• Skip to primary navigation
  • Skip to main content
  • Skip to primary sidebar

TireTerrain

  • Home
  • Comparisons & Reviews
  • All-Terrain Tire Decision Tool
  • Pro Tips
  • About

#YokohamaGeolandarAT4

Yokohama Geolandar AT4 vs Toyo Open Country AT3 — Wet-Road Safety or Sharper All-Round Performer? (2025)

Updated: September 30, 2025 by Emrecan Gurkan Leave a Comment

Real-world test data, driver impressions, and use-case insights — from a former Bridgestone test engineer.

The Yokohama Geolandar AT4 is Yokohama’s newest On-Road A/T tire, built for commuters in rainy and freeze-thaw regions who need wet-road safety, slush confidence, and quiet daily comfort. The Toyo Open Country AT3, by contrast, sits in the Off-Road A/T category — a sharper, more versatile design with stronger dry grip, balanced stability, and dependable tread life. Both are popular across the US and Canada for light trucks and SUVs, and both are available with the 3PMSF rating for severe winter traction.

That’s the split most buyers face — Geolandar AT4 for wet-weather commuting and year-round refinement vs Toyo AT3 for sharper handling and broader off-road ability. In the sections ahead, I’ll compare them across dry, wet, snow, and off-road testing. You can also line them up in our All-Terrain Tire Decision Tool for quick recommendations tailored by SUV, CUV, or truck class.

Close-up of a Yokohama Geolandar AT4 all-terrain tire mounted on a rugged SUV, parked on rocky terrain, showing aggressive tread pattern and black alloy wheel.
Yokohama Geolandar AT4 — engineered for the trail, tuned for the road. 🛞⛰️

Quick Look

The Toyo Open Country A/T III stands out as the sportier all-terrain, posting a 131.5-ft dry stop with 0.78 g cornering. It feels sharper on pavement, with reinforced shoulders and staggered tread blocks that resist flex, giving it a road-tire-like edge in corners. Off-road, it’s equally confident, with balanced scores across dirt, sand, mud, and rock, making it a reliable weekend trail partner. Owners consistently praise its snow traction and trail composure, though it rides firmer and hums more than highway-leaning competitors.

The Yokohama Geolandar A/T4, by contrast, is the commuter’s calm companion. With a 139-ft dry stop at 0.70 g, it trades bite for smooth predictability on long highway runs. Its wet braking (177 ft / 0.47 g) actually outpaces the Toyo, and comfort is its trump card, scoring 8.5/10 for quiet, cushioned ride quality. Drivers rave about its hushed manners at speed and stable feel in rain, though it lacks the trail toughness of the Toyo and struggles in deeper snow or ice compared to sharper, more aggressive A/Ts.

👉 Bottom line: Toyo AT3 = sporty, trail-ready grip; Geolandar A/T4 = quiet commuter refinement.

Toyo Open Country A/T III

Toyo Open Country AT3 tire
Compare prices:
Amazon
Prime shipping Direct from brands
Tire Rack
Free road-hazard coverage Backed by Discount Tire
SimpleTire
Financing options Local installers

Yokohama Geolandar A/T4

Yokohama Geolandar AT4 tire
Compare prices:
Tire Rack
Free road-hazard coverage Backed by Discount Tire
SimpleTire
Financing options Local installers
Amazon
Prime shipping Direct from brands

Tire Decision Tool

For those in a hurry: this tool makes it easy. Just pick your vehicle and what matters most to you, and it’ll instantly suggest the best tire options.

Click Show to see tire recommendations. (After that, changes update automatically.)
No matching tires found. Try another selection.

    Raw Test Data

    Tire Test Data

    Pick categories to show metrics, then open ☰ to pick tires. Optional chart is hidden by default.

    Parentheses show the rank among the currently displayed tires (1 = best for that metric).
    Left axis lists metrics. Top axis is used for g-force metrics so they scale clearly.
    Note: Lower is better for Stopping & Acceleration; higher is better for g-force, comfort, traction & off-road ratings. Parentheses show the rank among the currently displayed tires (1 = best for that metric).
    Sources worth checking
    Tire Rack AT Tire Test Tire Rack On-Road A/T Ratings Tire Rack Off-Road A/T Ratings SimpleTire Reviews Amazon SUV/LT Tires

    Dry Performance — Toyo sharper, Yokohama steadier at pace

    On pavement, Toyo stops in 131.5 ft with 0.78 g cornering, while Yokohama needs 139 ft with 0.70 g. That gap shows in how they drive. Toyo feels sharper and closer to a sport-leaning A/T, while Yokohama takes longer to settle into a turn but cruises smoothly once in line.

    Drivers echo the split. A Toyo owner on a Tacoma noted it “felt like a road tire in the corners,” while Geolandar drivers often say it “stays composed and calm, never twitchy.” From my test seat, Toyo’s reinforced shoulders and staggered tread edges keep blocks from flexing, while Yokohama’s softer compound and rib focus lean toward a calmer, less aggressive feel.

    • SUVs & crossovers: Yokohama feels more natural day-to-day.

    • ½-ton trucks: Toyo gives the sharper edge, Yokohama better for longer drives.

    • ¾-ton & HD: Toyo steadier when loaded; Yokohama less locked-in with weight.

    👉 Verdict: Toyo delivers sharper dry response; Yokohama steadies out at speed but lacks bite.

    Wet Performance — Yokohama hangs on longer, Toyo stretches stops

    Perfectly balanced tire

    In the rain, Yokohama posts 177 ft / 0.47 g, while Toyo runs longer at 185 ft / 0.50 g. On paper, Toyo shows higher traction, but in practice, Yokohama feels safer because its grooves clear water consistently, keeping stability under control. Toyo grips harder once loaded, but its stopping distance stretches out.

    Community feedback makes sense here: Geolandar owners praise it as “confident in the rain, even when worn,” while Toyo drivers say they “need a little more space when roads get greasy.” The explanation lies in balance: Yokohama’s groove layout maintains evacuation across tread life, while Toyo’s harder carcass fights squirm but gives up some raw stopping distance.

    • SUVs & crossovers: Yokohama inspires more confidence.

    • ½-ton trucks: Close call, but Toyo steadies better with a trailer.

    • ¾-ton & HD: Toyo more predictable under weight, Yokohama lighter rigs only.

    👉 Verdict: Yokohama safer for lighter vehicles in heavy rain; Toyo steadier under towing, but needs margin.

    Note from the Expert: When it comes to rain, I always emphasize two things: compound grip and water evacuation. You can see the full details in my analysis, but if you take just one thing away, remember that an AT tire’s stiff nature makes achieving top-tier wet performance a constant battle. This is why the question, Are All-Terrain Tires Good in Rain?, requires a nuanced answer that balances tread design against rubber stiffness.

