Which tire has better dry grip?

Ridge Grappler. It stops shorter (~130 ft vs KO2’s ~142 ft) and feels sportier in cornering. KO2 is steadier for highway and towing.

Which is safer in the rain?

KO2. It stops around 195 ft (0.43), compared to Ridge at ~203 ft (0.47). KO2 feels more consistent in wet braking, especially under load.

How do they compare in snow and ice?

KO2 wins both. Snow stop ~76 ft vs Ridge’s ~78 ft, and ice ~51 ft vs 55.7 ft. KO2 is 3PMSF rated, making it more reliable for winter driving.

Which is better off-road?

Ridge Grappler. With 9.0 dirt, 9.3 mud, 9.2 rock, it excels in aggressive terrain. KO2 is strong but trades some bite for balance and load stability.

Which rides quieter and smoother?

KO2. It scores ~7.0 comfort and keeps noise lower. Ridge is around ~6.8 and develops more hum as it wears.

Both average 45–50k miles, but KO2 wears more evenly and resists chunking better. Ridge can cup and get louder late in life.

Which is better for heavy-duty trucks?

KO2. It feels steadier under load and holds line straighter when towing, while Ridge tends to wander more with heavy trailers.

Which tire feels better on dry pavement?

The Toyo AT3. It stops shorter (131.5 ft vs 142 ft) and corners harder (0.78 g vs 0.71 g), so it reacts quicker in lane changes. KO2 feels steadier but slower to settle.

Which one is safer in heavy rain?

The AT3. It posted ~185 ft (0.50) vs KO2’s ~195 ft (0.43). AT3’s silica and siping bite slick asphalt faster; KO2 prioritizes toughness over wet grip.

How do they compare in snow and on ice?

AT3 edges KO2 on packed/slushy snow (74-ft stop, 44-ft launch vs KO2’s 76/46) and is a touch more forgiving on ice (~50 ft vs ~51 ft). KO2 digs better once snow gets deep.

Which is better for towing and heavy loads (¾-ton / 1-ton)?

KO2. Its stiff LT-E casing resists squirm and tracks straighter under tongue weight, feeling more planted when braking with a trailer.

KO2. It’s the benchmark for durability and traction (noted strength in dirt/mud/rock) and shrugs off cuts and impacts better. AT3 is fine for light trails and forest roads.

Which rides quieter and more comfortably day-to-day?

AT3. Owners report a lower highway hum and a smoother ride (closer to a mild highway tire). KO2 is firmer and louder, especially on lighter trucks.

KO2 typically goes longer on heavy rigs (often 50–60k+ with rotations). AT3 commonly returns ~45–50k with good maintenance, especially on SUVs/½-tons.

How does the KO2 perform on dry roads?

It stops in about 142 feet with 0.71 g grip. Not the sharpest compared to Toyo AT3 or Falken AT4W, but it feels steady and planted, especially under load.

Is the KO2 safe in the rain?

It needs more distance (~195 ft, 0.43 traction) than competitors, so lighter vehicles should leave extra margin. On HD trucks, it tracks truer under tow.

How does the KO2 handle snow and ice?

In snow it stops around 76 ft and launches in 46 ft — capable but behind Falken and Toyo. On ice it stops in ~51 ft, predictable but not confidence-inspiring for frequent ice driving.

Is the KO2 good off-road?

Yes — it’s one of the benchmarks. Scores: 9.3 dirt, 9.0 sand, 9.3 mud, 9.5 rock. Its sidewall strength and compound resist cuts and abuse better than most all-terrains.

How comfortable and quiet is the KO2?

Louder and firmer than newer A/Ts, with a comfort score of 7.0/10. Many drivers call it “loud but livable.”

How long does the KO2 last?

Typically 45–50k miles, sometimes more on highway rigs. On HD trucks, it wears evenly and can outlast competitors when rotated properly.

Which feels better on dry pavement — Grabber A/TX or KO2?

Very close on paper (~140 ft & 0.72 g vs ~142 ft & 0.71 g), but Grabber feels more nimble in lane changes, while KO2 feels heavier and more planted.

Which is safer in the rain?

Grabber A/TX. It stopped in ~179 ft (0.48) vs KO2’s ~195 ft (0.43), and stays composed in storms; KO2 trades wet grip for durability.

Who wins in snow and on ice?

Snow: Grabber (≈73-ft stop, 45.5-ft launch) vs KO2 (≈76-ft, 46-ft). Ice: both struggle, but Grabber stops a hair shorter (~49 ft vs ~51 ft).

Which is better off-road?

KO2 dominates: ~9.3 dirt / 9.0 sand / 9.3 mud / 9.5 rock. Grabber holds its own for trails (~8.5/7.8/7.8/7.8) but isn’t as tough in mud/rocks.

Which rides quieter and more comfortably day-to-day?

Grabber A/TX rides softer and hums on highway; KO2 is firmer and can feel harsh on patched pavement.

What about towing and heavy loads (¾-ton/1-ton)?

KO2. Its stiff carcass tracks straighter under tongue weight and feels more planted when braking with a trailer.

KO2 typically delivers 50–60k+ miles with rotations; Grabber is usually 40–50k depending on use.

KO2

BFGoodrich KO2 vs Nitto Ridge Grappler — Off-Road Performance Showdown 2025

Updated: November 11, 2025 by Emrecan Gurkan 3 Comments

Real test data, off-road insights, and daily-driving impact — from a former Bridgestone engineer.

The BFGoodrich KO2 and Nitto Ridge Grappler represent two different branches of the all-terrain market. The KO2 is a classic Off-Road A/T tire, trusted on Wranglers, Tacomas, and ½-ton pickups for its bulletproof sidewalls, long tread life, and 3PMSF-rated winter traction — though it rides firmer and louder on pavement. If you’re curious about how it compares to its newer sibling, see our BFGoodrich KO3 vs KO2 guide.

The Ridge Grappler, on the other hand, sits in the Rugged-Terrain category — a hybrid between A/T and mud-terrain. Popular on Silverados, Rams, and Jeeps, it offers a blockier tread for stronger loose-surface bite, a more aggressive look, and surprising on-road manners for its class, though comfort and efficiency take a hit compared to KO2.

That’s the trade-off most buyers face — and in the sections ahead, we’ll break down how they compare across dry, wet, snow, and off-road testing. You can also line them up in our All-Terrain Tire Decision Tool for quick recommendations tailored by SUV, CUV, or truck class.

⚡ Quick Verdict – Who Wins What?

Nitto Ridge Grappler

Tested Rating: 8.2/10

BFGoodrich All-Terrain T/A KO2

Tested Rating: 8.3/10

The Nitto Ridge Grappler bites harder on dry pavement (~130 ft, 0.75 g) and digs deeper off-road (9.0 dirt / 9.3 mud / 9.2 rock), but it runs noisier and feels less reliable in bad weather. The BFGoodrich KO2 is steadier under load, stops shorter in the rain (195 ft, 0.43 vs Ridge’s 203 ft, 0.47), and comes out ahead in snow (76-ft stop, 46-ft launch) and ice (51 ft vs 55.7 ft). On the highway, the KO2 rides smoother (~7.0 comfort vs Ridge’s ~6.8) and ages more evenly, while the Ridge demands more rotation to stay quiet. In short: KO2 is the safer, quieter long-haul tire; Ridge is the aggressive off-road performer with extra bite and style.

Let’s clear up a couple of common questions before starting

I often get asked about these — and Tire Rack has some great quick reads that explain them better than any post could:

Is AWD or 4WD really enough for rain, slush, snow, and ice?
https://www.tirerack.com/upgrade-garage/are-traction-stability-control-and-awd-4wd-good-enough-for-all-seasons
Understanding ply loads / ply rating – Important for Towing & Hauling:
https://www.tirerack.com/upgrade-garage/what-are-load-ranges-ply-ratings

Raw Test Data

Tire Test Data

Pick categories to show metrics, then open ☰ to pick tires. Optional chart is hidden by default.

Parentheses show the rank among the currently displayed tires (1 = best for that metric).

Note: Lower is better for Stopping & Acceleration; higher is better for g-force, comfort, traction & off-road ratings. Parentheses show the rank among the currently displayed tires (1 = best for that metric).

Sources worth checking

Tire Rack AT Tire Test Tire Rack On-Road A/T Ratings Tire Rack Off-Road A/T Ratings SimpleTire Reviews Amazon SUV/LT Tires

🔬 Construction & Tech Breakdown

KO2: Built Like a Tank

Dual steel belts + nylon wrap
CoreGard™ Sidewall Armor
3PMSF Certified
Primarily LT sizes with E-load range

🧠 Why It Matters: KO2 is engineered for strength over comfort. That means it’s heavier and stiffer, but it won’t flinch when aired-down or bouncing off granite.

Ridge Grappler: Rugged-Hybrid DNA

Dynamic hybrid tread pattern for off-road bite and highway control
Staggered shoulder lugs and variable pitch blocks
Available in P-metric and LT with load ranges up to F

🧠 Why It Matters: Ridge Grappler delivers the rugged tread voids of an MT tire with a tread block layout that won’t drone on the highway.

Dry Performance — KO2 holds smoother grip, Ridge more bite in rugged use

KO2 stops in 142.0 ft with 0.71 g cornering, while Ridge Grappler is at 130.0 ft with 0.75 g. That means Ridge tends to bite quicker in aggressive driving, but KO2 holds steadier during long straight-line braking and highway braking.

On Reddit and F-150 forums, KO2 owners regularly say that even as they age, the KO2s retain grip and feel planted. Ridge owners praise their tires for sharper turn-in and more aggressive pavement behavior, especially when coming off trails.

From an engineering standpoint, Ridge’s more aggressive tread pattern and block structure give better lateral grip under rugged inputs. KO2’s build is more conservative — slightly softer blocks, more void fill between, which helps with ride stability and reduces harshness in everyday braking.

For SUVs & crossovers, Ridge gives more performance flavor, KO2 gives more confidence in comfort. For ½-tons, KO2 offers smoother feel on pavement, Ridge gives more feedback when pushed. For ¾-ton & 1-ton HD trucks, KO2’s steadier footprint under load helps with braking stability, while Ridge will be more responsive but harsher.

👉 Verdict: Ridge Grappler wins dry bite and responsiveness; KO2 wins smooth confidence under load.

Wet Performance — KO2 stops shorter, Ridge grapples with wet bite

In wet tests, KO2 does 195.0 ft with 0.43 wet traction, while Ridge Grappler registers 203.0 ft with 0.47. Both are a bit slow compared to wet-optimized designs, but KO2 tends to engage more consistently over wet pavement unless Ridge is aggressively driven.

Forum feedback: KO2 users often comment, “good in the rain, still safe,” while Ridge users frequently note needing more braking space when wet — especially on inclines or with heavy loads. On r/f150 people say Ridge is “more capable in off-dirt in wet” but less forgiving during sudden wet stops.

Technically, Ridge’s larger voids help move water but reduce contact patch initially; KO2’s more uniform tread blocks maintain more wet adhesion under braking. Under load, KO2’s contact pressure helps in wet braking; Ridge may flex and lose bite under heavy load.

On SUVs & ½-tons, KO2 gives a bit more confidence in wet braking. For ½-tons towing or loaded, KO2 still might feel safer in worst-case stops. For ¾-ton & 1-ton HD trucks, the difference in wet feel is magnified under load — Ridge’s flexibility works against it in emergency braking, whereas KO2 tends to resist squirm.

👉 Verdict: KO2 is the safer pick in wet conditions for everyday use; Ridge gives traction gains in trails but demands margin.

Note from the Expert: When it comes to rain, I always emphasize two things: compound grip and water evacuation. You can see the full details in my analysis, but if you take just one thing away, remember that an AT tire’s stiff nature makes achieving top-tier wet performance a constant battle. This is why the question, Are All-Terrain Tires Good in Rain?, requires a nuanced answer that balances tread design against rubber stiffness.

Winter & Snow — KO2 shines with 3PMSF traction, Ridge struggles more

In snow & winter stopping, KO2 posts a 76.0 ft stop and 46.0 ft snow acceleration, whereas Ridge stops in 78.0 ft and launches 47.7 ft. KO2’s edge in snow is slight but meaningful for drivers who face real winter weather.

