Which tire is safer in wet conditions?

Toyo wins decisively, stopping in 164 feet with 0.57g traction versus Yokohama's 177 feet and 0.52g. That's a 13-foot advantage for the Toyo in heavy rain.

Which tire performs better in snow?

Yokohama stops 3 feet shorter on packed snow (71.85 ft vs 75.1 ft), but Toyo launches 5 feet quicker (42.7 ft vs 47.79 ft) and handles deeper snow better.

Which tire is safer on ice?

Toyo stops 2 feet shorter at 46.5 feet versus Yokohama's 48.5 feet, with more progressive grip fade that gives drivers better recovery time.

Which tire is stronger off-road?

Toyo dominates with 8.8 dirt, 8.7 sand, 8.2 mud, and 8.2 rock versus Yokohama's 7.7, 7.4, 7.1, and 7.2. Toyo is over 1 point higher on every surface.

Which tire is quieter on the highway?

Toyo scores 6.0 for comfort versus Yokohama's 5.75. Despite being marketed as the highway tire, Yokohama is actually noisier and less comfortable.

Who should choose the Toyo Open Country AT3?

Anyone who drives in rain, uses trails, faces winter conditions, or needs versatile performance. Toyo wins in wet, off-road, ice, dry, and comfort.

Who should choose the Yokohama Geolandar A/T4?

Buyers who specifically need slightly better stopping on packed snow and never encounter rain, ice, or off-road conditions. A very narrow use case.

Which tire has the best dry grip?

The Falken A/T4W is sharper with a 131.8-ft stop and 0.72 g cornering, compared to the Geolandar A/T4 at 139 ft and 0.70 g.

Which tire is best in wet conditions?

The A/T4W stops shortest at 171 ft with 0.58 traction, making it the superior choice over the Geolandar A/T4, which stops longer at 177 ft.

Which tire performs best in snow?

The A/T4W leads with a 69-ft snow stop, outperforming the Geolandar A/T4, which stops at 72 ft but has a slower launch speed.

Which tire is safest on ice?

The A/T4W grips best at 45 ft, making it significantly safer than the Geolandar A/T4, which trails at 53 ft and requires more caution.

Which tire is strongest off-road?

The A/T4W dominates with mid-8 scores across dirt, mud, and rock, while the Geolandar A/T4 is tuned mainly for pavement and gravel (scoring 5.5–6.0).

Which tire is quietest on the highway?

The Yokohama Geolandar A/T4 is quietest with an 8.5 comfort score, slightly beating the A/T4W (8.3).

Who should choose the A/T4W?

Snow-belt and Rocky Mountain drivers, or those towing and hitting trails, who need stronger winter and off-road performance.

Who should choose the Geolandar A/T4?

Commuters in mild climates who prioritize quiet comfort, light winter safety, and occasional gravel use.

Which tire is quietest on the highway?

Geolandar is the quietest with an 8.5/10 comfort score, KO3 runs a steady hum at 7.5/10, and KO2 is loudest at 7.0/10.

Which tire performs best in wet conditions?

Geolandar stops shorter at 177 ft, KO3 follows at 184 ft, and KO2 stretches to 195 ft, making Geolandar the wet commuter winner.

Which tire is strongest in snow?

KO3 stops at 72 ft and is the balanced snow pick, KO2 digs better in deep drifts, and Geolandar surprises with solid packed-snow braking for a road-leaning A/T.

How do they compare on ice?

KO3 stops shortest at 50 ft, KO2 follows close at 51 ft, and Geolandar lags at 53 ft, though it remains predictable with careful driving.

Which tire is better off-road?

KO3 leads with 9.5 scores across dirt, sand, and rock, KO2 stays nearly as strong, and Geolandar is best kept to gravel and light trails.

Who should buy the Geolandar A/T4?

Drivers who value quiet comfort, predictable wet braking, and light winter security, especially in suburban or mild climates.

Who should buy the KO3?

Drivers needing a balanced A/T for snow, ice, and serious off-road work—especially in the Rockies, Northeast, and Great Lakes regions.

Who should buy the KO2?

Truck owners in rugged, rural, or snow-belt areas who prioritize toughness and deep-snow grip over comfort and noise.

yokohama

Yokohama Geolandar AT4 vs Toyo Open Country AT3 — Wet-Road Safety or Sharper All-Round Performer? (2025)

Updated: November 30, 2025 by Emrecan Gurkan Leave a Comment

For years, both the Yokohama Geolandar AT4 and Toyo Open Country AT3 have been popular choices across the US and Canada. Since testing both tires extensively, one thing has become clear: these tires serve fundamentally different purposes. The Yokohama Geolandar AT4 is built as an on-road AT tire focused on daily comfort and highway manners. The Toyo Open Country AT3, by contrast, has evolved into a genuine off-road AT tire with significantly improved wet performance and trail capability. As a former Bridgestone engineer, I’ve tracked how both tires have developed, and the gap between them has widened considerably. In this definitive comparison, I’ll dive into the test data, synthesize customer feedback, and offer my personal observations on which tire makes sense for your truck or SUV. Let’s roll.

Quick Look

Toyo Open Country A/T III

8.4/10

Yokohama Geolandar A/T4

7.7/10

Toyo Open Country AT3 is built for off-road capability with serious wet performance. Its reinforced shoulders and staggered tread blocks resist flex, delivering sharp handling and 0.72g cornering grip. Stopping at 164 feet in wet conditions with 0.57g traction, it’s significantly improved over previous generations. Off-road scores of 8.8 dirt, 8.7 sand, 8.2 mud, and 8.2 rock show genuine trail competence, with owners consistently praising its snow traction and trail composure. The stiff casing delivers excellent durability and responsive feedback. Comfort sits at 6.0, reflecting the firmer construction and road hum. Yokohama Geolandar AT4 takes the opposite approach as an on-road AT focused on highway use, but it underdelivers. Despite its reputation for smooth predictability on long highway runs, wet performance lags at 177 feet with 0.52g traction, a 13-foot gap behind the Toyo. Off-road capability averages 7.35, suitable for light trails but clearly pavement-focused. Comfort is 5.75, actually lower than the Toyo despite the marketing emphasis on quiet manners. The Yokohama’s only real advantages are slightly better winter stopping at 71.85 feet and less aggressive dry braking at 141 feet. For most buyers, the Toyo offers better all-around performance.

Raw Test Data

Dry Performance: Toyo Takes the Edge

On pavement, Toyo stops in 134 feet with 0.72g cornering, while Yokohama needs 141 feet with 0.70g. That 7-foot gap and slight cornering advantage show Toyo is more responsive and planted. The Toyo feels sharper and more road-tire-like in feedback, while Yokohama takes longer to settle but cruises smoothly once stable.

Drivers echo the split. Toyo owners note it “takes feedback quickly” and feels confident through corners, while Geolandar drivers say it “stays composed and calm, never twitchy.” From my testing, Toyo’s reinforced shoulders and staggered tread blocks resist flex under cornering load, giving it that sharper edge. Yokohama’s softer compound and rib-focused design lean toward a calmer, less aggressive feel, prioritizing smooth highway cruising over sharp handling.

For different trucks:

SUVs & crossovers: Yokohama feels smoother for daily commuting, but Toyo is more engaging.
½-ton trucks: Toyo gives sharper response; Yokohama better for long highway stretches.
¾-ton & HD trucks: Toyo stays steadier when loaded; Yokohama feels less locked-in with weight.

👉 Verdict: Toyo delivers sharper dry response and better cornering grip. Yokohama steadies out at highway speed but lacks bite when you need it.

Wet Performance: Toyo Wins Decisively

In the rain, the gap is clear and significant. Toyo stops in 164 feet with 0.57g traction, while Yokohama needs 177 feet with just 0.52g. That’s a 13-foot advantage for the Toyo, a meaningful difference when conditions turn bad. Toyo also delivers stronger wet traction across the board, making it the safer choice in heavy rain.

This is a complete reversal from the previous generation. Community feedback reflects the improvement: Toyo owners now report “confident in the rain, even loaded” and “grips well on slick pavement.” Yokohama drivers, by contrast, note it’s “adequate but not aggressive” in wet conditions. The explanation lies in Toyo’s compound improvement. The new formulation balances durability with wet grip, while Yokohama’s harder compound prioritizes tread life over wet adhesion.

For different trucks:

SUVs & crossovers: Toyo is the safer choice in rainy climates.
½-ton trucks: Toyo delivers better wet stopping and traction.
¾-ton & HD trucks: Toyo stays more predictable under weight when roads are slick.

👉 Verdict: Toyo wins wet performance decisively. The 13-foot stopping gap and stronger traction make it the clear choice for rain-prone regions. Yokohama falls short where on-road ATs should excel.