    Winter & Snow — Toyo digs better, Yokohama plays it safe

    In snow, Toyo stops at 74 ft and launches in 44.0 ft, compared to Yokohama’s 72.0 ft stop and 47.0 ft launch. That means Yokohama brakes shorter, but Toyo pulls away quicker. In real life, Toyo feels more confident in deeper, unpacked snow thanks to its staggered shoulders, while Yokohama is calmer on salted and plowed lanes.

    On Jeep forums, Toyo drivers call it “a real snow tire in disguise.” By contrast, Geolandar users often note “it’s safe and easy in winter, but not aggressive.” The design explains it: Toyo has dense siping and compound tuning to stay pliable, while Yokohama keeps rubber firmer, trading off deep-snow bite for stability on cleared roads.

    • SUVs & crossovers: Yokohama feels steadier on plowed commutes.

    • ½-ton trucks: Toyo wins when fresh snow piles up.

    • ¾-ton & HD: Toyo stronger under weight, Yokohama too muted for heavy snow use.

    👉 Verdict: Toyo the better deep-snow performer, Yokohama calmer on plowed lanes.

    Note from the Expert: Our discussions often boil down to the core tradeoff. On one hand, you must understand why all-terrain tires are truly effective in deep snow, but not on ice. On the other hand, you face the 3PMSF Paradox—the hidden cost of that badge. The short answer is: The 3PMSF badge certifies traction, but it costs you durability. Dive into our full analysis on the critical 3PMSF rating for severe winter and off-road service, and its hidden costs, before you risk your rig on the trail.

    Ice — Neither shines, but Toyo forgives more

    Ice is where both tires admit their limits. Toyo stops in 50 ft, while Yokohama stretches to 53 ft. The gap is noticeable — Toyo slides but gives you time to correct, Yokohama feels like it fades away more suddenly.

    Drivers say it clearly: one AT3 user admitted it’s “fine if you’re careful, but not a studded alternative.” Yokohama owners echo: “not scary, but not a true ice tire.” The tech shows why: Toyo’s micro-siping keeps a touch of grip, while Yokohama’s harder shoulder compound limits edge effect on glassy ice.

    • SUVs & crossovers: Both demand caution, Toyo a hair safer.

    • ½-ton trucks: Toyo better for recovery time on ice.

    • ¾-ton & HD: Neither ideal, but Toyo steadier under load.

    👉 Verdict: Toyo edges ahead, but neither is a go-to ice solution.

    Off-Road — Toyo more capable, Yokohama built for gravel

    If you're changing from the H/T tires, Toyo AT3 can provide aggressive look. Still, I prefer Ridge Grappler

    Off-road scores make the split clear. Toyo posts 7.8 dirt / 7.7 sand / 7.9 mud / 7.8 rock, while Yokohama trails at 6.0 / 5.8 / 5.5 / 5.5. That translates exactly as it sounds: Toyo can tackle mixed trails confidently, while Yokohama is more of a gravel/back-road partner.

    Owners say it too. AT3 users mention it “grabs in ruts and never feels soft.” Geolandar drivers tend to frame it differently: “no rock crawling here, just quiet on gravel, and that’s fine.” From my engineering seat, Toyo’s tie-bars and reinforced casing keep blocks stiff under torque, while Yokohama’s lighter ribs reduce harshness but give up trail aggression.

    • SUVs & crossovers: Yokohama is the highway-friendly choice, Toyo for trail weekends.

    • ½-ton trucks: Toyo a solid compromise between comfort and off-road grip.

    • ¾-ton & HD: Toyo holds together on rocks and mud; Yokohama underbuilt for punishment.

    👉 Verdict: Toyo dominates off-road; Yokohama sticks to gravel and light dirt.

    Note from the Expert: Every successful day on the trail is about preparation and physics, because tire longevity is earned, not given. Before you even start, you must master the critical link between tire pressure and load range for every rig to maximize your contact patch. Once moving, remember your ultimate off-road armor is your sidewall protection against the inevitable pinch flat. And finally, your traction on the obstacle is dictated by choosing the right aggressive vs hybrid tread pattern for your terrain. Master those three steps, and your rig will be ready for anything.

    Comfort & Noise — Yokohama wins the commute

    Toyo AT3 has more blocky pattern and relatively stiffer compound. It lasts way much longer

    Here’s where Yokohama claws back ground. It scores 8.5 comfort, compared to Toyo’s 8.0. The difference is clear on long highway runs — Yokohama is quieter and smoother, Toyo a touch firmer and hums as tread wears.

    Forum voices back it up: Geolandar drivers rave “dead quiet even at 75 mph,” while Toyo owners admit “a little hum on the freeway, but nothing crazy.” The explanation: Yokohama’s rib-style tread smooths resonance and cushions vibrations, while Toyo’s larger lugs transmit more feedback into the cabin.

    • SUVs & crossovers: Yokohama wins daily comfort.

    • ½-ton trucks: Both livable, Yokohama quieter.

    • ¾-ton & HD: Noise blends into load anyway, but Toyo firmer.

    👉 Verdict: Yokohama is the comfort pick; Toyo is firmer but acceptable.

    Note from the Expert: For years, choosing all-terrain meant accepting noise—a true compromise for off-road grip. That’s why the question, Are All-Terrain Tires Louder than Highway Tires?, used to have a simple “yes” answer. Now, with the rise of on-road models, the core issue has shifted from noise to overall refinement. To fully understand which side of the comfort spectrum you’re buying into, you need to determine Are All-Terrain Tires Good for Daily Driving?—a question that depends entirely on the tire’s construction, not just the name.

    Where They Fit Best

    Yokohama Geolandar A/T4: Best fit for commuters who want a quiet, comfortable highway tire with light snow security and occasional gravel-road manners. Perfect for Southern states, interstate drivers, and SUVs that don’t need serious off-road chops.

    Toyo Open Country A/T III*: Suited for those balancing daily use with regular trail runs and winter conditions. Stronger in deep snow and dirt, with sharper dry handling. Ideal for mountain states, snow-belt commuters, and half-ton to ¾-ton trucks.

    👉 Bottom line: Yokohama is the commuter’s friend, smooth and quiet with light utility. Toyo is the more versatile all-rounder, sharper on-road and far more capable off it.

    Tire Size Selection: The Basics You Can’t Skip

    Even the best tread design can’t rescue a tire that’s built too weak. Back when I was testing tires at Bridgestone, I saw all-terrain models that should’ve performed but fell short — simply because the basics (size, load strength, and speed rating) weren’t matched to the vehicle.

    P-Metric vs. LT (Light Truck) Tires

    The first step is knowing whether you need LT or passenger tires. LT (Light Truck) tires are built with extra reinforcement and stiff sidewalls, designed for towing, hauling, or off-road use. Passenger (P-metric) tires are lighter, smoother, and tuned for daily comfort and fuel efficiency — but they’ll flex more under load.

