Do you want an off-road all-terrain tire but don’t want BF Goodrich KO2? Let me introduce you to one of the lightest tires in its class, Firestone Destination X/T. Since Destination X/T is mainly built for 3/4 or above trucks, its deaf ride makes it a good option for those who want durability and comfort at the same time. Yet, it doesn’t overperform BF Goodrich KO2 in every section. Let’s dig into it and see which one is a better fit for your use.
Firestone Destination X/T | BF Goodrich KO2 | |
---|---|---|
Better for | Mostly highway driving, fuel efficiency, hauling & towing, camping, 3/4 ton or above trucks | Snowy regions, severe off-road lovers, SUV, CUV, or 1/2-ton light truck owners |
Pros | Light-weight (decrease in MPG), long-lasting rubber, | Responsiveness, strong sidewalls, product range |
Cons | You should heat up tires a bit for the best wet and light-snow traction | Wet traction is questionable, doesn’t last as long as its competitors |
As a former Bridgestone engineer, in my perspective, the Firestone Destination XT leans towards being a more efficiency-oriented choice in this comparison. It excels as an option for towing and hauling. However, its blocks are stiffer and more rigid, resulting in a rougher ride. On the other hand, the BF Goodrich KO2 is an excellent option if you prioritize on-road manners, especially because it’s available in C and D load ranges. When it comes to winter performance, I don’t expect much difference on light and deep snow between the two. However, for icy conditions, I recommend being cautious with the Firestone Destination XT.
All-Terrain Tires Cheat Sheet
Finding the ideal all-terrain tire among the plethora of options available can be overwhelming. But don’t worry, my team and I have taken on this challenge head-on. Besides our hands-on experiences with these tires, we also analyze thousands of customer reviews and test reports.
We also analyzed ‘What customer complains more about all-terrain tires?’. Even though some of these complains are coming from the nature of all-terrain tires, there is still way to prevent yourself from these issues. Below, you can see articles about, hydroplaning, tire noise
- How to reduce tire noise?
https://www.discounttire.com/learn/tire-noise - Tire Vibration
https://www.discounttire.com/learn/tire-vibration - Tire Air Pressure – How to Decide?
https://www.discounttire.com/learn/tire-air-pressure-info
Please note that: Light-Duty is 1500 series, Medium-Duty is 2500 series and Heavy-Duty is 3500 series. If you do towing or hauling, I recommend considering at least Medium-Duty tires.
Mobile users can scroll the table to the left to see the whole data.
Name | Category | Articles | 3PMSF | Road Noise | Mileage | Fuel Economy | Riding Comfort | Responsiveness | Wet Performance | Mild Winter | Severe Winter | Mild Off-Road | Severe Off-Road | Best Fit by Pickup Truck Classification | Warranty (SL or XL) | Warranty (LT) | Product Page |
---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
Off Road All Terrain Tire | Review | Yes | Decent | Decent | Poor | Decent | Decent | Decent | Elegant | Elegant | Decent | Average | Light-Duty | 55,000 Miles | 55,000 Miles | Wildpeak AT3W | |
Toyo Open Country AT3 | Off Road All Terrain Tire | Review | Yes | Average | Elegant | Decent | Decent | Decent | Decent | Elegant | Decent | Elegant | Decent | Medium-Duty | 65,000 Miles | 50,000 Miles | Toyo Open Country AT3 |
General Grabber ATX | Off Road All Terrain Tire | Review | Yes | Average | Decent | Decent | Decent | Decent | Decent | Decent | Decent | Elegant | Elegant | Heavy-Duty | 60,000 Miles | 50,000 Miles | General Grabber ATX |