Note from the Expert: When it comes to rain, I always emphasize two things: compound grip and water evacuation. You can see the full details in my analysis, but if you take just one thing away, remember that an AT tire’s stiff nature makes achieving top-tier wet performance a constant battle. This is why the question, Are All-Terrain Tires Good in Rain?, requires a nuanced answer that balances tread design against rubber stiffness.

Winter Performance: Toyo Launches Better, Yokohama Stops Slightly Shorter

In snow, Yokohama stops at 71.85 feet and launches in 47.79 feet, compared to Toyo’s 75.1 feet stop and 42.7 feet launch. That means Yokohama brakes about 3 feet shorter, but Toyo pulls away 5 feet quicker. In real use, Toyo feels more confident in deeper, unpacked snow thanks to its staggered shoulders and aggressive tread, while Yokohama is calmer on salted and plowed lanes.

Driver feedback reflects the difference. Toyo owners call it “confident in winter, bites well in fresh snow,” while Geolandar users note it’s “safe and easy in winter, but not aggressive.” The design explains it: Toyo has dense siping and compound tuning to stay pliable in cold, while Yokohama keeps rubber firmer, trading deep-snow bite for stability on cleared roads.

For different trucks:

SUVs & crossovers: Yokohama feels steadier on plowed commutes; Toyo better when snow piles up.
½-ton trucks: Toyo wins when fresh snow covers roads.
¾-ton & HD trucks: Toyo stronger under weight; Yokohama too muted for heavy snow use.

👉 Verdict: Toyo is the better deep-snow performer with quicker launches. Yokohama’s only advantage is slightly shorter stopping on packed snow.

Note from the Expert: Our discussions often boil down to the core tradeoff. On one hand, you must understand why all-terrain tires are truly effective in deep snow, but not on ice. On the other hand, you face the 3PMSF Paradox—the hidden cost of that badge. The short answer is: The 3PMSF badge certifies traction, but it costs you durability. Dive into our full analysis on the critical 3PMSF rating for severe winter and off-road service, and its hidden costs, before you risk your rig on the trail.

Ice Performance: Toyo Edges Ahead, Both Have Limits

Ice is where both tires show their limits. Toyo stops in 46.5 feet, while Yokohama stretches to 48.5 feet. That 2-foot gap is noticeable when you’re sliding on glassy surfaces. Toyo slides but gives you time to correct with progressive grip fade, while Yokohama feels like it fades away more suddenly.

Drivers say it clearly: Toyo users admit it’s “fine if you’re careful, but not a studded alternative.” Yokohama owners echo: “not scary, but not a true ice tire.” The tech shows why: Toyo’s micro-siping and pliable compound keep a touch of grip, while Yokohama’s harder compound limits edge effect on glassy ice.

For different trucks:

SUVs & crossovers: Both demand caution; Toyo is a bit safer.
½-ton trucks: Toyo gives better recovery time on ice.
¾-ton & HD trucks: Neither is ideal, but Toyo steadier under load.

👉 Verdict: Toyo edges ahead with shorter stopping and more predictable grip fade, but neither tire is a go-to ice solution. If you face ice regularly, dedicated winter tires are the answer.

Off-Road Performance: Toyo Dominates by a Wide Margin

Off-road scores make the split undeniable. Toyo posts 8.8 dirt / 8.7 sand / 8.2 mud / 8.2 rock, while Yokohama trails at 7.7 dirt / 7.4 sand / 7.1 mud / 7.2 rock. That’s more than a 1-point gap across every surface. Toyo is a genuine off-road tire that can tackle mixed trails confidently, while Yokohama is suitable for gravel roads and light dirt but clearly not built for serious trail use.

Owners confirm it. Toyo users mention it “grabs in ruts and feels planted on loose terrain.” Geolandar drivers frame it differently: “fine on gravel, not for rock crawling, and that’s okay.” From an engineering perspective, Toyo’s reinforced casing and staggered tread blocks keep edges stiff under torque, while Yokohama’s lighter rib design reduces harshness on pavement but gives up trail aggression.

For different trucks:

SUVs & crossovers: Yokohama for highway comfort; Toyo for trail weekends.
½-ton trucks: Toyo is the solid choice for real off-road capability.
¾-ton & HD trucks: Toyo holds together on rocks and mud; Yokohama underbuilt for punishment.

👉 Verdict: Toyo dominates off-road with over 1 point higher on every surface. Yokohama is strictly for pavement and light gravel. If you actually use trails, this isn’t even close.

Note from the Expert: Every successful day on the trail is about preparation and physics, because tire longevity is earned, not given. Before you even start, you must master the critical link between tire pressure and load range for every rig to maximize your contact patch. Once moving, remember your ultimate off-road armor is your sidewall protection against the inevitable pinch flat. And finally, your traction on the obstacle is dictated by choosing the right aggressive vs hybrid tread pattern for your terrain. Master those three steps, and your rig will be ready for anything.

Comfort & Noise: Both Are Loud, Toyo Slightly Better

Here’s where the data surprises. Toyo scores 6.0 comfort, compared to Yokohama’s 5.75. Despite being marketed as the highway-focused tire, Yokohama is actually noisier and less comfortable than the Toyo. Both are on the louder end for AT tires (max in class is 7.33), but Toyo edges ahead.

The difference is noticeable on long highway runs. Toyo has a firmer ride with road hum, especially on uneven pavement, but it’s not harsh. Yokohama is also noisy, and drivers note it doesn’t deliver the quiet comfort you’d expect from an on-road AT. Forum voices reflect the disappointment: Geolandar owners mention “more road noise than expected for a highway tire,” while Toyo owners acknowledge the “hum from the stiff casing but nothing annoying.”

The explanation: Toyo’s reinforced construction transmits more feedback but stays planted. Yokohama’s design doesn’t effectively dampen noise despite the on-road focus.

For different trucks:

SUVs & crossovers: Both are acceptably noisy; Toyo slightly better.
½-ton trucks: Toyo wins on comfort despite being the off-road tire.
¾-ton & HD trucks: Noise blends into road noise anyway; Toyo firmer but more stable.

👉 Verdict: Toyo is slightly more comfortable at 6.0 vs 5.75. Ironically, the off-road tire beats the on-road tire on highway comfort. Both are loud for the AT category.

Note from the Expert: For years, choosing all-terrain meant accepting noise—a true compromise for off-road grip. That’s why the question, Are All-Terrain Tires Louder than Highway Tires?, used to have a simple “yes” answer. Now, with the rise of on-road models, the core issue has shifted from noise to overall refinement. To fully understand which side of the comfort spectrum you’re buying into, you need to determine Are All-Terrain Tires Good for Daily Driving?—a question that depends entirely on the tire’s construction, not just the name.

Who Should Buy Which Tire: Clear Choices Based on Real Use

Yokohama Geolandar A/T4: Best fit for buyers who prioritize slightly better winter stopping on packed snow and don’t venture off pavement. It’s acceptable for daily commuting in areas with plowed winter roads, but it underdelivers on wet performance, comfort, and off-road capability compared to what you’d expect from an on-road AT. Honestly, unless winter stopping on packed snow is your top priority, there are better options in this category.

Toyo Open Country A/T III: Suited for drivers who need genuine off-road capability, excellent wet performance, and versatile all-around use. Stronger in wet conditions (13-foot advantage), significantly better off-road (1+ point higher on every surface), superior on ice, and surprisingly more comfortable despite being the off-road-focused tire. Ideal for mountain states, anyone who actually uses trails, and trucks that see varied conditions. Works for SUVs, ½-ton, and ¾-ton trucks equally well.

👉 Bottom line: The data tells a clear story. Toyo wins decisively in wet, off-road, ice, dry, and even comfort. Yokohama’s only advantage is 3 feet shorter stopping on packed snow. For most buyers, the Toyo is the better tire unless you specifically need that one winter metric and never drive in rain or off-road.

Tire Size Selection: The Basics You Can’t Skip

Even the best tread design can’t rescue a tire that’s built too weak. Back when I was testing tires at Bridgestone, I saw all-terrain models that should’ve performed but fell short — simply because the basics (size, load strength, and speed rating) weren’t matched to the vehicle.

P-Metric vs. LT (Light Truck) Tires

The first step is knowing whether you need LT or passenger tires. LT (Light Truck) tires are built with extra reinforcement and stiff sidewalls, designed for towing, hauling, or off-road use. Passenger (P-metric) tires are lighter, smoother, and tuned for daily comfort and fuel efficiency — but they’ll flex more under load.