    Understanding Tire Load Range: XL vs. E-Load

    Then comes the tire load index and load range — essentially your tire’s strength rating. Here’s where things split between passenger XL and LT E:

    • XL (Extra Load) is a passenger tire with reinforced sidewalls. It can handle a bit more pressure (~41 PSI) than a standard SL tire and is perfect for SUVs, crossovers, or light trucks that carry extra gear, passengers, or small trailers. XL tires ride softer and quieter than LT options, making them ideal for daily use.

    • E Load Range is an LT tire class built with a much thicker casing. E-rated tires can handle far more pressure (up to ~80 PSI) and heavier loads, which makes them essential for ¾-ton and 1-ton trucks towing trailers or hauling close to max capacity. The trade-off is weight, stiffer ride, more road noise, and a small drop in fuel efficiency.

    Put simply: XL is for “extra luggage and family,” while E is for “truck bed full of bricks or a car trailer.”

    Why the Tire Speed Rating Matters for Safety

    Finally, don’t overlook the tire speed rating. It’s not just about top speed — it measures how well a tire handles heat and stress at highway pace. Lower ratings (like S) tend to ride softer and last longer, while higher ratings (H, T) feel more stable and responsive under sharp maneuvers. Heat build-up is the silent killer of tires, and speed rating is your safeguard.

    Bottom line: Match your tire’s construction (LT vs P-metric), load range (XL vs E), and speed rating to your vehicle’s demands. Get those right, and everything else — off-road grip, winter traction, comfort — will finally perform the way it was designed to.

    Final Verdict

    If you value sharper steering, stronger snow bite, and true trail capability, the Toyo A/T III is the clear choice. It’s ideal for snow-belt drivers, mountain-state commuters, and half-ton or ¾-ton truck owners who split time between highways and dirt.

    If comfort, quiet, and predictable wet-road stability matter most, the Yokohama Geolandar A/T4 is the better fit. It shines in Southern and suburban regions where winters are lighter, highways dominate, and off-road use is limited to gravel or mild dirt.

    👉 Bottom line: Toyo is the versatile athlete for year-round adventure, while Yokohama is the calm, commuter-friendly pick for daily drives.

    Frequently Asked Questions: Toyo Open Country A/T III vs Yokohama Geolandar A/T4

    • Which tire has better dry grip?
      The Toyo A/T III, with a 131.5-ft stop and 0.78 g cornering, feels sharper and sportier than the Yokohama’s 139 ft / 0.70 g result.

    • Which tire is safer in wet conditions?
      The Yokohama Geolandar A/T4 stops shorter in rain (177 ft / 0.47 g), while Toyo requires more distance but steadies better when towing.

    • Which tire performs better in snow?
      Toyo digs harder with a quicker launch in deeper snow, while Yokohama feels steadier on salted or plowed commutes.

    • Which tire is safer on ice?
      Toyo stops shorter at 50 ft and gives drivers more recovery time, while Yokohama trails at 53 ft and feels less forgiving.

    • Which tire is stronger off-road?
      The Toyo A/T III posts stronger scores across dirt, sand, mud, and rock, while Yokohama is more suited to gravel and back roads.

    • Which tire is quieter on the highway?
      Yokohama wins with an 8.5 comfort score, running quieter and smoother than Toyo’s firmer 8.0 ride.

    • Who should choose the Toyo A/T III?
      Drivers in snow-belt states or mountain regions, and truck owners who want a sharper, more versatile A/T with real off-road ability.

    • Who should choose the Yokohama Geolandar A/T4?
      Commuters in Southern or suburban areas who want a quiet, comfortable tire for daily use with light winter and gravel-road security.

    Filed Under: All Terrain Tires Tagged With: #AllTerrainTires, #AT4vsAT3, #ToyoOpenCountryAT3, #TruckLife, #YokohamaGeolandarAT4

    Yokohama Geolandar AT4 vs Falken Wildpeak AT4W: The New 3-Way All-Terrain Tire Comparison (Feat. AT3W Data)

    Updated: October 9, 2025 by Emrecan Gurkan Leave a Comment

    Real-world test data, driver impressions, and use-case insights — from a former Bridgestone test engineer.

    The Falken Wildpeak AT4W is an Off-Road A/T tire, snow-certified with the 3PMSF rating, and among the most popular choices for light trucks and SUVs across the US and Canada. Since the Falken Wildpeak AT3W is discontinued, understanding the AT4W’s lineage is key: the AT4W refines the proven AT3W formula by focusing on better wet braking, ice traction, and on-road comfort, illustrating Falken’s aim for a truly best-in-class all-around performer. (For the full generational breakdown, see our Falken Wildpeak AT4W vs AT3W guide.) By contrast, the Yokohama Geolandar AT4 slots into the On-Road A/T category — designed for commuters in rainy cities and freeze-thaw regions who want wet traction, quiet comfort, and year-round dependability with A/T styling.

    That’s the real choice buyers face — AT4W for the best all-around balance and aggressive capability, or Yokohama AT4 for road-focused comfort and wet-weather security. In the sections ahead, I’ll compare them across dry, wet, snow, and off-road performance. You can also line them up directly in our All-Terrain Tire Decision Tool for quick recommendations tailored by SUV, CUV, or truck class.

    Perfectly balanced tire

    Quick Look

    The Falken Wildpeak A/T4W is the heavy-duty performer, built for those who prioritize capability. It delivers superior stopping power with a 171-foot wet stop and locks down winter traction with a 69-foot stop in snow and 45-foot stop on ice. The AT4W dominates off-road with aggressive mid-8 scores and provides the planted stability needed for towing. Its comfort is a livable 8.3/10, trading serenity for toughness.

    In contrast, the Yokohama Geolandar A/T4 is the quiet commuter’s pick, prioritizing refinement. It offers the quietest and smoothest ride with an 8.5/10 comfort rating. While it is steady in light snow (72-foot stop), its performance is tuned strictly for pavement. The Geolandar’s gentle nature limits it off-road, making it strictly suitable for fire roads and suburban commutes.

    Falken Wildpeak A/T4W

    Falken Wildpeak AT4W tire
    Compare prices:
    Amazon
    Prime shipping Direct from brands
    Tire Rack
    Free road-hazard coverage Backed by Discount Tire
    SimpleTire
    Financing options Local installers

    Yokohama Geolandar A/T4

    Yokohama Geolandar AT4 tire
    Compare prices:
    Tire Rack
    Free road-hazard coverage Backed by Discount Tire
    SimpleTire
    Financing options Local installers
    Amazon
    Prime shipping Direct from brands

    Tire Decision Tool

    For those in a hurry: this tool makes it easy. Just pick your vehicle and what matters most to you, and it’ll instantly suggest the best tire options.

    Click Show to see tire recommendations. (After that, changes update automatically.)
    No matching tires found. Try another selection.

      Raw Test Data

      Tire Test Data

      Pick categories to show metrics, then open ☰ to pick tires. Optional chart is hidden by default.