BF Goodrich KO2 | Off Road All Terrain Tire | Review | Yes | Decent | Decent | Decent | Decent | Elegant | Decent | Decent | Decent | Elegant | Elegant | Heavy-Duty | N/A | 50,000 Miles | BF Goodrich All-Terrain T/A KO2 |
Sumitomo Encounter AT | Off Road All Terrain Tire | Review | Yes | Decent | Decent | Average | Decent | Decent | Decent | Elegant | Average | Decent | Average | Light-Duty | 60,000 Miles | 60,000 Miles | Sumitomo Encounter AT |
Firestone Destination XT | Off Road All Terrain Tire | Review | Yes | Average | Decent | Elegant | Decent | Elegant | Decent | Decent | Average | Decent | Decent | Heavy-Duty | N/A | 50,000 Miles | Firestone Destination X/T |
Cooper Discoverer AT3 XLT | On Road All Terrain Tire | Review | No | Decent | Decent | Decent | Decent | Elegant | Decent | Decent | Average | Elegant | Average | Heavy-Duty | N/A | 60,000 Miles | Cooper Discoverer AT3 XLT |
Falken Wildpeak AT Trail | On Road All Terrain Tire | Review | Yes | Decent | Decent | Decent | Decent | Decent | Elegant | Decent | Decent | Elegant | Average | Light-Duty | 65,000 Miles | N/A | Falken Wildpeak AT Trail |
Cooper Discoverer AT3 4S | On Road All Terrain Tire | Review | Yes | Elegant | Decent | Elegant | Elegant | Elegant | Elegant | Elegant | Decent | Decent | Fairy Well | Light-Duty | 65,000 Miles | N/A | Cooper Discoverer AT3 4S |
Firestone Destination AT2 | On Road All Terrain Tire | Review | Yes | Decent | Elegant | Elegant | Elegant | Elegant | Decent | Elegant | Average | Decent | Average | Light-Duty | 55,000 Miles | N/A | Firestone Destination AT2 |
On Road All Terrain Tire | Review | Yes | Elegant | Elegant | Decent | Elegant | Elegant | Decent | Decent | Average | Decent | Average | Light-Duty | 60,000 | N/A | BF Goodrich Trail Terrain T/A | |
Toyo Open Country R/T Trail | Rugged Terrain Tire | Review | Yes | Decent | Decent | Decent | Decent | Decent | Decent | Decent | Decent | Elegant | Decent | Heavy-Duty | 45,000 Miles | 45,000 Miles | Toyo Open Country R/T Trail |
Falken Wildpeak R/T | Rugged Terrain Tire | Review | No | Decent | Decent | Average | Average | Decent | Decent | Decent | Decent | Elegant | Decent | Heavy-Duty | 50,000 Miles | 50,000 Miles | Falken Wildpeak R/T |
Pathfinder AT Tire | On Road All Terrain Tire | Review | Yes | Average | Average | Decent | Decent | Decent | Decent | Decent | Average | Decent | Average | Light-Duty | 55,000 | 50,000 | Discount Tire Exclusive Product |
Nitto Ridge Grappler | Rugged Terrain Tire | Review | No | Decent | Decent | Decent | Elegant | Decent | Decent | Decent | Decent | Elegant | Decent | Heavy-Duty | N/A | N/A | Nitto Ridge Grappler |
General Grabber APT | On Road All Terrain Tire | Review | Yes | Decent | Decent | Average | Decent | Decent | Decent | Decent | Average | Decent | Fairy Well | Medium-Duty | 60,000 Miles | 60,000 Miles | General Grabber APT |
Vredestein Pinza AT | On Road All Terrain Tire | Review | Yes | Elegant | Decent | Decent | Elegant | Decent | Decent | Decent | Decent | Decent | Average | Medium-Duty | 70,000 Miles | 50,000 Miles | Vredestein Pinza AT |
Nitto Recon Grappler | Off Road All Terrain Tire | Review | No | Decent | Decent | Decent | Decent | Decent | Decent | Decent | Average | Elegant | Decent | Medium-Duty | 65,000 Miles | 55,000 Miles | Nitto Recon Grappler |
Michelin Defender LTX M/S | Highway Tire | Review | No | Elegant | Elegant | Elegant | Decent | Elegant | Decent | Decent | Fairy Well | Decent | Fairy Well | Heavy-Duty | 55,000 – 70,000 Miles | 55,000 – 70,000 Miles | Michelin Defender LTX M/S |