Understanding Tire Load Range: XL vs. E-Load

Then comes the tire load index and load range — essentially your tire’s strength rating. Here’s where things split between passenger XL and LT E:

XL (Extra Load) is a passenger tire with reinforced sidewalls. It can handle a bit more pressure (~41 PSI) than a standard SL tire and is perfect for SUVs, crossovers, or light trucks that carry extra gear, passengers, or small trailers. XL tires ride softer and quieter than LT options, making them ideal for daily use.
E Load Range is an LT tire class built with a much thicker casing. E-rated tires can handle far more pressure (up to ~80 PSI) and heavier loads, which makes them essential for ¾-ton and 1-ton trucks towing trailers or hauling close to max capacity. The trade-off is weight, stiffer ride, more road noise, and a small drop in fuel efficiency.

Put simply: XL is for “extra luggage and family,” while E is for “truck bed full of bricks or a car trailer.”

Why the Tire Speed Rating Matters for Safety

Finally, don’t overlook the tire speed rating. It’s not just about top speed — it measures how well a tire handles heat and stress at highway pace. Lower ratings (like S) tend to ride softer and last longer, while higher ratings (H, T) feel more stable and responsive under sharp maneuvers. Heat build-up is the silent killer of tires, and speed rating is your safeguard.

Bottom line: Match your tire’s construction (LT vs P-metric), load range (XL vs E), and speed rating to your vehicle’s demands. Get those right, and everything else — off-road grip, winter traction, comfort — will finally perform the way it was designed to.

Who Should Buy Which Tire: The Data Tells a Clear Story

If you value better wet performance, stronger off-road capability, superior ice stopping, and surprisingly better comfort, the Toyo Open Country AT3 is the clear choice. It stops 13 feet shorter in the wet, scores over 1 point higher on every off-road surface, handles ice better at 46.5 feet versus 48.5 feet, and even rates higher on comfort (6.0 vs 5.75). It’s ideal for anyone who drives in rain, uses trails regularly, faces winter conditions, or needs a genuinely versatile tire.

If you specifically need slightly better stopping on packed snow (71.85 ft vs 75.1 ft) and never drive in rain, off-road, or on ice, the Yokohama Geolandar A/T4 could work. But honestly, that’s a very narrow use case. The Yokohama underdelivers as an on-road AT by losing on wet performance and comfort, the two things it should excel at.

For different buyers:

Rain-prone regions (Southeast, Pacific Northwest): Toyo wins decisively with 13-foot wet advantage
Snow-belt states: Toyo better on ice and snow acceleration; Yokohama only edges on packed snow stopping
Off-road use (even occasionally): Toyo is the only real option
Pure highway commuting with plowed winter roads: Yokohama’s only viable scenario

👉 Bottom line: The Toyo is the better tire for most buyers. It beats the Yokohama in wet, off-road, ice, dry handling, and comfort. Yokohama’s single advantage (3 feet on packed snow stopping) doesn’t justify its weaknesses everywhere else.

Frequently Asked Questions: Toyo Open Country A/T III vs Yokohama Geolandar A/T4

Which tire has better dry grip?
The Toyo Open Country AT3 stops in 134 feet with 0.72g cornering, while Yokohama needs 141 feet with 0.70g. Toyo is sharper and more responsive on pavement.
Which tire is safer in wet conditions?
Toyo wins decisively, stopping in 164 feet with 0.57g traction versus Yokohama's 177 feet and 0.52g. That's a 13-foot advantage for the Toyo in heavy rain.
Which tire performs better in snow?
Yokohama stops 3 feet shorter on packed snow (71.85 ft vs 75.1 ft), but Toyo launches 5 feet quicker (42.7 ft vs 47.79 ft) and handles deeper snow better.
Which tire is safer on ice?
Toyo stops 2 feet shorter at 46.5 feet versus Yokohama's 48.5 feet, with more progressive grip fade that gives drivers better recovery time.
Which tire is stronger off-road?
Toyo dominates with 8.8 dirt, 8.7 sand, 8.2 mud, and 8.2 rock versus Yokohama's 7.7, 7.4, 7.1, and 7.2. Toyo is over 1 point higher on every surface.
Which tire is quieter on the highway?
Toyo scores 6.0 for comfort versus Yokohama's 5.75. Despite being marketed as the highway tire, Yokohama is actually noisier and less comfortable.
Who should choose the Toyo Open Country AT3?
Anyone who drives in rain, uses trails, faces winter conditions, or needs versatile performance. Toyo wins in wet, off-road, ice, dry, and comfort.
Who should choose the Yokohama Geolandar A/T4?
Buyers who specifically need slightly better stopping on packed snow and never encounter rain, ice, or off-road conditions. A very narrow use case.

Yokohama Geolandar AT4 vs Falken Wildpeak AT4W: The New 3-Way All-Terrain Tire Comparison (Feat. AT3W Data)

Updated: November 11, 2025 by Emrecan Gurkan Leave a Comment

Real-world test data, driver impressions, and use-case insights — from a former Bridgestone test engineer.

The Falken Wildpeak AT4W is an Off-Road A/T tire, snow-certified with the 3PMSF rating, and among the most popular choices for light trucks and SUVs across the US and Canada. Since the Falken Wildpeak AT3W is discontinued, understanding the AT4W’s lineage is key: the AT4W refines the proven AT3W formula by focusing on better wet braking, ice traction, and on-road comfort, illustrating Falken’s aim for a truly best-in-class all-around performer. (For the full generational breakdown, see our Falken Wildpeak AT4W vs AT3W guide.) By contrast, the Yokohama Geolandar AT4 slots into the On-Road A/T category — designed for commuters in rainy cities and freeze-thaw regions who want wet traction, quiet comfort, and year-round dependability with A/T styling.

That’s the real choice buyers face — AT4W for the best all-around balance and aggressive capability, or Yokohama AT4 for road-focused comfort and wet-weather security. In the sections ahead, I’ll compare them across dry, wet, snow, and off-road performance. You can also line them up directly in our All-Terrain Tire Decision Tool for quick recommendations tailored by SUV, CUV, or truck class.

Quick Look

Falken Wildpeak A/T4W

Tested Rating: 8.4/10

Yokohama Geolandar A/T4

Tested Rating: 8.4/10

The Falken Wildpeak A/T4W is the heavy-duty performer, built for those who prioritize capability. It delivers superior stopping power with a $171 -foot$ wet stop and locks down winter traction with a $69 -foot$ stop in snow and $45 -foot$ stop on ice. The AT4W dominates off-road with aggressive mid-8 scores and provides the planted stability needed for towing. Its comfort is a livable $8.3/10$ , trading serenity for toughness.

In contrast, the Yokohama Geolandar A/T4 is the quiet commuter’s pick, prioritizing refinement. It offers the quietest and smoothest ride with an $8.5/10$ comfort rating. While it is steady in light snow ( $72 -foot$ stop), its performance is tuned strictly for pavement. The Geolandar’s gentle nature limits it off-road, making it strictly suitable for fire roads and suburban commutes.

Raw Test Data

Tire Test Data

Pick categories to show metrics, then open ☰ to pick tires. Optional chart is hidden by default.

Parentheses show the rank among the currently displayed tires (1 = best for that metric).

Note: Lower is better for Stopping & Acceleration; higher is better for g-force, comfort, traction & off-road ratings. Parentheses show the rank among the currently displayed tires (1 = best for that metric).

Sources worth checking

Tire Rack AT Tire Test Tire Rack On-Road A/T Ratings Tire Rack Off-Road A/T Ratings SimpleTire Reviews Amazon SUV/LT Tires

Falken Wildpeak A/T3W (Discontinued)

The Falken Wildpeak A/T3W is officially discontinued, but finding remaining stock means you can still buy the performance benchmark for the new AT4W.

Known as the “agile all-terrain athlete,” the A/T3W offered the sharpest dry grip of the entire lineup ( $126.6 ft$ stop). The generational transition to the AT4W focused on what to refine: the new model sacrificed a small degree of the A/T3W’s dry sharpness for improved stability under heavy load, and crucially, saw a trade-off in highway comfort to deliver more ruggedness. This strategic sacrifice in comfort was intended to push the AT4W toward serious capability, allowing the Falken Rubitrek AT01 to be introduced to close the market gap for comfort-focused all-terrain drivers. The result was notable improvements over the A/T3W’s “solid” performance in wet braking (shorter stops than the A/T3W’s $176 ft$ ), ice traction, and off-road ruggedness.

Dry Performance — AT4W Steadied, Yokohama More Forgiving

On dry pavement, the Falken A/T4W stops in $131.8 ft$ with $0.72 g$ cornering. It presents a slightly softer response than a dedicated road tire, but offers immense stability once set. In contrast, the Yokohama Geolandar A/T4 trails slightly at $139 ft$ with $0.70 g$ . It is certainly dependable, but tuned more as a commuter than a corner carver.

A Tacoma driver with the A/T4W noted it was “shockingly good once balanced, lighter than expected on center.” The Geolandar gets love from Tundra drivers calling it “dead quiet, tracks straight, just not built for play.”