      Parentheses show the rank among the currently displayed tires (1 = best for that metric).
      Left axis lists metrics. Top axis is used for g-force metrics so they scale clearly.
      Note: Lower is better for Stopping & Acceleration; higher is better for g-force, comfort, traction & off-road ratings. Parentheses show the rank among the currently displayed tires (1 = best for that metric).
      Sources worth checking
      Tire Rack AT Tire Test Tire Rack On-Road A/T Ratings Tire Rack Off-Road A/T Ratings SimpleTire Reviews Amazon SUV/LT Tires

      Falken Wildpeak A/T3W (Discontinued)

      The Falken Wildpeak A/T3W is officially discontinued, but finding remaining stock means you can still buy the performance benchmark for the new AT4W.

      Known as the “agile all-terrain athlete,” the A/T3W offered the sharpest dry grip of the entire lineup (126.6 ft stop). The generational transition to the AT4W focused on what to refine: the new model sacrificed a small degree of the A/T3W’s dry sharpness for improved stability under heavy load, and crucially, saw a trade-off in highway comfort to deliver more ruggedness. This strategic sacrifice in comfort was intended to push the AT4W toward serious capability, allowing the Falken Rubitrek AT01 to be introduced to close the market gap for comfort-focused all-terrain drivers. The result was notable improvements over the A/T3W’s “solid” performance in wet braking (shorter stops than the A/T3W’s 176 ft), ice traction, and off-road ruggedness.

      Dry Performance — AT4W Steadied, Yokohama More Forgiving

      Stack of Falken Wildpeak AT4W HD all-terrain tires labeled LT285/70R17 Load Range E on display beside alloy wheels in an auto showroom.
      Falken Wildpeak AT4W HD — Load Range E tires ready for trucks, towing rigs, and overland builds.

      On dry pavement, the Falken A/T4W stops in 131.8 ft with 0.72 g cornering. It presents a slightly softer response than a dedicated road tire, but offers immense stability once set. In contrast, the Yokohama Geolandar A/T4 trails slightly at 139 ft with 0.70 g. It is certainly dependable, but tuned more as a commuter than a corner carver.

      A Tacoma driver with the A/T4W noted it was “shockingly good once balanced, lighter than expected on center.” The Geolandar gets love from Tundra drivers calling it “dead quiet, tracks straight, just not built for play.”

      From my testing eye, the A/T4W’s heavier shoulders and reinforced structure damp squirm, allowing it to hold a line better once vehicle weight or cargo is added. The Geolandar’s softer shoulders and ribbed design prioritize smoothness, which ultimately caps its agility and responsiveness.

      • SUVs & Crossovers: Yokohama is the calmer choice if you prioritize comfort.

      • 1/2-ton trucks: A/T4W is steadier when towing or hauling.

      • 3/4-ton & HD trucks: A/T4W clearly wins composure; Yokohama struggles under heavy load.

      👉 Verdict: A/T4W steadier when loaded, Yokohama smooth daily driver.

      Wet Performance — AT4W Grips Corners, Geolandar Composed

      In rain, the Falken Wildpeak A/T4W posts the shortest stop at 171 ft with 0.58 g, a clear advantage demonstrating more silica bite in its compound. By contrast, the Yokohama Geolandar A/T4 stretches the stopping distance to 177 ft with 0.47 g. While the Geolandar is more composed during routine braking, it offers less overall traction feel.

      A Bronco owner praised the A/T4W, stating, “wet grip is excellent, never lost trust even in storms.” Geolandar owners, however, noted their tire is “better in the rain than expected, but tuned more for quiet ride than grip.”

      The engineering confirms this trade-off: Falken’s high silica and dense siping are designed to aggressively slice through water films for maximum grip. Yokohama leans harder into rib reinforcement and noise pitch tuning, a focus that sacrifices absolute grip for refinement and quiet operation.

      Wet Driving Fit

      • SUVs & Crossovers: A/T4W is the safest choice in storms; Yokohama remains easy and calm.

      • 1/2-ton Trucks: A/T4W is preferred if you frequently tow in the rain.

      • 3/4-ton & HD Trucks: The A/T4W’s heavy-duty carcass steadies best under water load.

      👉 Verdict: A/T4W is the confident wet-weather choice, while Yokohama is smooth but not sharp.

      Note from the Expert: When it comes to rain, I always emphasize two things: compound grip and water evacuation. You can see the full details in my analysis, but if you take just one thing away, remember that an AT tire’s stiff nature makes achieving top-tier wet performance a constant battle. This is why the question, Are All-Terrain Tires Good in Rain?, requires a nuanced answer that balances tread design against rubber stiffness.

      Winter & Snow — AT4W Dominates Packed Roads, Yokohama Limited

      New set of Falken Wildpeak AT4W

      The numbers clearly show the split: the Falken Wildpeak A/T4W leads with a snow stop of 69.0 ft and a quick launch in 41.5 ft—excellent for plowed roads. The Yokohama Geolandar A/T4 comes in with a comparable stop distance of 72.0 ft, but its launch is significantly slower at 47.0 ft, making it workable but sluggish out of the hole.

      A 4Runner driver with A/T4Ws noted the tire was “predictable in deep snow, no drama.” Geolandar drivers are more reserved, stating it is “fine in light snow, but harder compound shows once tread wears.”

      Technically, the A/T4W’s advanced silica keeps the compound pliable in freezing temperatures for consistent grip. Yokohama’s harder tread edges help cut through for braking, but they lose acceleration bite and overall performance once the surface becomes polished or slick.

      Winter Fit

      • SUVs & Crossovers: A/T4W offers the most confidence; Yokohama is fine for light winters.

      • 1/2-ton Trucks: A/T4W is steadier when vehicle weight adds pressure.

      • 3/4-ton & HD Trucks: A/T4W is clearly more stable; Yokohama is not ideal.

      👉 Verdict: A/T4W leads in packed snow and overall confidence, making the Yokohama a more limited choice.

      Note from the Expert: Our discussions often boil down to the core tradeoff. On one hand, you must understand why all-terrain tires are truly effective in deep snow, but not on ice. On the other hand, you face the 3PMSF Paradox—the hidden cost of that badge. The short answer is: The 3PMSF badge certifies traction, but it costs you durability. Dive into our full analysis on the critical 3PMSF rating for severe winter and off-road service, and its hidden costs, before you risk your rig on the trail.

      Ice Performance — AT4W Secures Stops, Yokohama Requires Caution

      On ice, the Falken Wildpeak A/T4W stops at 45.0 ft, while the Yokohama Geolandar A/T4 drifts significantly longer to 53.0 ft. This margin is critical—those few feet can make the difference between a controlled stop and sliding into a curb.

      A/T4W owners consistently say it “bites on ice better than expected, easy to trust.” Geolandar feedback, however, is clear: “you need more space, not terrible, just not sharp.”

      Technically, Falken utilizes siping density and a softer winter compound to keep more rubber edges on the ground. Yokohama, which is tuned harder for long tread life, struggles to create that essential micro-bite needed on an icy glaze.