Kenda Klever R/T | Rugged Terrain Tire | Review | No | Average | Decent | Average | Decent | Decent | Decent | Decent | Fairy Well | Decent | Decent | Heavy-Duty | N/A | N/A | Kenda Klever R/T |
Goodyear Wrangler Territory AT | On Road All Terrain Tire | Review | No | Decent | Decent | Decent | Decent | Decent | Decent | Decent | Average | Elegant | Decent | Medium-Duty | N/A | N/A | Goodyear Wrangler Territory AT |
Goodyear Wrangler UltraTerrain AT | Off Road All Terrain Tire | Review | Yes | Decent | Decent | Decent | Decent | Decent | Decent | Decent | Average | Decent | Fairy Well | Medium-Duty | N/A | N/A | Discount Tire Exclusive Product |
Continental Terrain Contact H/T | Highway Tire | Review | No | Elegant | Elegant | Elegant | Elegant | Elegant | Decent | Average | Poor | Decent | Poor | Heavy-Duty | 70,000 Miles | 60,000 Miles | Continental TerrainContact H/T |
Patriot R/T | Rugged Terrain Tire | Review | Yes | Average | Average | Average | Decent | Decent | Decent | Decent | Decent | Decent | Decent | Medium-Duty | N/A | N/A | Patriot R/T+ |
Kenda Klever AT2 | Off Road All Terrain Tire | Review | Yes | Decent | Average | Average | Decent | Decent | Decent | Decent | Average | Decent | Average | Medium-Duty | 60,000 Miles | 50,000 Miles | Kenda Klever AT2 |
Yokohama Geolander AT G015 | On Road All Terrain Tire | Review | Yes | Elegant | Decent | Average | Elegant | Elegant | Decent | Decent | Average | Average | Poor | Light-Duty | 60,000 Miles | 50,000 Miles | Yokohama Geolandar AT G015 |
Mickey Thompson Baja Boss AT | Rugged Terrain Tire | Review | Yes (315 or narrower width) | Decent | Decent | Average | Decent | Elegant | Decent | Decent | Decent | Elegant | Decent | Medium-Duty | 50,000 Miles | 60,000 Miles | Mickey Thompson Baja Boss AT |
For those who prefer a more textual representation and dislike sifting through tables of data:
- https://tireterrain.com/best-all-terrain-tires/
- https://tireterrain.com/best-all-terrain-tires-for-snow/
- https://tireterrain.com/best-1-2-ton-truck-tires/
- https://tireterrain.com/best-3-4-ton-truck-tires/
- https://tireterrain.com/best-rt-tires/
- https://tireterrain.com/best-tires-for-snow-plowing/
A couple of popular size analyses:
- https://tireterrain.com/best-35×12-50r20-all-terrain-tires/
- https://tireterrain.com/best-285-70r17-all-terrain-tires/
- https://tireterrain.com/best-275-55r20-all-terrain-tires/
- https://tireterrain.com/best-275-65r18-all-terrain-tires/
Want to learn more about all-terrain tires:
- https://tireterrain.com/highway-tires-vs-all-terrain-vs-mud-terrain/
- https://tireterrain.com/all-season-vs-all-terrain-tires/
- https://tireterrain.com/tire-load-index-and-load-range/
- https://tireterrain.com/lt-tires-vs-passenger-tires/
- https://tireterrain.com/are-all-terrain-tires-good-for-daily-driving/
- https://tireterrain.com/are-all-terrain-tires-good-in-snow/
- https://tireterrain.com/are-all-terrain-tires-loud/
- https://tireterrain.com/how-long-do-all-terrain-tires-last/
- https://tireterrain.com/are-all-terrain-tires-good-in-rain/
- https://tireterrain.com/off-road-tire-pressure-load-range-for-every-rig/
Table of Contents
Tread Appearance
Firestone Destination XT (review) looks like a slightly less aggressive version of the Falken Wildpeak AT3W. Wildpeak AT3 is a trustworthy option. It is one of the best all-terrain tires. Destination XT’s tread design promises better on-road manners than Wildpeak AT3W.