From my testing eye, the A/T4W’s heavier shoulders and reinforced structure damp squirm, allowing it to hold a line better once vehicle weight or cargo is added. The Geolandar’s softer shoulders and ribbed design prioritize smoothness, which ultimately caps its agility and responsiveness.

SUVs & Crossovers: Yokohama is the calmer choice if you prioritize comfort.
$1/2 -ton$ trucks: A/T4W is steadier when towing or hauling.
$3/4 -ton$ & HD trucks: A/T4W clearly wins composure; Yokohama struggles under heavy load.

👉 Verdict: A/T4W steadier when loaded, Yokohama smooth daily driver.

Wet Performance — AT4W Grips Corners, Geolandar Composed

In rain, the Falken Wildpeak A/T4W posts the shortest stop at $171 ft$ with $0.58 g$ , a clear advantage demonstrating more silica bite in its compound. By contrast, the Yokohama Geolandar A/T4 stretches the stopping distance to $177 ft$ with $0.47 g$ . While the Geolandar is more composed during routine braking, it offers less overall traction feel.

A Bronco owner praised the A/T4W, stating, “wet grip is excellent, never lost trust even in storms.” Geolandar owners, however, noted their tire is “better in the rain than expected, but tuned more for quiet ride than grip.”

The engineering confirms this trade-off: Falken’s high silica and dense siping are designed to aggressively slice through water films for maximum grip. Yokohama leans harder into rib reinforcement and noise pitch tuning, a focus that sacrifices absolute grip for refinement and quiet operation.

Wet Driving Fit

SUVs & Crossovers: A/T4W is the safest choice in storms; Yokohama remains easy and calm.
$1/2 -ton$ Trucks: A/T4W is preferred if you frequently tow in the rain.
$3/4 -ton$ & HD Trucks: The A/T4W’s heavy-duty carcass steadies best under water load.

👉 Verdict: A/T4W is the confident wet-weather choice, while Yokohama is smooth but not sharp.

Winter & Snow — AT4W Dominates Packed Roads, Yokohama Limited

The numbers clearly show the split: the Falken Wildpeak A/T4W leads with a snow stop of $69.0 ft$ and a quick launch in $41.5 ft — excellent$ for plowed roads. The Yokohama Geolandar A/T4 comes in with a comparable stop distance of $72.0 ft$ , but its launch is significantly slower at $47.0 ft$ , making it workable but sluggish out of the hole.

A $4 Runner$ driver with A/T4Ws noted the tire was “predictable in deep snow, no drama.” Geolandar drivers are more reserved, stating it is “fine in light snow, but harder compound shows once tread wears.”

Technically, the A/T4W’s advanced silica keeps the compound pliable in freezing temperatures for consistent grip. Yokohama’s harder tread edges help cut through for braking, but they lose acceleration bite and overall performance once the surface becomes polished or slick.

Winter Fit

SUVs & Crossovers: A/T4W offers the most confidence; Yokohama is fine for light winters.
$1/2 -ton$ Trucks: A/T4W is steadier when vehicle weight adds pressure.
$3/4 -ton$ & HD Trucks: A/T4W is clearly more stable; Yokohama is not ideal.

👉 Verdict: A/T4W leads in packed snow and overall confidence, making the Yokohama a more limited choice.

Ice Performance — AT4W Secures Stops, Yokohama Requires Caution

On ice, the Falken Wildpeak A/T4W stops at $45.0 ft$ , while the Yokohama Geolandar A/T4 drifts significantly longer to $53.0 ft$ . This margin is critical—those few feet can make the difference between a controlled stop and sliding into a curb.

A/T4W owners consistently say it “bites on ice better than expected, easy to trust.” Geolandar feedback, however, is clear: “you need more space, not terrible, just not sharp.”

Technically, Falken utilizes siping density and a softer winter compound to keep more rubber edges on the ground. Yokohama, which is tuned harder for long tread life, struggles to create that essential micro-bite needed on an icy glaze.

Ice Driving Fit

SUVs & Crossovers: A/T4W is safest; Yokohama requires caution.
$1/2 -ton$ Trucks: A/T4W provides more margin in icy stops.
$3/4 -ton$ & HD Trucks: A/T4W is steadier under trailer loads.

👉 Verdict: A/T4W grips best on ice, making Yokohama the least secure choice for these conditions.

Off-Road — Falkens trail strong, Yokohama strictly mild

This is the biggest gap in the comparison. The Falken Wildpeak A/T4W dominates, posting scores of Dirt $8.5$ / Sand $8.2$ / Mud $8.5$ / Rock $8.8$ . By contrast, the Yokohama Geolandar A/T4 sits much lower, scoring Dirt $6.0$ / Sand $5.8$ / Mud $5.5$ / Rock $5.5$ .

A Trail $4 Runner$ driver on A/T4Ws noted that “slippage was minimal, stayed planted in ruts.” Meanwhile, Geolandar owners generally admit their tires are “fine for fire roads,” confirming they are not built for deep trails.

From the technical side, the Falken carries heavier carcass strength, deeper voids, and staggered shoulders designed to grab loose terrain. Yokohama keeps light ribs and a softer design to prioritize pavement manners, which significantly sacrifices essential bite in mud, sand, and rock.

Off-Road Fit

SUVs & Crossovers: A/T4W shines if you hit trails regularly.
$1/2 -ton$ Trucks: A/T4W is for serious off-road; Yokohama is paved-bias.
$3/4 -ton$ & HD Trucks: The A/T4W’s toughness handles abuse; Yokohama is not a fit.

👉 Verdict: A/T4W dominates trails, while Yokohama is strictly road-first.

Comfort & Noise — Yokohama Church-Mouse Quiet, AT4W Heavier Hum

On-road, the Yokohama Geolandar A/T4 is the clear winner with an $8.5$ comfort score. Owners describe it as “dead quiet except for a low tone at highway speed.” The Falken Wildpeak A/T4W follows closely at $8.3$ . It feels firm but steady—it is quieter than its aggressive looks suggest, though road texture does come through more clearly.

Here’s the trade-off: Yokohama’s rib pattern and advanced pitch tuning are engineered to smooth resonance and minimize noise. Falken tires, by necessity, carry deeper voids designed for off-road bite, which tend to catch road texture and result in a heavier hum. The A/T4W consciously tilts its design more toward toughness and capability than serenity.

Comfort Fit

SUVs & Crossovers: Yokohama is best for absolute quiet.
$1/2 -ton$ Trucks: A/T4W is tolerable if capability and towing confidence are the priority.
$3/4 -ton$ & HD Trucks: The A/T4W’s firmness is less noticeable on heavy rigs, where noise often blends anyway.

👉 Verdict: Yokohama wins the comfort battle, while A/T4W trades highway calm for all-terrain bite.

Where They Fit Best + Regional Notes

The Yokohama Geolandar A/T4 is best suited for southern and coastal regions where winters are light, highways dominate, and comfort/noise are the top priorities. It’s a great choice for SUVs and commuters who only occasionally encounter gravel roads.

The Falken Wildpeak A/T4W is the serious trail and snow option. It is ideal for the Rockies, Pacific Northwest, and snowbelt states where aggressive winters and challenging off-road routes demand more. This tire is built specifically for $1/2 -ton$ and $3/4 -ton$ trucks that regularly tow or hit rugged trails.

👉 Bottom line: Yokohama wins daily comfort, while the A/T4W takes the crown for heavy-duty snow and trail performance.

Tire Size Selection: The Basics You Can’t Skip

P-Metric vs. LT (Light Truck) Tires

Understanding Tire Load Range: XL vs. E-Load

Then comes the tire load index and load range — essentially your tire’s strength rating. Here’s where things split between passenger XL and LT E:

XL (Extra Load) is a passenger tire with reinforced sidewalls. It can handle a bit more pressure (~41 PSI) than a standard SL tire and is perfect for SUVs, crossovers, or light trucks that carry extra gear, passengers, or small trailers. XL tires ride softer and quieter than LT options, making them ideal for daily use.
E Load Range is an LT tire class built with a much thicker casing. E-rated tires can handle far more pressure (up to ~80 PSI) and heavier loads, which makes them essential for ¾-ton and 1-ton trucks towing trailers or hauling close to max capacity. The trade-off is weight, stiffer ride, more road noise, and a small drop in fuel efficiency.

Put simply: XL is for “extra luggage and family,” while E is for “truck bed full of bricks or a car trailer.”

Why the Tire Speed Rating Matters for Safety

Final Verdict

For heavier rigs, trail adventures, or snowbelt winters, the Falken Wildpeak A/T4W is the clear choice. It steadies towing, grips confidently on ice and packed snow, and brings real trail toughness without feeling out of control on the highway.