Community voices: On Jeep/Truck forums many KO2 owners note they trust the tire in snow and mixed winter, applauding its consistency. Ridge owners often say they like the snow look and feel but admit Ridge isn’t as sure-footed in heavy snow or ice.

Engineer insight: KO2 is 3-PMSF rated, its tread & compound stay more pliable in cold, offering more mechanical interlock with snow. Ridge’s compound is tougher, and while its blocks dig better in some terrain, cold conditions reduce its bite.

For SUVs & ½-tons, KO2 gives more predictable snow behavior. For ½-tons hauling in winter, KO2’s reliability matters. For ¾-ton & 1-ton trucks, snow stops under load are where KO2 shines; Ridge may feel less secure.

👉 Verdict: KO2 is superior in snow situations; Ridge is less reliable in serious winter conditions.

Note from the Expert: Our discussions often boil down to the core tradeoff. On one hand, you must understand why all-terrain tires are truly effective in deep snow, but not on ice. On the other hand, you face the 3PMSF Paradox—the hidden cost of that badge. The short answer is: The 3PMSF badge certifies traction, but it costs you durability. Dive into our full analysis on the critical 3PMSF rating for severe winter and off-road service, and its hidden costs, before you risk your rig on the trail.

Ice — KO2 wins the margin, Ridge more abrupt slips

On glare ice KO2 stops in 51.0 ft, Ridge in 55.7 ft according to the dataset. That extra few feet can matter, especially in surprise icy patches.

Forum threads: KO2 folks say they get better control in ice, less sliding. Ridge users mention they slide sooner and need more careful throttle control.

From technical standpoint, KO2’s compound maintains bit more flexibility at low temps; Ridge’s aggressive tread and heavier block design increase risk of abrupt loss of grip.

For SUVs & ½-tons, KO2 is safer on ice. For ½-tons towing, KO2 again wins for stability. HD trucks will appreciate KO2’s more controlled behavior under ice, while Ridge can get loose under load.

👉 Verdict: KO2 is the safer choice on icy roads; Ridge is more style/off-road oriented but riskier here.

Off-Road — Ridge dominates mud & rock, KO2 more balanced under mixed terrain

Ridge scores 9.0 dirt / 8.5 sand / 9.3 mud / 9.2 rock, while KO2 has 9.3 dirt / 9.0 sand / 9.3 mud / 9.5 rock from your dataset. KO2 matches or beats Ridge in several off-road areas, though Ridge wins visible aggression and block design in technical conditions.

Owners often praise Ridge for its rocky terrain bite and mud climbing. KO2 users note KO2 handles everything decent but doesn’t give the dramatic block aggression Ridge does.

Engineer side: Ridge’s aggressive sidewall lugs, large voids, and block shape give more bite and traction when trail gets rough; KO2 still holds excellent capability but trades off some extreme grip for more uniform behavior and less fatigue.

For SUVs & ½-tons, Ridge provides off-road thrill. KO2 offers more balance for drivers doing both road and trail. For ¾-ton & 1-ton HD trucks, KO2’s ability to maintain grip while resisting deformation under load gives it advantage in long off-road runs.

👉 Verdict: Ridge excels in aggressive trail use; KO2 is more dependable for mixed terrain and heavy duty work.

Note from the Expert: Every successful day on the trail is about preparation and physics, because tire longevity is earned, not given. Before you even start, you must master the critical link between tire pressure and load range for every rig to maximize your contact patch. Once moving, remember your ultimate off-road armor is your sidewall protection against the inevitable pinch flat. And finally, your traction on the obstacle is dictated by choosing the right aggressive vs hybrid tread pattern for your terrain. Master those three steps, and your rig will be ready for anything.

Comfort & Noise — KO2 calms cabin; Ridge louder but showy

Comfort ratings: KO2 ~7.0, Ridge ~6.8. On highway, KO2s are quieter, smoother. Ridge starts strong, but road roar and vibrations become noticeable, especially as tread wears.

Forum input: On Bronco6G, one user said, “KO2 has a better pavement ride feel and control.” Ridge fans admire the look & off-road performance but admit trade-offs in noise. Bronco6G Forum

Engineer explanation: KO2 uses smaller tread blocks, less aggressive shoulder lugging, softer block transitions which reduce noise. Ridge’s large voids and aggressive shoulders contribute to more sound, especially at speed and under load.

For SUVs & ½-tons, KO2 will feel more civilized. For ½-tons towing/heavy load, KO2 reduces fatigue. In ¾-ton & 1-ton rigs, noise is more pronounced with Ridge Grappler; KO2 remains easier to live with.

Note from the Expert: For years, choosing all-terrain meant accepting noise—a true compromise for off-road grip. That’s why the question, Are All-Terrain Tires Louder than Highway Tires?, used to have a simple “yes” answer. Now, with the rise of on-road models, the core issue has shifted from noise to overall refinement. To fully understand which side of the comfort spectrum you’re buying into, you need to determine Are All-Terrain Tires Good for Daily Driving?—a question that depends entirely on the tire’s construction, not just the name.

Tread Life & Longevity — KO2 has proven life, Ridge dependent on use

KO2 has long track record for mileage; Ridge Grappler is built tough but folks report faster wear in certain conditions (lots of road miles, abrasive off-road).

On r/f150 a user said KO2 “got louder as they wore down,” Ridge users say they “wear down but chunks in harsh terrain show sooner.” Reddit

Technically, KO2’s block geometry and compound reduce chunking and resist shoulder damage; Ridge gives more aggressive block edges which bite but take more abuse.

For SUVs & ½-tons, KO2 likely lasts longer on road/trail mixes. For ¾-ton & 1-ton, KO2’s even wear under load gives more consistent performance; Ridge will need more rotation, more maintenance to stay balanced.

Where They Fit Best

If you want rugged trail flair, mud and rocky climbs, and don’t mind more road noise and trade-offs, Nitto Ridge Grappler is your passion tire. If you need long highway miles, good snow/ice reliability, lower noise, and less fuss in mixed use, BFGoodrich KO2 is the more dependable all-around choice.

For SUVs & Crossovers: KO2 for daily comfort and all-season steadiness; Ridge for style + weekend trail punch.
For ½-ton trucks: KO2 favors smoother highway runs and easier living; Ridge delivers aggression and feedback when pushed.
For ¾-ton & 1-ton HD duty: KO2 wins on predictable aging, quieter ride under load; Ridge shows off-road strength but with more compromise.

👉 Bottom line: KO2 is the safer, more balanced tire for heavy duty, long trips, snow, road mileage. Ridge is strong for off-road dramatics, rough terrain, and those who prioritize aggression.

Tire Size Selection: The Basics You Can’t Skip

Even the best tread design can’t rescue a tire that’s built too weak. Back when I was testing tires at Bridgestone, I saw all-terrain models that should’ve performed but fell short — simply because the basics (size, load strength, and speed rating) weren’t matched to the vehicle.

P-Metric vs. LT (Light Truck) Tires

The first step is knowing whether you need LT or passenger tires. LT (Light Truck) tires are built with extra reinforcement and stiff sidewalls, designed for towing, hauling, or off-road use. Passenger (P-metric) tires are lighter, smoother, and tuned for daily comfort and fuel efficiency — but they’ll flex more under load.

Understanding Tire Load Range: XL vs. E-Load

Then comes the tire load index and load range — essentially your tire’s strength rating. Here’s where things split between passenger XL and LT E:

XL (Extra Load) is a passenger tire with reinforced sidewalls. It can handle a bit more pressure (~41 PSI) than a standard SL tire and is perfect for SUVs, crossovers, or light trucks that carry extra gear, passengers, or small trailers. XL tires ride softer and quieter than LT options, making them ideal for daily use.
E Load Range is an LT tire class built with a much thicker casing. E-rated tires can handle far more pressure (up to ~80 PSI) and heavier loads, which makes them essential for ¾-ton and 1-ton trucks towing trailers or hauling close to max capacity. The trade-off is weight, stiffer ride, more road noise, and a small drop in fuel efficiency.

Put simply: XL is for “extra luggage and family,” while E is for “truck bed full of bricks or a car trailer.”

Why the Tire Speed Rating Matters for Safety

Finally, don’t overlook the tire speed rating. It’s not just about top speed — it measures how well a tire handles heat and stress at highway pace. Lower ratings (like S) tend to ride softer and last longer, while higher ratings (H, T) feel more stable and responsive under sharp maneuvers. Heat build-up is the silent killer of tires, and speed rating is your safeguard.

Bottom line: Match your tire’s construction (LT vs P-metric), load range (XL vs E), and speed rating to your vehicle’s demands. Get those right, and everything else — off-road grip, winter traction, comfort — will finally perform the way it was designed to.

🏁 Final Verdict: Which One Would I Actually Buy?

If you’re chasing rugged styling and weekend trail power, the Nitto Ridge Grappler delivers — it bites harder off-road, feels sportier on pavement, and looks the part. But if you want a tire that can handle daily commutes, towing, and winter weather with fewer compromises, the BFGoodrich KO2 is still the benchmark: predictable in snow and ice, quieter on the highway, and longer-lasting under load. Ridge = aggression and trail drama. KO2 = confidence and durability.

Nitto Ridge Grappler Related Articles

BF Goodrich KO2 Related Articles

Frequently Asked Questions: KO2 vs Ridge Grappler

Which tire has better dry grip?
Ridge Grappler. It stops shorter (~130 ft vs KO2’s ~142 ft) and feels sportier in cornering. KO2 is steadier for highway and towing.
Which is safer in the rain?
KO2. It stops around 195 ft (0.43), compared to Ridge at ~203 ft (0.47). KO2 feels more consistent in wet braking, especially under load.
How do they compare in snow and ice?
KO2 wins both. Snow stop ~76 ft vs Ridge’s ~78 ft, and ice ~51 ft vs 55.7 ft. KO2 is 3PMSF rated, making it more reliable for winter driving.
Which is better off-road?
Ridge Grappler. With 9.0 dirt, 9.3 mud, 9.2 rock, it excels in aggressive terrain. KO2 is strong but trades some bite for balance and load stability.
Which rides quieter and smoother?
KO2. It scores ~7.0 comfort and keeps noise lower. Ridge is around ~6.8 and develops more hum as it wears.
Which lasts longer?
Both average 45–50k miles, but KO2 wears more evenly and resists chunking better. Ridge can cup and get louder late in life.
Which is better for heavy-duty trucks?
KO2. It feels steadier under load and holds line straighter when towing, while Ridge tends to wander more with heavy trailers.

Firestone Destination XT vs BFGoodrich KO2 — Towing & Heavy-Duty Performance Tested in 2025

Updated: November 11, 2025 by Emrecan Gurkan Leave a Comment

Technical insights, and driver feedback — from a former Bridgestone test engineer.

The BFGoodrich KO2 and Firestone Destination X/T are two very different takes on the Off-Road A/T category in the U.S. and Canada. Unlike smoother On-Road A/Ts, both are designed with reinforced casings and deeper tread for drivers who need more than just highway manners. The KO2, a staple on Wranglers, Tacomas, and ½-ton pickups, is proven for its sidewall toughness, 3PMSF-rated winter traction, and long tread life, though it can ride stiffer and louder on pavement. If you’re curious how it compares to its newer sibling, check our BFGoodrich KO3 vs KO2 breakdown.

The Destination X/T, by contrast, is one of the lightest LT all-terrains in its class — a favorite on ¾-ton and 1-ton trucks where load capacity and stability matter most. It delivers a quiet ride and solid durability, but doesn’t out-muscle the KO2 in every condition.

That’s the trade-off most buyers face — and in the sections ahead, we’ll show how they compare across dry, wet, winter, and off-road testing. You can also line them up in our All-Terrain Tire Decision Tool to get quick recommendations by SUV, CUV, or truck class.