On the other hand, BF Goodrich KO2 has a more aggressive tread design. It tends to perform well off the road. Actually, it proved their off-road ability on Baja Race. It is a champion.
Let’s start with the center section.
Firestone Destination XT has a lot of sipes on the center section. These sipes will improve your traction ability dramatically. Especially in winter conditions. Moreover, siping on the center blocks is full-depth so you get full traction for all of tread life.
BF Goodrich KO2 also has a good amount of siping on the center. The only difference is it has straight sipes. Which will decrease your ice and winter traction. Yet, this sipe design is better for off-road traction.
And lastly shoulders,
Destination XT has staggered shoulder lugs that have less siping straight and not full depth. Luckily, this makes them stiffer for better highway speeds. Normally, that causes a bit of wet performance but they increased the evacuation ability with thicker sipes on shoulders.
BF Goodrich KO2 has similar shoulders design. The only difference is the angle of thick sipes. BF Goodrich placed those sipes at different angles. That is going to improve your traction ability in harsh off-road conditions. In return, the noise level will be up after you make some miles.
In summary, BF Goodrich KO2 has a more aggressive tread design. Yet, in my point of view, Firestone Destination XT promises more.
Tread Life
I generally associate treadwear with even wearing ability. Well, it is also related to balance by implication (How long do all-terrain tires last?).
Tread depths are par. So the above paragraph topics will be our deciding points.
BFG KO2 has an asymmetric tread design. Also has a wider void area. These will cause balancing issues if you miss your rotation times. As a result, you will face uneven wearing.
Firestone Destination XT has a symmetrical tread design. Also has a close pattern design. So, it tends to wear evenly.
I can confidently say that Firestone Destination XT promises more regarding treadwear. Yet, on this level, it is all about you and your driving habits.
Getting maximum wear life from a tire is related to you as well as your tire,
If you’d like to learn how to get maximum tread life:
Note: Both tires come up with a 50000-mile tread life warranty.
You can check the below Destination XT videos (7500 miles and 22500 miles) from my dearest friend Scott. He also shared his views on holding stones.
Noise Comparison
I’ll keep this section concise. The comparison is quite clear to me. While a deeper tread may look appealing, it tends to generate more noise and vibration. Therefore, the Firestone Destination XT is the louder tire in this comparison.
However, it’s essential to remember that expecting too much in terms of quietness from both tires doesn’t make sense, as these are aggressive off-road tires.
All in all, if reducing noise is a priority, especially with C and D load range options, the BF Goodrich KO2 is the tire to choose.
Comfort
At beginning of the article, I talked about the good on-road manners of Destination XT. In this section, the table turned.
Comfort is related to compound as well as pattern. Destination XT has a softer design. I agree. Yet, I have made my research. Thanks to my fellows on Bridgestone.
Destination XT has a rigid compound due to wear rate. And that cost lack of comfort. Slow down when you are passing the bumps.
BF Goodrich KO2 offers a slightly smoother ride than Firestone Destination XT.
Here is a perfect article what to expect from all-terrain tires for daily driving –> https://tireterrain.com/are-all-terrain-tires-good-for-daily-driving/
Wet Performance
Wet performance of all-terrain tires can be a concern due to their wide design, which makes them prone to hydroplaning.
Deeper tread can help improve wet performance, giving Firestone Destination XT a slight advantage. However, it’s worth noting that its stiff compound can lead to reduced wet traction.
In this case, I’d opt for the BF Goodrich KO2 because it provides a bit more security in wet conditions. Nevertheless, I still believe that the stability of the Firestone Destination XT can be an advantage, especially for hauling and towing applications.
Winter Performance
Both of these tires carry the 3 peak mountain snowflake marking, indicating their ability to perform well in snowy conditions. However, it’s important to acknowledge that despite these ratings, all-terrain tires are not specialized snow tires. While they can handle light and deep snow effectively, they may not excel on icy surfaces.