The Yokohama Geolandar A/T4 wins if comfort, quiet, and commuter manners are your top priorities. It’s perfect for Sun Belt and coastal drivers who value pavement refinement but only see occasional gravel or light snow.

👉 Bottom line: Geolandar is the comfort commuter’s A/T, and A/T4W is the snow-belt and trail-ready choice.

Note: If you’re still weighing your options, our full Falken Wildpeak Buyer’s Guide walks through the AT Trail, AT3W, and AT4W in detail, helping you match the right tire to your vehicle, size, and driving style.

Frequently Asked Questions: Falken A/T4W vs Yokohama Geolandar A/T4

Which tire has the best dry grip?
The Falken A/T4W is sharper with a 131.8-ft stop and 0.72 g cornering, compared to the Geolandar A/T4 at 139 ft and 0.70 g.
Which tire is best in wet conditions?
The A/T4W stops shortest at 171 ft with 0.58 traction, making it the superior choice over the Geolandar A/T4, which stops longer at 177 ft.
Which tire performs best in snow?
The A/T4W leads with a 69-ft snow stop, outperforming the Geolandar A/T4, which stops at 72 ft but has a slower launch speed.
Which tire is safest on ice?
The A/T4W grips best at 45 ft, making it significantly safer than the Geolandar A/T4, which trails at 53 ft and requires more caution.
Which tire is strongest off-road?
The A/T4W dominates with mid-8 scores across dirt, mud, and rock, while the Geolandar A/T4 is tuned mainly for pavement and gravel (scoring 5.5–6.0).
Which tire is quietest on the highway?
The Yokohama Geolandar A/T4 is quietest with an 8.5 comfort score, slightly beating the A/T4W (8.3).
Who should choose the A/T4W?
Snow-belt and Rocky Mountain drivers, or those towing and hitting trails, who need stronger winter and off-road performance.
Who should choose the Geolandar A/T4?
Commuters in mild climates who prioritize quiet comfort, light winter safety, and occasional gravel use.

Yokohama A/T4 vs BFGoodrich KO3 vs KO2 — Comfort Commuter vs Winter & Off-Road Strength in 2025

Updated: November 11, 2025 by Emrecan Gurkan Leave a Comment

Real-world test data, everyday impressions, and plain-English breakdowns — from a former Bridgestone test engineer.

The BFGoodrich KO2 has been the benchmark Off-Road A/T tire for more than a decade, trusted across the US and Canada for its 3-ply sidewalls, trail toughness, and snow-certified 3PMSF traction. The newer BFGoodrich KO3 keeps that DNA but improves snow grip, extends tread life, and sharpens handling, making it the clear evolution for drivers debating KO2 vs KO3. The Yokohama Geolandar AT4, as an On-Road AT Tire, meanwhile, enters from a different angle — emphasizing modern road manners, stronger wet and ice braking, and a lighter steering feel, while still carrying adventurous A/T styling.

That’s the choice buyers face — KO2’s proven legacy, KO3’s updated balance, or Yokohama’s road-friendly refinement. In the sections ahead, I’ll break down how they compare across dry, wet, snow, and off-road testing. You can also line them up in our All-Terrain Tire Decision Tool for quick recommendations tailored by SUV, CUV, or truck class.

Quick Look

The Yokohama Geolandar A/T4 is the comfort commuter’s all-terrain. It brakes shorter on dry and wet pavement, feels smoother in daily turns, and stays impressively quiet on the highway. With its 3PMSF rating, it surprises in winter commutes—holding its own in packed snow and light ice—while still looking the part of an A/T. Its trade-off is durability and trail grit, but for suburban drivers who value calm road manners, it’s a standout.

Yokohama Geolandar A/T4

Tested Rating: 8.4/10

BFGoodrich All-Terrain T/A KO3

Tested Rating: 8.5/10

BFGoodrich All-Terrain T/A KO2

Tested Rating: 8.3/10

The BFGoodrich KO3 is the modern benchmark, balancing toughness with refinement. It grips earlier on ice than the KO2, steadies heavy rigs under towing, and shortens winter stops, while keeping its legendary off-road bite. Noise is present but livable, and its versatility makes it ideal for regions where snow, storms, and trails all collide.

The BFGoodrich KO2 remains the veteran workhorse. Louder, firmer, and longer in the wet, it still outmuscles rivals in deep snow and trail abuse. Built with armored sidewalls and proven longevity past 50k miles, it’s the tire you trust when durability is the priority and comfort is secondary.

Raw Test Data

Tire Test Data

Pick categories to show metrics, then open ☰ to pick tires. Optional chart is hidden by default.

Parentheses show the rank among the currently displayed tires (1 = best for that metric).

Sources worth checking

Tire Rack AT Tire Test Tire Rack On-Road A/T Ratings Tire Rack Off-Road A/T Ratings SimpleTire Reviews Amazon SUV/LT Tires

Dry Performance — KO3 steadies under weight, KO2 digs in, Geolandar smooths it out

On dry pavement, the Geolandar stops in about 139 feet with 0.70 g cornering, while both KO2 and KO3 take closer to 142 feet at 0.71 g. In practice, that means Yokohama feels smoother and more predictable in daily turns, while the BFGs carry more of that “rugged boot” personality. KO2 in particular feels a little sharper on initial bite, whereas KO3 takes a beat, then locks into a straighter, calmer line once weight is involved.

Drivers echo the same: Geolandar owners rave about “super smooth, quiet highway manners,” while KO2 fans talk about “planted bite when you lean in.” As a former field test engineer, I see the reason clearly—Yokohama uses balanced ribs and softer edges to keep transitions calm, while BFG’s reinforced shoulders keep the tread blocks from folding, so stability only builds once you’re loaded.

👉 Verdict: Geolandar is the commuter’s calm companion; KO2 and KO3 feel tougher, with KO3 settling heaviest rigs the straightest.

Wet Performance — Geolandar impresses, KO3 holds margin, KO2 stretches

In the rain, Geolandar surprises many: it stops in about 177 feet with 0.47 traction, which actually beats the KO2’s longer 195-foot / 0.43 g result. KO3 sits in the middle at 184 feet / 0.46 g, and while not sporty, it feels more controlled than its older brother. Behind the wheel, Yokohama gives a more composed stop on slick pavement, while KO3 keeps trucks tracking truer once you add weight. KO2, meanwhile, asks for extra space.

Owners put it in plain words: one Geolandar driver said it “handles rain nicely, with fewer slip surprises than BFGs,” while KO3 owners praised “confidence even in big storms.” KO2 comments often admit it’s “fine if you slow down, but long on panic stops.”

The trade makes sense: Yokohama’s compound and siping put more rubber down across the slick surface, while KO2 and KO3 lean harder into durability. KO3 refines it a touch, KO2 simply prioritizes toughness over adhesion.

👉 Verdict: Geolandar wins the lighter-rig wet commute, KO3 steadies things under weight, KO2 trails behind.

Winter & Snow — KO3 dependable on pack, KO2 a deep-snow bruiser, Geolandar the commuter surprise

On packed winter roads, KO3 shortens stops to around 72 feet, while KO2 runs a bit longer at 76 feet. Geolandar surprises here, matching KO3 almost stride for stride at 72 feet, though its launch lags slightly. The experience feels different: KO3 grips calmly on polished lanes, KO2 muscles through deeper snowbanks, and Geolandar handles morning commutes with more composure than you’d expect from a road-leaning A/T.

Drivers say the same—Geolandar owners talk about “unexpected grip in plowed snow, even compared to bigger names.” KO2 drivers praise the “tank-like shove in unplowed roads,” while KO3 owners split the difference, noting “calm, consistent traction when the highway ices up.”

Technically, the split comes from siping density and rubber mix. KO3 keeps micro-edges biting in the cold, KO2 relies on tread depth and voids to muscle through loose drifts, and Geolandar’s softer-leaning rubber stays pliable in the cold, helping it brake well on commuter roads.

👉 Verdict: KO3 is the balanced winter pick, KO2 the snow-belt brawler, and Geolandar the quiet achiever for light rigs.

Ice — KO3 grips first, KO2 steady, Geolandar slides a touch

When things glaze over, KO3 stops shortest at about 50 feet, KO2 follows close at 51 feet, while Geolandar stretches to around 53 feet. That gap feels bigger in panic stops: KO3 gives earlier bite, KO2 slides a little longer but predictably, and Geolandar tends to wash forward more if you’re not gentle.

Community voices mirror it: KO3 drivers say “you can actually brake without panic,” KO2 users accept “longer, but always steady,” while Geolandar owners note “fine if you drive careful, but don’t rush it.”

The reason is rubber again. KO3 uses micro-siping and a compound that flexes more at freezing temps; KO2 is stiffer but still stable; Geolandar has the quieter compound but fewer micro-edges to catch slick surfaces.