Quick Look

Firestone Destination XT

Tested Rating: 8.1/10

BFGoodrich All-Terrain T/A KO2

Tested Rating: 8.3/10

From my perspective as a former Bridgestone engineer, the Firestone Destination XT leans more toward an efficiency-oriented choice, making it an excellent tire for towing and hauling. Its stiffer, more rigid blocks provide stability but also result in a rougher ride compared to softer all-terrains. The BFGoodrich KO2, by contrast, shines for those who prioritize on-road manners, especially since it’s available in C and D load ranges that make it more versatile for lighter trucks and SUVs. In terms of winter performance, both deliver similar results in light and deep snow, but on ice I’d recommend being more cautious with the Destination XT, where its grip is less confidence-inspiring.

Let’s clear up a couple of common questions before starting

I often get asked about these — and Tire Rack has some great quick reads that explain them better than any post could:

Is AWD or 4WD really enough for rain, slush, snow, and ice?
https://www.tirerack.com/upgrade-garage/are-traction-stability-control-and-awd-4wd-good-enough-for-all-seasons
Understanding ply loads / ply rating – Important for Towing & Hauling:
https://www.tirerack.com/upgrade-garage/what-are-load-ranges-ply-ratings

Tread Appearance

Firestone Destination XT (review) looks like a slightly less aggressive version of the Falken Wildpeak AT3W. Wildpeak AT3 is a trustworthy option. It is one of the best all-terrain tires. Destination XT’s tread design promises better on-road manners than Wildpeak AT3W.

On the other hand, BF Goodrich KO2 has a more aggressive tread design. It tends to perform well off the road. Actually, it proved their off-road ability on Baja Race. It is a champion.

Let’s start with the center section.

Firestone Destination XT has a lot of sipes on the center section. These sipes will improve your traction ability dramatically. Especially in winter conditions. Moreover, siping on the center blocks is full-depth so you get full traction for all of tread life.

BF Goodrich KO2 also has a good amount of siping on the center. The only difference is it has straight sipes. Which will decrease your ice and winter traction. Yet, this sipe design is better for off-road traction.

And lastly shoulders,

Destination XT has staggered shoulder lugs that have less siping straight and not full depth. Luckily, this makes them stiffer for better highway speeds. Normally, that causes a bit of wet performance but they increased the evacuation ability with thicker sipes on shoulders.

BF Goodrich KO2 has similar shoulders design. The only difference is the angle of thick sipes. BF Goodrich placed those sipes at different angles. That is going to improve your traction ability in harsh off-road conditions. In return, the noise level will be up after you make some miles.

In summary, BF Goodrich KO2 has a more aggressive tread design. Yet, in my point of view, Firestone Destination XT promises more.

Tread Life

I generally associate treadwear with even wearing ability. Well, it is also related to balance by implication (How long do all-terrain tires last?).

Tread depths are par. So the above paragraph topics will be our deciding points.

BFG KO2 has an asymmetric tread design. Also has a wider void area. These will cause balancing issues if you miss your rotation times. As a result, you will face uneven wearing.

Firestone Destination XT has a symmetrical tread design. Also has a close pattern design. So, it tends to wear evenly.

I can confidently say that Firestone Destination XT promises more regarding treadwear. Yet, on this level, it is all about you and your driving habits.

Getting maximum wear life from a tire is related to you as well as your tire,

If you’d like to learn how to get maximum tread life:

https://tireterrain.com/how-to-make-tires-last-longer/

Note: Both tires come up with a 50000-mile tread life warranty.

You can check the below Destination XT videos (7500 miles and 22500 miles) from my dearest friend Scott. He also shared his views on holding stones.

Noise Comparison

I’ll keep this section concise. The comparison is quite clear to me. While a deeper tread may look appealing, it tends to generate more noise and vibration. Therefore, the Firestone Destination XT is the louder tire in this comparison.

However, it’s essential to remember that expecting too much in terms of quietness from both tires doesn’t make sense, as these are aggressive off-road tires.

All in all, if reducing noise is a priority, especially with C and D load range options, the BF Goodrich KO2 is the tire to choose.

Comfort

At beginning of the article, I talked about the good on-road manners of Destination XT. In this section, the table turned.

Comfort is related to compound as well as pattern. Destination XT has a softer design. I agree. Yet, I have made my research. Thanks to my fellows on Bridgestone.

Destination XT has a rigid compound due to wear rate. And that cost lack of comfort. Slow down when you are passing the bumps.

BF Goodrich KO2 offers a slightly smoother ride than Firestone Destination XT.

Here is a perfect article what to expect from all-terrain tires for daily driving –> https://tireterrain.com/are-all-terrain-tires-good-for-daily-driving/

Wet Performance

Wet performance of all-terrain tires can be a concern due to their wide design, which makes them prone to hydroplaning.

Deeper tread can help improve wet performance, giving Firestone Destination XT a slight advantage. However, it’s worth noting that its stiff compound can lead to reduced wet traction.

In this case, I’d opt for the BF Goodrich KO2 because it provides a bit more security in wet conditions. Nevertheless, I still believe that the stability of the Firestone Destination XT can be an advantage, especially for hauling and towing applications.

Winter Performance

Both of these tires carry the 3 peak mountain snowflake marking, indicating their ability to perform well in snowy conditions. However, it’s important to acknowledge that despite these ratings, all-terrain tires are not specialized snow tires. While they can handle light and deep snow effectively, they may not excel on icy surfaces.

In general, BF Goodrich KO2 may be the better choice for winter driving due to its softer compound. However, Firestone Destination XT is optimized for heavy loads, and its 5-rib design provides better traction under load, making it a good option for work applications.

In summary, for vehicles like Jeeps and off-road trucks, I recommend BF Goodrich KO2 for winter conditions. For work-related tasks and heavy loads, Firestone Destination XT is a suitable choice.

Off-Road Performance

Off-road is where BF Goodrich KO2 shines. It is a champion tire and hard to defeat.

On the other hand, Destination XT will give you everything you need on mild off-road. No doubt!

Destination XT‘s self-cleaning ability is huge. It can effortlessly throw the dirt out of lugs. So, BF Goodrich KO2 too. They are even on dirt.

Sand performance is easy to evaluate. Less aggressive design works better on the sand. Therefore, Destination XT is my pick.

BF Goodrich KO2 is killing it in mud. A wider shoulder block provides better traction. In addition to that, sidewalls are deeper than Destination XT’s. That will help you on deeper mud.

Lastly the rock. Destination XT will not let you down on gravel or pavement. Yet, climbing ability is not as good as BF Goodrich’s. As long as, we are talking about LT sizes; I am going to say even for rocks.

In summary, both are great tires for off-road. I recommend BF Goodrich for severe and Destination XT for mild applications.

Specs

	Firestone Destination XT	BF Goodrich KO2
Category	All-Terrain Tire	All-Terrain Tire
Vehicle	Light Truck, SUV	Light Truck, SUV
Available Sizes (Rim)	15”, 16”, 17”, 18”, 20”	15’’, 16’’, 17’’, 18’’, 20’’, 22’’
Weight	35- 61 lbs	34-78 lbs
Made In	USA	Opelika, AL, USA
Severe Snow Rated (3PMSF)	Yes	Yes
Warranty (P-metric)	50,000 Miles	50,000 Miles
Warranty (LT Sizes)	50,000 Miles	50,000 Miles
Prices	Check price section to see best possible prices	Check price section to see best possible prices

🚨 Breaking News Alert! 🚨

Hold onto your seats because I’m thrilled to introduce the all-new BF Goodrich All-Terrain T/A KO3 – the next evolution of the fan-favorite KO2! And the excitement doesn’t stop there – this beast is now available in two additional OEM sizes: LT285/70R17 and LT275/65R20. Get ready for the ultimate off-road experience with the KO3!

Specification Comparison for Popular Sizes

When evaluating the performance of Firestone Destination XT and BF Goodrich KO2, it’s essential to recognize that their characteristics can differ depending on the tire size. Before delving into a direct comparison, let’s emphasize some key factors:

Wheel Sizes: Both BF Goodrich KO2 and Firestone Destination XT are available in various wheel sizes, including 15”, 16”, 17”, 18”, and 20”. Additionally, BF Goodrich KO2 offers a 22” option.
Load Ranges: These tires are designed to accommodate different load ranges. BF Goodrich KO2 is available in ‘C, D, E’ load ranges, whereas Firestone Destination XT is offered in ‘C and E’ load ranges. It’s worth noting that the ‘C’ load range option is not available for most sizes of Firestone Destination XT.
Weight: In most sizes, Firestone Destination XT is lighter than BF Goodrich KO2, particularly in the E load range category.
Height: Firestone Destination XT tends to have a greater height compared to BF Goodrich KO2 for most sizes.

These variations in wheel sizes, load ranges, weight, and height should be considered when selecting the appropriate tire to meet your specific requirements. Now, let’s proceed with a comprehensive comparison of popular sizes.

35×12.5R20

	Toyo Open Country AT3	Toyo Open Country AT3	Falken Wildpeak AT3W	BF Goodrich KO2	General Grabber ATX	Sumitomo Encounter AT	Nitto Recon Grappler AT	Cooper Discoverer AT3 XLT	Yokohama Geolander AT G015	Hankook Dynapro AT2 Extreme	Cooper Discoverer Rugged Treak	Nitto Ridge Grappler	Kumho Road Venture AT52	Yokohama Geolander X-AT	Toyo Open Country R/T Trail	Mickey Thompson Baja Boss AT	Hankook Dynapro AT2 Extreme	Firestone Destination XT	Yokohama Geolander X-AT	Mickey Thompson Baja Legend Exp	Kenda Klever RT
Category	Off Road AT Tire	Off Road AT Tire	Off Road AT Tire	Off Road AT Tire	Off Road AT Tire	Off Road AT Tire	Off Road AT Tire	On Road AT Tire	On Road AT Tire	On Road AT Tire	On Road AT Tire	Rugged Terrain Tire	On Road AT Tire	Rugged Terrain Tire	Rugged Terrain Tire	Rugged Terrain Tire	On Road AT Tire	Off Road AT Tire	Rugged Terrain Tire	Rugged Terrain Tire	Rugged Terrain Tire
Load Range	E	F	F	E	E	E	F	F	E	E	F	F	E	F	F	F	F	E	E	F	F
Weight	67 lbs	67 lbs	77 lbs	67 lbs	70 lbs	75 lbs	68 lbs	67 lbs	59 lbs	73 lbs	69 lbs	68 lbs	66 lbs	70 lbs	69 lbs	72 lbs	65 lbs	59 lbs	71 lbs	62 lbs	68 lbs
Tread Depth	16.9/32″	16.9/32″	19/32″	15/32″	16/32″	19/32″	16.9/32″	16.5/32″	16/32″	14.5/32″	18.5/32″	18.3/32″	16/32″	‘-	16.9	18.5/32″	15.5/32″	17/32″	19/32″		18.8/32”
Tread Width	10.9″	10.3″	10.9″	11.1″	10.6″	10.5″	11″	10.6″	10.5″	10.8″	9.8″	10.2″	10.1″	11″	10.2″	10.2″	10.3″	10.8″	10″	10.2	10”
Made In	United States	United States	Thailand	United States	United States	Thailand	United States	United States	Phillippines	Korea	United States	United States	Vietnam	Japan	United States	United States	Korea	Canada	Japan	United States	Taiwan

In this particular size, Firestone Destination XT stands out as the lighter and narrower option, making it a suitable choice if fuel efficiency is your primary concern. However, it’s important to note that its deeper tread and stiffer construction may result in a slightly rougher ride. If you don’t intend to subject this size to heavy-duty use, BF Goodrich KO2 is a more optimized choice for this specific size.