      Ice Driving Fit

      • SUVs & Crossovers: A/T4W is safest; Yokohama requires caution.

      • 1/2-ton Trucks: A/T4W provides more margin in icy stops.

      • 3/4-ton & HD Trucks: A/T4W is steadier under trailer loads.

      👉 Verdict: A/T4W grips best on ice, making Yokohama the least secure choice for these conditions.

      Off-Road — Falkens trail strong, Yokohama strictly mild

      This is the biggest gap in the comparison. The Falken Wildpeak A/T4W dominates, posting scores of Dirt 8.5 / Sand 8.2 / Mud 8.5 / Rock 8.8. By contrast, the Yokohama Geolandar A/T4 sits much lower, scoring Dirt 6.0 / Sand 5.8 / Mud 5.5 / Rock 5.5.

      A Trail4Runner driver on A/T4Ws noted that “slippage was minimal, stayed planted in ruts.” Meanwhile, Geolandar owners generally admit their tires are “fine for fire roads,” confirming they are not built for deep trails.

      From the technical side, the Falken carries heavier carcass strength, deeper voids, and staggered shoulders designed to grab loose terrain. Yokohama keeps light ribs and a softer design to prioritize pavement manners, which significantly sacrifices essential bite in mud, sand, and rock.

      Off-Road Fit

      • SUVs & Crossovers: A/T4W shines if you hit trails regularly.

      • 1/2-ton Trucks: A/T4W is for serious off-road; Yokohama is paved-bias.

      • 3/4-ton & HD Trucks: The A/T4W’s toughness handles abuse; Yokohama is not a fit.

      👉 Verdict: A/T4W dominates trails, while Yokohama is strictly road-first.

      Note from the Expert: Every successful day on the trail is about preparation and physics, because tire longevity is earned, not given. Before you even start, you must master the critical link between tire pressure and load range for every rig to maximize your contact patch. Once moving, remember your ultimate off-road armor is your sidewall protection against the inevitable pinch flat. And finally, your traction on the obstacle is dictated by choosing the right aggressive vs hybrid tread pattern for your terrain. Master those three steps, and your rig will be ready for anything.

      Comfort & Noise — Yokohama Church-Mouse Quiet, AT4W Heavier Hum

      On-road, the Yokohama Geolandar A/T4 is the clear winner with an 8.5 comfort score. Owners describe it as “dead quiet except for a low tone at highway speed.” The Falken Wildpeak A/T4W follows closely at 8.3. It feels firm but steady—it is quieter than its aggressive looks suggest, though road texture does come through more clearly.

      Here’s the trade-off: Yokohama’s rib pattern and advanced pitch tuning are engineered to smooth resonance and minimize noise. Falken tires, by necessity, carry deeper voids designed for off-road bite, which tend to catch road texture and result in a heavier hum. The A/T4W consciously tilts its design more toward toughness and capability than serenity.

      Comfort Fit

      • SUVs & Crossovers: Yokohama is best for absolute quiet.

      • 1/2-ton Trucks: A/T4W is tolerable if capability and towing confidence are the priority.

      • 3/4-ton & HD Trucks: The A/T4W’s firmness is less noticeable on heavy rigs, where noise often blends anyway.

      👉 Verdict: Yokohama wins the comfort battle, while A/T4W trades highway calm for all-terrain bite.

      Note from the Expert: For years, choosing all-terrain meant accepting noise—a true compromise for off-road grip. That’s why the question, Are All-Terrain Tires Louder than Highway Tires?, used to have a simple “yes” answer. Now, with the rise of on-road models, the core issue has shifted from noise to overall refinement. To fully understand which side of the comfort spectrum you’re buying into, you need to determine Are All-Terrain Tires Good for Daily Driving?—a question that depends entirely on the tire’s construction, not just the name.

      Where They Fit Best + Regional Notes

      The Yokohama Geolandar A/T4 is best suited for southern and coastal regions where winters are light, highways dominate, and comfort/noise are the top priorities. It’s a great choice for SUVs and commuters who only occasionally encounter gravel roads.

      The Falken Wildpeak A/T4W is the serious trail and snow option. It is ideal for the Rockies, Pacific Northwest, and snowbelt states where aggressive winters and challenging off-road routes demand more. This tire is built specifically for 1/2-ton and 3/4-ton trucks that regularly tow or hit rugged trails.

      👉 Bottom line: Yokohama wins daily comfort, while the A/T4W takes the crown for heavy-duty snow and trail performance.

      Tire Size Selection: The Basics You Can’t Skip

      Even the best tread design can’t rescue a tire that’s built too weak. Back when I was testing tires at Bridgestone, I saw all-terrain models that should’ve performed but fell short — simply because the basics (size, load strength, and speed rating) weren’t matched to the vehicle.

      P-Metric vs. LT (Light Truck) Tires

      The first step is knowing whether you need LT or passenger tires. LT (Light Truck) tires are built with extra reinforcement and stiff sidewalls, designed for towing, hauling, or off-road use. Passenger (P-metric) tires are lighter, smoother, and tuned for daily comfort and fuel efficiency — but they’ll flex more under load.

      Understanding Tire Load Range: XL vs. E-Load

      Then comes the tire load index and load range — essentially your tire’s strength rating. Here’s where things split between passenger XL and LT E:

      • XL (Extra Load) is a passenger tire with reinforced sidewalls. It can handle a bit more pressure (~41 PSI) than a standard SL tire and is perfect for SUVs, crossovers, or light trucks that carry extra gear, passengers, or small trailers. XL tires ride softer and quieter than LT options, making them ideal for daily use.

      • E Load Range is an LT tire class built with a much thicker casing. E-rated tires can handle far more pressure (up to ~80 PSI) and heavier loads, which makes them essential for ¾-ton and 1-ton trucks towing trailers or hauling close to max capacity. The trade-off is weight, stiffer ride, more road noise, and a small drop in fuel efficiency.

      Put simply: XL is for “extra luggage and family,” while E is for “truck bed full of bricks or a car trailer.”

      Why the Tire Speed Rating Matters for Safety

      Finally, don’t overlook the tire speed rating. It’s not just about top speed — it measures how well a tire handles heat and stress at highway pace. Lower ratings (like S) tend to ride softer and last longer, while higher ratings (H, T) feel more stable and responsive under sharp maneuvers. Heat build-up is the silent killer of tires, and speed rating is your safeguard.

      Bottom line: Match your tire’s construction (LT vs P-metric), load range (XL vs E), and speed rating to your vehicle’s demands. Get those right, and everything else — off-road grip, winter traction, comfort — will finally perform the way it was designed to.

      Final Verdict

      For heavier rigs, trail adventures, or snowbelt winters, the Falken Wildpeak A/T4W is the clear choice. It steadies towing, grips confidently on ice and packed snow, and brings real trail toughness without feeling out of control on the highway.

