs, 1/2 ton pick-ups and mainly highway drivers, Nitto Ridge Grappler and Exo Grappler have equally great tread life. In that case, you should rotate them every 5,000 miles to get decent tread life. Though, lug-type patterns tend to wear unevenly. It will decrease your tread life significantly.

      For heavy-duty applications and above 3/4 ton pickups(best tires), you should go with Nitto Exo Grappler. Nitto Ridge Grappler stays too fluffy for this application. It’s also damaged by hauling and towing. For this reason, Nitto Exo Grappler is your tire for these applications.

      Note: While Nitto Exo Grappler has a winter compound, Nitto Ridge Grappler has a summer compound. That’s highly important for long-lasting rubber. If you use the right compound in the right climate your tread life will increase.

      Regarding durability,  there is no debate. Nitto Exo Grappler is a more durable tire due to its 3-ply sidewalls and tough heavy-duty compound selection. Ridge Grappler’s compound cut and chip is way much easier on off-road applications.

      Getting maximum wear life from a tire is related to you as well as your tire,

      If you’d like to learn how to get maximum tread life:

      https://tireterrain.com/how-to-make-tires-last-longer/

      Off-Road Performance

      Beefy sidewalls of Nitto Exo Grappler

      Depending on the surface, these tires perform differently. So, I will evaluate them one by one.

      Dirt and Gravel

      Mild off-road conditions made of dirt and gravel. So, most of you only face these conditions. Well, no worries both are great tires for mild off-road conditions.

      Due to their lug-type patterns, both have a unique grip on dirt. In fact, Exo Grappler has fewer contact patches. Yet, it compensates for better siping. Let’s say draw for this time.

      My favorite is Ridge Grappler regarding gravel. I’m pretty sure that their traction capabilities are soo close. Yet, stone ejectors are a huge plus for consistent gravel traction. Nitto Ridge Grappler is a slightly better tire for gravel.

      Sand

      If you face dry sand so often, you should stay away from Exo Grappler. Less aggressive design always works better on the sand. Nitto Ridge Grappler is perfect tire for sand.

      Mud

      Mud driving is important for adventure lovers. In that case, water evacuation, self-cleaning abilities are crucial. 

      They are close-rated due to self cleaning and water evacuation. Yet, Nitto Exo Grappler is a heavy-duty tire. It has decent performance on occasional mud. Yet, deep adventure mud isn’t its expertise. Its compound is too stiff to not dig into muddy grounds. Nitto Ridge Grappler is your tire if you’re mud adventure lover!

      Rock Crawling

      In fact, both are not good tires for rock crawling. Yet, I would go with Nitto Ridge Grappler every day of the week. 

      Due to its stiff and thick sidewalls, Nitto Exo Grappler AWT is tend to crack on air down driving. 

      Warranty

      These products aren’t covered by the manufacturer’s tread life warranty.

      Specs

      Nitto Exo GrapplerNitto Ridge Grappler
      CategoryHybrid All-Terrain TireHybrid All-Terrain Tire
      VehicleLight Truck, SUVLight Truck, SUV
      Available Sizes (Rim)17”, 18”, 20”16”, 17”, 18”, 20”, 22”, 24”
      Weight40 – 81 lbs40 – 95 lbs
      Made InWhite, GA, USAWhite, GA, USA
      Severe Snow Rated (3PMSF)NoYes
      Warranty (P-metric)N/AN/A
      Warranty (LT Sizes)N/AN/A
      PricesCheck price section to see best possible pricesCheck price section to see best possible prices

      Price

      The tire market has a dynamic price policy. Hence, in my point of view, sharing tire price is pointless.

      Though, I’ve analyzed the top 10 brands of most popular tire brands.

      Here are the dealers with a reasonable price range,

      DiscountTire

      • Biggest dealer in the US. Founded in 1960
      • 1000 stores in 35 states. You most probably find one on your parallel street
      • Free rotation and balancing
      • 5% off for DiscountTire cardholders on online purchase
      • Highest rated online tire dealer in Consumer Affairs
      • Almost all brands are available
      • Delivery takes 2-4 days (30% shorter average waiting time when you book online)
      • Frequent discounts and promotions

      Nitto Exo Grappler AWT: https://www.discounttire.com/buy-tires/nitto-exo-grappler-awt

      Nitto Ridge Grappler: https://www.discounttire.com/buy-tires/nitto-ridge-grappler

      SimpleTire

      • Free shipping
      • Delivered in 2 days
      • Verified shops near you(for mount and balance)
      • Mobile installation option
      • 7 million customers since 2021
      • 4.7/5 points on Google rate
      • Top-notch customer service, you may even request a price match

      Nitto Exo Grappler AWT: https://simpletire.com/brands/nitto-tires/exo-grappler-awt   

      Nitto Ridge Grappler: https://simpletire.com/brands/nitto-tires/ridge-grappler

      PriorityTire

      • Local installer and mobile installer options
      • Huge product range(you may find any tire you want)
      • 4.8 overall satisfaction rate
      • Always have a good deal to find
      • 90 days money-back guarantee
      • Free FedEx shipping

      Nitto Exo Grappler AWT: https://www.prioritytire.com/by-brand/nitto/exo-grappler-awt-tires/

      Nitto Ridge Grappler: https://www.prioritytire.com/by-brand/nitto/ridge-grappler-tires/

      While choosing dealers, I especially pay attention to reliability. All of the dealers on this list have 15-20 years of experience in the online tire business. Therefore, I can guarantee a smooth and fast tire buying process.

      Conclusion

      Nitto Ridge and Exo Grappler are both great tires for their use range. The below table will help you to decide the best one for yourself.

      Nitto Ridge GrapplerNitto Exo Grappler
      Better forDry regions,
      mostly highway driving,
      SUVs, CUVs, and 1/2 ton trucks
      Squishy and icy regions,
      hauling & towing,
      heavy-duty working trucks,
      3/4 ton or above trucks
      full-size SUVs
      ProsSmooth and quiet ride,
      wet and dry traction
      Insane wet and snow traction,
      mild & severe off-road traction,
      durability
      ConsTread life is questionable for 3/4 ton or above working trucksCan be noisy for daily driving

      If you have any further questions, please leave them in the below section. Have a safe ride folks!

      Filed Under: All Terrain Tires, Rugged Terrain Tires Tagged With: Comparisons, nitto, Nitto Exo Grappler, nitto ridge grappler

      • « Go to Previous Page
      • Page 1
      • Interim pages omitted …
      • Page 4
      • Page 5
      • Page 6
      • Page 7
      • Page 8
      • Interim pages omitted …
      • Page 12
      • Go to Next Page »

      Primary Sidebar

      Find Tires

      Contact Channels

      • Email
      • Facebook
      • LinkedIn
      • Twitter

      High-End Tires by Category

      Best All-Terrain Tires

      Best Rugged-Terrain Tires

      Best Mud-Terrain Tires

      Best All-Season Tires for Snow

      Best Tires for Snow Plowing

      Best Semi-Truck Tires

      Categories

      Copyright © 2026

      • Disclaimer
      • About Me
      • Contact
      • Privacy Policy