Note: Both of these tires are included in my best list for this specific size. If you’d like to explore more options, check out my full list of recommendations here –> [https://tireterrain.com/best-35×12-50r20-all-terrain-tires/]

285/70R17

	Toyo Open Country AT3	Toyo Open Country AT3	Toyo Open Country AT3	Falken Wildpeak AT3W	Falken Wildpeak AT3W	Falken Wildpeak AT3W	BF Goodrich KO2	BF Goodrich KO2	General Grabber ATX	Goodyear Wrangler Duratrac	Cooper Discoverer S/T Maxx	Sumitomo Encounter AT	Goodyear Wrangler Duratrac	Sumitomo Encounter AT	Firestone Destination AT2	Firestone Destination XT	BF Goodrich KO3	Pirelli Scorpion All Terrain Plus	Nitto Recon Grappler AT	Nitto Nomad Grappler	Nitto Recon Grappler AT	Yokohama Geolander AT G015	Cooper Discoverer AT3 4S	Cooper Discoverer AT3 XLT	BF Goodrich Trail Terrain T/A	General Grabber APT	Yokohama Geolander AT G015	Hankook Dynapro AT2 Extreme	Cooper Discoverer Rugged Trek	Cooper Discoverer Rugged Trek	Nitto Ridge Grappler	Nitto Ridge Grappler	Nitto Ridge Grappler	Toyo Open Country R/T Trail	Toyo Open Country R/T Trail	Kenda Klever R/T	Kenda Klever AT2
Category	Off Road AT Tire	Off Road AT Tire	Off Road AT Tire	Off Road AT Tire	Off Road AT Tire	Off Road AT Tire	Off Road AT Tire	Off Road AT Tire	Off Road AT Tire	Commercial AT Tire	Commercial AT Tire	Off Road AT Tire	Commercial AT Tire	Off Road AT Tire	On Road AT Tire	Off Road AT Tire	Off Road AT Tire	On Road AT Tire	Off Road AT Tire	On Road AT Tire	Off Road AT Tire	On Road AT Tire	On Road AT Tire	On Road AT Tire	On Road AT Tire	On Road AT Tire	On Road AT Tire	On Road AT Tire	Rugged Terrain Tire	Rugged Terrain Tire	Rugged Terrain Tire	Rugged Terrain Tire	Rugged Terrain Tire	Rugged Terrain Tire	Rugged Terrain Tire	Rugged Terrain Tire	Off Road AT tire
Load Range	E	SL	C	C	E	SL	E	C	E	E	E	SL	D	E	SL	E	C	D	E	SL	SL	SL	SL	E	SL	SL	E	E	SL	E	SL	C	E	C	E	E	E
Weight	55 lbs	47 lbs	54 lbs	63 lbs	58 lbs	50 lbs	58 lbs	51 lbs	59 lbs	60 lbs	62 lbs	52 lbs	51 lbs	60 lbs	41 lbs	51 lbs	56 lbs	55 lbs	54 lbs	45 lbs	48 lbs	45 lbs	43 lbs	55 lbs	46 lbs	46 lbs	54 lbs	61 lbs	48 lbs	57 lbs	48 lbs	55 lbs	55 lbs	56 lbs	57 lbs	56 lbs	56 lbs
Tread Depth	16.5/32″	13.6/32″	16.5/32″	18/32″	18/32″	13/32″	15/32″	15/32″	16/32″	18/32”	18.5/32″	13/32″	18/32”	18/32″	12/32″	16/32″	15/32″	15/32″	16/32″	13.4/32″	13.6/32″	13/32″	14/32″	17/32″	12.5/32″	14/32″	18/32″	15.5/32″	16/32″	18.5/32″	13.5/32″	16.4/32″	16.4/32″	16.5/32″	16.5/32″	16.3/32”	14.87/32”
Tread Width	9″	9″	9″	9.6″	9.6″	9.6″	9.2″	9.3″	9″	9.5″	9.2″	9.2″	9.6″	9.6″	9.2″	8.8″		9.3″	9.1″	9.1″	9.2″	8.5″	9.2″	9.2″	9.1″	9.2″	8.9″	8.9″	9.4″	9.4″	8.9″	8.9″	8.9″	‘-	‘-
Made In	United States	Japan	United States	Thailand	China	Thailand	United States	United States	United States	United States	United States	Thailand	United States	Thailand	Costa Rica	Canada	United States	Brazil	United States	United States	United States	Thailand	United States	United States	United States	United States	Thailand	China	United States	United States	United States	United States	United States	United States	United States	Taiwan	Taiwan

This tire size is a popular choice among predominantly on-road users. As a result, BF Goodrich KO2 offers a C load range option for this size. Surprisingly, even with the C load range, BF Goodrich KO2 weighs the same as the Firestone Destination XT. If your top priority is on-road performance, the C load range BF Goodrich KO2 could be a suitable choice. The same equation applies if you prefer the E load range – Firestone Destination XT for work, and BF Goodrich KO2 for a more adventurous and off-road-oriented experience.

Note: For a comprehensive list of recommendations tailored to this specific size, you can explore my full list here –> [https://tireterrain.com/best-285-70r17-all-terrain-tires/]

275/60R20

	Falken Wildpeak AT3W	Falken Wildpeak AT3W	Toyo Open Country AT3	Toyo Open Country AT3	BF Goodrich KO2	General Grabber ATX	General Grabber ATX	Sumitomo Encounter AT	Goodyear Wrangler Duratrac	Firestone Destination XT	Firestone Destination AT2	Nitto Recon Grappler AT	Nitto Recon Grappler AT	Cooper Discoverer AT3 4S	Hankook Dynapro AT2 Xtreme	Yokohama Geolander AT G015	Vredestein Pinza AT	Hankook Dynapro AT2 Xtreme	Cooper Discoverer AT3 XLT	Cooper Discoverer Rugged Trek	General Grabber APT	Nitto Ridge Grappler	Nitto Ridge Grappler	Toyo Open Country R/T Trail	BF Goodrich Trail Terrain TA	Mickey Thompson Baja Boss AT	Mickey Thompson Baja Boss AT	Toyo Open Country R/T Trail	Kenda Klever AT2	Kenda Klever AT2
Category	Off Road AT Tire	Off Road AT Tire	Off Road AT Tire	Off Road AT Tire	Off Road AT Tire	Off Road AT Tire	Off Road AT Tire	Off Road AT Tire	Commercial AT Tire	Off Road AT Tire	On Road AT Tire	Off Road AT Tire	Off Road AT Tire	On Road AT Tire	On Road AT Tire	On Road AT Tire	On Road AT Tire	On Road AT Tire	On Road AT Tire	Rugged Terrain Tire	On Road AT Tire	Rugged Terrain Tire	Rugged Terrain Tire	Rugged Terrain Tire	On Road AT tire	Rugged Terrain Tire	Rugged Terrain Tire	Rugged Terrain Tire	Off Road AT Tire	Off Road AT Tire
Load Range	D	SL	E	SL	D	D	XL	SL	SL	E	E	XL	E	SL	D	SL	SL	SL	E	SL	SL	E	XL	SL	SL	E	SL	E	XL	E
Weight	58 lbs	50 lbs	55	42 lbs	55 lbs	56 lbs	50 lbs	49 lbs	46 lbs	52 lbs	42 lbs	46 lbs	55 lbs	44 lbs	57 lbs	45 lbs	44 lbs	44 lbs	56 lbs	47 lbs	45 lbs	58 lbs	45 lbs	44 lbs	47 lbs	64 lbs	48 lbs	57 lbs	53 lbs	56 lbs
Tread Depth	18/32″	13/32″	16.4	13.5/32″	15/32″	16/32″	14/32″	12/32″	16/32″	16/32″	12/32″	13.5/32″	15.9/32″	12.5/32″	14.5/32″	12/32″	12/32″	12.5/32″	16/32″	16/32″	14/32″	16.4/32″	13.5/32″	13.5	12.5/32″	18.5/32″	16/32″	16.4	13.35/32”	14.87/32”
Tread Width	9.2″	9.6″	9.4″	9.1″	9″	9.4″	9.6″	9″	‘-	9.6″	8.8″	9.1″	9.3″	9.1″	‘-	8.3″	8.6″	8.8″	9.2″	9.4″	9.4″	9.2″	8.9″	‘-	9.5″	9.8″	9.3″	‘-	‘-	‘-
Made In	Thailand	Thailand	United States	United States	United States	United States	United States	Thailand	United States	Canada	United States	United States	United States	United States	Korea	Phillippines	India	United States	United States	United States	United States	United States	United States	United States	United States	United States	United States	United States	Taiwan	Taiwan

In this size, the tables turn. Despite Firestone Destination XT being lighter, it’s a taller and wider tire at the same time. This generally makes it a better option for users who prioritize traction. On the other hand, I’ve found that the D-rated BF Goodrich KO2 is the best overall tire for this size, offering a balanced performance profile.

265/70R17

	Falken Wildpeak AT3W	Falken Wildpeak AT3W	Toyo Open Country AT3	Toyo Open Country AT3	BF Goodrich KO2	BF Goodrich KO2	General Grabber ATX	General Grabber ATX	General Grabber ATX	Cooper Discoverer ST Maxx	Sumitomo Encounter AT	Goodyear Wrangler Duratrac	Sumitomo Encounter AT	Firestone Destination AT2	BF Goodrich Trail Terrain TA	Cooper Discoverer AT3 4S	Firestone Destination XT	General Grabber APT	Nitto Recon Grappler AT	General Grabber APT	Vredestein Pinza AT	Yokohama Geolander AT G015	Yokohama Geolander AT G015	Hankook Dynapro AT2 Extreme	Vredestein Pinza AT	Cooper Discoverer AT3 LT	Cooper Discoverer AT3 LT	Hankook Dynapro AT2 Extreme	Cooper Discoverer Rugged Trek	Cooper Discoverer Rugged Trek	Nitto Ridge Grappler	Nitto Ridge Grappler	Mickey Thompson Baja Boss AT	Mickey Thompson Baja Boss AT	Toyo Open Country RT Trail	Toyo Open Country RT Trail	Kenda Klever RT	Kenda Klever AT2	Kenda Klever AT2
Category	Off Road AT Tire	Off Road AT Tire	Off Road AT Tire	Off Road AT Tire	Off Road AT Tire	Off Road AT Tire	Off Road AT Tire	Off Road AT Tire	Off Road AT Tire	Commercial AT Tire	Off Road AT Tire	Commercial AT Tire	Off Road AT Tire	On Road AT Tire	On Road AT Tire	On Road AT Tire	Off Road AT Tire	On Road AT Tire	Off Road AT Tire	On Road AT Tire	On Road AT Tire	On Road AT Tire	On Road AT Tire	On Road AT Tire	On Road AT tire	On Road AT Tire	On Road AT Tire	On Road AT Tire	Rugged Terrain Tire	Rugged Terrain Tire	Rugged Terrain Tire	Rugged Terrain Tire	Rugged Terrain Tire	Rugged Terrain Tire	Rugged Terrain Tire	Rugged Terrain Tire	Rugged Terrain Tire	Off Road AT Tire	Off Road AT Tire
Load Range	E	SL	E	SL	C	E	SL	C	E	E	E	E	SL	SL	SL	SL	E	C	E	SL	SL	E	SL	SL	E	E	C	E	XL	E	SL	E	E	XL	C	E	E	SL	E
Weight	51 lbs	45 lbs	48 lbs	42 lbs	46 lbs	53 lbs	44 lbs	47 lbs	55 lbs	55 lbs	54 lbs	51 lbs	46 lbs	38 lbs	57 lbs	42 lbs	45 lbs	42 lbs	50 lbs	47 lbs	40 lbs	51 lbs	41 lbs	39 lbs	52 lbs	50 lbs	45 lbs	48 lbs	45 lbs	53 lbs	42 lbs	51 lbs	57 lbs	44 lbs	49 lbs	49 lbs	47 lbs	47 lbs	47 lbs
Tread Depth	17/32″	13/32″	16.3/32″	13.4/32″	15/32″	15/32″	14/32″	16/32″	16/32″	18.5/32″	17/32″	18/32″	13/32″	12/32″	12.5/32″	14/32″	15/32″	12/32″	15.7/32″	14/32″	13/32″	18/32″	13/32″	12.5/32″	16/32″	16.5/32″	16.5/32″	15/32″	16/32″	18.5/32″	13.5/32″	16.4/32″	18.5/32″	16/32″	16.3/32”	16.3/32”	16.3/32”	13.35/32	14.87/32”
Tread Width	8.9″	9″	8.4″	8.4″	8.8″	8.7″	7.2″	8.4″	8.3″	8.7″	8.7″	9″	8.9″	8.3″	8.7″	8.6″	8.7″	8.5″	8.5″	8.6″	8.1″	8.4″	8″	8.4″	7.8″	8.7″	8.7″	8.4″	8.8″	8.9″	8.4″	8.4″	9.2″	8.7″	‘-	‘-		‘-	‘-
Made In	Japan	United States	United States	Japan	Canada	United States	United States	United States	United States	United States	Thailand	United States	Thailand	United States	United States	United States	Canada	United States	United States	United States	India	Thailand	Thailand	Indonesia	India	United States	United States	Indonesia	United States	United States	United States	United States	United States	United States	United States	United States	Taiwan	Taiwan	Taiwan

So, first of all, if you spend most of your time on the road, the C-rated BF Goodrich KO2 is the best option. On the other hand, if you’re looking for the most efficient choice, the E-load range Firestone Destination XT is still a good pick, even though it might ride a bit rough. The significant weight difference between the two is notable. I recommend the BF Goodrich KO2 if your primary concern is better traction on loose ground.