In general, BF Goodrich KO2 may be the better choice for winter driving due to its softer compound. However, Firestone Destination XT is optimized for heavy loads, and its 5-rib design provides better traction under load, making it a good option for work applications.
In summary, for vehicles like Jeeps and off-road trucks, I recommend BF Goodrich KO2 for winter conditions. For work-related tasks and heavy loads, Firestone Destination XT is a suitable choice.
A side note here: Understanding the snow performance of all-terrain tires can be quite challenging. For those who find it perplexing, I’d like to direct your attention to a helpful resource: “6 Best All-Terrain Tires for Snow by AT Tire Category“ This article is specifically designed to assist you in making informed decisions regarding all-terrain tires in snowy conditions.
Off-Road Performance
Off-road is where BF Goodrich KO2 shines. It is a champion tire and hard to defeat.
On the other hand, Destination XT will give you everything you need on mild off-road. No doubt!
Destination XT‘s self-cleaning ability is huge. It can effortlessly throw the dirt out of lugs. So, BF Goodrich KO2 too. They are even on dirt.
Sand performance is easy to evaluate. Less aggressive design works better on the sand. Therefore, Destination XT is my pick.
BF Goodrich KO2 is killing it in mud. A wider shoulder block provides better traction. In addition to that, sidewalls are deeper than Destination XT’s. That will help you on deeper mud.
Lastly the rock. Destination XT will not let you down on gravel or pavement. Yet, climbing ability is not as good as BF Goodrich’s. As long as, we are talking about LT sizes; I am going to say even for rocks.
In summary, both are great tires for off-road. I recommend BF Goodrich for severe and Destination XT for mild applications.
Specs
Firestone Destination XT | BF Goodrich KO2 | |
---|---|---|
Category | All-Terrain Tire | All-Terrain Tire |
Vehicle | Light Truck, SUV | Light Truck, SUV |
Available Sizes (Rim) | 15”, 16”, 17”, 18”, 20” | 15’’, 16’’, 17’’, 18’’, 20’’, 22’’ |
Weight | 35- 61 lbs | 34-78 lbs |
Made In | USA | Opelika, AL, USA |
Severe Snow Rated (3PMSF) | Yes | Yes |
Warranty (P-metric) | 50,000 Miles | 50,000 Miles |
Warranty (LT Sizes) | 50,000 Miles | 50,000 Miles |
Prices | Check price section to see best possible prices | Check price section to see best possible prices |
🚨 Breaking News Alert! 🚨
Hold onto your seats because I’m thrilled to introduce the all-new BF Goodrich All-Terrain T/A KO3 – the next evolution of the fan-favorite KO2! And the excitement doesn’t stop there – this beast is now available in two additional OEM sizes: LT285/70R17 and LT275/65R20. Get ready for the ultimate off-road experience with the KO3!
Specification Comparison for Popular Sizes
When evaluating the performance of Firestone Destination XT and BF Goodrich KO2, it’s essential to recognize that their characteristics can differ depending on the tire size. Before delving into a direct comparison, let’s emphasize some key factors:
Wheel Sizes: Both BF Goodrich KO2 and Firestone Destination XT are available in various wheel sizes, including 15”, 16”, 17”, 18”, and 20”. Additionally, BF Goodrich KO2 offers a 22” option.
Load Ranges: These tires are designed to accommodate different load ranges. BF Goodrich KO2 is available in ‘C, D, E’ load ranges, whereas Firestone Destination XT is offered in ‘C and E’ load ranges. It’s worth noting that the ‘C’ load range option is not available for most sizes of Firestone Destination XT.
Weight: In most sizes, Firestone Destination XT is lighter than BF Goodrich KO2, particularly in the E load range category.
Height: Firestone Destination XT tends to have a greater height compared to BF Goodrich KO2 for most sizes.
These variations in wheel sizes, load ranges, weight, and height should be considered when selecting the appropriate tire to meet your specific requirements. Now, let’s proceed with a comprehensive comparison of popular sizes.