      The Yokohama Geolandar A/T4 wins if comfort, quiet, and commuter manners are your top priorities. It’s perfect for Sun Belt and coastal drivers who value pavement refinement but only see occasional gravel or light snow.

      👉 Bottom line: Geolandar is the comfort commuter’s A/T, and A/T4W is the snow-belt and trail-ready choice.

      Note: If you’re still weighing your options, our full Falken Wildpeak Buyer’s Guide walks through the AT Trail, AT3W, and AT4W in detail, helping you match the right tire to your vehicle, size, and driving style.

      Frequently Asked Questions: Falken A/T4W vs Yokohama Geolandar A/T4

      • Which tire has the best dry grip?
        The Falken A/T4W is sharper with a 131.8-ft stop and 0.72 g cornering, compared to the Geolandar A/T4 at 139 ft and 0.70 g.

      • Which tire is best in wet conditions?
        The A/T4W stops shortest at 171 ft with 0.58 traction, making it the superior choice over the Geolandar A/T4, which stops longer at 177 ft.

      • Which tire performs best in snow?
        The A/T4W leads with a 69-ft snow stop, outperforming the Geolandar A/T4, which stops at 72 ft but has a slower launch speed.

      • Which tire is safest on ice?
        The A/T4W grips best at 45 ft, making it significantly safer than the Geolandar A/T4, which trails at 53 ft and requires more caution.

      • Which tire is strongest off-road?
        The A/T4W dominates with mid-8 scores across dirt, mud, and rock, while the Geolandar A/T4 is tuned mainly for pavement and gravel (scoring 5.5–6.0).

      • Which tire is quietest on the highway?
        The Yokohama Geolandar A/T4 is quietest with an 8.5 comfort score, slightly beating the A/T4W (8.3).

      • Who should choose the A/T4W?
        Snow-belt and Rocky Mountain drivers, or those towing and hitting trails, who need stronger winter and off-road performance.

      • Who should choose the Geolandar A/T4?
        Commuters in mild climates who prioritize quiet comfort, light winter safety, and occasional gravel use.

      Filed Under: All Terrain Tires Tagged With: #AllTerrainTires, #FalkenWildpeakAT3W, #FalkenWildpeakAT4W, #TruckLife, #YokohamaGeolandarAT4

      Yokohama A/T4 vs BFGoodrich KO3 vs KO2 — Comfort Commuter vs Winter & Off-Road Strength in 2025

      Updated: September 30, 2025 by Emrecan Gurkan Leave a Comment

      Real-world test data, everyday impressions, and plain-English breakdowns — from a former Bridgestone test engineer.

      The BFGoodrich KO2 has been the benchmark Off-Road A/T tire for more than a decade, trusted across the US and Canada for its 3-ply sidewalls, trail toughness, and snow-certified 3PMSF traction. The newer BFGoodrich KO3 keeps that DNA but improves snow grip, extends tread life, and sharpens handling, making it the clear evolution for drivers debating KO2 vs KO3. The Yokohama Geolandar AT4, as an On-Road AT Tire, meanwhile, enters from a different angle — emphasizing modern road manners, stronger wet and ice braking, and a lighter steering feel, while still carrying adventurous A/T styling.

      That’s the choice buyers face — KO2’s proven legacy, KO3’s updated balance, or Yokohama’s road-friendly refinement. In the sections ahead, I’ll break down how they compare across dry, wet, snow, and off-road testing. You can also line them up in our All-Terrain Tire Decision Tool for quick recommendations tailored by SUV, CUV, or truck class.

      Quick Look

      The Yokohama Geolandar A/T4 is the comfort commuter’s all-terrain. It brakes shorter on dry and wet pavement, feels smoother in daily turns, and stays impressively quiet on the highway. With its 3PMSF rating, it surprises in winter commutes—holding its own in packed snow and light ice—while still looking the part of an A/T. Its trade-off is durability and trail grit, but for suburban drivers who value calm road manners, it’s a standout.

      The BFGoodrich KO3 is the modern benchmark, balancing toughness with refinement. It grips earlier on ice than the KO2, steadies heavy rigs under towing, and shortens winter stops, while keeping its legendary off-road bite. Noise is present but livable, and its versatility makes it ideal for regions where snow, storms, and trails all collide.

      The BFGoodrich KO2 remains the veteran workhorse. Louder, firmer, and longer in the wet, it still outmuscles rivals in deep snow and trail abuse. Built with armored sidewalls and proven longevity past 50k miles, it’s the tire you trust when durability is the priority and comfort is secondary.

      Yokohama Geolandar A/T4

      Yokohama Geolandar AT4 tire
      Compare prices:
      Tire Rack
      Free road-hazard coverage Backed by Discount Tire
      SimpleTire
      Financing options Local installers
      Amazon
      Prime shipping Direct from brands

      BFGoodrich All-Terrain T/A KO3

      BFGoodrich KO3 tire
      Compare prices:
      Amazon
      Prime shipping Direct from brands
      Tire Rack
      Free road-hazard coverage Backed by Discount Tire

      BFGoodrich All-Terrain T/A KO2

      BFGoodrich KO2 tire
      Compare prices:
      Amazon
      Prime shipping Direct from brands
      Tire Rack
      Free road-hazard coverage Backed by Discount Tire

      Tire Decision Tool

      For those in a hurry: this tool makes it easy. Just pick your vehicle and what matters most to you, and it’ll instantly suggest the best tire options.

      Click Show to see tire recommendations. (After that, changes update automatically.)
      No matching tires found. Try another selection.

        Raw Test Data

        Tire Test Data

        Pick categories to show metrics, then open ☰ to pick tires. Optional chart is hidden by default.

        Parentheses show the rank among the currently displayed tires (1 = best for that metric).
        Left axis lists metrics. Top axis is used for g-force metrics so they scale clearly.
        Note: Lower is better for Stopping & Acceleration; higher is better for g-force, comfort, traction & off-road ratings. Parentheses show the rank among the currently displayed tires (1 = best for that metric).
        Sources worth checking
        Tire Rack AT Tire Test Tire Rack On-Road A/T Ratings Tire Rack Off-Road A/T Ratings SimpleTire Reviews Amazon SUV/LT Tires

        Dry Performance — KO3 steadies under weight, KO2 digs in, Geolandar smooths it out

        Close-up of a Yokohama Geolandar AT4 all-terrain tire mounted on a rugged SUV, parked on rocky terrain, showing aggressive tread pattern and black alloy wheel.
        Yokohama Geolandar AT4 — engineered for the trail, tuned for the road. 🛞⛰️

        On dry pavement, the Geolandar stops in about 139 feet with 0.70 g cornering, while both KO2 and KO3 take closer to 142 feet at 0.71 g. In practice, that means Yokohama feels smoother and more predictable in daily turns, while the BFGs carry more of that “rugged boot” personality. KO2 in particular feels a little sharper on initial bite, whereas KO3 takes a beat, then locks into a straighter, calmer line once weight is involved.