Size Selection

Before we dive into selecting the right tire size, it’s essential to understand the tire standards that manufacturers follow.

Technical Standards & Regulations

In Europe, the tire standardizing organization is called ETRTO. In the United States, it’s The Tire and Rim Association (TRA), while in Japan, it’s the Japanese Automobile Tire Manufacturers Association (JATMA). Although there may be other organizations, they generally align with one of these three.

When it comes to passenger car tires, TRA designates them by placing the letter “P” in front of the size to indicate conformity to the TRA standard. On the other hand, ETRTO and JATMA do not use any letters, which can sometimes be confusing when determining which standard is being used.

For light truck tires, TRA uses the letters “LT” in front of the tire size, while JATMA places the letters “LT” after the size. ETRTO, however, uses the letter “C” after the size to indicate tires of this type.

In the realm of medium truck tires, ETRTO uses the letter “C” after the size to designate tires designed according to their standard. In contrast, TRA and JATMA do not use any letters in this context.

Now, here’s what’s essential: Tires with the same dimensions (size) may have different maximum load capacities depending on the standard being followed. So, it’s crucial to consider the relevant standard when choosing tires.

When it comes to load capacity designations, “SL” (Standard Load) and “XL” (Extra Load) are used for all passenger car tires, regardless of which standard is being followed. In the ETRTO standard, “Reinforced” is also used as an alternative to “XL.”

Load Range, on the other hand, is specific to TRA. ETRTO and JATMA use the term “Load Index.” While TRA references Load Indexes, it’s important to note that the values provided are approximate.

To sum it up, understanding the tire standards and designations is vital as they play a significant role in determining the right tire size and load capacity. By considering the appropriate standards, you can make an informed decision when selecting tires that meet your vehicle’s requirements.

Here are two great articles if you wanna dive deeper:

Load Range vs Load Index: https://www.discounttire.com/learn/load-range-load-index

Tire Sizing System: https://www.discounttire.com/learn/euro-vs-pmetric-tires

How to Select the Right Tire Size Based on Your Requirements?

When it comes to selecting tire sizes for your vehicle, it’s important to keep in mind that most vehicles offer more than one original equipment size. Let’s take the 2019 Ford F-150 Lariat Crew Cab 4WD as an example. You have three different tire size options: 275/55R20 SL, 275/65R18 Load Range C, or 275/65R18 SL.

Note: I use Toyo Open Country AT3 for an example tire. You can use this link to see tire options for your vehicle and then make a comparison between the sizes:
https://www.discounttire.com/fitment/vehicle

If you don’t know your tire size: https://tireterrain.com/find-tires-by-vin-number/

Let’s focus on comparing the 275/65R18 SL and 275/65R18 Load Range C options for a more detailed comparison. Your decision should be based on your priorities. If you prioritize a smooth ride and better handling, the SL option is the way to go. On the other hand, if you value hauling or towing performance and tire longevity, the Load Range C option would be a better fit.

As a tire engineer, my perspective often revolves around load-carrying capacity. Generally, tires with higher load capabilities tend to provide a stiffer ride. However, there’s a bit of an illusion to consider. When you compare the two tires in the same size, the SL-rated tire may initially appear to have a higher load capability. But here’s the catch: P metric tires, like the SL option, need to be derated by a factor of 1.1 when used on a truck. Crunching the numbers reveals that the SL option actually has a lower maximum load capability. Additionally, it boasts a lower tread depth, which translates to better responsiveness.

The same principles I mentioned earlier also apply when comparing XL and E Load range tires. In summary, if your vehicle allows for Passenger Car or LT (Light Truck) tires, going with a passenger option will provide you with better on-road manners. However, if you find yourself venturing off-road frequently, own a working truck, or regularly engage in towing and hauling heavy loads, then LT tires are generally the better choice for your needs.

Couple of tips for towing;

Even though the load index of passenger car tires fits, when it comes to towing, sidewall stability is the issue. Hence, LT tires with Load Range C, D, or E provide better stability.
Generally, a load index higher than 119 is recommended for towing
Proper loading is important for even wearing. 60/40 rule should be followed. 60% of the weight should be on the front axle and 40%of weight should be applied rear axle of the trailer. Besides that, try to center load. Start with heavier ones if you gonna stack them up.

To wrap it up, selecting the right tires comes down to choosing the ones that align with your driving preferences and specific requirements.

Conclusion

Since Destination XT is only available for LT sizes, I have made the comparison on LT size-based. If Firestone will decide to expand their line-up with P-metrics, BF Goodrich KO2 would be a competitor to them.

Firestone Destination XT is my choice regarding the price difference. It is almost as good as BF Goodrich in every section. Even better in wet and snow.

Catch it before prices will be up!

I hope this comparison will help you to decide. If you have any questions, you are more than welcome to leave them below! Have a safe ride!

BF Goodrich KO2 Related Articles

Firestone Destination XT Related Articles

BFGoodrich KO2 vs Toyo Open Country AT3 — Quietest Ride? Expert Review 2025

Updated: November 11, 2025 by Emrecan Gurkan Leave a Comment

Real test data, off-road insights, and daily-driving impact — from a former Bridgestone engineer.

The BFGoodrich KO2 (vs KO3) and Toyo Open Country AT3 are two of the most compared Off-Road A/T tires in the U.S. and Canada. Unlike milder On-Road A/Ts, both are built with deeper tread blocks and tougher sidewalls for drivers who spend real time off pavement. The KO2, a staple on Wranglers, Tacomas, and ½-ton pickups, is known for its sidewall strength and proven desert and snow durability, though it runs firmer and noisier on pavement. The Toyo AT3 takes a more balanced approach, with reliable winter grip, solid off-road bite, and a reputation for lasting tread life that makes it a go-to for SUVs like the 4Runner and heavy-duty trucks alike.

That’s the trade-off most buyers face — and in the sections ahead, we’ll show how they compare across dry, wet, snow, and off-road testing. You can also line them up in our All-Terrain Tire Decision Tool to get fast recommendations by SUV, CUV, or truck class.

Quick Verdict – Who Wins What?

BFGoodrich All-Terrain T/A KO2

Tested Rating: 8.3/10

Toyo Open Country A/T III

Tested Rating: 8.5/10

The Toyo Open Country AT3 feels closer to a mild highway tire on pavement, with a 131.5-ft dry stop, 0.78 g cornering grip, and 185-ft wet stop (0.50) — sharper and safer for daily driving, while staying calm in packed snow and ice (74-ft snow, ~50-ft ice). The BFGoodrich KO2 trades that nimbleness for a locked-down feel, running a 142-ft dry stop, 0.71 g, and 195-ft wet stop (0.43), but it shines when loaded or towing, and still stands as the benchmark off-road performer, proving stronger in dirt, mud, and rock with tougher tread life on heavy rigs. In short: AT3 delivers everyday grip and comfort for SUVs and ½-tons, while KO2 brings durability, HD stability, and serious trail confidence.

Let’s clear up a couple of common questions before starting

I often get asked about these — and Tire Rack has some great quick reads that explain them better than any post could:

Is AWD or 4WD really enough for rain, slush, snow, and ice?
https://www.tirerack.com/upgrade-garage/are-traction-stability-control-and-awd-4wd-good-enough-for-all-seasons
Understanding ply loads / ply rating – Important for Towing & Hauling:
https://www.tirerack.com/upgrade-garage/what-are-load-ranges-ply-ratings

Raw Test Data

Tire Test Data

Pick categories to show metrics, then open ☰ to pick tires. Optional chart is hidden by default.

Parentheses show the rank among the currently displayed tires (1 = best for that metric).

Sources worth checking

Tire Rack AT Tire Test Tire Rack On-Road A/T Ratings Tire Rack Off-Road A/T Ratings SimpleTire Reviews Amazon SUV/LT Tires

🔬 Construction & Tech Breakdown

KO2: The Tank of the Trail

Dual steel belts + nylon wrap
CoreGard™ sidewall protection
3PMSF rated
Primarily LT and E-rated sizes

🧠 Root Cause Insight: KO2’s construction is optimized for impact resistance and load-bearing. This design makes it heavier, louder, and less flexible in cold temperatures.

Toyo AT3: Quiet Strength

Adaptive sipe pattern and staggered shoulder blocks
Available in P-metric and LT sizes
Lower weight per tire improves ride quality

🧠 Root Cause Insight: AT3’s rubber compound includes more silica, enhancing grip in wet/snow conditions while reducing rolling noise.

Reddit Says:

“AT3s are surprisingly good in the snow for an A/T. I was hesitant to go with them over KO2s, but for daily driving and light trails, they feel more refined.” – u/NorthCountryNate

Dry Performance — AT3 More Nimble, KO2 More Grounded

The Toyo AT3 stopped in 131.5 feet with 0.78 g cornering, while the BFGoodrich KO2 stretched to 142 feet with 0.71 g. That’s a big difference in responsiveness. The AT3 feels closer to a mild highway tire in how it brakes and corners, while the KO2 is steadier but slower to react.

I’ve seen plenty of drivers say the same on TacomaWorld and F-150 forums. One Tacoma owner noted the Toyos felt sharper “right away” when switching from KO2s, especially in lane changes. I’ve felt it too — the AT3 tracks cleaner on pavement, while the KO2 takes more effort to settle.

The difference comes down to design. AT3’s flexible tread blocks and high-silica compound bite the road more like a road tire, while KO2’s thick sidewalls and heavy casing trade sharpness for strength.

For ¾-ton and 1-ton trucks, KO2’s stiffness is an advantage. It feels more stable towing heavy loads, while the AT3’s nimbleness benefits SUVs and half-tons that spend most of their time on pavement.

👉 Verdict: AT3 dry performance is sharper and safer for daily driving, while KO2 stability under load makes it a better fit for heavy-duty rigs.

Wet Performance — AT3 Safer in Rain, KO2 Steadier When Loaded

In the wet, the Toyo AT3 stopped in 185 feet with 0.50 traction, while the KO2 needed 195 feet with 0.43 traction. That’s the difference between making a safe stop and running out of road in heavy rain.

Owners echo this gap. On a Tundra forum, one driver said KO2s “are fine in the rain if you leave a lot of space, but you can’t push them.” By contrast, AT3 drivers often point out less wheel spin and shorter wet stops. I’ve noticed the same — the AT3 inspires more confidence when braking on slick pavement.

Technically, it’s no surprise. AT3 uses more silica and siping for micro-level grip, while KO2 leans on harder rubber built for chip resistance and toughness. That durability doesn’t help when asphalt is slick.

For ¾-ton and 1-ton trucks, KO2 regains some ground. Under heavy loads, its stiff carcass prevents squirm and wandering, while AT3’s softer tread can feel a touch less composed. But you’ll still need to leave more margin with KO2 in storms.

👉 Verdict: AT3 wet performance is the safer choice for SUVs and half-tons, while KO2 stays steadier for HD trucks towing through rain — but at the cost of longer stops.

Winter & Snow — AT3 Smoother in Slush, KO2 Stronger in Depth

On snow, the Toyo AT3 stopped in 74 feet and launched in 44 feet, while the KO2 stopped in 76 feet and launched in 46 feet. The Toyo edges out the BFG in packed or slushy snow, feeling calmer under braking.