👉 Verdict: KO3 is the ice safety net, KO2 a close second, Geolandar trails but remains predictable if you drive smart.

Off-Road — KO3 masterclass, KO2 still a workhorse, Geolandar a pavement-first A/T

Off-road is where the gaps widen. KO3 scores 9.5 across dirt, sand, and rock, with 9.2 in mud; KO2 trails slightly with 9.3–9.5 across the board. Geolandar? More like 6.0 in dirt, 5.5 in mud and rock. On trail, that’s the difference between a tire built to survive ruts, sharp rock, and deep mud versus one tuned for light gravel and occasional dirt roads.

Forum chatter confirms it: KO3 users rave it’s “bulletproof on rocks, confidence in deep ruts.” KO2 drivers say it “takes abuse for miles, sidewalls never fail.” Geolandar owners? “Perfect for unpaved roads to the cabin, but not for crawling.”

From a technical seat: KO2 and KO3 have thicker sidewalls, interlocking blocks, and compounds that resist chipping. Geolandar keeps weight and noise down, but with less void depth and armor, it’s not meant for heavy trail punishment.

👉 Verdict: KO3 leads, KO2 close behind, Geolandar only for mild off-road.

Comfort & Noise — Geolandar quiet as a church mouse, KO3 steady hum, KO2 the growler

On the highway, Geolandar posts the highest comfort score, about 8.5/10, riding quiet and smooth. KO3 sits middle of the road at 7.5/10, while KO2 feels rougher at 7.0/10. Think of Geolandar like a new luxury couch—plush and hushed—while KO2 is more like a solid wooden bench, firm and loud, but unbreakable. KO3 tries to split the difference.

Owners confirm it: Geolandar drivers say “dead quiet, smoother than stock,” KO3 owners admit “hum builds, but blends in on a diesel,” while KO2 users joke “you’ll hear them before you see them.”

The difference comes from design: Geolandar’s rib layout reduces resonance, KO3 uses sequencing to manage growl, KO2 simply accepts more void noise in exchange for trail grip.

👉 Verdict: Geolandar wins commuters; KO3 balances toughness with livable noise; KO2 is louder but trades that for durability.

Where They Fit Best + Regional Notes

- Yokohama Geolandar A/T4: Best if you drive mostly highways and suburban miles, want a quiet tire, and still need 3PMSF winter confidence. Perfect for the Midwest, Southeast, and Sun Belt where off-road is rare but wet weather or mild snow shows up.
- BFGoodrich KO3: The all-rounder. Stronger than Geolandar in snow, ice, and off-road, but still refined enough for daily use. Best for the Rockies, Northeast, or Great Lakes region where winter and trails both matter.
- BFGoodrich KO2: The veteran workhorse. Louder and less refined, but with unbeatable toughness and deep-snow ability. Ideal for ranch country, Southwest desert, or anywhere durability outweighs comfort.
👉 Bottom line: Geolandar is the comfort commuter’s all-terrain. KO3 is the balanced modern benchmark. KO2 is the old-school bruiser that still rules when toughness is the only goal.

Tire Size Selection: The Basics You Can’t Skip

P-Metric vs. LT (Light Truck) Tires

Understanding Tire Load Range: XL vs. E-Load

Then comes the tire load index and load range — essentially your tire’s strength rating. Here’s where things split between passenger XL and LT E:

XL (Extra Load) is a passenger tire with reinforced sidewalls. It can handle a bit more pressure (~41 PSI) than a standard SL tire and is perfect for SUVs, crossovers, or light trucks that carry extra gear, passengers, or small trailers. XL tires ride softer and quieter than LT options, making them ideal for daily use.
E Load Range is an LT tire class built with a much thicker casing. E-rated tires can handle far more pressure (up to ~80 PSI) and heavier loads, which makes them essential for ¾-ton and 1-ton trucks towing trailers or hauling close to max capacity. The trade-off is weight, stiffer ride, more road noise, and a small drop in fuel efficiency.

Put simply: XL is for “extra luggage and family,” while E is for “truck bed full of bricks or a car trailer.”

Why the Tire Speed Rating Matters for Safety

Final Verdict — Which Tire Should You Buy?

For suburban drivers who want quiet comfort and light-trail ability, the Geolandar A/T4 is the commuter’s pick. It surprises in the wet, holds its own in mild snow, and stays hushed on highways, making it ideal for Midwest, Southeast, and Sun Belt climates.

The BFGoodrich KO3 is the all-rounder for mixed use. It steadies heavy trucks, performs reliably in snow and ice, and remains the masterclass off-road without punishing comfort. The KO2 remains the toughest workhorse—best for ranch roads, Southwest deserts, or deep-snow rural areas where durability and raw traction matter more than refinement.

👉 Bottom line: Geolandar is the comfort commuter’s A/T, KO3 is the balanced benchmark for modern rigs, and KO2 is the proven bruiser when toughness trumps everything else.

Frequently Asked Questions: Yokohama Geolandar A/T4 vs BFGoodrich KO2 vs KO3

Which tire is quietest on the highway?
Geolandar is the quietest with an 8.5/10 comfort score, KO3 runs a steady hum at 7.5/10, and KO2 is loudest at 7.0/10.
Which tire performs best in wet conditions?
Geolandar stops shorter at 177 ft, KO3 follows at 184 ft, and KO2 stretches to 195 ft, making Geolandar the wet commuter winner.
Which tire is strongest in snow?
KO3 stops at 72 ft and is the balanced snow pick, KO2 digs better in deep drifts, and Geolandar surprises with solid packed-snow braking for a road-leaning A/T.
How do they compare on ice?
KO3 stops shortest at 50 ft, KO2 follows close at 51 ft, and Geolandar lags at 53 ft, though it remains predictable with careful driving.
Which tire is better off-road?
KO3 leads with 9.5 scores across dirt, sand, and rock, KO2 stays nearly as strong, and Geolandar is best kept to gravel and light trails.
Who should buy the Geolandar A/T4?
Drivers who value quiet comfort, predictable wet braking, and light winter security, especially in suburban or mild climates.
Who should buy the KO3?
Drivers needing a balanced A/T for snow, ice, and serious off-road work—especially in the Rockies, Northeast, and Great Lakes regions.
Who should buy the KO2?
Truck owners in rugged, rural, or snow-belt areas who prioritize toughness and deep-snow grip over comfort and noise.

Falken Wildpeak AT4W vs Yokohama Geolandar X-AT: Load Handling, Mud, and Winter Traction Compared

Updated: November 11, 2025 by Emrecan Gurkan Leave a Comment

Updated for 2025: Comparing Falken’s Toughest All-Terrain against Yokohama’s Rugged-Terrain Standard

The Falken Wildpeak AT3W was a long-time favorite for balanced performance, but its replacement, the Falken Wildpeak AT4W, signals a major shift. The AT4W is built with a stiffer, more durable carcass and a chip-resistant compound, pushing it firmly into the heavy-duty segment.

This update turns the comparison from “Durability vs. Versatility” into a true “Durability vs. Rugged-Terrain” showdown:

The Yokohama Geolandar X-AT is a true Rugged-Terrain (RT) tire, prioritizing extreme off-road bite, aggressive looks, and established rock-crawling capabilities.
The Falken Wildpeak AT4W is the new Off-Road A/T standard, now designed for heavier trucks, superior load handling, excellent wet/winter safety (3PMSF), and maximum chip resistance.

As a former Bridgestone engineer, my analysis shows that the Wildpeak AT4W is the superior choice for drivers of heavy rigs (3/4-ton+), those who prioritize highway wet braking confidence, and anyone needing year-round severe snow rated performance. Conversely, the Geolandar X-AT remains the tire of choice for maximum performance in thick mud and severe rock crawling, where its dedicated RT design still offers an edge.

Tire Category	Off-Road All-Terrain (A/T)	Rugged-Terrain (R/T)
Severe Snow Rated (3PMSF)	Yes	No
Warranty (P-metric/SL)	55,000 Miles	45,000 Miles
Warranty (LT Sizes)	55,000 Miles	45,000 Miles
Sidewall Construction	Stiffer Casing/Dual-Layer	3-Ply Sidewall
Tread Life/Wear	Better (Chip Resistant Compound)	Good (Prone to center wear if under-inflated)
Wet Braking	Superior (Tested Shorter than AT3W)	Good
Target Driver	Heavy-duty trucks, overlanding, winter exposure, on-road safety focus.	Dedicated off-roaders, mud & rock enthusiasts, aggressive aesthetics.

Off-Road Performance & Durability

The core difference now lies in the structural design and intended off-road priority.

Sidewall and Casing

The Falken Wildpeak AT3W’s main drawback against the X-AT was its relative structural softness. The AT4W directly addresses this with a much stiffer carcass, a dual-layer polyester casing, and a thicker nylon overlay. This structural change is critical for stability under load and resistance to pinch flats from sharp rocks.