35×12.5R20
BF Goodrich KO2 | Firestone Destination XT |
---|---|
Off Road AT Tire | Off Road AT Tire |
E | E |
67 lbs | 59 lbs |
15/32″ | 17/32″ |
11.1″ | 10.8″ |
United States | Canada |
In this particular size, Firestone Destination XT stands out as the lighter and narrower option, making it a suitable choice if fuel efficiency is your primary concern. However, it’s important to note that its deeper tread and stiffer construction may result in a slightly rougher ride. If you don’t intend to subject this size to heavy-duty use, BF Goodrich KO2 is a more optimized choice for this specific size.
Note: Both of these tires are included in my best list for this specific size. If you’d like to explore more options, check out my full list of recommendations here –> [https://tireterrain.com/best-35×12-50r20-all-terrain-tires/]
285/70R17
BF Goodrich KO2 | BF Goodrich KO2 | Firestone Destination XT |
---|---|---|
Off Road AT Tire | Off Road AT Tire | Off Road AT Tire |
E | C | E |
58 lbs | 51 lbs | 51 lbs |
15/32″ | 15/32″ | 16/32″ |
9.2″ | 9.3″ | 8.8″ |
United States | United States | Canada |
This tire size is a popular choice among predominantly on-road users. As a result, BF Goodrich KO2 offers a C load range option for this size. Surprisingly, even with the C load range, BF Goodrich KO2 weighs the same as the Firestone Destination XT. If your top priority is on-road performance, the C load range BF Goodrich KO2 could be a suitable choice. The same equation applies if you prefer the E load range – Firestone Destination XT for work, and BF Goodrich KO2 for a more adventurous and off-road-oriented experience.
Note: For a comprehensive list of recommendations tailored to this specific size, you can explore my full list here –> [https://tireterrain.com/best-285-70r17-all-terrain-tires/]
275/60R20
BF Goodrich KO2 | Firestone Destination XT |
---|---|
Off Road AT Tire | Off Road AT Tire |
D | E |
55 lbs | 52 lbs |
15/32″ | 16/32″ |
9″ | 9.6″ |
United States | Canada |
In this size, the tables turn. Despite Firestone Destination XT being lighter, it’s a taller and wider tire at the same time. This generally makes it a better option for users who prioritize traction. On the other hand, I’ve found that the D-rated BF Goodrich KO2 is the best overall tire for this size, offering a balanced performance profile.
265/70R17
BF Goodrich KO2 | BF Goodrich KO2 | Firestone Destination XT |
---|---|---|
Off Road AT Tire | Off Road AT Tire | Off Road AT Tire |
C | E | E |
46 lbs | 53 lbs | 45 lbs |
15/32″ | 15/32″ | 15/32″ |
8.8″ | 8.7″ | 8.7″ |
Canada | United States | Canada |
So, first of all, if you spend most of your time on the road, the C-rated BF Goodrich KO2 is the best option. On the other hand, if you’re looking for the most efficient choice, the E-load range Firestone Destination XT is still a good pick, even though it might ride a bit rough. The significant weight difference between the two is notable. I recommend the BF Goodrich KO2 if your primary concern is better traction on loose ground.
Size Selection
Before we dive into selecting the right tire size, it’s essential to understand the tire standards that manufacturers follow.
Technical Standards & Regulations
In Europe, the tire standardizing organization is called ETRTO. In the United States, it’s The Tire and Rim Association (TRA), while in Japan, it’s the Japanese Automobile Tire Manufacturers Association (JATMA). Although there may be other organizations, they generally align with one of these three.
When it comes to passenger car tires, TRA designates them by placing the letter “P” in front of the size to indicate conformity to the TRA standard. On the other hand, ETRTO and JATMA do not use any letters, which can sometimes be confusing when determining which standard is being used.
For light truck tires, TRA uses the letters “LT” in front of the tire size, while JATMA places the letters “LT” after the size. ETRTO, however, uses the letter “C” after the size to indicate tires of this type.