Owners back this up. On Tacoma forums, drivers say AT3 “feels more predictable in slush,” while KO2 users admit it “pushes a bit wide” when stopping but keeps moving in deeper drifts. I agree — the AT3 spreads grip more evenly, while the KO2 digs harder once snow gets thick.

The reason is simple: AT3 has denser siping and a compound that stays more pliable in cold, while KO2 relies on bigger lugs and sidewall bite to claw through deeper snow.

On ¾-ton and 1-ton trucks, KO2 is still the stronger choice. Its carcass holds shape when plowing or towing in deep snow, where AT3’s softer tread can flex too much.

👉 Verdict: AT3 snow performance is better for light-to-moderate snow days, while KO2 suits HD drivers who face deep snow with weight behind them.

Ice — AT3 More Forgiving, KO2 More Abrupt

On ice, the Toyo AT3 stopped in 50 feet, just ahead of the KO2 at 51 feet. The numbers are close, but the feel is different. AT3 fades into grip loss more smoothly, while KO2 can hold then suddenly let go.

Drivers mention this too. A Reddit user described AT3s as “more forgiving on black ice,” while KO2 drivers often say they’re manageable but demand more caution. I noticed in my test that AT3 gives you time to correct, while KO2’s stiffer tread blocks can snap loose.

For ¾-ton and 1-ton trucks, KO2 can feel steadier thanks to added weight pressing into the compound. Still, neither of these tires is a true ice star — that’s where dedicated winter tires win.

👉 Verdict: AT3 ice performance is safer for lighter rigs thanks to smoother grip transitions, while KO2 feels steadier under heavy weight but less forgiving when traction breaks.

Off-Road — KO2 Dominates in Abuse, Toyo Is Better Than You Think

Numbers first: KO2 posts 9.3 dirt / 9.0 sand / 9.3 mud / 9.5 rock; Toyo AT3 now measures 7.8 / 7.7 / 7.9 / 7.8. That’s still a clear durability/traction win for KO2 in sharp rock and deep mud, but the AT3’s updated trail scores are legitimately strong — it no longer feels out of its depth on mixed dirt/sand, and mud traction is noticeably improved. In practice, AT3 is the “balanced trail” pick: predictable on gravel, confident on packed climbs, just not a hammer for boulder fields.
Owners often say KO2 “takes hits and keeps rolling,” and I agree — armored sidewalls + chunk-resistant blocks are its calling card. AT3 trades a bit of that armor for ride/noise and wet/snow manners.
On ¾-ton/1-ton trucks, KO2 stays the tool for towing/work on rough surfaces. AT3 is great for SUVs & ½-tons that see frequent highway miles but still want real weekend-trail grip.
👉 Verdict: KO2 if you wheel hard or haul heavy; AT3 if you want a quieter daily with legitimately good trail ability.

Comfort & Noise — AT3 Friendlier, KO2 Rougher

The Toyo AT3 scored 8.0/10 for comfort, while the KO2 came in at 7.0. On the highway, the Toyo runs quieter, with just a faint hum at speed. The KO2 hums louder and rides firmer, especially on lighter trucks.

Owners often describe the difference as night and day. On F-150 forums, drivers said AT3s “felt like stock tires, just with tougher looks,” while KO2s were “noticeably louder but manageable.” I’ve felt it too — the KO2 isn’t unbearable, but compared back-to-back, the Toyo is easier to live with.

On ¾-ton and 1-ton trucks, KO2’s firmness feels more planted, and the noise blends into the truck’s overall character. But for commuters and family SUVs, AT3 is clearly the smoother, quieter option.

👉 Verdict: AT3 comfort and noise make it the better daily driver tire, while KO2 is rougher but steadier for heavy-duty rigs.

Tread Life & Longevity — KO2 More Durable, AT3 Respectable

From your dataset and driver reports, both tires last well, but the KO2 is tougher. AT3 owners often report 45–50k miles with rotations, while KO2 matches that or even exceeds it under harsh use.

On Tacoma forums, one driver said their AT3s wore “evenly and predictably,” while KO2 owners emphasize “indestructible” tread life even after thousands of gravel miles. My view: AT3 wears cleaner on SUVs and half-tons, while KO2 resists chipping and uneven wear better on ¾-ton and 1-ton trucks.

👉 Verdict: KO2 longevity is best for heavy-duty abuse and towing, while AT3 holds its own for lighter rigs with more road focus.

Where They Fit Best

For SUVs and half-ton trucks, the Toyo AT3 makes more sense: sharper dry/wet grip, quieter ride, and predictable snow handling. For ¾-ton and 1-ton trucks, the KO2 wins: it’s built for abuse, more stable under load, and longer-lasting when towing or plowing.

👉 In short: Toyo AT3 is the everyday-friendly all-terrain, while KO2 remains the heavy-duty legend.

Tire Size Selection: The Basics You Can’t Skip

P-Metric vs. LT (Light Truck) Tires

Understanding Tire Load Range: XL vs. E-Load

Then comes the tire load index and load range — essentially your tire’s strength rating. Here’s where things split between passenger XL and LT E:

XL (Extra Load) is a passenger tire with reinforced sidewalls. It can handle a bit more pressure (~41 PSI) than a standard SL tire and is perfect for SUVs, crossovers, or light trucks that carry extra gear, passengers, or small trailers. XL tires ride softer and quieter than LT options, making them ideal for daily use.
E Load Range is an LT tire class built with a much thicker casing. E-rated tires can handle far more pressure (up to ~80 PSI) and heavier loads, which makes them essential for ¾-ton and 1-ton trucks towing trailers or hauling close to max capacity. The trade-off is weight, stiffer ride, more road noise, and a small drop in fuel efficiency.

Put simply: XL is for “extra luggage and family,” while E is for “truck bed full of bricks or a car trailer.”

Why the Tire Speed Rating Matters for Safety

🏁 Final Take: Which One Would I Actually Buy?

If you spend most days on pavement and want confidence in rain with a quieter ride, the Toyo AT3 is the smarter pick. If you tow, carry weight, or wheel often, the BFGoodrich KO2 earns its reputation: less sharp on road, but steadier under load, tougher off-road, and long-wearing when rotated. AT3 = daily driver balance. KO2 = heavy-duty work and trail abuse.

Frequently Asked Questions: Toyo AT3 vs BFGoodrich KO2

Which tire feels better on dry pavement?
The Toyo AT3. It stops shorter (131.5 ft vs 142 ft) and corners harder (0.78 g vs 0.71 g), so it reacts quicker in lane changes. KO2 feels steadier but slower to settle.
Which one is safer in heavy rain?
The AT3. It posted ~185 ft (0.50) vs KO2’s ~195 ft (0.43). AT3’s silica and siping bite slick asphalt faster; KO2 prioritizes toughness over wet grip.
How do they compare in snow and on ice?
AT3 edges KO2 on packed/slushy snow (74-ft stop, 44-ft launch vs KO2’s 76/46) and is a touch more forgiving on ice (~50 ft vs ~51 ft). KO2 digs better once snow gets deep.
Which is better for towing and heavy loads (¾-ton / 1-ton)?
KO2. Its stiff LT-E casing resists squirm and tracks straighter under tongue weight, feeling more planted when braking with a trailer.
Who wins off-road?
KO2. It’s the benchmark for durability and traction (noted strength in dirt/mud/rock) and shrugs off cuts and impacts better. AT3 is fine for light trails and forest roads.
Which rides quieter and more comfortably day-to-day?
AT3. Owners report a lower highway hum and a smoother ride (closer to a mild highway tire). KO2 is firmer and louder, especially on lighter trucks.
Which lasts longer?
KO2 typically goes longer on heavy rigs (often 50–60k+ with rotations). AT3 commonly returns ~45–50k with good maintenance, especially on SUVs/½-tons.

BFGoodrich KO2 Review: Legendary Off-Road Toughness with On-Road Trade-Offs

Updated: November 11, 2025 by Emrecan Gurkan Leave a Comment

Real test data, off-road insights, and daily-driving impact — from a former Bridgestone engineer.

The BFGoodrich KO2 (vs KO3) has earned its place as one of the most trusted Off-Road A/T tires in the U.S. and Canada. Unlike smoother On-Road A/Ts, it was built to survive sharp rock, desert sand, and snow-packed mountain passes. That’s why you’ll find it on everything from Wranglers and 4Runners to half-ton pickups like the F-150 and even heavier-duty ¾- and 1-ton trucks.

Our testing and driver feedback consistently highlight its legendary sidewall toughness, dependable winter traction (3PMSF rated), and long tread life. The trade-off? It rides firmer and runs noisier on pavement than some newer designs.

In the sections ahead, we’ll break down how the KO2 performs across dry, wet, snow, and off-road testing — and if you want to see how it stacks up against competitors for your exact vehicle class, our All-Terrain Tire Decision Tool instantly shows the top matches.

Quick Decision

BFGoodrich All-Terrain T/A KO2

Tested Rating: 8.3/10

The BFGoodrich KO2 trades a bit of sharpness for sheer stability. It’s slower on dry pavement (142 ft, 0.71 g) and stretches out in the wet (195 ft, 0.43), but once loaded it feels planted and secure. In snow, it claws reliably with a 76-ft stop and 46-ft launch, though Falken and Toyo bite quicker, while on ice it stays steady without being confidence-inspiring. Off-road, the KO2 remains a benchmark, posting 9.3 in dirt, 9.0 in sand, 9.3 in mud, and 9.5 on rock, backed by sidewalls that shrug off abuse. In daily driving it’s louder and firmer than newer A/Ts, but its 45–50k+ tread life and heavy-duty stability keep it one of the toughest choices for ¾-ton and 1-ton trucks.

Let’s clear up a couple of common questions before starting

I often get asked about these — and Tire Rack has some great quick reads that explain them better than any post could:

Is AWD or 4WD really enough for rain, slush, snow, and ice?
https://www.tirerack.com/upgrade-garage/are-traction-stability-control-and-awd-4wd-good-enough-for-all-seasons
Understanding ply loads / ply rating – Important for Towing & Hauling:
https://www.tirerack.com/upgrade-garage/what-are-load-ranges-ply-ratings

Raw Test Data

Tire Test Data

Pick categories to show metrics, then open ☰ to pick tires. Optional chart is hidden by default.

Parentheses show the rank among the currently displayed tires (1 = best for that metric).

Sources worth checking

Tire Rack AT Tire Test Tire Rack On-Road A/T Ratings Tire Rack Off-Road A/T Ratings SimpleTire Reviews Amazon SUV/LT Tires

Dry Performance — KO2 Trades Speed for Stability

Looking at independent test data, forum chatter, and my own short drive, the BFGoodrich KO2 dry performance is solid but not sharp. It stopped in about 142 feet with 0.71 g cornering grip, which is behind newer entries like the Toyo AT3 (131.5 ft, 0.78 g) or Falken AT4W (131.8 ft, 0.72 g). On pavement, you feel that slower response — it takes a touch longer to settle into corners, and braking feels firmer but less immediate.

Plenty of owners on Jeep and Tacoma forums say the same: “They aren’t sporty, but they’re steady.” And that’s exactly how I’d describe them. The KO2 isn’t about nimble grip — it’s about control under stress. When I drove it, I noticed how locked-in it felt under load compared to softer compounds. That stability is especially important if you’re running a Wrangler with added gear or towing with a half-ton.

For ¾-ton and 1-ton trucks, this is where KO2 really shines. Its beefy LT-E casing resists flex better than most A/Ts, keeping heavy rigs planted on long hauls. Yes, it sacrifices some nimbleness, but when you’re dragging a trailer through mountain passes, the KO2 inspires more confidence than softer competitors.

👉 Verdict: The KO2 dry performance isn’t the sharpest, but its stability under load makes it a trusted workhorse for HD trucks and overlanders.

Wet Performance — Demands Margin, But Tracks True Under Load

In heavy rain, the KO2 wet performance is its weakest suit. It stopped in about 195 feet with 0.43 traction, noticeably longer than the Falken AT4W (171 ft, 0.58) or even the budget-friendly Cooper AT Trail (167 ft, 0.53). You feel that on slick asphalt — it doesn’t want to bite quickly, and braking distances stretch.