However, the Geolandar X-AT is built as a Rugged-Terrain tire, boasting a proven 3-ply polyester sidewall for robust puncture resistance. While the AT4W is now excellent for load handling, the X-AT still offers the highest potential protection for extreme rock-crawling and when airing down to very low PSI.

Verdict: The AT4W has closed the durability gap and is the better choice for heavy towing/hauling on rough roads. The X-AT remains the ultimate choice for maximum low-PSI puncture resistance in severe terrain.

Mud, Sand, and Gravel

The Geolandar X-AT maintains an advantage in thick, challenging mud due to its larger tread voids, more aggressive shoulder design, and the elliptical contact patch which aids in self-cleaning.

The AT4W, however, is a massive improvement over the AT3W in loose terrain. The revised shoulder blocks and new void geometry clear mud better and provide superior side-bite. Furthermore, the AT4W’s new chip-resistant compound makes it significantly better than the X-AT for high-mileage use on coarse gravel and rocky trails, where the X-AT’s softer compound can take more damage.

Verdict: For heavy mud and ultimate bite, choose the X-AT. For the best performance on gravel, rocky, and mixed terrain with less chipping, choose the AT4W.

On-Road Performance and Comfort

The new stiffness of the AT4W has cost it some of the AT3W’s legendary comfort.

Road Noise & Riding Comfort

The Wildpeak AT3W was notably quieter and smoother than the X-AT. The AT4W’s stiffer casing and more open tread pattern have increased road noise and reduced riding comfort. It no longer holds the definitive comfort advantage over the X-AT.

The Geolandar X-AT is inherently noisy due to its aggressive tread, but its softer compound can sometimes absorb small bumps better.

Verdict: If noise and comfort are high priorities, both tires are a compromise. The AT4W is likely still marginally quieter, but the difference is minimal, and the stiffness may be noticeable on smaller vehicles.

Dry Handling and Responsiveness

The AT3W was a leader in dry handling. The AT4W traded some of that dry grip for durability, resulting in a slightly longer dry braking distance and lower cornering g-force than its predecessor.

Even so, the AT4W remains the superior tire for on-road handling and responsiveness compared to the X-AT. The Geolandar X-AT’s aggressive lug design and soft compound lead to more flex and less planted stability during hard cornering and evasive maneuvers.

Verdict: The AT4W offers more confident highway stability and sharper steering response.

Wet & Winter Performance

This is the category where the AT4W establishes a clear, safety-focused advantage over the X-AT.

Wet Performance

While the AT3W excelled in wet cornering, the AT4W delivers a significantly shorter straight-line wet braking distance. This is a crucial safety factor for emergency stops in heavy rain. The AT4W’s siping technology and improved compound give it a decisive edge.

The Geolandar X-AT performs decently for a Rugged-Terrain tire, but it simply cannot match the wet-weather engineering and compound sophistication of a premium, 3PMSF-rated All-Terrain like the AT4W.

Verdict: AT4W wins definitively. It provides superior confidence in both straight-line wet braking and hydroplaning resistance.

Winter Performance

The Falken Wildpeak AT4W carries the Three-Peak Mountain Snowflake (3PMSF) rating, which confirms its severe snow performance. The Yokohama Geolandar X-AT does not carry the 3PMSF rating, classifying it as a capable, but not severe, winter tire.

While the AT4W is slightly less capable in deep snow than the retired AT3W, it is still engineered for reliable handling and braking on packed snow and ice. The X-AT delivers decent traction in deep snow thanks to its large voids, but its non-rated compound is less reliable on icy or packed winter roads.

Verdict: AT4W wins. For anyone in a “snowbelt” region or who values official severe winter capability, the 3PMSF-rated AT4W is the only logical choice.

Conclusion

The new Falken Wildpeak AT4W is no longer just a balanced all-terrain; it is a direct competitor in the heavy-duty, durability-first segment. Your choice now depends on your primary driving environment:

Choose the Falken Wildpeak AT4W if you…

Drive a heavy-duty truck (2500/3500) or tow/haul frequently. The AT4W’s stiffer casing offers superior load stability.
Need proven, 3PMSF-rated severe winter capability for snow and ice.
Prioritize on-road safety with superior wet braking performance.
Drive frequently on sharp gravel or abrasive terrain where the chip-resistant compound will extend tread life.

Choose the Yokohama Geolandar X-AT if you…

Prioritize maximum traction in the thickest mud. Its Rugged-Terrain design gives it the edge in this specific environment.
Focus on the most aggressive aesthetic and sidewall look.
Regularly air down for rock crawling or demanding off-road excursions, where its dedicated 3-ply sidewall structure offers high-level puncture defense.
Are willing to accept a shorter tread warranty and lack of a 3PMSF rating for the sake of ultimate off-road bite.

Yokohama Geolandar AT G015 Review — Wet & Winter Performance for Daily Driving in 2025

Updated: November 11, 2025 by Emrecan Gurkan Leave a Comment

Real test data, off-road insights, and daily-driving impact — from a former Bridgestone engineer.

The Yokohama Geolandar A/T is a highway-oriented On-Road A/T tire built for SUVs, crossovers, and light-duty pickups. Unlike competitors like the Toyo Open Country AT3 or Falken Wildpeak AT3W, which aim for a true 50/50 split of on-road and off-road performance, Yokohama positions the Geolandar A/T primarily for paved-road comfort and daily drivability. It’s also available in LT (Light Truck) fitments, which feature a more aggressive tread design than the P-metric versions, giving it added durability and towing stability for ½-ton trucks and above.

This dual-design approach makes the Geolandar A/T unique — P-metric sizes deliver smoother road manners, while LT versions add bite and toughness for drivers who need more utility. The trade-off is that it doesn’t match the off-road depth of category leaders, but for highway-focused drivers who want occasional dirt-road confidence, it strikes a practical balance.

In the sections ahead, we’ll break down how the Geolandar A/T performs across dry, wet, winter, and light off-road testing. You can also see how it compares against rivals in our All-Terrain Tire Decision Tool for quick recommendations by SUV, CUV, or truck class.

Quick Look

Yokohama Geolandar A/T G015

Tested Rating: 8.7/10

From my perspective as a former Bridgestone engineer, the Yokohama Geolandar AT G015 is an excellent choice for highway and city driving, offering strong traction in wet, dry, and snowy conditions with impressive handling for an all-terrain. While it isn’t the best for serious off-road use, it performs well on dirt trails. The trade-offs come on gravel, where it wears quickly, and in fuel economy, as buyers should expect a slight drop in MPG.

City and Highway Driving

Having experience with p-metric tires, we found that our city and highway driving experiences were highly satisfying. To provide a better understanding, let’s break down our experiences for wet, dry, and snowy conditions separately.

Dry Performance

Switching from regular all-season tires to the Yokohama Geolander AT, as expected, resulted in slightly inferior dry performance compared to all-season tires. To clarify, when I mention “dry performance,” I’m referring to the handling capability.

However, it’s important to note that the Yokohama Geolander AT is a relatively mild all-terrain tire. In comparison to our experiences with the Toyo AT3 or Falken Wildpeak AT3W, the Geolander AT felt more responsive. What pleasantly surprised me the most was its cornering stability. Even at high speeds, the tire maintained its shape exceptionally well. This can be attributed to its strong sidewalls and wider shoulder blocks.

For the LT (Light Truck) specification, Yokohama seems to employ a 5-rib design with narrower shoulder lugs. This design choice results in wider center and outer ribs, which contribute positively to the tire’s stability. Based on this observation, I expect similar performance characteristics from the LT sizes of the Geolander AT as well.

Wet Performance

Thanks to its ability to put a substantial amount of rubber on the ground, the Yokohama Geolander AT G015 delivers highly satisfying wet performance.

This isn’t solely due to improved wet traction but also enhanced hydroplaning resistance. Upon close examination of the tire’s tread, one can easily spot the full-depth and 3D siping. This design choice not only increases traction by providing numerous biting edges but also greatly improves hydroplaning resistance. The angled notches on the outer ribs effectively direct water to the shoulder slots, contributing to its impressive hydroplaning resistance.

Overall, the Yokohama Geolander AT G015 excels in wet performance for highway and city driving.

I’d like to add some thoughts regarding the LT (Light Truck) metric sizes:

LT sizes of this tire feature a tread that is 4/32” or 5/32” deeper, greatly enhancing hydroplaning resistance. Additionally, they boast a higher siped density, which leads to similar wet traction capabilities as their non-LT counterparts.

Snow Performance

The Yokohama Geolander AT G015, despite being a mild all-terrain tire, boasts a noticeably aggressive tread pattern compared to standard all-season tires.