        Drivers echo the same: Geolandar owners rave about “super smooth, quiet highway manners,” while KO2 fans talk about “planted bite when you lean in.” As a former field test engineer, I see the reason clearly—Yokohama uses balanced ribs and softer edges to keep transitions calm, while BFG’s reinforced shoulders keep the tread blocks from folding, so stability only builds once you’re loaded.

        👉 Verdict: Geolandar is the commuter’s calm companion; KO2 and KO3 feel tougher, with KO3 settling heaviest rigs the straightest.

        Wet Performance — Geolandar impresses, KO3 holds margin, KO2 stretches

        In the rain, Geolandar surprises many: it stops in about 177 feet with 0.47 traction, which actually beats the KO2’s longer 195-foot / 0.43 g result. KO3 sits in the middle at 184 feet / 0.46 g, and while not sporty, it feels more controlled than its older brother. Behind the wheel, Yokohama gives a more composed stop on slick pavement, while KO3 keeps trucks tracking truer once you add weight. KO2, meanwhile, asks for extra space.

        Owners put it in plain words: one Geolandar driver said it “handles rain nicely, with fewer slip surprises than BFGs,” while KO3 owners praised “confidence even in big storms.” KO2 comments often admit it’s “fine if you slow down, but long on panic stops.”

        The trade makes sense: Yokohama’s compound and siping put more rubber down across the slick surface, while KO2 and KO3 lean harder into durability. KO3 refines it a touch, KO2 simply prioritizes toughness over adhesion.

        👉 Verdict: Geolandar wins the lighter-rig wet commute, KO3 steadies things under weight, KO2 trails behind.

        Note from the Expert: When it comes to rain, I always emphasize two things: compound grip and water evacuation. You can see the full details in my analysis, but if you take just one thing away, remember that an AT tire’s stiff nature makes achieving top-tier wet performance a constant battle. This is why the question, Are All-Terrain Tires Good in Rain?, requires a nuanced answer that balances tread design against rubber stiffness.

        Winter & Snow — KO3 dependable on pack, KO2 a deep-snow bruiser, Geolandar the commuter surprise

        Side-by-side comparison shot: Fresh BF Goodrich KO3 on the left, showing off its new tread pattern, and the seasoned KO2 on the right, with visible wear, revealing more voids

        On packed winter roads, KO3 shortens stops to around 72 feet, while KO2 runs a bit longer at 76 feet. Geolandar surprises here, matching KO3 almost stride for stride at 72 feet, though its launch lags slightly. The experience feels different: KO3 grips calmly on polished lanes, KO2 muscles through deeper snowbanks, and Geolandar handles morning commutes with more composure than you’d expect from a road-leaning A/T.

        Drivers say the same—Geolandar owners talk about “unexpected grip in plowed snow, even compared to bigger names.” KO2 drivers praise the “tank-like shove in unplowed roads,” while KO3 owners split the difference, noting “calm, consistent traction when the highway ices up.”

        Technically, the split comes from siping density and rubber mix. KO3 keeps micro-edges biting in the cold, KO2 relies on tread depth and voids to muscle through loose drifts, and Geolandar’s softer-leaning rubber stays pliable in the cold, helping it brake well on commuter roads.

        👉 Verdict: KO3 is the balanced winter pick, KO2 the snow-belt brawler, and Geolandar the quiet achiever for light rigs.

        Note from the Expert: Our discussions often boil down to the core tradeoff. On one hand, you must understand why all-terrain tires are truly effective in deep snow, but not on ice. On the other hand, you face the 3PMSF Paradox—the hidden cost of that badge. The short answer is: The 3PMSF badge certifies traction, but it costs you durability. Dive into our full analysis on the critical 3PMSF rating for severe winter and off-road service, and its hidden costs, before you risk your rig on the trail.

        Ice — KO3 grips first, KO2 steady, Geolandar slides a touch

        When things glaze over, KO3 stops shortest at about 50 feet, KO2 follows close at 51 feet, while Geolandar stretches to around 53 feet. That gap feels bigger in panic stops: KO3 gives earlier bite, KO2 slides a little longer but predictably, and Geolandar tends to wash forward more if you’re not gentle.

        Community voices mirror it: KO3 drivers say “you can actually brake without panic,” KO2 users accept “longer, but always steady,” while Geolandar owners note “fine if you drive careful, but don’t rush it.”

        The reason is rubber again. KO3 uses micro-siping and a compound that flexes more at freezing temps; KO2 is stiffer but still stable; Geolandar has the quieter compound but fewer micro-edges to catch slick surfaces.

        👉 Verdict: KO3 is the ice safety net, KO2 a close second, Geolandar trails but remains predictable if you drive smart.

        Off-Road — KO3 masterclass, KO2 still a workhorse, Geolandar a pavement-first A/T

        Off-road is where the gaps widen. KO3 scores 9.5 across dirt, sand, and rock, with 9.2 in mud; KO2 trails slightly with 9.3–9.5 across the board. Geolandar? More like 6.0 in dirt, 5.5 in mud and rock. On trail, that’s the difference between a tire built to survive ruts, sharp rock, and deep mud versus one tuned for light gravel and occasional dirt roads.

        Forum chatter confirms it: KO3 users rave it’s “bulletproof on rocks, confidence in deep ruts.” KO2 drivers say it “takes abuse for miles, sidewalls never fail.” Geolandar owners? “Perfect for unpaved roads to the cabin, but not for crawling.”

        From a technical seat: KO2 and KO3 have thicker sidewalls, interlocking blocks, and compounds that resist chipping. Geolandar keeps weight and noise down, but with less void depth and armor, it’s not meant for heavy trail punishment.

        👉 Verdict: KO3 leads, KO2 close behind, Geolandar only for mild off-road.

        Note from the Expert: Every successful day on the trail is about preparation and physics, because tire longevity is earned, not given. Before you even start, you must master the critical link between tire pressure and load range for every rig to maximize your contact patch. Once moving, remember your ultimate off-road armor is your sidewall protection against the inevitable pinch flat. And finally, your traction on the obstacle is dictated by choosing the right aggressive vs hybrid tread pattern for your terrain. Master those three steps, and your rig will be ready for anything.

        Comfort & Noise — Geolandar quiet as a church mouse, KO3 steady hum, KO2 the growler

        On the highway, Geolandar posts the highest comfort score, about 8.5/10, riding quiet and smooth. KO3 sits middle of the road at 7.5/10, while KO2 feels rougher at 7.0/10. Think of Geolandar like a new luxury couch—plush and hushed—while KO2 is more like a solid wooden bench, firm and loud, but unbreakable. KO3 tries to split the difference.

        Owners confirm it: Geolandar drivers say “dead quiet, smoother than stock,” KO3 owners admit “hum builds, but blends in on a diesel,” while KO2 users joke “you’ll hear them before you see them.”

        The difference comes from design: Geolandar’s rib layout reduces resonance, KO3 uses sequencing to manage growl, KO2 simply accepts more void noise in exchange for trail grip.