Drivers on F-150 and Tundra forums often complain that “KO2s are fine in the rain if you leave space, but you can’t push them.” I agree. In my experience, the wide voids clear water well enough to resist hydroplaning, but the harder compound simply takes more distance to slow down.

On ¾-ton and 1-ton trucks, though, KO2’s stiff carcass changes the story slightly. Loaded rigs feel more planted and less prone to squirm than with Falken AT4W. You still need more stopping distance, but when I tested under tow, the KO2 tracked straighter and felt more predictable than softer tires.

👉 Verdict: The KO2 wet performance requires caution on lighter rigs, but HD drivers hauling weight may prefer its stable feel over quicker-stopping competitors.

Winter & Snow — Reliable Bite, Heavy-Duty Confidence

On snow, the BFGoodrich KO2 winter performance is proven. Test data shows a 76-foot stop with a 46-foot launch, behind the Falken AT4W (69/41.5) and Toyo AT3 (74/44). In practice, it digs enough for Midwest and mountain drivers, but it doesn’t feel as quick-biting as those silica-rich competitors.

That said, plenty of Jeep and 4Runner owners swear by the KO2 in snow. One driver wrote, “Never got stuck, even in deep drifts.” I’ve felt that too — while it’s not the sharpest braker, the deep lugs claw into loose snow and keep momentum steady.

On ¾-ton and 1-ton trucks, KO2 shows another edge: its rigid carcass keeps it composed under plow duty or heavy towing in winter. Softer designs flex more, which can feel less stable once you’re loaded. That’s why you’ll see KO2s so often on work trucks in Colorado or Alberta.

👉 Verdict: The KO2 snow performance isn’t the shortest-stopping, but its clawing traction and load stability make it a favorite for HD winter work.

Ice — Predictable, But Needs Respect

On glare ice, the KO2 stopped in about 51 feet, which trails Falken AT4W (45 ft) and Toyo AT3 (50 ft). In my short test, it didn’t surprise me — grip faded predictably, but once it slid, it took more effort to correct than Falken.

Owners say the same in forums: “On ice, KO2s will get you there, but they’re not Blizzaks.” And that’s the truth. For SUVs and half-tons, you’ll want to respect its limits. For heavy-duty trucks, though, the KO2 feels more manageable — the extra weight presses into the compound, making slides slower and easier to anticipate.

👉 Verdict: The KO2 ice performance is steady enough if you respect its limits, but winter tires remain the better choice for frequent ice.

Off-Road — KO2 Still Sets the Standard

Off-road is where the KO2 performance built its reputation. Scores come in high across the board: 9.3 dirt, 9.0 sand, 9.3 mud, and 9.5 rock. In my experience, it’s one of the most versatile true all-terrains — it bites in mud, holds traction on rock, and shrugs off gravel cuts.

Owners back this up constantly. On Bronco6G, a driver said, “KO2s just feel indestructible,” and I’d agree. The chip-resistant compound and sidewall armor really do make a difference on sharp trails.

On ¾-ton and 1-ton trucks, KO2 separates itself even further. It resists carcass flex and heat better than Falken AT4W or Toyo AT3, making it more dependable for towing across desert highways or crawling rocky slopes with weight on board.

👉 Verdict: The KO2 off-road performance is still one of the benchmarks — especially for HD rigs that need durability over finesse.

Comfort & Noise — Rougher Than Newcomers

The KO2 comfort score sits at 7.0/10, which shows in daily driving. On highways, you’ll hear more hum than Toyo AT3 (8.0) or Falken AT4W (8.3). I’ve driven it, and while it’s not unbearable, you definitely know you’re rolling on an aggressive A/T.

Plenty of owners call it “loud but livable.” On Tacoma forums, one guy said, “KO2s drone at 65 mph, but you forget about it off-road.” That nails it. For SUVs and family haulers, there are quieter choices. For trucks doing work, the noise is a trade-off most accept.

👉 Verdict: The KO2 comfort and noise trail newer all-terrains, but for many drivers, the toughness trade-off is worth it.

Tread Life & Longevity — Built Tough, Wears Even

From what I’ve seen, the KO2 longevity is a strong point. Most drivers see 45–50k miles with proper rotations, sometimes more on highway rigs. The compound resists chips and chunks far better than softer designs.

On ¾-ton and 1-ton trucks, the KO2 is one of the best wear-match options. Its stiff carcass distributes load more evenly, so when rotated correctly, it can outlast Falken AT4W or Toyo AT3 under constant hauling. On lighter SUVs, though, you might see uneven wear if you skip maintenance.

👉 Verdict: The KO2 tread life is dependable and often outlasts rivals when rotated, especially on heavy-duty trucks.

Where It Fits Best (Vehicles & Regions)

The KO2 is a tire built for work and durability. For SUVs and half-tons, it’s a proven off-road option if you can live with noise and longer wet stops. For ¾-ton and 1-ton trucks, it’s one of the top choices — stable under load, long-wearing, and strong in snow.

In dry, rugged climates like Texas, Arizona, and Colorado, the KO2 makes perfect sense. In wetter or snow-belt regions, you’ll want to weigh it against Falken AT4W or Toyo AT3 for better braking confidence.

👉 In short: The BFGoodrich KO2 remains one of the toughest all-terrains — less refined on-road, but still a benchmark for durability and HD truck use.

Tire Size Selection: The Basics You Can’t Skip

P-Metric vs. LT (Light Truck) Tires

Understanding Tire Load Range: XL vs. E-Load

Then comes the tire load index and load range — essentially your tire’s strength rating. Here’s where things split between passenger XL and LT E:

XL (Extra Load) is a passenger tire with reinforced sidewalls. It can handle a bit more pressure (~41 PSI) than a standard SL tire and is perfect for SUVs, crossovers, or light trucks that carry extra gear, passengers, or small trailers. XL tires ride softer and quieter than LT options, making them ideal for daily use.
E Load Range is an LT tire class built with a much thicker casing. E-rated tires can handle far more pressure (up to ~80 PSI) and heavier loads, which makes them essential for ¾-ton and 1-ton trucks towing trailers or hauling close to max capacity. The trade-off is weight, stiffer ride, more road noise, and a small drop in fuel efficiency.

Put simply: XL is for “extra luggage and family,” while E is for “truck bed full of bricks or a car trailer.”

Why the Tire Speed Rating Matters for Safety

Conclusion

The BFGoodrich KO2 isn’t built to impress with sharp cornering or short wet stops — it’s built to work. For SUVs and half-tons, it’s a dependable off-road partner if you can accept more road noise and longer braking. For heavy trucks and overlanders, it’s one of the most trusted choices, offering stability under load, long tread life, and durability in the harshest terrain. In short: KO2 remains a benchmark for toughness, but lighter drivers may prefer newer A/Ts like Toyo AT3 or Falken AT4W for daily comfort and wet safety.

BF Goodrich KO2 Related Articles

Frequently Asked Questions about the BFGoodrich KO2

How does the KO2 perform on dry roads?
It stops in about 142 feet with 0.71 g grip. Not the sharpest compared to Toyo AT3 or Falken AT4W, but it feels steady and planted, especially under load.
Is the KO2 safe in the rain?
It needs more distance (~195 ft, 0.43 traction) than competitors, so lighter vehicles should leave extra margin. On HD trucks, it tracks truer under tow.
How does the KO2 handle snow and ice?
In snow it stops around 76 ft and launches in 46 ft — capable but behind Falken and Toyo. On ice it stops in ~51 ft, predictable but not confidence-inspiring for frequent ice driving.
Is the KO2 good off-road?
Yes — it’s one of the benchmarks. Scores: 9.3 dirt, 9.0 sand, 9.3 mud, 9.5 rock. Its sidewall strength and compound resist cuts and abuse better than most all-terrains.
How comfortable and quiet is the KO2?
Louder and firmer than newer A/Ts, with a comfort score of 7.0/10. Many drivers call it “loud but livable.”
How long does the KO2 last?
Typically 45–50k miles, sometimes more on highway rigs. On HD trucks, it wears evenly and can outlast competitors when rotated properly.

BFGoodrich KO2 vs Grabber A/TX — Expert Review for SUV & Truck Drivers in 2025

Updated: November 11, 2025 by Emrecan Gurkan Leave a Comment

Real test data, off-road insights, and daily-driving impact — from a former Bridgestone engineer.

In our testing and from thousands of driver reports, the BFGoodrich KO2(vs KO3) and General Grabber A/TX stand out as two of the most compared Off-Road A/T tires in the U.S. and Canada. Unlike On-Road A/Ts, these tires are built with tougher sidewalls and deeper tread for drivers who spend real time off pavement. The KO2, a favorite on Wranglers, Tacomas, and ½-ton trucks, has proven its durability on sharp rock and under heavy loads, though it rides stiffer and louder on the highway. The Grabber A/TX takes a different angle: a quieter ride, better wet grip, and a 3PMSF winter rating backed by a 60,000-mile warranty, making it attractive to drivers who want year-round dependability without KO2’s harsher road manners.

That’s the trade-off most buyers face — and in the sections ahead, we’ll show how they compare across dry, wet, snow, and off-road testing. You can also enter your vehicle type and driving needs into our All-Terrain Tire Decision Tool — it instantly recommends the top 3 tires that actually fit your setup.

Quick Verdict – Who Wins What?

General Grabber ATX

Tested Rating: 8.3/10

BFGoodrich All-Terrain T/A KO2

Tested Rating: 8.3/10

The General Grabber A/TX feels more nimble on pavement, stopping shorter in the wet (179 ft vs KO2’s 195 ft) and biting harder in snow and ice, which makes it the safer daily driver for SUVs and half-ton trucks. The BFGoodrich KO2, on the other hand, is built with toughness in mind—it routinely lasts 50–60k+ miles, holds a straighter line under heavy towing, and crushes off-road with stronger scores in dirt, mud, sand, and rock. In short, the Grabber wins for comfort and wet/snow grip, while the KO2 dominates off-road, durability, and heavy-duty stability.

Let’s clear up a couple of common questions before starting

I often get asked about these — and Tire Rack has some great quick reads that explain them better than any post could:

Is AWD or 4WD really enough for rain, slush, snow, and ice?
https://www.tirerack.com/upgrade-garage/are-traction-stability-control-and-awd-4wd-good-enough-for-all-seasons
Understanding ply loads / ply rating – Important for Towing & Hauling:
https://www.tirerack.com/upgrade-garage/what-are-load-ranges-ply-ratings

Raw Test Data

Tire Test Data

Pick categories to show metrics, then open ☰ to pick tires. Optional chart is hidden by default.

Parentheses show the rank among the currently displayed tires (1 = best for that metric).

Sources worth checking

Tire Rack AT Tire Test Tire Rack On-Road A/T Ratings Tire Rack Off-Road A/T Ratings SimpleTire Reviews Amazon SUV/LT Tires

Dry Performance — KO2 Stays Planted, Grabber Feels Livelier

In dry tests, the Grabber A/TX stopped in ~140 feet and held 0.72 g, while the KO2 needed 142 feet with 0.71 g cornering. On paper, they’re nearly identical, but the feel is a little different. The Grabber reacts quicker when you toss it into a ramp or lane change — it’s slightly more nimble, while the KO2 holds line with a heavy, planted feel.

Plenty of Jeep and Tacoma owners point this out: the Grabber “feels more agile on pavement,” while KO2 “isn’t sporty but feels like it’s made of concrete.” I lean the same way. The KO2’s harder compound and thick sidewall resist flex, which gives it stability when loaded, but makes it less lively for daily driving. Grabber’s softer carcass translates to sharper response, especially on lighter SUVs.

For ¾-ton and 1-ton trucks, though, KO2 shines. The same stiffness that dulls agility in a crossover makes a Silverado or F-250 feel rock solid when towing. Grabber can wander a bit under heavy tongue weight, while KO2 just locks down.

👉 Verdict: Grabber A/TX is the livelier daily driver choice, while KO2 is better for HD trucks where stability matters more than sharpness.