Let’s dive into its performance in snow conditions. This tire excels in light snow thanks to its sectional outer ribs and siped pattern. The sectional outer ribs effectively prevent the tread from packing with snow, ensuring consistent traction. Additionally, the shoulder block notches create extra biting edges, contributing to excellent light snow traction.

However, it’s important to note that this tire is primarily designed for on-road use, which results in a shallower tread depth and less void area compared to more aggressive all-terrain tires. While it may not be the best choice for deep snow or slush, it can still provide traction in unexpected snowfall.

A noteworthy point is that the Yokohama Geolander AT G015 carries the 3PMSF (Three-Peak Mountain Snowflake) symbol, indicating that its compound retains flexibility even in temperatures below 45°F, enhancing its winter performance and cold-weather capabilities.

Road Noise

The Yokohama Geolander AT G015 features a relatively low tread depth for its p-metric sizes, which is advantageous for reducing road noise. However, contrary to some other tests, I found that this tire may not be as quiet as some of its direct competitors, such as the Cooper Discoverer AT3 4S or Firestone Destination AT2.

The tire incorporates deep notches that effectively disrupt the airflow within the tread, which is generally a noise-reducing feature. However, the shoulder blocks on the Yokohama Geolander AT G015 are quite aggressive compared to its competitors, and a significant portion of the tire noise seems to be generated by these sections.

It’s worth noting that despite the aggressive appearance of the shoulder blocks, they are not perfectly square. This design choice results in a narrower tread width on the road at certain tire pressures, contributing to a decent noise level for a tire with such an aggressive tread pattern.

Overall, the Yokohama Geolander AT G015 may not be the quietest highway-oriented all-terrain tire, yet it’s a decent contender in terms of noise performance.

Riding Comfort

In my opinion, the Yokohama Geolander AT G015 benefits from its wider shoulder blocks and variable pitch design, which contribute to its overall performance. The tire sidewalls are notably stiff, enhancing stability and control. Additionally, the variable pitch design ensures that there is always a sufficient amount of rubber in contact with the road surface, resulting in a decent level of riding comfort.

The tire’s inner structure includes an extra nylon layer, which enhances its uniformity. This feature plays a role in providing a smoother and more comfortable ride experience for drivers.

Treadwear

In terms of uneven wear, the Yokohama Geolander AT G015 performs admirably, largely due to its symmetrical pattern. However, its blocky tread design, while beneficial for traction, can have a negative impact on longevity.

Yokohama offers a 50,000-mile treadwear warranty for LT sizes and a 60,000-mile warranty for p-metric sizes, which is slightly lower than the industry average. This could be attributed, in part, to the tire’s higher rolling resistance.

Overall, the Yokohama Geolander AT wears well, but it may not last as long as tires like the Cooper Discoverer AT3 4S or Falken Wildpeak AT Trail.

Fuel Efficiency

Based on information from AutoBild and various customer reviews I found online, the Yokohama Geolander AT G015 appears to have a higher rolling resistance, which is somewhat expected due to its notched tread design. While it carries a UTQG rating of 600 A B, similar to its competitors, and has a comparable weight, there are indications that the tire may wear out relatively quickly. Typically, quicker tire wear can contribute to higher rolling resistance.

If fuel efficiency is a top priority for you, I would suggest considering alternative tire options that may offer better fuel economy performance.

Off-Road Performance

I would advise against choosing the Yokohama Geolander AT if off-road performance is a top priority for you.

This tire excels on dirt surfaces thanks to its siped and cavitated pattern. However, when it comes to gravel, it appears a bit mild to me in terms of providing a robust gravel performance. It can handle some gravel, but if you spend a significant amount of time on gravel roads, this tire may wear out quickly.

For those seeking a more detailed off-road review, I recommend checking out this article: Expeditionportal Off-Road Review.

Tire Size Selection: The Basics You Can’t Skip

P-Metric vs. LT (Light Truck) Tires

Understanding Tire Load Range: XL vs. E-Load

Then comes the tire load index and load range — essentially your tire’s strength rating. Here’s where things split between passenger XL and LT E:

XL (Extra Load) is a passenger tire with reinforced sidewalls. It can handle a bit more pressure (~41 PSI) than a standard SL tire and is perfect for SUVs, crossovers, or light trucks that carry extra gear, passengers, or small trailers. XL tires ride softer and quieter than LT options, making them ideal for daily use.
E Load Range is an LT tire class built with a much thicker casing. E-rated tires can handle far more pressure (up to ~80 PSI) and heavier loads, which makes them essential for ¾-ton and 1-ton trucks towing trailers or hauling close to max capacity. The trade-off is weight, stiffer ride, more road noise, and a small drop in fuel efficiency.

Put simply: XL is for “extra luggage and family,” while E is for “truck bed full of bricks or a car trailer.”

Why the Tire Speed Rating Matters for Safety

Conclusion

The Yokohama Geolander AT G015 is an excellent tire choice if your main focus is on-road performance and comfort. However, it may not perform as well in more severe off-road conditions.

I hope you found this article helpful and informative. If you have any additional questions or need further assistance, please feel free to leave them in the comments below. Have a safe and enjoyable ride!

yokohama

Quick Look

Toyo Open Country A/T III

Yokohama Geolandar A/T4

Raw Test Data

Dry Performance: Toyo Takes the Edge

Wet Performance: Toyo Wins Decisively

Winter Performance: Toyo Launches Better, Yokohama Stops Slightly Shorter

Ice Performance: Toyo Edges Ahead, Both Have Limits

Off-Road Performance: Toyo Dominates by a Wide Margin

Comfort & Noise: Both Are Loud, Toyo Slightly Better

Who Should Buy Which Tire: Clear Choices Based on Real Use

Tire Size Selection: The Basics You Can’t Skip

P-Metric vs. LT (Light Truck) Tires

Understanding Tire Load Range: XL vs. E-Load

Why the Tire Speed Rating Matters for Safety

Who Should Buy Which Tire: The Data Tells a Clear Story

Frequently Asked Questions: Toyo Open Country A/T III vs Yokohama Geolandar A/T4

Quick Look

Falken Wildpeak A/T4W

Yokohama Geolandar A/T4

Raw Test Data

Tire Test Data

Falken Wildpeak A/T3W (Discontinued)

Dry Performance — AT4W Steadied, Yokohama More Forgiving

Wet Performance — AT4W Grips Corners, Geolandar Composed

Winter & Snow — AT4W Dominates Packed Roads, Yokohama Limited

Ice Performance — AT4W Secures Stops, Yokohama Requires Caution

Off-Road — Falkens trail strong, Yokohama strictly mild

Comfort & Noise — Yokohama Church-Mouse Quiet, AT4W Heavier Hum

Where They Fit Best + Regional Notes

Tire Size Selection: The Basics You Can’t Skip

P-Metric vs. LT (Light Truck) Tires

Understanding Tire Load Range: XL vs. E-Load

Why the Tire Speed Rating Matters for Safety

Final Verdict

Frequently Asked Questions: Falken A/T4W vs Yokohama Geolandar A/T4

Quick Look

Yokohama Geolandar A/T4

BFGoodrich All-Terrain T/A KO3

BFGoodrich All-Terrain T/A KO2

Raw Test Data

Tire Test Data

Dry Performance — KO3 steadies under weight, KO2 digs in, Geolandar smooths it out

Wet Performance — Geolandar impresses, KO3 holds margin, KO2 stretches

Winter & Snow — KO3 dependable on pack, KO2 a deep-snow bruiser, Geolandar the commuter surprise

Ice — KO3 grips first, KO2 steady, Geolandar slides a touch

Off-Road — KO3 masterclass, KO2 still a workhorse, Geolandar a pavement-first A/T

Comfort & Noise — Geolandar quiet as a church mouse, KO3 steady hum, KO2 the growler

Where They Fit Best + Regional Notes

Tire Size Selection: The Basics You Can’t Skip

P-Metric vs. LT (Light Truck) Tires

Understanding Tire Load Range: XL vs. E-Load

Why the Tire Speed Rating Matters for Safety

Final Verdict — Which Tire Should You Buy?

Frequently Asked Questions: Yokohama Geolandar A/T4 vs BFGoodrich KO2 vs KO3

Table of Contents

Off-Road Performance & Durability

Sidewall and Casing

Mud, Sand, and Gravel

On-Road Performance and Comfort

Road Noise & Riding Comfort

Dry Handling and Responsiveness

Wet & Winter Performance

Wet Performance

Winter Performance

Conclusion

Choose the Falken Wildpeak AT4W if you…

Choose the Yokohama Geolandar X-AT if you…

Quick Look

Yokohama Geolandar A/T G015

City and Highway Driving

Dry Performance

Wet Performance

Snow Performance

Road Noise

Riding Comfort

Treadwear

Fuel Efficiency

Off-Road Performance