In the realm of medium truck tires, ETRTO uses the letter “C” after the size to designate tires designed according to their standard. In contrast, TRA and JATMA do not use any letters in this context.
Now, here’s what’s essential: Tires with the same dimensions (size) may have different maximum load capacities depending on the standard being followed. So, it’s crucial to consider the relevant standard when choosing tires.
When it comes to load capacity designations, “SL” (Standard Load) and “XL” (Extra Load) are used for all passenger car tires, regardless of which standard is being followed. In the ETRTO standard, “Reinforced” is also used as an alternative to “XL.”
Load Range, on the other hand, is specific to TRA. ETRTO and JATMA use the term “Load Index.” While TRA references Load Indexes, it’s important to note that the values provided are approximate.
To sum it up, understanding the tire standards and designations is vital as they play a significant role in determining the right tire size and load capacity. By considering the appropriate standards, you can make an informed decision when selecting tires that meet your vehicle’s requirements.
Here are two great articles if you wanna dive deeper:
Load Range vs Load Index: https://www.discounttire.com/learn/load-range-load-index
Tire Sizing System: https://www.discounttire.com/learn/euro-vs-pmetric-tires
How to Select the Right Tire Size Based on Your Requirements?
When it comes to selecting tire sizes for your vehicle, it’s important to keep in mind that most vehicles offer more than one original equipment size. Let’s take the 2019 Ford F-150 Lariat Crew Cab 4WD as an example. You have three different tire size options: 275/55R20 SL, 275/65R18 Load Range C, or 275/65R18 SL.
Note: I use Toyo Open Country AT3 for an example tire. You can use this link to see tire options for your vehicle and then make a comparison between the sizes:
https://www.discounttire.com/fitment/vehicle
If you don’t know your tire size: https://tireterrain.com/find-tires-by-vin-number/
Let’s focus on comparing the 275/65R18 SL and 275/65R18 Load Range C options for a more detailed comparison. Your decision should be based on your priorities. If you prioritize a smooth ride and better handling, the SL option is the way to go. On the other hand, if you value hauling or towing performance and tire longevity, the Load Range C option would be a better fit.
As a tire engineer, my perspective often revolves around load-carrying capacity. Generally, tires with higher load capabilities tend to provide a stiffer ride. However, there’s a bit of an illusion to consider. When you compare the two tires in the same size, the SL-rated tire may initially appear to have a higher load capability. But here’s the catch: P metric tires, like the SL option, need to be derated by a factor of 1.1 when used on a truck. Crunching the numbers reveals that the SL option actually has a lower maximum load capability. Additionally, it boasts a lower tread depth, which translates to better responsiveness.
The same principles I mentioned earlier also apply when comparing XL and E Load range tires. In summary, if your vehicle allows for Passenger Car or LT (Light Truck) tires, going with a passenger option will provide you with better on-road manners. However, if you find yourself venturing off-road frequently, own a working truck, or regularly engage in towing and hauling heavy loads, then LT tires are generally the better choice for your needs.
Couple of tips for towing;
- Even though the load index of passenger car tires fits, when it comes to towing, sidewall stability is the issue. Hence, LT tires with Load Range C, D, or E provide better stability.
- Generally, a load index higher than 119 is recommended for towing
- Proper loading is important for even wearing. 60/40 rule should be followed. 60% of the weight should be on the front axle and 40%of weight should be applied rear axle of the trailer. Besides that, try to center load. Start with heavier ones if you gonna stack them up.
To wrap it up, selecting the right tires comes down to choosing the ones that align with your driving preferences and specific requirements.
Conclusion
Since Destination XT is only available for LT sizes, I have made the comparison on LT size-based. If Firestone will decide to expand their line-up with P-metrics, BF Goodrich KO2 would be a competitor to them.
Firestone Destination XT is my choice regarding the price difference. It is almost as good as BF Goodrich in every section. Even better in wet and snow.
Catch it before prices will be up!
I hope this comparison will help you to decide. If you have any questions, you are more than welcome to leave them below! Have a safe ride!