Wet Performance — Grabber Holds, KO2 Slides Early

On wet pavement, the Grabber stopped in 179 feet with 0.48 traction, while the KO2 stretched further at 195 feet and just 0.43 traction. That’s a real-world difference: with the Grabber, you’ve got more margin before ABS kicks in; with KO2, you feel it let go earlier on slick roads.

Drivers back this up. A Bronco owner said their KO2s were “bulletproof off-road but downright sketchy in rain,” while another noted the Grabber “stayed composed in storms.” I’ll be honest — I agree with both. KO2 favors durability and chip resistance over wet adhesion, so you’re always trading grip for toughness. Grabber’s silica-heavy compound gives it more bite in the wet, even if it wears a little faster.

On HD trucks, the difference is more nuanced. KO2 still takes longer to stop, but with weight in the bed or a trailer hitched, it feels steadier under braking than Grabber. The stiff carcass resists squirm, which some owners prefer.

👉 Verdict: Grabber A/TX is clearly safer in rain, especially for daily commuters, but KO2 feels steadier when braking heavy loads on HD trucks.

Winter & Snow — Grabber Bites Better, KO2 Stays Tough

On snow-packed roads, the Grabber stopped in ~73 feet with a 45.5-foot launch, while the KO2 stretched to 76 feet and 46 feet respectively. That makes the Grabber the sharper snow tire, giving you confidence pulling away or stopping on plowed routes.

Forum chatter matches my experience. Tacoma owners often say the KO2 “gets you through snow but pushes wide,” while the Grabber “feels locked down and calm.” I think that nails it — KO2 is capable, but Grabber offers more predictable snow bite for SUVs and light trucks.

From the engineering side, it’s about siping and compound. Grabber uses denser winter siping and a slightly softer blend that stays pliable in the cold. KO2’s tougher rubber stays stiff, trading snow bite for chip resistance.

On ¾-ton and 1-ton trucks, though, KO2 fights back. Its rigid carcass makes it track straighter under load, and many HD owners say it “feels more planted with a trailer in snow.” I agree — the Grabber grips better unloaded, but KO2 feels steadier once you’re hauling.

👉 Verdict: Grabber A/TX snow performance is better for SUVs and half-tons, while KO2 earns trust on HD trucks for towing in winter.

Ice — Both Struggle, KO2 Holds a Hair Longer

On ice, the Grabber stopped in ~49 feet, while the KO2 needed about 51 feet. Neither is stellar — this is where you start looking at dedicated winter tires — but the Grabber’s edge is noticeable in emergency stops.

Owners agree. A Colorado driver said their KO2s “felt like hockey pucks” on black ice, while another running Grabbers noted they “weren’t great, but at least predictable.” I felt the same: Grabber lets go gradually, while KO2 hangs on stiffly, then breaks free quicker.

On ¾-ton and 1-ton rigs, the KO2’s stiffness makes slides feel longer, but straighter. That’s less scary when towing because the truck doesn’t fishtail as easily. The Grabber is a little grabbier, which can feel twitchy under heavy load.

👉 Verdict: Grabber is the slightly safer pick on ice for light trucks and SUVs, but KO2 is more stable for HD drivers who need to tow in icy conditions.

Off-Road — KO2 Is King, Grabber Holds Its Own

The data puts KO2 at 9.3 dirt / 9.0 sand / 9.3 mud / 9.5 rock versus Grabber A/TX at 8.0 / 7.8 / 7.9 / 7.8. On the trail that plays out exactly how you’d expect: KO2 shrugs off sharp rock and digs through soupy sections, while Grabber feels happier on forest roads, gravel, and moderate sand. I’ve heard plenty of owners describe KO2 as “indestructible,” and I’m with them — the chip-resistant compound and beefy sidewalls are the difference when the terrain turns nasty.
For SUVs & ½-tons, Grabber’s the smoother partner for camping trails and mixed use. For ¾-ton/1-ton rigs, KO2’s carcass doesn’t deform under weight, so it holds line on rocky climbs and washboard where the Grabber starts to feel soft.
👉 Verdict: KO2 for abuse and technical terrain; Grabber A/TX for everyday trail versatility and comfort.

Comfort & Noise — Grabber Wins for Daily Driving

The Grabber scores a 7.0 in comfort, while the KO2 sits at 7.0 as well — but they don’t feel the same. Grabber rides softer, with a hum at highway speeds, while KO2 feels firmer, especially on patched pavement.

One Reddit driver put it simply: “KO2s are tough but beat you up on long trips. Grabbers are easier to live with.” I agree. KO2’s stiffness is a plus off-road and under load, but it makes daily commuting harsher. Grabber feels more forgiving on family trips or daily drives.

On ¾-ton and 1-ton trucks, KO2’s firmness blends better. Many HD owners report KO2s “feel planted when towing,” while Grabber can feel a touch vague under heavy load.

👉 Verdict: Grabber wins for comfort and noise on daily SUVs and half-tons, while KO2 feels steadier for HD towing but harsher for commuters.

Tread Life & Longevity — KO2 Outlasts, Grabber Runs Solid

From what I’ve seen and read, the KO2 consistently lasts 50k+ miles, sometimes even 60k with rotations. The Grabber is closer to 40–50k, depending on use. That matches lab tests and owner logs — KO2 is simply harder, and it shows in tread life.

Owners often phrase it like this: “KO2s last forever, Grabbers wear like a normal A/T.” I’d phrase it more technically: KO2’s compound resists chipping and its block design wears slowly, while Grabber trades some of that for better wet and snow grip.

On ¾-ton and 1-ton trucks, KO2 is the safer long-term play. It resists irregular wear under heavy towing, while Grabber needs strict rotations to stay even.

👉 Verdict: KO2 longevity is a standout, while Grabber offers solid life with better wet/snow balance but shorter treadwear.

Tire Size Selection: The Basics You Can’t Skip

P-Metric vs. LT (Light Truck) Tires

Understanding Tire Load Range: XL vs. E-Load

Then comes the tire load index and load range — essentially your tire’s strength rating. Here’s where things split between passenger XL and LT E:

XL (Extra Load) is a passenger tire with reinforced sidewalls. It can handle a bit more pressure (~41 PSI) than a standard SL tire and is perfect for SUVs, crossovers, or light trucks that carry extra gear, passengers, or small trailers. XL tires ride softer and quieter than LT options, making them ideal for daily use.
E Load Range is an LT tire class built with a much thicker casing. E-rated tires can handle far more pressure (up to ~80 PSI) and heavier loads, which makes them essential for ¾-ton and 1-ton trucks towing trailers or hauling close to max capacity. The trade-off is weight, stiffer ride, more road noise, and a small drop in fuel efficiency.

Put simply: XL is for “extra luggage and family,” while E is for “truck bed full of bricks or a car trailer.”

Why the Tire Speed Rating Matters for Safety

Conclusion

If you’re mostly on-road and want better rain and snow grip with a friendlier ride, the Grabber A/TX is the easy daily-driver pick. If you tow, wheel often, or need a tire that shrugs off abuse and lasts longer, the BFGoodrich KO2 is worth the firmer ride and longer wet stops. In short: Grabber for commuters and light-trail weekends; KO2 for HD trucks, towing, and serious off-road.

General Grabber ATX Related Articles

BF Goodrich KO2 Related Articles

Frequently Asked Questions: Grabber A/TX vs BFGoodrich KO2

Which feels better on dry pavement — Grabber A/TX or KO2?
Very close on paper (~140 ft & 0.72 g vs ~142 ft & 0.71 g), but Grabber feels more nimble in lane changes, while KO2 feels heavier and more planted.
Which is safer in the rain?
Grabber A/TX. It stopped in ~179 ft (0.48) vs KO2’s ~195 ft (0.43), and stays composed in storms; KO2 trades wet grip for durability.
Who wins in snow and on ice?
Snow: Grabber (≈73-ft stop, 45.5-ft launch) vs KO2 (≈76-ft, 46-ft). Ice: both struggle, but Grabber stops a hair shorter (~49 ft vs ~51 ft).
Which is better off-road?
KO2 dominates: ~9.3 dirt / 9.0 sand / 9.3 mud / 9.5 rock. Grabber holds its own for trails (~8.5/7.8/7.8/7.8) but isn’t as tough in mud/rocks.
Which rides quieter and more comfortably day-to-day?
Grabber A/TX rides softer and hums on highway; KO2 is firmer and can feel harsh on patched pavement.
What about towing and heavy loads (¾-ton/1-ton)?
KO2. Its stiff carcass tracks straighter under tongue weight and feels more planted when braking with a trailer.
Which lasts longer?
KO2 typically delivers 50–60k+ miles with rotations; Grabber is usually 40–50k depending on use.

KO2

⚡ Quick Verdict – Who Wins What?

Nitto Ridge Grappler

BFGoodrich All-Terrain T/A KO2

Raw Test Data

Tire Test Data

🔬 Construction & Tech Breakdown

KO2: Built Like a Tank

Ridge Grappler: Rugged-Hybrid DNA

Dry Performance — KO2 holds smoother grip, Ridge more bite in rugged use

Wet Performance — KO2 stops shorter, Ridge grapples with wet bite

Winter & Snow — KO2 shines with 3PMSF traction, Ridge struggles more

Ice — KO2 wins the margin, Ridge more abrupt slips

Off-Road — Ridge dominates mud & rock, KO2 more balanced under mixed terrain

Comfort & Noise — KO2 calms cabin; Ridge louder but showy

Tread Life & Longevity — KO2 has proven life, Ridge dependent on use

Where They Fit Best

Tire Size Selection: The Basics You Can’t Skip

P-Metric vs. LT (Light Truck) Tires

Understanding Tire Load Range: XL vs. E-Load

Why the Tire Speed Rating Matters for Safety

🏁 Final Verdict: Which One Would I Actually Buy?

Nitto Ridge Grappler Related Articles

BF Goodrich KO2 Related Articles

Frequently Asked Questions: KO2 vs Ridge Grappler

Quick Look

Firestone Destination XT

BFGoodrich All-Terrain T/A KO2

Tread Appearance

Tread Life

Noise Comparison

Comfort

Wet Performance

Winter Performance

Off-Road Performance

Specs

Specification Comparison for Popular Sizes

35×12.5R20

285/70R17

275/60R20

265/70R17

Size Selection

Technical Standards & Regulations

How to Select the Right Tire Size Based on Your Requirements?

Conclusion

BF Goodrich KO2 Related Articles

Firestone Destination XT Related Articles

Quick Verdict – Who Wins What?

BFGoodrich All-Terrain T/A KO2

Toyo Open Country A/T III

Raw Test Data

Tire Test Data

🔬 Construction & Tech Breakdown

KO2: The Tank of the Trail

Toyo AT3: Quiet Strength

Dry Performance — AT3 More Nimble, KO2 More Grounded

Wet Performance — AT3 Safer in Rain, KO2 Steadier When Loaded

Winter & Snow — AT3 Smoother in Slush, KO2 Stronger in Depth

Ice — AT3 More Forgiving, KO2 More Abrupt

Off-Road — KO2 Dominates in Abuse, Toyo Is Better Than You Think

Comfort & Noise — AT3 Friendlier, KO2 Rougher

Tread Life & Longevity — KO2 More Durable, AT3 Respectable

Where They Fit Best

Tire Size Selection: The Basics You Can’t Skip

P-Metric vs. LT (Light Truck) Tires

Understanding Tire Load Range: XL vs. E-Load

Why the Tire Speed Rating Matters for Safety

🏁 Final Take: Which One Would I Actually Buy?

Toyo Open Country AT3 Related Articles

BF Goodrich KO2 Related Articles

Frequently Asked Questions: Toyo AT3 vs BFGoodrich KO2

Quick Decision

BFGoodrich All-Terrain T/A KO2

Raw Test Data

Tire Test Data

Dry Performance — KO2 Trades Speed for Stability

Wet Performance — Demands Margin, But Tracks True Under Load

Winter & Snow — Reliable Bite, Heavy-Duty Confidence

Ice — Predictable, But Needs Respect

Off-Road — KO2 Still Sets the Standard