        👉 Verdict: Geolandar wins commuters; KO3 balances toughness with livable noise; KO2 is louder but trades that for durability.

        Note from the Expert: For years, choosing all-terrain meant accepting noise—a true compromise for off-road grip. That’s why the question, Are All-Terrain Tires Louder than Highway Tires?, used to have a simple “yes” answer. Now, with the rise of on-road models, the core issue has shifted from noise to overall refinement. To fully understand which side of the comfort spectrum you’re buying into, you need to determine Are All-Terrain Tires Good for Daily Driving?—a question that depends entirely on the tire’s construction, not just the name.

        Where They Fit Best + Regional Notes

        After 63,000 KM (40,000 miles), KO2 still have most of its tread. You can see the minor chipping. Yet, it's totally fine at this wear level
          • Yokohama Geolandar A/T4: Best if you drive mostly highways and suburban miles, want a quiet tire, and still need 3PMSF winter confidence. Perfect for the Midwest, Southeast, and Sun Belt where off-road is rare but wet weather or mild snow shows up.

          • BFGoodrich KO3: The all-rounder. Stronger than Geolandar in snow, ice, and off-road, but still refined enough for daily use. Best for the Rockies, Northeast, or Great Lakes region where winter and trails both matter.

          • BFGoodrich KO2: The veteran workhorse. Louder and less refined, but with unbeatable toughness and deep-snow ability. Ideal for ranch country, Southwest desert, or anywhere durability outweighs comfort.

          👉 Bottom line: Geolandar is the comfort commuter’s all-terrain. KO3 is the balanced modern benchmark. KO2 is the old-school bruiser that still rules when toughness is the only goal.

        Tire Size Selection: The Basics You Can’t Skip

        Even the best tread design can’t rescue a tire that’s built too weak. Back when I was testing tires at Bridgestone, I saw all-terrain models that should’ve performed but fell short — simply because the basics (size, load strength, and speed rating) weren’t matched to the vehicle.

        P-Metric vs. LT (Light Truck) Tires

        The first step is knowing whether you need LT or passenger tires. LT (Light Truck) tires are built with extra reinforcement and stiff sidewalls, designed for towing, hauling, or off-road use. Passenger (P-metric) tires are lighter, smoother, and tuned for daily comfort and fuel efficiency — but they’ll flex more under load.

        Understanding Tire Load Range: XL vs. E-Load

        Then comes the tire load index and load range — essentially your tire’s strength rating. Here’s where things split between passenger XL and LT E:

        • XL (Extra Load) is a passenger tire with reinforced sidewalls. It can handle a bit more pressure (~41 PSI) than a standard SL tire and is perfect for SUVs, crossovers, or light trucks that carry extra gear, passengers, or small trailers. XL tires ride softer and quieter than LT options, making them ideal for daily use.

        • E Load Range is an LT tire class built with a much thicker casing. E-rated tires can handle far more pressure (up to ~80 PSI) and heavier loads, which makes them essential for ¾-ton and 1-ton trucks towing trailers or hauling close to max capacity. The trade-off is weight, stiffer ride, more road noise, and a small drop in fuel efficiency.

        Put simply: XL is for “extra luggage and family,” while E is for “truck bed full of bricks or a car trailer.”

        Why the Tire Speed Rating Matters for Safety

        Finally, don’t overlook the tire speed rating. It’s not just about top speed — it measures how well a tire handles heat and stress at highway pace. Lower ratings (like S) tend to ride softer and last longer, while higher ratings (H, T) feel more stable and responsive under sharp maneuvers. Heat build-up is the silent killer of tires, and speed rating is your safeguard.

        Bottom line: Match your tire’s construction (LT vs P-metric), load range (XL vs E), and speed rating to your vehicle’s demands. Get those right, and everything else — off-road grip, winter traction, comfort — will finally perform the way it was designed to.

        Final Verdict — Which Tire Should You Buy?

        For suburban drivers who want quiet comfort and light-trail ability, the Geolandar A/T4 is the commuter’s pick. It surprises in the wet, holds its own in mild snow, and stays hushed on highways, making it ideal for Midwest, Southeast, and Sun Belt climates.

        The BFGoodrich KO3 is the all-rounder for mixed use. It steadies heavy trucks, performs reliably in snow and ice, and remains the masterclass off-road without punishing comfort. The KO2 remains the toughest workhorse—best for ranch roads, Southwest deserts, or deep-snow rural areas where durability and raw traction matter more than refinement.

        👉 Bottom line: Geolandar is the comfort commuter’s A/T, KO3 is the balanced benchmark for modern rigs, and KO2 is the proven bruiser when toughness trumps everything else.

        Frequently Asked Questions: Yokohama Geolandar A/T4 vs BFGoodrich KO2 vs KO3

        • Which tire is quietest on the highway?
          Geolandar is the quietest with an 8.5/10 comfort score, KO3 runs a steady hum at 7.5/10, and KO2 is loudest at 7.0/10.

        • Which tire performs best in wet conditions?
          Geolandar stops shorter at 177 ft, KO3 follows at 184 ft, and KO2 stretches to 195 ft, making Geolandar the wet commuter winner.

        • Which tire is strongest in snow?
          KO3 stops at 72 ft and is the balanced snow pick, KO2 digs better in deep drifts, and Geolandar surprises with solid packed-snow braking for a road-leaning A/T.

        • How do they compare on ice?
          KO3 stops shortest at 50 ft, KO2 follows close at 51 ft, and Geolandar lags at 53 ft, though it remains predictable with careful driving.

        • Which tire is better off-road?
          KO3 leads with 9.5 scores across dirt, sand, and rock, KO2 stays nearly as strong, and Geolandar is best kept to gravel and light trails.

        • Who should buy the Geolandar A/T4?
          Drivers who value quiet comfort, predictable wet braking, and light winter security, especially in suburban or mild climates.

        • Who should buy the KO3?
          Drivers needing a balanced A/T for snow, ice, and serious off-road work—especially in the Rockies, Northeast, and Great Lakes regions.

        • Who should buy the KO2?
          Truck owners in rugged, rural, or snow-belt areas who prioritize toughness and deep-snow grip over comfort and noise.

        Filed Under: All Terrain Tires Tagged With: #AllTerrainTires, #BFGoodrichKO2, #BFGoodrichKO3, #OffRoadLife, #YokohamaGeolandarAT4

        Primary Sidebar

        Find Tires

        Contact Channels

        • Email
        • Facebook
        • LinkedIn
        • Twitter

        High-End Tires by Category

        Best All-Terrain Tires

        Best Rugged-Terrain Tires

        Best Mud-Terrain Tires

        Best All-Season Tires for Snow

        Best Tires for Snow Plowing

        Best Semi-Truck Tires

        Categories

        Copyright © 2025

        • Disclaimer
        • About Me
        • Contact
        • Privacy Policy